Today Fri Sat
It is forecast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on August 21, 2014
It is forecast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on August 22, 2014
Mostly Cloudy
It is forecast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on August 23, 2014
Chance of Rain



Public Works: The Rebirth of Affordable Housing

Could a San Francisco initiative save Toronto's struggling affordable housing system?

Public Works looks at public space, urban design, and city-building innovations from around the world, and considers what Toronto might learn from them.

A rendering that projects how the Alice Griffith community in Hunters Point, San Francisco , will look when it is rebuilt. Image courtesy of McCormack, Baron, Salazar.

Toronto has a serious problem with affordable housing. The number of Torontonians on the housing wait list is at over 165,000, and counting. Spending on affordable housing is in sharp decline. Toronto’s Shelter, Support, and Housing Administration Division (SSHA) has seen its budget cut by over $215 million since 2010, thanks largely to decreases in provincial and federal contributions. Repairs to Toronto’s existing public housing units are expected to run to $2.6 billion over the next 10 years. The City is working hard to solicit one third of that money from Queen’s Park and Parliament Hill. But, in spite of some encouraging success, recent history provides little cause for optimism. There are, however, models of success in other North American cities. In San Francisco, a notoriously troubled public housing system is getting a major overhaul thanks to HOPE SF, a City initiative with state, federal, corporate, and non-profit support.

In the mid-2000s, San Francisco’s Hunters View housing project epitomized the very worst of American public housing. Murder and drug crime were rampant. The residences themselves, built mostly in the 1950s, were dilapidated and in bad need of repair. Things looked grim. But in 2006, the neighbourhood was picked as the pilot site for HOPE SF—and now Hunters View is at the forefront of an ambitious, holistic redevelopment of affordable housing.

HOPE SF’s stated goal is to “rebuild our most distressed public housing sites, while increasing affordable housing and ownership opportunities, and improving the quality of life for existing residents and the surrounding communities.” In total, HOPE SF will replace 2,500 existing public housing units, and add 6,000 brand-new mixed-income residential units, across four communities (one of which includes Hunters View). Based on a similar project in Seattle’s NewHolly neighbourhood, HOPE SF is creating safe, healthy, economically integrated communities that will provide locals with options for public housing, affordable home ownership, and market-value homes. Ideally, this mixed-income atmosphere will improve the neighbourhoods’ purchasing power and attract businesses that will, in turn, create job opportunities.

It’s all part of the HOPE SF approach to build strong, healthy communities, not just inexpensive housing. Small and struggling local businesses will be given a chance to bid for contracts on the HOPE SF building projects. Also built into the initiative are programs for job training, healthcare, and the development of parks and community gardens. Throughout the construction of HOPE SF projects, job opportunities will be made available to neighbourhood residents. There’s even a “walking schoolbus” that supervises kids’ trip to school in an effort to improve the area’s lousy school attendance rate.

Attention (and money) has also been paid to short-term public housing solutions. In 2007, the San Francisco mayor’s office and the City’s housing authority pledged $2 million per year for urgent repairs to housing projects. And in 2009, the U.S. Department of Housing and Development put $17.9 million toward San Francisco public housing repairs—enough to fix up 1,800 homes.

Would a HOPE-style program work in Toronto? We’re already experimenting with mixed-income communities. While proponents continue to tout its benefits, though, not everyone has been happy with this new direction in affordable housing.

What makes HOPE SF an admirable case study is the cooperation of all levels of government, and the fact that corporations and communities have come together to fund and execute an major improvement in affordable housing. It’s certainly not a quick and cheap solution—but it represents a combined effort by many stakeholders to avoid band-aid solutions and address the greater social and economic problems that were harming that system in the first place.


  • Patrick Smyth

    Just don’t expect Cllrs Vaughan, Perks, Davis, Carroll, McConnell, Fletcher, Augimeri who, along with others, agreed with mayoral wannabe Stintz and eliminated 23 affordable hosting units in my community.

    • Paul Kishimoto

      Expect them to what?

      • Patrick Smyth

        Wow sorry. My garbled comment should be;

        “Just don’t expect Cllrs Vaughan, Perks, Davis, Carroll, McConnell, Fletcher, Augimeri to support Affordable Housing. They, along with others, agreed with mayoral wannabe Stintz and eliminated 23 affordable housing units in my community.” (Thanks for reading)

  • wklis

    Wonder where Rob Ford is on this?

    See Councillor Ford remarks on shelters:

    • Notcleverguy

      Ford is nothing but a dick about every issue that doesn’t directly affect him.

      • dsmithhfx

        “Ford is nothing but a dick about every issue that doesn’t directly affect him.


        • Notcleverguy

          Ha, fair enough.

          Not that I will ever defend this clown in any way, but there is a pattern. He drives a car, so he gets rid of the car tax, he lives west of Yonge, so he privatizes garbage collection west of Yonge, the list goes on, he’s not a dick when it comes to his interests.

          • Patrick Smyth

            Ford has made fools of Council, The Ombuds, Integrity Commissioner, Toronto Police and many voters. I’m happy more damage has not been done but I suspect there’s a load of dubious stuff headed for Agendas from now until last Council Meeting in August. (Keep an eye on them) No, Ford is not the only clown and not the only one out for self-interest.

        • TheSotSays

          The big news this week is the new “free” NDP program in political activism” over at Ryerson. It’s going to be very bad news for the current batch of Toronto NDP internet trolls.

          Anyone not a Summa Cum Laude Activist from Ryerson will simply be laughed at and have their bike stolen.

  • Canadianskeezix

    Is the only difference the level of federal commitment?

  • m_ax

    Actually right now we’re waiting to hear from the Province about the next round of funding for affordable housing. The feds already announced their commitment two years ago to extending the current Investment in Affordable Housing program to 2019. Because the programs have usually been cost-shared by both levels of government (and administered at the municipal level), it’s contingent on the province committing equal funds. I suspect we’ll hear something from Ontario in the next budget in a few weeks. BC announced their renewed agreement with the feds at the beginning of March.

    That said, you’re right in that the feds (and the province) aren’t bringing enough money to the table, both for new construction programs, capital repairs, and funding for co-ops reaching the end of their operating agreements.