Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on April 18, 2014
Chance of Rain
12°/2°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on April 19, 2014
Clear
12°/3°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on April 20, 2014
Partly Cloudy
10°/5°

8 Comments

cityscape

City Staff Will Decide Whether These Murals Are “Vandalism” or “Art”

A new graffiti panel will sit in judgment of disputes over the cultural merit of specific pieces of wall art.

Next Friday, for the first time, a panel of City staffers will sit in judgment of paintings on the exterior walls of private property. They will decide whether the paintings are “art,” and therefore exempted from enforcement, or “graffiti vandalism” that must be removed at the property owner’s expense.

The murals pictured in the gallery above are the ones the panel will be discussing. They could be removed in their entirety if the panel condemns them.

How did civil servants come to be the ones making art-or-vandalism determinations? It started when Mayor Rob Ford was elected.

The City’s graffiti panel was voted into existence by city council in summer 2011, as part of a package of reforms to Toronto’s graffiti bylaw. The reforms were prompted by an anti-graffiti enforcement blitz launched by Mayor Rob Ford shortly after he took office. Before, it had been up to councillors to decide whether or not a piece of graffiti qualified as an “art mural.”

The new graffiti panel is non-political. Its membership consists of City staff who oversee things like facilities management, parks, and public art. The idea is for them to apply the City’s policies in a more consistent way than politicians were able to.

Not every case will get a public airing. The graffiti panel only comes into play when a property owner appeals a vandalism violation, or when the City’s licensing division refers a case to the panel.

The panel will decide whether graffiti murals meet the requirements for permitted “graffiti art,” which the City defines like so:

…markings made or affixed to property that are approved by the property owner or occupant, where the markings aesthetically enhance the surface they cover and the general surroundings, having regard to the community character and standards.

Click through the gallery to see some of the paintings that will be under discussion at the graffiti panel’s first real meeting (there was also a procedural meeting, in October) on November 2. All of these murals are seeking designation as “art,” to avoid future violations. Even if the graffiti panel decides a mural is artistic, it has the power to issue new violations for any tags on top of it.

All photos screencapped from City staff reports.

UPDATE: November 5, 2012, 2:30 PM This post originally omitted an image of a mural at 1255 Queen Street, one of the nine under discussion at the graffiti panel’s November 2 meeting. The image has been added.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    Meanwhile, Madrid embarks on a street art safari project, with “guided tours of the city, workshops, exhibitions, publications and artistic actions intended to bring street art to citizens”.

  • https://paul.kishimoto.name/ Paul Kishimoto

    How long before someone makes a “death panels” reference?

    • Anonymous

      Hanging’s too good for ‘em!

  • KWaltz

    I still don’t understand a number of things around this article. 1. How is any panel from this city hall not “political”? 2. Who are the panel members and what are their qualifications that allow them decide what is aesthetically pleasing, on my behalf? 3. When does this panel take a look at the illegal billboards, the distracting and garish tv commercial highway boards and the questionable deals with ad agencies who have free reign to place “info” boards across our city?
    I love street art

  • Anonymous

    Owner says : “Yeah I asked for this to be painted on my property” = it stays

    Owner says : “No, I didn’t ask for this to be painted on my property but I like it” = it stays

    Owner says : “No, I didn’t ask for this to be painted on my property” = it goes

    The f*cking end.

    Next.

  • George

    Shouldn’t only the owner of the wall be the one to decide the issue of “art or vandalism”?
    And why is the cost of a clean-up not borne by the vandal?

  • Pally

    Oh man I really hope they keep that Totoro one that is the highlight of my daily commute :-(

  • Esra

    Aw boo, I hope they stay away from the Dundas West/Keele area graffiti. There is some really beautiful stuff in the west end.