Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2013
Chance of Rain
13°/5°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Chance of Rain
16°/7°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2013
Mostly Cloudy
18°/7°

12 Comments

politics

Queen’s Park Watch: Government Feud With Doctors Not Good for Anyone

The Ontario government and the province's doctors aren't seeing eye to eye on fees, and we may all end up paying the price.

The war between government budget-slashers and the province’s doctors is heating up.

It comes as no surprise. Back in February, the Drummond cost-cutting report recommended a wage freeze for doctors, and a reduction of specific fees where technology had rendered the related activities less labour-intensive. The report sparked some low-key bickering between physicians and the government, which quickly faded to background noise.

However, last week Premier McGuinty fired a direct shot across the bow with a quasi-extortionate press release suggesting that if doctors didn’t take their medicine, seniors and the housebound would suffer. He followed up on Sunday with an open letter to other provinces seeking support for his fee-cutting plan, getting some traction with provincial finance ministers who have already wrung maximum savings from cancelling Friday morning Timbits.

Physicians were unpersuaded.

The Canadian Medical Association took the bait, warning the premier that “imposing your views on physicians … is a leadership style that comes with great risk,” while the Coalition of Family Physicians and Specialists of Ontario went on nuclear alert, declaring a “Code Orange” and advising doctors to “explore options in more hospitable practice jurisdictions.”

It’s unlikely that Ontario’s syringe-slingers will pack up their stethoscopes and decamp like a swarm of lab-coated Okies. As the government has pointed out repeatedly, with average billings of over $350,000 annually, most doctors aren’t hitting the food bank just yet. (The Liberals should know—they’re the ones who handed out the generous raises back when the economy was healthier.) Besides, the fee reduction proposal isn’t unreasonable on the face of it. If technology has reduced the time it takes a doctor to perform a task from three hours down to one, it seems logical to pay them less money to do it.

Still, this is one group you don’t want working to rule; you don’t need your surgeon going on a latte run while your steaming brain is parked on a tin plate next to the operating table. And the oft-repeated Liberal contention that Ontario doctors are the best-paid in Canada is debatable. Finally, since it’s a basic tenet of our society that taking away anything from anyone, anytime, for any reason, is fascism or worse, there was never a possibility that the physicians were going to let this go without a fight.

And yet what we need to avoid is a fight. Both sides promise that if their needs aren’t met, Joe and Jane Patient will pay the price, and either could make the prediction self-fulfilling.

It must be a pisser for the premier to find that seven years of largesse toward public employees hasn’t bought him much gratitude, but he should recognize that the Jeckyll-Hyde shift from sugar daddy to autocrat is buying him even less.

The doctors should acknowledge that they’re well paid and understand that they aren’t winning public sympathy by pouting and mumbling darkly about opportunities in oil sands country. More importantly, they need to stop focusing on how much it upsets them to be yelled at by the premier, and start talking about how they see their role in returning Ontario to fiscal stability. Are they willing to make any sacrifice at all, or does the emphasis on process imply a bargaining position as inflexible as that of the government?

There’s still an opportunity to stop threatening and start talking. Here’s hoping both sides take it.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    About how much does an Ontario doctor earn? “Billings” are put at $350k, does than mean income?

    • Anonymous

      I couldn’t locate any coherent, reliable data on earnings, which is why I used billings. If anyone has seen that info anywhere, I’d be interested in knowing too.

    • Anonymous

      The stats were in the Star a couple of weeks ago. (ISTR)… there were some pulling in ~a million in specialties where the time per procedure had dropped significantly from when rates were set years ago.

  • http://www.leschinskidesign.com/contact/addme picard102

    Interesting that even their code green is somewhat tepid and cautionary. One wonders if it has ever been at green since it’s inception.

    All I can picture is men in a room with lab coats wringing their hands over the miserable state of $350k in bookings, worried about gas money for their R8′s

  • Bo Yee Ngan

    I think ontario gov. is getting bad advice. less than 10-20 centsout of every dollar of the ohip budget pays medical bills. There go to be savings found from those who get paid from the other 80 cents group inclusive of those non md ceos, those who run airambulances and force through dysfunctional E Health projects. One ceo even wrote to the star touting rationing quality health based on’evidence base medicine’ a buzz word and research concept vulnerable to growing pains. restrospective studies is a bit of rearmirror driving. those who chooses how to buy mutual funds knows well what guidance review of past performances will give you. analsing billing patterns is the worse way to run quality health service. lets look at reality. physician cost increased over 10 years is not a shock as premier claims. we are living longer and as we age ( and not exiting ohip to go to heaven) our aging bodies need more medical care and medical procedures done to get hips cataracts fixed. this is a health sign. this is to time to motivate your health providers and not listen to advice from those ceo from the non medical sector paid by ohip from that 80 cents on the dollar side. ontarians may find more savings thete and put the money where the cure will come from.

  • Sleepymd

    There are savings to made and feed to be cut. Doctors know this. What they don’t want is for these cuts to be made unilaterally by politicians who don’t understand healthcare and who forget that doctors aren’t salaried public employees with benefits.

    Negotiate properly with the OMA and you’ll get your savings in a rationale manner with happy doctors and a well served public.

    • Anonymous

      Or doctors are defending their “right” to grow rich as Croesus on the public teat.

  • Eric S. Smith

    Finally, since it’s a basic tenet of our society that taking away anything from anyone, anytime, for any reason, is fascism or worse

    Not wrong.

  • pumpkin

    This is a dramatic way of scapegoating a group in order to distract from overspending from government mismanagement (think E-health, ORNGE). What the government actually needs to do is talk to the people at the front lines to figure out ways to make the system more efficient. For example, increased wait times for radiology (made worse by the cuts) means patients wait in hospital for extra days at a cost of >$1000/night for the hospital bed to wait for a CT/MRI scan. Lack of nursing home beds, means that patients wait in the emergency department for hours or even days for a hospital bed. This is expensive and not good for patient care. However, fixing these problems are difficult, take effort, and not sexy for McGuinty and his government and it requires them to actually listen and collaborate with the people who work at the front lines (gasp!).

    • Anonymous

      When people wave around ORNGE and E-health, they don’t seem to realize that the money lost in these scandals, though a big nominal figure, represents the amount of money required to keep the system running for maybe a week. The real story there is not the lost money, it’s the blatant corruption itself. Scandals aside, inefficient operations are far, far more costly than either scandal.

      The reason for wait times with radiologists and other specialists is not because of a lack of specialists – the job market for many specialist fields is very similar to that for teachers, and this is a national problem, not just Ontario – but because they’re very costly to hire and hospitals simply can’t afford them in their limited budget.

      Something has to give. The doctors themselves may or may not cooperate but they seem to have taken a hardline approach – we’ll take a freeze, but will not discuss rationalizing payouts and thus the government is forced to act unilaterally.

      Further, where will they go? The US is not that appealing. Private insurers are similarly unilaterally cutting fees, malpractise is a circus, and the administration of the insurance system is a nightmare. Elsewhere in Canada? The only province NOT running a deficit is Saskatchewan. If McGuinty is successful in cutting their fees, other provinces will follow suit in short order, and Sask. is a small province with 1 million people and none of the specialized medical centres seen in the larger cities. Never mind the PITA factor of re-establishing a new clinic and client base and relocating your family, if any.

  • Cc

    “Billings” does not mean income. Doctors pay their overhead expenses from this total, and this often amounts to 1/3-1/2 of their billings. And often doctors are starting their careers in their mid 30′s with over $100,000 in student debt.

  • Anonymous

    Chrisoftoronto, I would hardly say the doctors have “taken a hardline approach.” The OMA’s opening offer was a 2 yr pay freeze and assistance with another 250 million in cuts. The government would be lucky to see such moderation in any of their upcoming public sector negotiations. And I don’t think it’s a question of “if McGuinty is succesful in cutting their fees…” The fees have been cut unilaterally by the Minister, there is no question of “if.”

    I agree there will likely not be any exodus of docs, the problem with the government’s approach is more subtle but much more pernicious. The 2008 agreement (and to a large extent the 2004 one) represented a key component in the government’s successful efforts to reducing wait times and improve access in selected areas. Simply put, most specialists are on fee for service (FFS) and much of the increased physician compensation envelope comes from more work being done. This particularly true with the surgical Wait Times strategy. Eliminating the billing caps allowed surgeons and anaesthetists to continue working above their caps, without which the wait lists could not fall.

    The goverment bought policy acheivements with their compensation money, not just votes, and they have put those same acheivements at risk over the long term now. More importantly, they have eliminated any ability to make real transformative change to the health care system by alienating health care providers. The Liberals should learn from the failures of the Mike Harris regime. The Common Sense Revolutionaries botched education reform (remember bill 160?) by antagonizing the people who actually provide education…the teachers. Similarly, you can’t reform health care if you refuse to have a dialogue with the doctors.