Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
20°/16°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Partly Cloudy
21°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
22°/12°

11 Comments

news

“No Homo”–phobia

20110309gsa1.jpg
Marta, centre, discussing the Vaughan Road Academy GSA.


“My Italian grandparents don’t get it,” Marta announces. And, in truth, it might seem hard to understand why this group of students at Vaughan Road Academy devotes a great deal of time—every Thursday’s lunch, plus extra hours for programming, planning, and petitioning—to combat homophobia in their high school.
Meet the Vaughan Road Academy Gay-Straight Alliance.
As the GSA members note, none of the students who are “out” at their school even attend the meetings. But the club is not lacking interest: at ten core members, this new group has more active students than most other GSAs in the Toronto District School Board.
In trying to explain why the meetings are busy, a cynic might point to the fact that GSAs in Ontario have gotten a lot of press lately with the recent coverage of Halton Catholic District School Board GSA ban. Or that TDSB’s director of education, Chris Spence, announced a one thousand dollar award in early January for the three best gay-straight alliances in TDSB schools, which will be given to the clubs that “have demonstrated a committed effort in helping create a school climate that is safer and more positive for students and staff of all sexual orientations and gender identities” [PDF].
Or maybe a skeptic could note that all of the students in the group are part of the International Baccalaureate program, a highly competitive academic stream which makes up roughly one-third of the Vaughan Road Academy students, and that the majority are in grade eleven—a resumé-stuffing year for high school students looking to go to competitive universities.
Call us optimists, but we don’t think that’s the case.


20110309gsa3.jpg
Dylan.


As the members of the Vaughan Road GSA know, you don’t need to be queer to be worried about homophobia—and you don’t need to be queer to be affected by it, either.
Sometimes the connection is clear: Shari, for instance, explains that joining the GSA was an obvious choice for her because her moms are lesbians. And sometimes it’s the simple fact of being fed up with the pervasiveness of queer-bashing. Levi told us that he finds homophobia in high schools “has gotten to a critical level…it’s getting overbearing.”
While comments like “that’s so gay” are still ubiquitous in the school, the GSA students, with the help of teacher Jason Kunin, are taking action to affect change wherever they can. The point of the club is less to eradicate homophobia—which they realize is perhaps more than any group, no matter how dedicated, can do—than to make it socially unacceptable. Targetting language use the Vaughan Road GSA came out with a button campaign, a play on the throwaway “no homo” line they heard tossed out casually. Their button: “no homo”–phobia. And while there is the odd student who crosses out the ‘phobia’ line on the pin, leaving the phrase “no homo,” most of the students and staff have responded positively, wearing the pins around school.
Another recent program took place in the fall of 2010: to raise awareness of teen bullying surrounding homophobia, and to commemorate the recent slew of homophobia-related suicides, the GSA planned Purple Day, asking students to wear the colour and show their support. The students applaud both the pins and Purple Day as having been great successes.

20110309gsa4.jpg
GSA staff adviser Jason Kunin.


They are not stopping there. Newest on the students’ list is garnering signatures for a petition denouncing the spate of slushie throwing at openly gay residents near Jarvis Collegiate. They seem to be learning the tricks of the activist trade quickly—according to Marta, “the more obnoxious you are, the more signatures you have… It’s all about obnoxious status updates.”
Also on the agenda is the school library’s “Girl Reads” and “Guy Reads” sections, which categorize books in terms of what male and female readers are each apparently most likely to enjoy. When the students struggle with an effective way to challenge the idea that there are books that belong in these categories (chaining themselves to the desks in the library was vetoed), Kunin suggests a mini field trip to the library, to “perhaps discreetly switch the books. There is direct action.”

20110309gsa5.jpg
Back to front, left to right: Jackson, Ben, Marta; Dylan, Mardi, Levi, Shari; Jason Kunin.


These students may not identify as gay, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t passionate about minimizing homophobia. Dylan explains: “We are sort of human rights activists…without great funding.” More to the point, it’s tough to include gay students in the gay-straight alliance when there are so few out kids at Vaughan Road Academy.
“It’s a rare kid who comes out in high school,” says Kunin. But, he goes on: “the fact that some of the out students don’t join the GSA doesn’t worry me. I know it makes a difference just the fact that we are there—that they know that there are students who will speak up for them, a staff member who will speak up for them.” The GSA at Vaughan Road Academy just launched in the fall of 2010. In analyzing the impact they have made, Kunin notes that “prior to this year, there was nothing. [Being gay] was an unspoken topic except for in a derogatory way in the hallways.”
Queer or not, some students at Vaughan Road Academy are out to change that.
Photos by Nick Kozak/Torontoist.

Comments

  • tomwest

    The whole “Girl Reads” and “Guy Reads” section is sexist anyway. As a student I read and enjoyed plenty of books which I subsequently found out wre aimed at the opposite gender. f my school had those divisions, I would have been put off reading books in the “wrong” section (and probably ridiculed if I had).

  • isyouhappy

    “Kunin suggests a mini field trip to the library, to “perhaps discreetly switch the books. There is direct action.”

    Thank you for this article.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1azy7ySU Charles B Wrong

    I think that the youth culture has reappropriated the word homo as a term to qualify things as either 'in line' or 'out of line', uttering no homo when something is authentic and 'pure homo', or bbtfva (butt buddying twinks forever), when something is not. granted, these utterances do reproduce 'that being gay is bad' structure and this might facilitate homophobia but still, it's part of their youth culture and I can't believe we are discouraging these kids from appropriating material into their own (made by themselves) cultural milieu and using that to express their world. In their creativity and ingenuity of using these terms, they show us how they made it into something transcendental, something more than just merer sexual orientation. it transcends sex, it describes any sort of orientation. It's their own way to understand the world.

    The educational system turns enough of them into sheep, and this (at this space of vulgarity) might be that crack in the wall which could break loose the confines of institutional think. Everyone knows that education teaches us how to think, that it reproduces within us cultural material which we shape our world. The wonderful thing about these group of teenagers, who regardless of zero policy rules and forced (re)education programs, is that they are still resisting. if we condemn them from expressing themselves, we would effectively be cutting off the legs of a generation who can resist the hegemonic pressures and maintain that critical distance while constructing and maintaining their own cultural space and identities.

  • rich1299

    Its great to see how times have changed, when I was a young closeted gay boy my high school had an unwritten rule, no beating up fags… on school property. My wood shop teacher was an anti-gay bigot who made life miserable for me, I was regularly picked on and bullied in the hallways for being different but I wasn't even visibly gay at the time, well in retrospect my fondness for The Smiths might have given it away to some astute bigots. I think its great to see students standing up for LGBT students in some of today's high schools, that's got to make things at least a little easier for the young queers today, when I was their age I was so upset and tormented in my high school I used to day dream about blowing the entire place up, of course I never did, eventually I did find a closeted gay teacher there who was some help and comfort to me but that was in my final year of school. GSAs are definitely the way to go in all our schools, including the Catholic ones where they aren't allowed.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1azy7ySU Charles B Wrong

    booooooooooooooooooring

  • Canadianskeezix

    While I appreciate your comments about creativity and independent thought, using “no homo” to mean something that is not authentic hardly transcends sex or sexual orientation. It's not really reappropriation of the word “homo” either, any more than “that's so gay” ever was. It's the same old homophobic crap, just different words, and its hardly a mark of creativity or ingenuity to resort to mindless and hurtful put-downs to express simple concepts. The whole point is that there are those among these kids who are trying to “understand the world” and express themselves without diminishing some of the other kids around them. It has nothing to do with condemning them from expressing themselves, but rather discouraging them from condemning the vulnerable among them with the same old insults (new words, same concepts) that generations before them used.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    Your first “we” is ambiguous, but there's no reading of it that renders your comment sensible.

    It is, of course, the students themselves who are “discouraging” their peers from doing something (“the Vaughan Road GSA came out with a button…”); they are actively making “their own cultural milieu,” as you put it—one free of homophobia.

    “We” are not doing anything more than applauding the GSA at this school, and “we” are certainly doing nothing direct to the students who do say “no homo,” etc.

    Your wider implication that some homophobia or heterosexism is an acceptable cost for allowing students (again, not “these”, but their peers) to say what they like supposes, first, that reappropriation is good, and second, that the students who do use phrases like “no homo” are consciously practicing reappropriation as a way of reducing the negative connotations of the term.

    On the first point, the debate around words like nigger is proof enough that reappropriation is a fraught topic, and not a clear good. On the second, it is doubtful, and, as you acknowledge, ineffective.

    I can't tell whether you're turning these semantic cartwheels in earnest or whether you're trolling, but the former is misleading, and the other malicious. Please stop.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/3ury7yPY some dude

    I'm am just doing some research for my school project and i stumble upon this link through google. i know i'm a bit late in commenting but i still wonder what do you mean by: “The whole point is that there are those among these kids who are trying to “understand the world” and express themselves without diminishing some of the other kids around them.”?

    Doesn't all types of expression diminish someone else identity? Like at my school, the kids who are progressive diminish regularly those who they consider as ignorant or what is ignorant. It is almost a death sentence to be ignorant. They discriminate against the ignorance without considering why these people are ignorant, like inequalities are associated colored people not having the same opportunity or background as they do. Even in your post, you diminishes the ability of a certain group to express themselves in their attempts to understand the world, isn't that also an expression that diminishes some other peoples ability to express themselves?

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/3ury7yPY some dude

    I think by using 'we' he is referring to US, all of US, who have the opportunity to do react to this, I am reading it as is more of a rhetorical device than anything else.

    As for the point of reappropriation, reappropriation does not have to be a clear good, it doesn't occur within a universal context, for if reappropriation does than there would be not anything that needs to be reappropriated since its already existing meaning would already be appropriated. I think to understand this continued use of no-homo we have to see it in context. it is clearly not about discrimination based on orientation because that's illegal and morally wrong but people still uses the word.

    I must give you all some credit for giving me some insight into in queer studies, i am using this for my highschool social studies course.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/3ury7yPY some dude

    I'm am just doing some research for my school project and i stumble upon this link through google. i know i'm a bit late in commenting but i still wonder what do you mean by: “The whole point is that there are those among these kids who are trying to “understand the world” and express themselves without diminishing some of the other kids around them.”?

    Doesn't all types of expression diminish someone else identity? Like at my school, the kids who are progressive diminish regularly those who they consider as ignorant or what is ignorant. It is almost a death sentence to be ignorant. They discriminate against the ignorance without considering why these people are ignorant, like inequalities are associated colored people not having the same opportunity or background as they do. Even in your post, you diminishes the ability of a certain group to express themselves in their attempts to understand the world, isn't that also an expression that diminishes some other peoples ability to express themselves?

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/3ury7yPY some dude

    I think by using 'we' he is referring to US, all of US, who have the opportunity to do react to this, I am reading it as is more of a rhetorical device than anything else.

    As for the point of reappropriation, reappropriation does not have to be a clear good, it doesn't occur within a universal context, for if reappropriation does than there would be not anything that needs to be reappropriated since its already existing meaning would already be appropriated. I think to understand this continued use of no-homo we have to see it in context. it is clearly not about discrimination based on orientation because that's illegal and morally wrong but people still uses the word.

    I must give you all some credit for giving me some insight into in queer studies, i am using this for my highschool social studies course.