Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Clear
14°/5°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2013
Clear
16°/6°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2013
Clear
18°/7°

26 Comments

news

Welcome to Rob Ford’s Toronto


It was weird enough in the spring of 2000. The wild-eyed eagerness with which Mel Lastman was promoting the city that year crossed into farce, straying into the outright offensive. First the moose, hundreds of them, motionlessly swarming the downtown core as Lastman stood to one side, cackling gleefully. You had to feel a little sorry for him. It seemed like the most transparent cribbing of all time, ripping off Chicago’s parade of brightly-coloured cows, but to Lastman it was worth it—both the price and the head-shaking perception, evidently. The Star, Globe, and other dailies quoted Mel’s hilarious fervour, telling bemused residents not to worry, squealing, “They’re going to love it!”


The same spirit of civic boosting emerged in promoting Toronto as host city for the 2008 Summer Olympics. Part of that bid included a trip to Kenya to meet with the National Olympics Committees of Africa. Astoundingly, the salesman mayor pitching the city’s candidacy told the media, “Why the hell would I want to go to a place like Mombasa?” He added: “I just see myself in a pot of boiling water with all these natives dancing around me.” As jaws fell and the apologies spilled from Lastman’s mouth—”I’m sorry I made the remarks”; “I’m truly sorry”; “I’m very sorry”—you could almost hear this slow, rusty cranking, the nails-on-a-chalkboard sound of the coffin sealing shut on Toronto’s Olympic dreams. And after the disclosure of a skyrocketing budget, right up until long-time Lastman ally Tom Jacobek signed his nomination papers in 2002, it was also the sound of the Bad Boy’s plummet from the city’s grace. After he was gone, the sound just stayed in our ears.
The 2003 mayoral election could rightly be described as an attempt, in part, to excise the civic embarrassment of the Lastman era. Seven years and several leaps in municipal progress later, we’re about to face what we thought was impossible: a leader whose reign will make Lastman look like he presided over Plato’s academy.
Lastman was many things, but at least he acknowledged his manifold ignorance enough to apologize, politically motivated though that probably was. In late winter 2008, seven years after Torontonians thought they’d heard the worst, Rob Ford (then councillor for Ward 2, Etobicoke North), steadfastly refused to apologize for his own remarks: “Those Oriental people work like dogs,” he said, helpfully clarifying, “The Oriental people, they’re slowly taking over.”
David Miller demanded an apology. “We don’t stereotype people by [their] racial or ethnic background in this city.” Judging from the Star‘s coverage, it could be weakly suggested that Ford was complimenting what he saw as a superior work ethic, only in the most arrogant, belittling, guffawingly clueless way possible. His office, Ford’s staff said, received fifteen phone calls and twenty emails, and only one of them was negative. From that hefty cross-section of Etobicoke’s electorate, Ford surmised he was safe. “I don’t know why I should,” he said, about apologizing. “People aren’t asking me to.”
About a week later, a group of Torontonians arrived at City Hall for a word with Ford. “Essentially, we’re a group of people that’s working very hard,” quipped Kristyn Wong-Tam, the group’s organizer (and, as of Monday night, the newly crowned winner of Ward 27′s coveted council seat). Ford wasn’t on the premises. So the group of concerned citizens, all of Asian descent, took a seat, intently focused on that day’s work: wrenching an apology from Rob Ford.
They would have been better off trying to draw blood from a stone.
The sparring that followed was as embarrassing as anything Lastman left in his wake—and at that point, Ford was just a brash, ignorant, self-absorbed aberration on city council, not yet a brash, ignorant, self-absorbed contender for the most powerful office in town.
Deflecting the issue, Ford demanded to know why councillor Paula Fletcher let the group into City Hall. Fletcher fired back, “This isn’t Guantanamo Bay.” Still unaware of the colonialist—and yes, racist—overtones suppurating from the word “oriental,” Ford wouldn’t and didn’t make anything close to an apology. Faces met palms everywhere.
This, of course, is the same man who railed biblically against the faintest suggestion of a homeless shelter in his ward, said appalling things on record about AIDS and its victims, and spent most of his municipal career deriding cyclists and their infrastructure in one way or another—even going so far as to blame them for each and every fatal accident.
But earlier this summer, shortly after the G20, came the worst indication of who the man really is, the red-faced back-bencher championed by half of the city’s voters as their candidate of choice. After the last out-of-town busload of tactical cops had left the city, long after the beatings, arbitrary detentions, and egregious abuses of power alleged during that humid June weekend, Rob Ford chimed in with his thoughts about all that had gone down. “I don’t think there should be an inquiry or a review,” he said. “I think the police were too nice.” This followed a thousand arrests and the rainstorm kettling that left average Torontonians, urged to enjoy their own city, at the mercy of police for hours. “I would have had a zero-tolerance approach.”
One shudders to think what Mayor Ford will do with all the boots he wants patrolling the city, paid for with his magic pot of recession gold. Or if he really paid attention to what was happening that weekend at all.
For the man who would be mayor, there have always been two cities: his Toronto, and another, colder Toronto in which anyone who doesn’t like his policies can fuck off and die. This will be a mayor who has probably never ventured into Kensington Market except to gladhand in it. This will be a mayor who sees laneways splashed with street art as a public nuisance to be condemned, not a public expression of character to be cherished. This will be a mayor who sees cyclists as public enemy number one. This will be a mayor who sees our city as one big public-private partnership waiting to fail, not a living thing to be eased along after seven enviable years. He may, suddenly now, be making gestures at unity, but for the city he’s been charged with leading, Rob Ford may well be the ice at its core, about to split Toronto wide open.
For the rest of us, it’s just a little funny how embarrassed we were by Mel Lastman.

Filed under: , , , ,

[pinit] Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined JBeebe

    You may be absolutely right about the competency of Rob Ford. We, however, can not afford to ignore the overwhelming number of Torontonians who went out to vote for him.
    The message was not cut arts, or cut social services, or cut TTC. The message is bring accountability back to City Hall. If those of us who call ourselves progressives and care deeply about building a great city ignore this message, we will get more Rob Fords in the future.
    We have to make government more responsive and effective otherwise people will bring the whole thing down.
    A clean well run TTC is not a partisan issue and progressives should fight waste and abuse harder than anyone else.
    Don’t let Ford or anyone else own this issue.

  • http://undefined friend68

    Never mind Rob Ford — save us from the insufferable whining tone of this article.

  • http://undefined Moonmoth

    Certainly a prophetic article.

  • http://undefined Dipsomaniac

    “The message is bring accountability back to City Hall.”
    The irony of Rob Ford, who has a history of avoiding accountability for his statements, running and winning on that message, is depressing.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    I don’t agree that we can draw that kind of message from this election.
    Conventional wisdom is that the current federal government was elected by people who wanted to “bring accountability back to [Ottawa].” There was certainly a lot of noise about that during the campaign. But the government has been secretive instead, has converted a surplus into a deficit, and in turn necessitated (though it may foist the job off on its successor) both tax/fee increases and service cuts to ensure solvency. The Harris government in Ontario fits in a similar narrative, and I can see Rob Ford’s Toronto doing likewise.
    The actual “message” is, “the grass is too tall, let’s get out the flamethrower.” For a variety of complex reasons, lawnmowers were either not available, did not get due attention, or didn’t get elected. This is unambiguously irrational behaviour. No sane person trims their lawn with a flamethrower.
    I agree progressives should heed the lessons of the election. I agree that government should be more responsive and effective. Is there anyone who believes government should be less etc. etc.?
    That’s a relevant question, because that is exactly what we have got. Rob Ford is not going to make government more responsive or effective. Rob Ford will do no better than to put government into a crisis, from which someone else will have to rescue it. Perhaps, if that rescue is accomplished, the government will be more responsive or effective. I don’t think you can suggest that’s the only possible route to improvement.

  • http://undefined JBeebe

    Hi Paul,
    I don’t know if Ford will succeed in making government more accountable.
    But I do know that progressives should own this issue and I also know that this election clearly tells us that they don’t. That does not mean that progressives don’t work for accountability but it does mean that progressives have either failed in practice or perception.
    In politics, perception matters. When government asks citizens to pay more for services in the form of higher taxes, they have to trust that the money will be wisely spent. Clearly, hundreds of thousands of people in Toronto don’t believe this.
    There are problems with city services and progressives should be leading the fight (and be perceived to be leading the fight) to address those problems and making the system more responsive.
    Cheers

  • http://undefined rek

    “I don’t know if Ford will succeed in making government more accountable.”
    Don’t bet on it. Either he doesn’t know what accountability means – which wouldn’t surprise me – or he doesn’t know the actual cost of th… What am I saying? He doesn’t know what accountability means, and he doesn’t know what things actually cost.

  • http://undefined spacejack

    Given the extreme confidence in prophecies of doom we’re seeing here and elsewhere in the media and on the web… one’s got to wonder if a spiteful and vindictive public sector, their unions and their supporters in the media will do more to bring this about than Ford.

  • smasharts

    I think the main thing I got from the article is a point of view on the man that will represent our city. I’m sure it is not the only point of view, and I have to assume there are qualities about RF (still cannot say the name out loud) that may be quite positive. Perhaps these will show themselves in due time.
    Another point of view is numbers. Not always indicative, numbers can be used and skewed in any way we like – budgets, people, savings, etc. In the case of this election, RF garnered 50% of the ballots cast. I understand that turnout was around 53% – not quite the stampede that was expected, but not bad for a municipal election. Which could be seen as a sign that RF was elected by 25% of the electorate. Would the 47% who did not cast their votes do so along the same lines as those who did? We will never know, and this only shows that every vote is important.
    Finally, we got what we got. What RF actually does with his office, his new powers and his visions and promises remain to be seen. Accountability? This should be everyone’s responsibility, not just the mayor’s.

  • http://undefined lanner

    Accountability:
    Somebody (not me, leaving town) could make a Wiki – (or a wikileaks!) starting NOW – “The Real Rob Ford” or “Rob Ford day x day” or something, just to record the stuff he does and archive it. So easy to erase history. And in the SOUTH, campaigners have certainly found it useful to be able to index and draw up the Things People Say – which they later try to erase. The campaign to succeed Ford (or manage him, or impeach him, or whatever) needs to begin now, if anyone has some skills and a little time. A wiki can be contribted to by a groupo. too.

  • rek

    Why bother? He’s been sticking his foot in his mouth for years as a councillor and it’s had no consequences for him.

  • http://undefined Better Than Lastman

    The question is, will he be better than Lastman? betterthanlastman.ca

  • http://undefined Redpath

    I find it offensive that when you refer to Torontonians you assume everyone thinks like you do. I think that has been patently proved not to be the case. Please do not speak for me. I voted for Ford and am rejoicing in his victory. And I live downtown (shock!)
    You also assume that Kensington Market is the centre of Toronto. Wake up and look around. Toronto is not just compromised of a hipster reading NOW magazine at a Dark Horse downtown, and this election was not just about you and your elitist friends.
    Speaking of, the elitism displayed in this article is more aggravating than anything Ford has said or done (which is always conveyed with the best intentions, like it or not). You attempt to be inclusive in your vision of Toronto, but only to those who live south of Bloor.
    Well, maybe today was a wake up call. Toronto is not the 10 block radius you assume it to be, and Torontonians are not all like you. Welcome, Mayor Ford!

  • http://undefined dsm iv tr

    The worst arrogance is the arrogance that comes from thinking everyone is talking for you, or about you.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Leaving town, certainly not because of this election, I take?
    If so, I have to read the Christian Lander “Stuff White People Like” card on you.

  • http://undefined thomas.owain

    I enjoy that people do not think like me yet, but I’m quite stubborn about trying to persuade each of them to start doing so.
    The mainstream, national radio show “As It Happens” just welcomed Mayor Ford. It’s a show that revels in differences of opinion.
    Here is how he responded: http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/asithappens_20101026_40204.mp3
    Who’s the elitist, in this scenario?

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    That isn’t really the best question to be rhetorically asking. The best question is: “What does Rob have to say when he isn’t saying precisely those sound bytes which please his supporters? Stripped of this, what remains?” What remains is very little beyond his less savoury remarks. It behoves him to initiate new sound bytes so as not to lose people with the rhetoric which is dying with this just-concluded election cycle.
    Incidentally, I was seated right next to Howard Gomberg at the Torontoist election night party at the Cadillac Lounge Monday night. Just after he paraded the bar with his Gomberg for Mayor bumbershoot, he sat back down and said, “Rob Ford is putting a stop to the gravy train! Stopping it right in front of his house!” Snap.
    Incidentally, Torontoist wasn’t there to catch that off-news. They were elsewhere.

  • http://undefined linnyqat

    Oh my gentle Jesus. First facepalm. Thanks for the link (I think?)

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    It was pretty tacky. It might rhyme, but “CBC” isn’t “CFRB,” and that makes a world of difference for His Worship.
    Speaking of which, the Flounder shirt I whipped up is now out of date, owing that he is no longer a candidate. A new one is probably in order.

  • http://undefined linnyqat

    There’s a great comment on the CBC’s podcast site from a Vancouver listener that pretty much sums it up:

    “It was almost as if the interview with mayor elect Rob Ford was accepted as an opportunity for him to express his disdain for the CBC and its listeners. What an arrogant man.”

    Ayup.

  • http://undefined joeclark

    The difference is those “elitists” know they’re living in a city and act like it.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    The optics are really less about “accountability” and more about transparency. The optics of raising taxes without a clear-path demonstration of where those revenues were benefiting something considered of civic value is one thing that upset a lot of “taxpayers” — many of whom are not engaged in the day-to-day well-being of this city.
    Citizens may feel otherwise, but the point is fairly straightforward: transparency is not a nice-to-have function of governance. It is a minimum cornerstone of what is now the new standard of good governance — both with Toronto and on up to federal politics (pick a scandal or four from the last twenty years).

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    His junior football team is given the offence strategy of “taking out the kneecaps” of their “elitist opponents.” Works like a charm.
    Those are scare quotes, not pull-quotes. If they were the latter, would it really matter?

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Say, here’s a thought, Redpath (you know there’s an “elite” museum called Redpath at McGill, yes?):
    In his four years, Ford shoudl direct his chief urban planner — who will henceforth be elected, rather than appointed as an independent advisor — to adopt a new official city plan, revoking the 2004 plan under retired city planner Paul Bedford’s watch. With this new plan, Ford calls for zoning with radically lower housing densities south of Bloor, expropriating thousands of elitists’ homes, forcing them to move north of Bloor and turning that vast wasteland of a stretch south of Bloor into something great like Montréal’s Griffintown. If Ford needs an instruction guide on the how-to, he need not look further than to former Montréal mayor-juggernaut Jean Drapeau, who orchestrated this radical transformation of Griffintown from a residential neighbourhood to a scant industrial zone, forcing an elite city council opponent out of office in the process.
    It’ll be awesome. It’ll be like a 1917 all over again — only inversed.

  • http://undefined Edmund

    Redpath, you’re correct in thinking that Torontoist doesn’t speak for all Torontonians. But then, neither do you. No-one does. All you can do (at best) is give voice to a segment of the voting population who feel a certain way, and even then you’re not going to be bang-on with everyone in the group. Some modifiers in the article would have helped a lot.
    Regarding Robert Bruce Ford’s ‘intentions’: I don’t give one hoot about people’s intentions, only the practical outcome. He may not have intended the ‘Orientals’ remark as racist, but it was perceived as such by people of Asian descent. Regardless of the intention, the effect was the same. I could go spraypaint City Hall with ‘Go Rob Ford!’ hundreds of times, and honestly believe it would help the city. But there would be no practical difference between me and someone who did it just because they’re a jackass.

  • http://undefined BRIBOK

    Here’s a story about Toronto Costume sellers getting strange demands this week: http://bit.ly/9yR0Fx