Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
31°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
26°/15°

17 Comments

news

Canada’s Sugar Beach Opens in the Nick of Time

Canada’s Sugar Beach, a manmade sliver of sand at the foot of Jarvis Street, had its grand opening today. With its prime downtown location and its free amenities, there’s plenty to like about this new warm-weather hangout. Less likable is the fact that it’s opening only a few weeks before the start of September—though its nine-month construction cycle was nearly over by the beginning of July, and canny locals have been using the place for at least a month.


A private security guard was patrolling Sugar Beach on Saturday, two days before the opening. He said he’d had no instructions to prevent people from bypassing the ineffectual chain-link fence that was then blocking the area off from Queen’s Quay East.
The guard was a Caribbean man. He told us he’d thought he was in for something at least a little similar to the coastlines of Jamaica when his superiors had told him he was being assigned to a beach. But this was different than he’d expected.
There isn’t any swimming at Sugar Beach. There’s a long drop to the surface of the lake, and the water is, in any case, considered unsafe for humans. The sand is perfectly fine, though. Imported from Ohio, it sits in a triangle-shaped depression that, nine months ago, was flat asphalt. There are pink fiberglass umbrellas in the sand, and a scattering of plastic Muskoka chairs. A pair of huge granite boulders with red and white stripes (to make them appear more sugary) sit in the middle of the lot with a kind of lazy, tortoise-like dignity. (They were imported from Quebec in pieces, and then glued back together.) The whole beach is surrounded by a promenade made of granite paving stones, and dotted with trees. There are in-ground, barrier-free water jets that spurt into the air at intervals. They might ultimately prove more useful than the similar ones in Yonge-Dundas Square, because Sugar Beach users who go near them, intentionally or otherwise, stand at least some chance of being in the mood to get wet.
On Saturday, the beach was breezy and tranquil.
Perhaps thirty people—including individuals, couples, and families—were there, soaking in the intermittent sun, or looking out over the lake, or at the empty dock of the Redpath Sugar Factory, which abuts the western edge of the beach, and from which the beach derived its name. To the east is a multi-storey office building: the newly completed headquarters of Corus Entertainment.
Arthur Nowicki, who bikes the waterfront’s Martin Goodman Trail for exercise, discovered the beach about a month ago, and was relaxing on Saturday in one of its Muskoka chairs before heading back to his west-end home. “This is my turnaround, now,” he said. Previously, he’d used Cherry Beach. “It’s nice that they’re improving this part of the waterfront.”
Jay Ashren and Ryan Carlsen, who’d come to Sugar Beach together, had heard about it from a friend of a friend. They agreed that it was nice, but complained that Redpath’s sugar boats occasionally blot out the sun.
Today’s grand opening was a far different scene. Waterfront Toronto, which spearheaded the beach’s construction as part of their ongoing waterfront revitalization effort, had hired a calypso band to serenade the crowd with steel drums. Shirtless beachgoers had been supplanted by executives in suits and reporters in shirtsleeves. Everyone seemed badly in need of a swim, but the only liquids on hand were free fruit smoothies, in keeping with the sucrose-saturated theme—and cartoonishly huge lollipops for the kids.
Jim Flaherty, Canada’s minister of finance, explained why the beach is officially known as Canada’s Sugar Beach (the “Canada’s” is cumbersome, so we dropped it after the first paragraph): “The reason for that is that most of the money came from Canada, from your taxes,” he said. Waterfront Toronto is funded by all three levels of government—municipal, provincial, and federal—but for the past two years the corporation has received particularly large federal contributions.
Glen Murray, MPP for Toronto-Centre, who lives just blocks away, praised the beach’s likely future effect on property values, which he believes will help build the area’s tax base “faster than inflation.”
Mayor Miller, who enjoyed himself after the event, took the podium to expound on the many advantages of bringing people, jobs, and transit to the waterfront. “The water’s edge must be for the people of Toronto,” he said.
“And imagine perhaps one day even swimming in Lake Ontario,” he continued, referring to the unswimmable waters below Sugar Beach. “Perhaps in another ten years we’ll be back here and doing just that.”
It still wouldn’t be anything like Jamaica. But at least Sugar Beach will always be convenient.
Photos by Michael Chrisman/Torontoist.

Comments

  • http://undefined Stephanie

    The water is unsafe for humans? What kind of beach is that, then?

  • http://undefined Christopher

    Yeah… that’s my feeling exactly.
    Another prime example of Toronto wasting taxpayer monies

  • http://undefined Cynna
  • mark.

    It’s not a “waste” of money at all.

  • http://undefined steve

    They might ultimately prove more useful than the similar ones in Yonge-Dundas Square
    In other words they will be turned on more then a few time during the summer.
    Dundas square is is a commercial endeavor sold to Toronto citizens as a public square. It is closed to the public for corporate advertising events and flea markets more often then it is open for public relaxation. Even when the tables are setup your slapped in the face with advertisements at night it lit up like an office.

  • http://undefined s’rose

    funding from all 3 levels of government, especially federal…
    wish ttc was a beach.

  • http://undefined Erica

    Honestly? It’s a great little space to relax and catch some sun. Do you really want to swim in the shipping lane right near all the industrial properties? There is a giant ship that docks there when it delivers sugar to the Redpath factory. Not exactly the safest place to be splashing around.

  • http://undefined lunarworks

    Looking good. Better to have this in place BEFORE the area gets developed, because there’s usually little room for an afterthough.

  • http://undefined CaligulaJones

    Considering the state of public washrooms at existing beaches, yes, building new beaches instead of fixing what is broke could be considered a waste.
    Then again, you don’t get politicians slapping each other on their backs after a urinal gets cleaned.

  • http://stevekupferman.typepad.com Steve Kupferman
  • http://undefined Bubba

    Yup! we won’t give you money for public transit but will give ya a load of cash to build an artificial beach where you won’t be able to swim and will only be able to use 4 months out of the year.
    Maybe the ttc should put sand on all their subway platforms and call them destinations instead of stations and serve everybody rum punch, and then all three levels of government will fund public transit in toronto! HA!
    Gimme some of that sun tan lotion!

  • http://undefined Dave McD

    I think this is a waste of money for 2 reasons.
    First; Calling it a beach is a misnomer if there is no swimming. It’s sort of like advertising your ski hill but you don’t have any snow.
    Second; I live in the High Park area where there are kms of real beaches and grassy parks with trees that are virtually useless because of the high levels of contamination caused mainly by goose droppings and a broken down Breakwall that limits water circulation. Then, to add insult to injury the Sunnyside pool is shut down for the whole season because of inadequate maintenence.
    Spending over $14 Million on a glorified sandbox is a waste of money and a case of misplaced priorities when there is existing infrastructure of much higher real value to the public that is allowed to deteriorate. There could be thousands of kids from High Park and Pardale enjoying the Lake, why not fix it.

  • http://undefined Stephanie

    This is exactly what I mean – the money could have been used to improve other locations. Why create something new, when existing areas really could use the attention?
    And yes, in my mind, beach = swimming. No swimming = glorified sandbox. (And I mean that for the “beaches” where the water is unsafe, too.)

  • CanadianSkeezix

    People are far too focused on the word “beach”. It’s just a name. Putting aside everyone’s subjective opinions as to what is or is not a beach, they could have just as easily called it Sugar Park. I’m not sure how the use of word beach, regardless of one’s own interpretation of the word, is an indication of a waste of money.
    More importantly, Sugar Beach will form part of the park/open space system for the thousands of residents and workers that will soon be living and working in East Bayfront, not to mention all those Torontonians from across the City who make use of the waterfront. Park levies are being collected on both commercial and residential development in the precinct, not to mention development charges (a portion of which are directed towards park development), and those funds are supposed to be used to acquire land and develop parks in the vicinity of where they were collected. Not to diminish issues with park and recreational issues elsewhere, this neighbourhood will have its own park needs, just like any other neighbourhood, and there is no justification for diverting its park funds elsewhere. In fact, in getting the park land developed early (rather than waiting until after all the workers and residents are in place, when park development costs would be greater), the city is actually being quite efficient with these funds.

  • http://undefined Marc Lostracco

    Not to mention that the vast majority of people on Toronto’s beaches don’t even step foot in Lake Ontario.

  • http://undefined Matthew

    If it’s supposed to serve the purpose of a park, it should have some grass. I’m getting really sick of these urban park monstrosities that try to pass off gravel or sand as being an acceptable equivalent to grass

  • http://undefined Gloria

    I’m kind of confused why anyone would care if you can swim or not (well, Marc pretty much sums it up).
    I always thought it was a little witty. It’s smack dab in the middle of the city, after all! It’s urban.
    Even if it was ON water, it wouldn’t really be a beach … more like added sand. The pre-installed chairs and umbrellas, I think, clearly indicate how this is supposed to be about atmosphere and feel. And not to mention that not everyone goes to a beach to swim either, even if the water is swimmable. It can just be about sand beneath your feet, sun, and fresh air next to water.
    Sugar Beach is great. It provides some variety and a little humour as a new park/public space in Toronto.