Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2013
Chance of Rain
13°/5°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Chance of Rain
16°/7°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2013
Mostly Cloudy
18°/7°

10 Comments

news

CN Tower Keeping Its Name…For Now

23Mar10_CNTower_clouds.jpg
Photo by room929 from the Torontoist Flickr Pool.


When Canada Lands Company heard that local web startup Vehicle Gateway was making a seventy-eight-million-dollar bid for the naming rights to the CN Tower, it was apparently news to them.
“The CN Tower’s naming rights are not currently for sale,” the Crown corporation said this morning.
In an interview yesterday with Peter Davies, Vehicle Gateway’s Sales and Marketing manager, Torontoist was told that the government was aware of their impending pitch. “This is a legitimate bid,” Davies said. “It’s definitely real and valid.”


Gordon McIvor, CLC’s vice-president of public and government affairs, says that there had been no contact between the two companies, adding that he first heard of the scheme from the media.
In a carefully worded press release, which conspicuously left open the possibility of selling naming rights in the future, the CLC stated that no bid requests have been made for the CN Tower’s naming rights, nor had tower management or the CLC been approached by Vehicle Gateway.
Peter Davies indicated to us that the alleged bid was timed to coincide with the release of the Ontario budget on Thursday, even though the CLC is a federal corporation. The Canada Lands Company has also announced its annual public meeting for April 14, wherein long-term plans for the CN Tower are traditionally revealed. Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has publicly floated the idea of selling off naming rights to government-owned assets like the CN Tower.
Vehicle Gateway’s bid would see the CN Tower awash in green light at night, representing the company’s official corporate colour.
While it may be hard to imagine a rebranding of our city’s world-famous landmark, it’s hardly a novel idea these days. We’ve resigned ourselves to BMO Field, the Enwave Theatre, the Air Canada Centre, and the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts. We’ve watched films at the Scotiabank Theatre, at Toronto Life Square, and in the Visa Screening Room at TIFF. The Pantages is now the Canon, and the National Trade Centre at the Ex has made way for a Direct Energy logo. Yet there seems to be something rather sacred about our pointy projectile (as there is with the Eaton Centre and Chicago’s Wrigley Field), despite having already been named for a corporation.
Being beloved and historic may still not be enough: consider the Willis Tower in Chicago—formerly the world’s tallest building, and known until last summer as the Sears Tower. And if ”VG Tower” sounds like it’s too ripe for jokes about female genitalia, UK football team Newcastle United had to play out their 2009 season at the SportsDirect.com@StJamesPark Stadium (we shit you not).
When the Canadian National Railway sold the tower to the Canada Lands Company in 1995, Torontonians feared a name change and wisdom prevailed: the building was renamed, but to “Canada’s National Tower,” allowing the recognizable CN moniker to remain. Between 1997 and 2003, the tower was operated by Peter Munk’s Trizec Properties, but following a twenty-six-million-dollar reno, Trizec broke the lease and control reverted back to the CLC.
As for Vehicle Gateway, the company insists that the financing exists and that the bid is the real deal. If they can’t get the CN Tower’s name changed, a company spokesperson claims that they’ve got other landmarks in their sights…plus a new glut of free publicity.

Comments

  • http://undefined j.harry

    And this was worthy of not one, but two articles? What exactly does this add to the original. I don’t get it.

  • Darren

    Actually 3 articles. Its just an attempt to rip on the curren federal government…that conveniantly happens to be conservative

  • http://undefined geodee

    More like an attempt to get free publicity. I had a look at their site and it’s a complete hack. Seems like Torontoist has been duped by VD’s owner.

  • http://undefined james a

    Does Torontoist own stock in this company or have friends working there or something?
    It boggles the mind how you could see this as being anything other than a lame publicity stunt, and frankly your integrity suffers as a result.

  • http://undefined Solex

    Apparently people like yourself don’t get it that our cultural landmarks are being renamed to suit corporations and not the people who built them in a state of civic-mindedness eons ago. But, what else is new from a populace benumbed by neoconservative bullshit-the same neoconservative bullshit that’s lead us into the current recession?

  • http://undefined Darren

    My god….the crap coming from this guy’s mouth is really getting extreme. Can someone please filter out the BS and immaturity from these pages!

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    Does Torontoist own stock in this company or have friends working there or something?
    No, obviously.
    It boggles the mind how you could see this as being anything other than a lame publicity stunt, and frankly your integrity suffers as a result.
    You should really read the original article again, especially the latter half.

  • http://undefined rek

    So what you’re saying is all non-neocons should be censored?

  • http://undefined Darren

    No, no one should be censored. But those people who do nothing but jump to conspiracy theories and use immature profanity while going ballistic should have their comments deleted or edited somehow. Call it a commensense filter or whatever

  • Corporations Suck

    Green light every night? Gross. It will always be the CN tower. I hate these corporations that march into cities and turn buildings into their own personal bill boards!