Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
28°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
27°/15°

9 Comments

news

Sheep Go to Heaven, Angels Go to Hell, Gay Angels Come to Toronto

virginads_01082010.jpg
Gayngels? All good for Toronto. Image courtesy of Virgin.

You may have seen the posters around town hocking low-cost cellphones and Blackberrys in the most appealing way possible: with hot, ass-grabbing, face-sucking angels.
But now, two Canadian cities—Calgary, not surprisingly, and Mississauga, somewhat more so—have decided that Virgin Mobile’s steamy “Hook up fearlessly” ad campaign is a little too hot for their apparently chaste commuters. After being inundated by at least six whole complaints, Calgary Transit pulled the offending ads this week. Ron Collins, a spokesperson for Calgary Transit, cited the models’ lasciviously wandering hands as being over the line, telling the CBC that “It’s basically the positioning of the hands of the male on the female….In one, the hand’s on her buttocks. Another, it’s on her thigh area and that sort of thing and so we didn’t think that was appropriate.”
Virgin Mobile, however, has yet to be discouraged by all the torches and pitchforks and cries of won’t someone please think of the children??? “We’re very proud of our ads,” Chris Baines, spokesperson for Virgin Mobile, told CBC. “We don’t think there’s anything wrong with them. They are just young couples passionately embracing or kissing. It’s no more than that and they’re a lot of fun.”


Collins disagrees. “If you look at that through the eyes of a child using the transit system,” he told the Globe, “we didn’t think it was appropriate they should be subjected to that.” Kissing is fine, Virgin, but leave room for the Holy Spirit.
And come on, think of the children.

201001virginadcalgary.jpg
Just the right amount of hotness for Calgary, thank you very much.

Which seems to be the whole issue, since another of Virgin’s risque angel make-out posters, with more lip-locked shirt-lifting and less back-alley thigh-groping (a close-up of which is at right) has remained a fixture of Calgary’s network of bus shelters.
The thing is, while we don’t want to come down too hard on Cow Town’s morally upright sons and daughters, how surprising is such a puritanical move for a city that, as recently as October, got all uppity about transit ads for Ron Mueck’s gigantic wrinkly baby sculpture, an installation Collins described as “inappropriate”? Children riding the C-Train, after all, might be irreversibly scarred for life by—well, by themselves.
Mississauga, meanwhile, had two of the sexy promos yoinked in December, replaced with posters depicting two men doing a lot of “embracing,” as the Globe put it. (That ad is pictured at the very top of this post.) No less sexy, the man-on-man fun depicted in the ad was never shared with the streets or bus stops of Calgary, after the other, more controversial materials were removed. But the gay ad has cropped up in numerous high-traffic, high-profile locations all around Toronto—we just saw one at a transit shelter near the East York Town Centre on Overlea Boulevard. Just don’t tell Calgary. We still want to be their friend.

Filed under: , , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined rek

    Hicks and suburbanites!

  • http://undefined W. K. Lis

    Wonder how many fatwas from the self-appointed ones it would take to yank the ads in Toronto?

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    I am really hoping that the gayngels’ names are Cal and Gary.

  • http://undefined Suzannah Showler

    Angelheaded hipsters. Cherry-popping angels.

  • http://undefined spacejack

    Maybe they should just put up some illegal billboards.

  • http://alexandrahighcrest.com/blog/ Alexandra Highcrest

    The negative reaction to these ads is silly. I always thought Biblical angels were asexual so you can’t have gay angels, unless perhaps the angels are making out with each other (that’d be kinda hot).
    Jesus seemed to be kissing somebody every day and I imagine some of his smooches were pretty passionate so the passion shown in the ads isn’t out of line. I think the critics and those out there protecting children from seeing provocative images should head back to school — Sunday school — and learn a little more about love and tolerance.

  • http://undefined alexmeyers

    I still don’t understand what these ads have to do with angels. “Hooking-up” I get, but angels?
    heh “cal and gary sitting in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g”

  • rek

    The company is called Virgin. Angels are virgins?

  • http://www.guesswork.ca Patrick Metzger

    Alexandra is right. Angels are asexual; under their robes they look like Barbie dolls. These beings are most likely incubi and succubi (hence the colloquial term “Hell’s booty call”).