Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
28°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
27°/15°

3 Comments

news

Mathew Ingram Leaving the Globe and Mail to Blog

20100108mathewi.jpg
Mathew Ingram speaks at last year’s TEDxTO. Photo by J. Adam Huggins and Aaron Rodericks, courtesy of TEDxTO.


Mathew Ingram, whose job as communities editor at the Globe and Mail consisted of ushering the one-hundred-and-sixty-six-year-old newspaper into the age of social media, announced on Twitter this afternoon that he would be resigning his post to pursue a new job with GigaOM, a technology news blog, thereby casting in his lot with the new media world he has spent years advocating (and reporting on, before he became an editor) for his old employer. Ingram began working for the Globe in 1994, and assumed his current role in late 2008.


GigaOM is the flagship blog of the the GigaOm Network, which describes itself as “a leading provider of publications and events for the technology and entrepreneurial markets worldwide.” The Network provides content to the websites of a number of major news outlets, including The New York Times, BusinessWeek, and Salon.
In a post announcing Ingram’s hiring, Om Malik, founder of the GigaOM Network, wrote: “I have been trying to convince Mathew to come and help us realize our dreams for some time. But his dream was to be the G&M’s online communities editor, to help that publication embrace social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook. So we waited.”
Patience was evidently rewarded. Following Ingram’s announcement of his latest career move on Twitter, the torrent of well-wishes began almost instantaneously―and, at the time of this writing, has yet to yield. (In typical fashion, Ingram has been replying to individuals, though it must, in this case, be a time-consuming exercise in speed-tweeting.)
During Ingram’s time as communities editor at the Globe, the paper underwent a number of forward-looking changes, including a total redesign of theglobeandmail.com and the launch of a policy wiki. (During this time, the paper also initiated a partnership with Torontoist, which sees some of our content linked on the Globe‘s Toronto hub.)
During his speech at last year’s TEDxTO, which we covered, Ingram—also a co-founder of Toronto’s mesh conference—spoke about the importance of trust in the mainstream media. He called trust a “competitive advantage” and implied that it was one of the few remaining things separating established newspapers from web-based upstarts (like ourselves). Ingram’s decision to leave his job at a media mainstay to write for a blog that was founded in 2006 seems like a vote of confidence in the credibility of web journalism. For obvious, selfish reasons, we’re all for that.

Comments

  • http://undefined joeclark

    I’m trying to imagine the reasons why Torontoist failed to report on Ingram’s massive, endemic conflict of interest while working at the Globe. Reportorial incompetence on the part of Kupferman, or byproduct of the seemingly unproductive content agreement Torontoist has with the Globe?
    dstopping: Consider assigning a followup piece to another writer examining how freer Ingram will now be to shill for paid ventures after finally being unshackled from the fetters of journalistic ethics. (Also worth examining: How those ethics governed his behaviour before. Hint: They didn’t.)

  • http://undefined balleyne

    Wow, someone’s got it in for Mathew… Are you referring to his involvement in the Mesh Conference? I don’t see the “massive, endemic conflict of interest” to which you’re alluding. Third possible reason that Kupferman didn’t mention “it”: it’s neither massive, nor obvious, but rather debatable, if at all existing.
    I think it’s great news, and I think Mathew does great work.

  • http://undefined joeclark

    Balleyne, explain to me how covering technology for a newspaper while simultaneously running a for-profit technology conference fails to meet the threshold of conflict of interest.
    Nonetheles, he got away clean. With the help of people like you.