Today Mon Tue
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 12, 2012
Chance of Snow
1°/-3°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 13, 2012
Partly Cloudy
3°/-3°
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 14, 2012
Chance of Snow
3°/-1°

6 Comments

news

Eye‘s Website Gets Blepharoplasty, Too

20090213eyenewlayout.jpg
Miracle of miracles! A month after Eye‘s paper got a new layout, its website finally got one too. And while it’s (predictably) gray and white and red all over, the changes aren’t only cosmetic. Eye‘s online editor, Stuart Berman, told Torontoist in an email this morning that “our previous homepage—while visually robust—didn’t fully communicate the idea that eyeweekly.com is very much a daily operation. Now, our new content is displayed in a more logical, chronological flow as opposed to being segregated to specific sections. As a result of the new homepage design, we’ll be ramping up our daily efforts even more.” Why, that all sounds just like a blog!
The site is both more and less tidy than it was before. While the newer articles now go on top of the old ones, and there are some nice new fonts and images shoved together with ugly old ones, good luck if you actually want to read any actual content: one thousand words of teeny-tiny sans-serif text with no images to break it doesn’t exactly make the process easy. Berman, of course, is quick to mention that they’re only in “the first phase of what will be an extensive stage-by-stage redesign of the entire site over the next few months—from here, we’ll be burrowing deeper into the site to revise section and article layouts as well as revamp the presentation of our listings.” But there’s one big thing that’s missing now from the redesign that it may be too late to fix: any unique visual identity whatsoever. NOW‘s website, messy and awful as it is, at least looks and feels and reads like NOW; Eye‘s new layout could belong to almost any publication in the world. Still, as far as websites go, “logical” is always a big step in the right direction.

Filed under: , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://www.bitpicture.com Marc Lostracco

    The most infuriating part of the last redesign was the colossal bungling of the movie listings/theatres, which used to all be on one page. I was hopeful for a second when I read this, but now that I go to the brand new site, it still takes a thousand steps to get the information I want, and I have to check theatre-by-theatre to see what’s playing at each (and is there a reason it takes sooooooo long to load?).
    The original listings page may have been fug, but it was useful and I could get the information quick. I guess I’ll stick with CinemaClock‘s customizable and bookmarkable listings, or Flixter’s “Movies” app on the iPhone, then. Sigh.
    And the microscopic fonts…oy.

  • http://www.colinmedley.com Colin Medley

    Ugh, what a generic looking website. Nothing memorable about it at all. Why do most print publications have such bad sites?

  • http://null mister j

    actually, the ‘film finder’ on the main page is pretty good. lots of options with the drop-down, and you can switch between ‘films’ and ‘theatres’. The rest of the site is horrible, though!

  • http://null fantasygoat

    Agreed. I just use my iPhone now, and therefore never have a reason to use their terrible site.

  • http://www.bitpicture.com Marc Lostracco

    It’s not good. It takes forever to load, for one, but I don’t want to get a list of the six theatres I frequent from a long list of 33 theatres I don’t go to and have to tediously click through to each one to see what’s playing at them. Hence, CinemaClock and the Flixter iPhone app, which allow me to set favourite theatres and list them all on one page for quick reference.
    I realize that websites to this to maximize page views so they can sell more ads as you click and click and click and click, but that doesn’t make it luck less hard.

  • http://www.bitpicture.com Marc Lostracco

    And I should also note that the “search results” when getting the list of theatres not only displays incorrectly, but I have to page through four times to get from the AMC link to the Varsity link. Stupid, stupid, stupid.