
Photo of the T3 Tramway from *** Fanch The System !!! ***.
On Friday evening at City Hall, two representatives of the Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP)—Vice-President Philippe Martin and Director of Open Spaces and Heritage Remi Feredj—gave a public presentation on Paris's T3 LRT system to share lessons for Toronto to learn from. Their appearance seemed perfectly timed to reignite the debate over subways versus light rapid transit, most notably along the Eglinton corridor. David Miller and the city have long propounded that LRT lines are the best and most feasible option, but a confidential Metrolinx report leaked to the press last week showed that the provincial transportation agency's plans emphasize subways. The major fear is, of course, that the higher price tag of a subway line along Eglinton—costing between $6 and $10 billion versus $2.2 billion for LRT—would divert scarce resources from other potential transit projects.
The experience of developing the T3 tramway in Paris shows why the debate shouldn't just be about dollars and cents. Traffic along the route where the T3 was built, where articulated buses served 50,000 passengers per day along an orbital ring in south Paris, didn't justify the cost of a full Metro line—something which TTC Chair Adam Giambrone has reiterated time and again about Eglinton. Since being opened in December 2003, the T3 now carries double the passenger load—100,000 riders per day—along a line with 17 stations and connections to two regional commuter trains, five Metro lines, and 37 bus routes. Of that increased ridership, 14 per cent were new transit users. Parisians already have a transit-friendly mentality but, as Friday's audience was told, they're learning more and more that "you can live without the car."

Photo of the Public Presentation (with Philippe Martin and Remi Feredj in the top right) by Kevin Plummer.
In addition to increasing mobility, the T3 was also built with the dual goal of redeveloping and enhancing the urban environment in a declining part of the city. Being buried out of sight, subways don't offer the same opportunity to remake the streetscape that LRT lines provide. More connected to the street, LRT lines can fundamentally change the roadway's character for the better, and, as Paris has learned, trams can even work as a beautification project. Except at crossings and stations, the T3's entire track is lined with grass, like the tram system in Nice that Torontoist swooned over recently. In Paris, trees are also planted in T3 stations. It's hard to over-state the mental benefit of a little extra well-maintained greenery in the city.
The trams are quieter and produce less pollution than the cars they are replacing. In fact, with the loss of one lane in each direction, vehicular traffic has decreased by 50 per cent along the main road and dropped by 20 per cent on neighbouring streets. The addition of trams has also slowed the pace of the remaining traffic. Clearly all of this adds up to significant improvements toward making the urban environment much friendlier for pedestrians and cyclists. The most evocative part of Friday's presentation was a series of before and after photos showing just how much the streetscape had been transformed—from a major thoroughfare with three lanes in each direction into a much more hospitable, greenery-lined boulevard.

Photo of the T3 Tramway from Wikipedia.
The construction of the dedicated tram track, however, had its critics. Sacrificing one lane in each direction meant the loss of parking for local businesses. Given Toronto's recent experience with building a dedicated streetcar line along St. Clair, the crowd on Friday was a little shocked at the apparent ease with which the loss of parking was accepted when the Parisian mayor demonstrated resolve to force the issue. To minimize outcry, liaisons from the RATP and the city of Paris held discussions with the public, transit users, and local business owners throughout the tram's development. The monthly monitoring of sales, which began right at the outset of T3 planning, still continues in an effort to accurately assess the tram's long-term impact on business. As one would expect, sales declined while the heavy-duty construction was underway, so the RATP set up an alternative dispute resolution mechanism to hear grievances and offer compensation if sales dropped by 8 per cent, or the disruption to the business lasted more than three months. Now, over a year since the tram opened, the RATP reports show that sales are higher than before the tram's construction. Even the Parisians admit that it's still too early to conclude definitively, but the introduction of added public transit appears to have boosted local businesses.
With the T3 trams taking priority at signals and crossings, there are obviously a couple snarls with vehicular traffic. Most notably, the RATP presenters admitted that traffic management personnel are always needed at Porte d'Orleans, a major entrance into downtown Paris, to ensure that cars keep the tram tracks clear and obey the signals. But the tram has been such an overwhelming success that Paris and the RATP are already conducting initial studies on a proposed extension.

Newsstand: November 9, 2009
I'm still really holding out on a car. But in the past 10 days, I've had - not one- but two SERIOUS incidents with the TTC. (Rude, unresponsive, thoughtless drivers who look like they're WAY past the retirement deadline, and a bus that never came). Days like these, I really pine for a vehicle of my own. Sigh.
The fact that someone actually has to say that you can live without a car is evidence of how we all are forced toward using them.
Or it is evidence that they are more convenient to use.
The only time I feel 'forced' to have a car (which I don't have) is when I think about wanting to get out of the city at a moment's notice (road trip!) or think about buying/transporting something big. But then that's the gap Zip and AutoShare and regular rentals exist to fill, and all is well in the world again. But then I live downtown, mere steps from a subway station. I'm sure I'd feel differently if I live up at Finch and Keele and wanted to get to Broadview and Queen in a timely manner.
But I don't see why the city can't have more subway lines and more LRT service, money aside. They serve different needs and suit different locations.
Vincent, thanks for making my point. People conflate the convenience of a car with something they require to survive.
This "convenience" of not having to wait for a street car somehow balances out all the traffic jams, high gas prices and climate change.
rek, consider whether the business models of the zip, autoshare and car rental people would make sense if no one had a car. It only works because the market is small and demand is manageable. No one would be able to afford the capital investment in rapidly depreciating assets to provide a fleet for everyone to share whenever the mood strikes.
Yeah, if anything, Toronto needs less cars.
I worry that if this city goes forward with a plan for Eglinton it might be pressured into one of two terrible ideas that each have precedents in the past 25 years:
1] An Eglinton Stubway, à la Sheppard.
2] A proprietary LRT system, running with specially-built rolling stock on non-TTC-standard rails, that ends up costing more in maintenance than it will ever be worth to the city in transit value and that is never expanded on in any way, à la Scarborough RT.
These were both careless decisions, especially considering our city already has a perfect urban light-rail solution that is relatively inexpensive to install, expand on, and maintain.
Sincerely,
A Fan of Streetcars
x_the_x - I'll keep that in mind for the day they ban personal vehicles in the city. Until then...
I think I'll cry the next time I hear about yet another 'plan' or 'consultation' about public transit in Toronto. My god, how many plans are there? 500? It's time for someone to take a risk, make a decision and DO something!
"when the (...) mayor demonstrated resolve to force the issue"
Ah. Resolve. Our Mayor. For something that isn't a tax or completion of a family holiday.
Could be a problem.
consider whether the business models of the zip, autoshare and car rental people would make sense if no one had a car.
Yeah - imagine how a company could ever make money if *everyone* needed their product. What is this, Yogi Berra logic?
The fact is, even for people who use a car regularly, their car sits idle 95% of the day. So hourly rentals like Zipcar and Autoshare brilliantly maximize the use of an otherwise idle product.
^^if there is a niche, a company will succeed.
The T3 tramway line connects to five different subway lines (of 14!) and two suburban train lines. These interconnections take place at 9 of its 17 stops.
By contrast, Toronto doesn't have a 5-line subway backbone, never mind 14. Its suburban trains run occasionally, require separate payments, and are poorly integrated into the system. And none of its planned Transfer City LRT lines connect to the subway at more than two points, with those usually very far apart too boot.
One of the things that allows the T3 tramway to work well is that it helps fill and interconnect an intense transit mesh. For that reason, it is not a very good analogy for Toronto -- although learning from some of what it does right, such as maximizing connections to other modes in order to increase overall network interconnectivity, is the sort of thing you'd hope the TTC would consider learning from.
Thrilled to see that this event happened at City Hall. But I still wonder how many photos of sexy, sleek, successful cities it will take for Toronto and the TTC to get their collective head out of the sand and start implementing best practices from elsewhere. Those decades of being the only streetcar-friendly city on the continent have not done Toronto well now that everyone else has trams, streetcars, LRT, etc. and the TTC is struggling to catch up to the 1990s, never mind the 2010s. Get your act together, Toronto, and put these systems on the street asap, and damn the local NIMBY convenience stores with a 5 yr lease and a punishing self-interest. The momentum is building but let's see some results.
Yes, the TTC should constantly be building new infrastructure. We want to decrease car use, and the population keeps increasing. Let's stop sitting on our hands, fer crisssakes.
New immigrants to Toronto are often very accustomed to public transit. And people like me KNOW we can live without a car. Give people the choice if they really want to commute by car or TTC everyday. Right now for many location in Toronto, the only real choice is by car: after LRT expansion, people will still have the car choice open to them, but others will switch to the TTC.