
The day after the CBC announced its plans to release the finale of Canada's Next Great Prime Minister through BitTorrent, Bell Canada has moved quietly to throttle its services—including peer-to-peer filesharing—outraging both its customers and wholesale clients.
Among the affected is TekSavvy, a family-run Internet Service Provider based in Chatham with service areas in Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, and British Columbia. Describing its people-first approach as "revolutionary," Broadband Reports profiled TekSavvy as the top North American service provider in August of last year, trumping competitors in customer satisfaction. Last week, users noticed that BitTorrent downloads had been capped at 30k. Openly wondering if TekSavvy was behind the suddenly restricted bandwidth, users checked everything from router and torrent configurations to their network connections, while representatives of TekSavvy repeatedly affirmed that throttling bandwidth is not among the small provider's practices. "We are not throttling anything," writes TSI Rick, a TekSavvy representative on the discussion forum at Broadband Reports. "As far as I am aware [we] will never throttle anyone. We don't believe in it." R0CKY, another TSI rep, was somewhat more succinct: "We do not throttle."
Before long, users reasoned that Bell Canada, TekSavvy's wholesale peer-to-peer provider, was responsible for the sluggish transfer rates. "I work for an ISP," writes an anonymous user, "and I deal with Sympatico/Bell everyday." Describing a chat with a representative from Bell Nexxia, the user writes, "I asked for confirmation, she placed me on hold, and came back saying [that] yes, this is true." The anonymous informant describes speaking to another Nexxia rep, assumedly on the management end of things, and writes, "She wouldn't come right out to say [that] yes this is all true, but is not denying it." As further details were unavailable, the user was careful to keep undue speculation on the down-low. "I can’t confirm that any of this is true," ISP_Worker writes.
Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-Commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, was quick to address the issue on Monday. "Apparently Bell did not inform their wholesale partners that new network management practices were on the way," he writes, "leading to a meeting on Tuesday morning to address the issue."
Referring to incendiary exchanges on Broadband Reports and other forums, Geist continues. "Some posters have reported that the throttling has undermined their ability to download the CBC episode of Canada’s Next Great Prime Minister," he writes, "precisely the concern that many predicted when CBC announced its willingness to use BitTorrent for content distribution." The timing, no doubt, is telling: with an anticipated spike in traffic following the episode's broadcast, Bell’s furtive effort to dial down its clients’ bandwidth isn’t overly surprising.
While the monolithic telecom giant hasn't publicly 'fessed up regarding any past or present throttling, Bell Canada, following its meeting with TekSavvy, is "openly acknowledging that they are rolling out a full throttling process," R0CKY writes. "They plan to have things fully throttled by April 7th."
Just in time for Battlestar Galactica.
Photo by Yelnoc.

Newsstand: November 19, 2009
I assume this is also true for Yak.
God fucking dammit. I had TekSavvy for two months until my roommate moved out and took it with him, and I was just about to pick between them and Yak (looks like a $2 difference in price but otherwise the same service) and now this.
Is Bell even allowed to do this?
Well, crap. I was thinking of ditching Bell this summer and switching to TekSavvy.
Brutal.
Are there any alternatives to Bell's lines?
30k is simply unacceptable.
If this is true I will wash my hands of bell, land line and all.
If I was a service provider and my wholesaler began serving me a degraded product without my knowledge that caused problems for my customers and had the potential of harming the perception of my company, I'd be piiiiiiissed.
It doesn't quite sell me on Bell. I'm moving soon and need to figure out who's going to get my internet business. Do the web-savvy folk here have any suggestions as to who I should go to for my internet service? The place I'm in now already had service when I moved in. I've never had to look into who provides the best service at the best prices and any recommendations would be welcome.
I've been using TekSavvy for almost three years and have to say that it's been the most trouble-free ISP I've had since, well, ever.
Bell deserves to fry if they press ahead with this stupidity. What part of "high speed" don't they understand?
"If I was a service provider and my wholesaler began serving me a degraded product without my knowledge that caused problems for my customers and had the potential of harming the perception of my company..."
I'd start rounding up the lawyers.
In my new place I wanted an ISP that wasn't Bell or Rogers for specifically this purpose, and have no problems with Teksavvy. This is a real pisser for anyone on the service...mega UGH!
Bell has been charging me and my girlfriend monthly for Internet that we've never used (we signed up with Bell the day we moved in then switched it a couple of days later). The same amount keeps showing up on the bill, and we keep calling them and telling them we cancelled our service months ago, and even though our usage rates always show up as 0.00 or whatever, they keep doing it. Seriously sucks.
Yes, because god forbid that a customer actually use something they pay for.
Hey Greatcop,
i'm on year 5 of receiving a Bell bill with a balance of 0.00.
What's even funnier is that they sent it to collections!
Your only hope is to die, and even then, the bills will just pile up at the doorstep of where you used to live.
Taken from another forum:
"The problem is that Bell and Rogers own all the lines. So for a new company to come in a truly challenge them, they would have to spend billions on laying new lines all over the province/country. So in a way it is competition, but it is also infrastructure. If bell just rented out their lines, like they say they do, then everything would be fine."
"The problem is not simply lack of competition. The bigger problem is lack of concern by the government. If the government was actually concerned about this, there would be rules and regulations in place preventing Rogers and Bell from having monopolies, while helping stimulate competition. There would also be strict guidelines as to how or what ISPs can do with internet bandwith before it reaches the end consumer or wholesale 3rd-party ISPs.
People need to focus their efforts on making this issue for the government, forcing the government to act. This story needs to be all over the news, on Citytv, on CBC, on CTV, on Global. The word needs to be spread all over media outlets which would force the government to take notice and let "Joe Blow consumer" hear about what's going on."
So Bell promises certain download speeds in their marketing of their packages; then through throttling deliberately ensures that the promised download rate for specific applications can never be achieved-isn't this false advertising (at the very least?)
And I had just been looking at switching from Bell to Teksavvy (as Teksavvy will finally be offering landline phone service in the next few weeks). My choice just got easier... goodbye Bell.
sniderscion:
What you say is entirely accurate, but incomplete. Bell has been throttling their own customers since last October.
What they're starting to do now is actually throttling other people's customers, presumably because they're losing marketshare to companies that give a damn about providing good service. It is an anti-competitive load of bull.
To quote South Park's Cartman, Bell can "Suck my balls!" I refuse to have anything to do with these jerks since my telephone service went down for 10 days back in the mid-90s, and I lost clients as a result. No apologies from Ma Bell, no explanation, nothing. Funny how Bell rhymes with Hell.
On a good note, action is being taken to prevent and change the exact same thing in the U.S. Hopefully this will spark a large debate and help jump start some action here in this country too.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080327.wgtcomcasta0327/BNStory/Technology/home?cid=al_gam_mostview
get involved http://democraticmedia.ca