Tip Us Off
E-mail us with news tips, discoveries, story ideas, and anything else cool.
Advertisements

About Torontoist

Torontoist is a website about Toronto and everything that happens in it. More about us.

Editor-in-Chief: DAVID TOPPING

Publisher: GOTHAMIST

What's On
04/07–05/17 The December Man (CanStage)
05/07–18 Sexual Practices of the Japanese (Factory Theatre)
05/20 meshU (MaRS)
05/21 Toro Gets Its Groove Back (Online)
03/21–05/22 So Me's Portraits (Studio Gallery)
05/31 Idiotarod (Grange Park)
05/01–31 CONTACT (Everywhere)
06/04 Pug Awards Announced (Gardiner Gallery)
03/05–06/14 Evil Dead: The Musical (The Diesel Playhouse)
06/20–21 Star Trek: The Music (Roy Thomson Hall)
04/17–07/13 Out From Under (ROM)
08/15 Radiohead Concert (Molson Amphitheatre)
11/19/2007–08/18/2008 Photos from 69 Featured on OneStop (TTC Stations)

WEEKLY LISTINGS
TV

LEGEND
Art
Film & TV
Porn & Sex
Everything
Misc.
Recent Comments
The Tall Poppy Interview
Favourites

December 5, 2007

The Great Torontoist Challenge: Chocolate Box Edition

banner2_knittingskwerlgurl.jpg
Photo by knittingskwerlgurl from Flickr.

Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hannukah, Kwanzaa or Festivus, this is the time of year to give gifts and eat way too much food. Torontoist is no exception in enjoying these pastimes, and finds that giving a gift that is food is most often the best way to go. Giving a box of chocolates is a pretty sure way to make someone's day better, and is a firm favourite of primary school teachers, bosses, letter carriers, and garbage-collecting agents alike. Torontoist would like to note that we have carefully avoided any reference to idiot-savant Southerners and what their mamas might say about life.

The Contestants

  • Godiva. Established in Brussels in 1926, Godiva is now a subsidiary of the Campbell Soup Company. Godiva is available in most department stores, Chapters, and Indigo, and also has five boutiques in the GTA. Godiva enjoys a reputation that allows it to charge about twice as much per pound than many of its competitors. Lucky.
  • Pot of Gold. Though now owned by Hershey, Pot of Gold was originally introduced by Halifax-based Moirs in 1928. We're pretty sure Pot of Gold used to have a catchy jingle, but ironically we can no longer remember it.
  • Laura Secord. Named after a certain War of 1812 heroine, Laura Secord has 148 retail outlets across the country. It should be noted that none of these outlets sell cows willing to act as excuses for why you're walking 32 kilometres through the Niagara Escarpment. They do, however, sell assorted chocolates.
  • Le Chocolat. Only recently launched by Shoppers Drug Mart (the press release is from early November of this year), Le Chocolat purports to demonstrate that you don't have "to sacrifice quality for reasonable prices."
  • Chocolate Concepts. Born, apparently, out of a woman's basement here in Toronto, the Chocolate Concepts assorted box, Forever Cocoa, is available at a whole slew of places, including Pusateri's, Michael-Angelo's, and Bruno's.

Chocboxes.JPG

The Criteria

  • Visuals. Is it an attractive package? When opened, are the chocolates nice looking? Do they have a variety of finishes? Are they creatively done, and so on?
  • Mapability. If you deem choco-centric mystery as a hobby, then maybe maps are not for you. But if you're like Torontoist and prefer to avoid things like raisins or that weird strawberry goopy stuff, then maps are fairly key.
  • Showpiece. Most boxes have a centre piece that is the showpiece or calling card—what's the overall impression?
  • Flavour. Does it taste as described? Is it nice and fresh?
  • Chocolate Quality. Does it have a smooth consistency? Or is it waxy or brittle? Is it nice and shiny and obviously tempered?
  • Variety. Is it a Noah's Ark-style box with two of each flavour? Are there lots of different, creative flavours?

Additional Criteria

We have ranked these by cost without considering weight, as one of the contestants did not have it listed on the box. We leave the math to you!

Godiva ($34.99 per 283 g.); Chocolate Concepts ($16.99 per 12 pieces); Laura Secord ($14.10 per 200 g.); Le Chocolat ($9.99 for 150 g.); Pot Of Gold ($6.99 for 410 g.).

Results

  • Visuals. Godiva—22.5/30. With its festive season-appropriate stylings, Godiva won the heart of more than one judge. Upon further inspection—opening the box and looking inside—our judges agreed that the chocolates themselves were nice, with a variety of shapes and finishes.
  • Mapability. Laura Secord—28/30. Laura Secord won in the map category hands down. There were photos of the chocolates as well as descriptions, which are handy when there are dark and milk chocolates that are similar in appearance.
  • Showpiece. Godiva—25/30. The only non-solid showpiece, this foil wrapped confection was fresh and delicious.
  • Flavour. Godiva—26/30. Godiva offered up some real amazing flavours—raspberry creams, cinnamon, and many more. The flavours were unique compared to the other contestants, and the surrounding chocolate was top notch.
  • Chocolate Quality. Godiva—27.5/30. In some cases you do pay for quality. This appears to be one of them.
  • Variety. Laura Secord—24/30. Laura Secord had two of many of the flavours as well as a good variety. The panel noted that Laura Secord is expanding its horizons, with more dark chocolate choices as well as new flavours.

Conclusions

chocconcepts2.jpg

Chocolate Concepts' offering, Forever Cocoa, was the loser of our challenge. While it did come in second place on visuals and was Noah-style in having two of each flavour, it scored a zero in the mapability category due to its complete lack of one. Torontoist was then forced to blindly try different pieces in the hopes of finding one that we enjoyed. What we did find was that each selection was a solid, which means serious limitations in variety. It was also noted, in an attempt to share a piece between two judges, that these chocolates are really hard to split or bite into. Our try at cutting one sample in two resulted in chocolate flying everywhere and the judges scurrying to keep it from the dog.

PotofGold2.jpg

We're pretty sure we gave a box of Pot of Gold to at least one teacher in our varied yet glorious grade school career. If we could turn back time we may have chosen differently. The crux of the matter is such—Pot of Gold isn't so much a box of chocolates as it is a box of candy. This stuff is so sweet and has a made-by-giant-Willy-Wonka-robots quality to it that our judging panel could not agree with. A large number of the chocolates looked the same, and though the map was helpful, it was a close call on some of our selections. On a whole it is what it is—less expensive, chock-full of sugar, and henceforth perfect for children the world over. Blink.

LeChocolat2.jpg

Smack dab in the middle is Shoppers Drug Mart's Le Chocolat. While Torontoist does raise its eyebrows at the rather obvious attempt at making this item seem a bit more chichi with a French appellation, we do have to agree that these chocolates were yummy. The window in the lid of the packaging suggested a hint of cheapness to some, while others found it helpful to see the wares prior to purchase. The chocolate was of good quality and the flavours were delicious, however the lack of variety—especially when one considers the cost—was a downside. Certainly these chocolates were larger than the other contestants', but sometimes you'd rather sample a couple different flavours rather than filling up on one.

LauraSecord2.jpg

In second place was Laura Secord's Assorted Miniatures. The visual presentation for this contestant was clean, simple and classic. Their showpiece, the iconic cameo, was maybe not super exciting to taste, but it had an elegant look and did the trick of centering the collection. As stated above, Laura Secord won for the best of the maps. You will be hard-pressed to mess up your selection and the fruits of your labour—the labour being strenuous map reading—will be delicious. Though Laura Secord may not have the highest, most pure, sourced from a small village in Belgium populated only by cocoa-refining Oompa Loompas-type of chocolate, it was still not waxy or too sweet. It was good quality and the flavours were delicious and varied, if at times a bit on the safe side. Torontoist would not hesitate to bring a box of these wee yummies to a dinner party or holiday kegger as a delightful hostess gift.

Godiva2.jpg

The winner, by a narrow margin of under two percent, is Godiva. Of our contestants, Godiva most definitely had the highest quality of chocolate. The flavours on offer were delicious and at times quite creative compared to what was available in the other boxes. There were two downsides to Godiva as a contestant—the cost and the map. The cost requires no explanation; the map, on the other hand, does. The map itself, in terms of the graphics and explanations, was clear. The issue arose when our panel realized that Godiva doesn't only provide a list of chocolates residing in the current box. Instead they provide a list of every bloody chocolate they make. And so, friends, Torontoist found itself taking a good time longer to make a selection. You may want that Pecan Caramel Cluster, but that doesn't mean it will be there, and to be honest, that just isn't cool. They may have great flavours and top-quality chocolate on offer, but don't tease the consumer! That's just plain rude. Rant aside, Godiva does know how to make a superb chocolate and of our contestants they had the best to offer. The way that Godiva has gotten around the map issue is simple—every single chocolate in that box was not only good, it was fan-fucking-tastic. Shrug. Makes one forget about the value of the reading material that came with it.

Photos of our contestants by John Reitsma.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: Torontoist Continues Below!

Comments (12)

Once again the "Great Torontoist whatever" meme fails to be either great, or or have much to do with Toronto.

I have one question for you: where the heck is Soma's box of chocolate. Where is it? It's the best chocolate shop in the city. Why is it not here?

I understand you are cheap/lazy/without alternate modes of transportation, but then maybe you should leave this to people who actually care/have money/own a car.

It really would have been nice to see a few more of Toronto's independent chocolate makers featured here, instead of a bunch of selections from the mall, that pretty much anyone with a mouth is already familiar with (gee, Pot of Gold is filled with sugar? I was unaware).

 

Why no local chocolate shoppes?

May I suggest that in the future you give different categories different weightings? I just saying that the map isn't equally as important as the quality of the chocolate. Maybe you could rate the map out of 10 or something.

 

I understand you are cheap/lazy/without alternate modes of transportation, but then maybe you should leave this to people who actually care/have money/own a car.

Wow. That's really harsh for something that's supposed to be a fun, light-hearted feature.

Cheap? She gets paid very little for writing the article and buys the food herself. I'd hardly call that cheap. Lazy? That's just rude. And suggesting someone should have a car in order to write about food is just ridiculous, especially in Toronto. I used to be a food critic and I certainly don't own a car.

 

Jesus Christ, Beth, we expect comments like that from matty, but from a former contributor?

Not that you shouldn't be critical. We love criticism. You know we do. You make good points. But why be such an asshole when making them?

And $35 isn't enough to spend on a box of chocolates? Maybe you're not such a cheap date after all.

 

wow. i just got into work and had a look to see if i got any comments. *jackpot*

beth—on top of the fact that you have no bloody clue who i am and have indeed been beyond rude, i'd like to point out the following:

1) i actually don't get paid at all by torontoist as i don't post enough. the reason i don't post enough is because it's too expensive. some challenges have set me back over $100. see the vicious circle here? either way—i have a "feeling" that soma doesn't cost $4.00.

2) i do own a car. however, i have another job (cause i have to pay bills and can’t spend all my money on satisfying your needs by going to soma) and i also have other responsibilities outside of writing these posts. so it isn't that i don't think of soma or other fantastic places in toronto. rather, i have to consider the money (as per above) and i also have to organise to get a panel together (which can be difficult when people have jobs, kids, etc.), then i have to go and get all the contestants. if you would like to perhaps look at my budget and schedule and come up with some suggestions i'm sure myself and my editors would be more than pleased to consider them.

i think it speaks volumes that you feel a need to make personal attacks against people you don't know over what is intended to be a light hearted post about boxes of chocolates that could be given as gifts. in the end any good points you've made are totally lost.

 

I think that all five boxes of chocolates are probably the five brands most likely to be bought or consumed over the holidays, so it's pretty relevant.

"We all know where the rainbow goeeeeesss...we are told it's a Pot of Gooold!"

 

For one I would like to suggest that everyone here is focussing too little on the fact that Pot of Gold is absolutely marvelous and yet got the el shafto horriblo.

Where are the bonus points for it being the subject of a fabulous Shawn Majumder bit? There's your Toronto (er... Mississauga) connection, baby!

 

"we all know where the rainbow goes...we are told it's a pot of gold..."

 

Still though, you could have at least TRIED to represent or at least mention a few local or at least Canadian companies.

It wouldn't have been too hard to get Purdy's in there, would it?

 

who knew a fun little column would spark such anger and malice from people. is chocolate that important to you beth, that you feel the need to put others down? i, among many others, enjoy this column and am happy others are doing the leg work of researching and testing the best foods. much appreciated julie!! and beth, if you cared so much, have so much money and own a car...why don't you do something more productive with your time than whine and complain.

 

They are not personal attacks, in any way. They are simply based on previous comments made in previous "great Torontoist challenges" as to why the choices made were not more interesting and more local.

Julie pretty much just reinforces what I said by making a wealth of excuses rather than give me a legitimate reason as to why the choices were so lame.

My comments were, perhaps, sarcastic (and admittedly sarcasm occasionally has a hard time distinguishing itself from meanness over the internet).

I'm sorry if I take food seriously, and would love to see it taken seriously on my favorite Toronto based blog.

Some of us (and I'm thinking it's more than just me, as these things seem to get great quantities of comments, many of them along the lines of "why would you make those choices?") would like these challenges to be a little more thorough.

Indeed, Ben seems to agree with me.

 

dear beth,

who pee'd in your cheerios...?

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.