April 8, 2007
Give Yourself Over to Absolute Canstage
Canstage's heavily-hyped season-ending production of The Rocky Horror Show has finally opened at the Bluma. Last season, they finished things off with "revolutionary" 60s musical Hair, and this year they have opted for one of the 70s' key "revolutionary" musicals. Fortunately for the audiences, Rocky is an infinitely superior show to Hair in almost every way: the songs are catchier, the characters more memorable, the plot more engaging and Canstage's production, helmed by Ted Dyskstra (co-creator of 2 Pianos, 4 Hands and Toronto's Hedwig), is significantly more finessed.
Rocky Horror is not the easiest musical to pull off. The movie is so iconic, the fans so hardcore and the film performances by Tim Curry, Barry Bostwick and Susan Sarandon so indelible that an unfocused production is bound to get dissed. And then there's the question of whether you simply try to recreate the movie on stage, which will always be disappointing, or whether you go in a completely different direction and run the risk of missing the point entirely. The Canstage production balances somwhere between these two concepts and the result is, for the most part, successful.
We still get the familiar story: Denton High squares Brad and Janet get stuck with a flat on their way to visit Dr. Scott and wind up at a mysterious castle owned by Frank-n-Furter, a so-called "sweet transvestite" and begin an adventure of sexual self-discovery and general silliness. Dykstra cleverly keeps the "science fiction double-feature" feel intact, making Frank's lair resemble an abandoned grindhouse (complete with popcorn machine). This works less well during the actual song "Science Fiction Double-Feature," which is sung over a seriously unimpressive piece of AV that looks like it would take about a half hour with Google Image and Power Point to assemble. On the other end of the AV spectrum, all of the Narrator's dialogue is delivered through pre-recorded projected images of John Neville, which the audience ate with a spoon.
There are some great performances here - Adam Brazier's Frank is atypically butch; a muscle man in heels who wants another version of himself when he creates Rocky, who Gerrad Everard portrays as a Fabio-esque romance novel coverhunk. And Ron Pederson does a great job at finding and following Brad's journey from straight-laced straight boy to fabulous drag queen. The biggest problem with the show is the fact that the ensemble consists of only four people, which is not enough for any musical, especially one being performed in the giant Bluma. "The Time Warp" should be a show-stopper, but the tiny chorus just seemed to get lost within the masses of empty space.
Canstage definitely know who its audience is with this production. Most of the people in the audience are going to be 50+ subscribers, not the rebellious youth, so the production is kept relatively tame. Not the most "revolutionary" take on Rocky, Canstage's production seems at times less "erotic nightmare" and more Ross Petty Christmas panto. Still, it's an entertaining show and probably enough to satisfy any serious Rocky-fan. It's definitely also a show they could safely bring their parents to.


"...a seriously unimpressive piece of AV that looks like it would take about a half hour with Google Image and Power Point to assemble"
Oh, man, don't tell me they just project the posters for the films mentioned in the song.
"...the ensemble consists of only four people..."
"...less 'erotic nightmare' and more Ross Petty Christmas panto."
That's a serious disappointment.
On the other hand, the Hart House production last year blew me away with how shockingly good it was. I remember Ouzounian (whose daughter was essentially nude in that production) writing in the Star that Bragg and Dykstra went to Hart House to check out the show. It's too bad they seem to have overlooked so many of the things that made it great.
"Oh, man, don't tell me they just project the posters for the films mentioned in the song."
You got it. I found that part seriously cheesy. The production over all actually had a lot of good points, Ross Petty moments aside. Having seen both productions, I personally preferred this one to the Hart House version in most aspects, although the tiny ensemble did disappoint. But neither version come close to the 2000 Broadway revival with Dick Cavett, Joan Jet and Daphne Rubin-Vega.
I can't stand to see Hair compared to the Rocky Horror show in such a shallowly dismissive way, based only on CanStage's productions of each.
Hair? Really? Canstage's production aside, that show has just not aged well. It barely has characters or a plot, its political message is trite at best and there are really only a couple of songs in it worth remembering. Richard O'Brien may not be Shakespeare, but Rocky Horror has a lot more going on as a text that Hair ever did.
I can see her bum... which I suppose makes it more risqué than the movie.
That's odd...I was going to wear the exact same thing to work today!
Oh wow. Out of all the pictures to use, you choose the one that gives it away... That was the best part of science fiction the first time i saw it. "Lalala, she's singing, lala, sexy phantoms singin'," and then BAM! "OMG I see her butt!"
Surprise? Not anymore.
Though overall I agree with what the article has said... I didn't get to see the Hart House version (sad, I know) but friends who went said both were very close in awesomeness. Most lean towards canstage, but a few towards the other.
In any case, I think the Phantoms were the most interesting part of the show, and I think more of them could have helped... Or just another tier of ensemble.