<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Torontoist &#187; polysulfide</title>
	<link>http://torontoist.com</link>
	<description>Torontoist is about Toronto and everything that happens in it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 03:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Vintage Toronto Ads: Is That Landmark Sealed with Polysulfide?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="100" height="100" src="http://torontoist.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/20090804polysulfide1-100x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" title="" /><p class="rss_dek">Source: Canadian Architect, January 1985 These three local towers were&#8230; While searching for information regarding Morton Thiokol and polysulfides that didn&#8217;t involve deep scientific analysis of the chemical composition of the sealant used in these Toronto landmarks, we ran into an interesting tidbit from the current manufacturer: the sealant should have a &#8220;twenty-year service life [...]</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://torontoist.com/2009/08/vintage_toronto_ads_is_that_landmark_sealed_with_p/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vintage_toronto_ads_is_that_landmark_sealed_with_p</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

