<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Torontoist &#187; grammar</title>
	<link>http://torontoist.com</link>
	<description>Torontoist is about Toronto and everything that happens in it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>S.T.O.P.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo by PDPhotography from the Torontoist Flickr Pool. Earlier this month, the Globe ran a piece on Toronto, interviewing locals about the parts of town they enjoy most. The most interesting thing about the article, however, was the title: I love T.O. Of all short forms for the city, &#8220;T.O.&#8221; is the worst, and when [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://torontoist.com/2009/01/stop/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stop</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Joe Clark&#8217;s Got a Brand New Book</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo of the New Canadian Library edition of Ethel Wilson&#8217;s Swamp Angel by David Topping. Note spelling of &#8220;colors.&#8221; You probably write &#8220;honour&#8221; and &#8220;analyze.&#8221; Quite possibly you write &#8220;cozy&#8221; and &#8220;axe.&#8221; But do you write &#8220;jewellery&#8221; or &#8220;jewelry&#8221;? &#8220;Focused&#8221; or &#8220;focussed&#8221;? To guide you through the mangrove swamp that is Canadian spelling, up pops [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://torontoist.com/2008/10/joe_clark_organizing_our_marvellous_neighbours/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=joe_clark_organizing_our_marvellous_neighbours</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Radical Agendas</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="100" height="100" src="http://torontoist.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grammer_29Sep081-100x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" title="" /><p class="rss_dek">Behind the scenes, we at Torontoist are known to pedantically and tediously debate the use of em dashes—like these—and the proper form of an ellipsis (technically, &#8220;…&#8221; is more correct than &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; See? Tedious!). While we&#8217;re fans of splitting grammatical hairs and clearly make our own share of errors from time to time, it&#8217;s hardly [...]</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://torontoist.com/2008/09/radical_agendas/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=radical_agendas</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Baby, You Can Steal My Car?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="100" height="100" src="http://torontoist.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/manrobscarwithbaby1-100x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" title="" /><p class="rss_dek">Good newspaper headlines are concise, descriptive, clear, and––occasionally, just occasionally––nothing short of genius. And then there&#8217;s &#8220;Man who stole car with baby faces more charges.&#8221; Originally published yesterday on The Star&#8216;s website without a clarifying subheadline, the wonderfully ambiguous title evokes at least three possible scenarios when left by itself: 1. The man and baby [...]</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://torontoist.com/2008/01/baby_you_can_steal_my_car/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=baby_you_can_steal_my_car</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

