Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on April 17, 2014
Partly Cloudy
10°/4°
It is forcast to be Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on April 18, 2014
Rain
10°/2°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on April 19, 2014
Partly Cloudy
14°/4°

28 Comments

news

MGM Unveils Its Vision for a Casino Complex at Exhibition Place

10,000 jobs, three million square feet, and a lot of unanswered questions.

mgm casino proposal exhibition place 1

The most important thing to recognize about the splashy proposal for a casino complex MGM showed off today is that it isn’t actually a plan—it’s a concept. There are drawings, but they are meant to illustrate ideas rather than concrete designs. Even if Toronto agrees to host a casino, and even if the OLG awards the contract to MGM, there is no guarantee that the end result will look like the renderings above. Nor, in fairness, was MGM pretending otherwise: all the representatives who addressed media this morning were very clear on this fact. (“This isn’t a proposal,” cautioned MGM vice president Alan Feldman. “This is a tool for having a discussion.”)

This is not MGM’s fault, but a constraint imposed by the process is currently underway. Toronto City Council can only green light the existence of a casino in Toronto—they can accept or reject that basic proposition. Everything that comes after will be determined by the OLG. On the one hand, the OLG has said they won’t build in any city that rejects a casino. On the other, the cities across Ontario that are making that choice right now have no say in any of the particulars involved. Council can’t, for instance, approve this MGM proposal specifically, or even approve a casino for Exhibition Place (as opposed to any other location) specifically. It’s only if council agrees to host a casino—which they’ll decide at a meeting to be held in April—that the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) will issue a formal Request for Proposals. And it’s only once those proposals come in that we’ll have a real sense of the location, form, and scope a casino complex might have.

In the meantime all anyone can do is produce their best guesses and biggest hopes. Today was MGM’s turn.

MGM’s hopes are certainly great. Their development would be about three million square feet. Eight per cent of that area, or 240,000 square feet, would be allocated to the casino itself. They’d also build a 1,200-room hotel, a shopping centre, about ten restaurants, and an 800-900 seat performance space that would serve as a permanent Toronto base for Cirque du Soleil. They would eliminate the 3,500 surface parking spots currently on the site, and build a 10,000 spot underground parking facility. Several new pedestrian bridges would be added to span Lakeshore Boulevard, and though it’s not in the renderings, a physical model of the site (which media was not allowed to photograph) called for a new streetcar spur that would drop people off close by.

Some key questions that emerged from their presentation:

Transportation and traffic

MGM has a traffic study underway, but it is not yet complete or publicly available. They anticipate a 75/25 per cent split in terms of how people access the casino complex: three quarters of visitors, they believe, will come by car, and a quarter by public transit. Projections for the number of visitors they anticipate each day are not currently available, however.

MGM representatives told us that they have had “very preliminary” conversations with the TTC about their streetcar expansion idea, but TTC CEO Andy Byford told us (via spokesperson Brad Ross) that he hasn’t seen a plan, and the TTC will not be commenting on any of these proposals right now. And while MGM says that building the new track would be part of their investment in the site—that is, they’d foot the bill—this leaves unanswered questions about service levels, operating costs, and the impact on riders who use the streetcar to get in and out of downtown. It also isn’t MGM’s call. Though they made the case for enhanced TTC and GO service today, that will be up to the agencies themselves.

Mike Layton (Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina) represents the area that includes Exhibition Place, and the impact of a casino complex on traffic is one of his biggest concerns. He told reporters today that the new complex would create “5,000 car trips an hour on Lakeshore and on the Gardiner” and is extremely worried about the added pressure this will put on both the roads and TTC service.


The CNE

MGM went to great lengths today to try to reassure anyone who might be worried about the impact a casino complex would have on The Ex, emphasizing that their plan included a large amount of space for the midway—that it would be even better, in fact, since it was closer to the waterfront and the landscaping would improve substantially. They are also promising to cover the losses The Ex would suffer because its own casino would be displaced by the new complex, for a period of 10 years.

As several reporters pointed out, however, the visitor experience at The Ex, especially for families with children, will be substantially different, especially given the greater distance between the midway and the permanent buildings. More broadly, there’s a question about whether families will be less likely to come to The Ex if it’s located by a major casino complex, as opposed to the small, homespun temporary casino that is currently part of The Ex. CNE president Brian Ashton has so far opposed any suggestion that The Ex could successfully co-exist with a casino complex.


Liberty Village

Today’s proposal included a pedestrian connection to the neighbouring Liberty Village, which Feldman touted as an opportunity rather than a threat. MGM projects their complex will create 10,000 full-time jobs; those are people who might frequent Liberty Village shops and bars, and live in its condos, he suggested.

Layton, the Liberty Village BIA, and a major developer in the area are not persuaded: all are opposed to a casino complex at Exhibition Place on the grounds that it will disrupt life for residents and businesses in the area. Worries range from traffic congestion, to the economic impact on local shops and restaurants of having a much flashier venue close by, to a potential spike in crime.


What’s Next

City staff from many departments have been working together to produce a full report on the potential impact of a casino complex in Toronto. That report is expected to be released next week, and will be discussed by city council’s executive committee on March 20. The committee is composed of Mayor Rob Ford’s strongest allies; Ford is strongly in favour of a casino and it is widely anticipated that the executive committee will endorse a casino complex—though, again, that will be for a casino in principle, not for any particular location, developer, or proposal. If they do support a casino then a full city-council debate will take place, likely in early April, to make a final decision on the matter.



Comments

  • Mathew

    “More broadly, there’s a question about whether families will be less likely to come to The Ex if it’s located by a casino.”

    So I’m slightly confused by this statement: isn’t it already located by a casino, albeit a temporary one?

    • HamutalDotan

      It is, but nothing like the scope of what’s envisioned here. Part of what I mean by we can’t predict is that we can’t predict what street life outside the casino, when it is much larger, will be like, and how the atmosphere in the area will change.

      I will amend to “casino complex” though, as you’re right that the point isn’t quite clear.

      • Mathew

        Hmm, I agree that we can’t predict that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=513128009 Gordon Yarley

    Either way we’re ending up with some interesting ideas.

  • LeslieCz

    “OLG” is what?

    • HamutalDotan

      The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation – the provincial agency that regulates casinos and lotteries. (I’ve just added the full name of the agency in the article.)

  • rouletteless in T.O.

    A casino of 240,000sq ft for Exhibition Place would be larger than the MGM casino in Las Vegas at 155,000sq ft and Ballys in Atlantic City T 150,000sq ft.

    Dont be surprised if they build a temporary casino and dither away or renege on building the rest, unless they get tax breaks, lease deals, and reduction of gaming tax

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=28110435 Kate Roberts

    What about parking? this Casino looks like it’s basically on top of the exiting parking lot.

    Some of the proposals say that they’ll need a 10,000 spot lot at least – and that’s just for the casino – where are people going to park who are going to the CNE, Molson Amphitheatre, Ricoh Centre, Medieval Times, BMO field….?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=28110435 Kate Roberts

      Also it looks like the other two parking lots would be where the CNE sets up if the casino took their usual spot – so there would be no parking at all over the summer – a.k.a BUSIEST TIME FOR THIS AREA

      • HamutalDotan

        As per the article: the plan is to build a 10,000 spot underground parking facility.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=28110435 Kate Roberts

          Ah, thanks for some reason I didn’t catch that part :)

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    Thanks MGM; I’ve carefully considered your proposal but have decided it just isn’t right for this location.

    • dsmithhfx

      I would support them building it in Bora Bora.

  • http://twitter.com/DarksydeCAD William

    It does seem a little over sized, Vegas has changed to be come more of a family destination. The Falls Casino has a water park for kids right on top of it’s parking garage. Families and casinos are not mutually exclusive, if done right.
    Was there anything mentioned about the Ontairo Place lands?

    • VincentClement

      No, the family destination concept was a dud. Vegas is going back to being an adult-themed destination.

  • OgtheDIm

    So much for expanding BMO.

  • dere

    no! n! no! the rich will get richer while the poor only poorer.. leave our valuable land alone and use it for betterment of social life… the proposal is damn ugly anyway.. -10 for effort MGM

  • torontothegreat

    Would it be illegal for council to demand that MGM funds a transit plan for the city if they want to build this?

    • VincentClement

      It’s a provincial project, so all Council can do is request things. It will be up to OLG to decide what is and is not funded. The only leverage that the City has is that the Ex is municipally-owned. But the Province can ‘relocate’ the complex to Ontario Place or simply expropriate the land from the City.

      • torontothegreat

        Thanks for the answer.

        • HamutalDotan

          There’s actually some dispute about this – the City solicitor is saying that council could attach conditions, but it’s not yet clear to me which legislation would give council the authority to do so. Trying to find out more.

          • torontothegreat

            I just really wonder if like-minded people (like us, here) would be more receptive of this idea if MGM agreed to pay for an entire transit plan such as Transit City or a new subway line? I’m personally not sure how I feel about it, but I do feel like it would soften the blow.

  • torontothegreat

    Liberty Village is such a non-issue IMHO. Liberty “village” (I use that term VERY loosely) is hardly that. Don’t get me wrong, it USED to be like that — 10 years ago. If anything, it will only only hurry along the impending result.

  • http://www.facebook.com/paullloydjohnson Paul Lloyd Johnson

    I know that a lot of people will not like me saying this for various reasons, but I actually really like these concept drawings. I like that the car parks have been moved underground and I really like how they have organised the space better. The whole site seems to be much more focused on pedestrian access, rather than dedicated to parking.

    Wether you approve of the casino or not, the idea of redeveloping exhibition place like this has to be a little interesting. It engages more with the waterfront and gets rid of the sea of cars.

    • VincentClement

      Agreed. That part of the Exhibition needs a major overhaul. It’s silly that a historical building is in the middle of a parking lot.

  • sasha

    I’m really not interested in seeing a massive casino complex here but I have a feeling we’ll be bulldozed into one just the same. Seems to me a few will benefit greatly here- I’m already seeing ads to this end including pics of a certain tv chef.

  • julieandrew

    Wow!!Really great!!
    http://www.casino4girls.com

  • lovetoronto

    The City and MGM’s renderings have intentionally omitted the fact that an HK Hotel will be built adjacent to the Allstream Centre on the corner of Newfoundland Drive and Lakeshore Blvd. The HK Hotel was approved by City Council last year.