Today Thu Fri
It is forecast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on August 20, 2014
It is forecast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on August 21, 2014
Chance of a Thunderstorm
It is forecast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on August 22, 2014
Mostly Cloudy



Judge Punishes Man for Blocking Bike Lane Removal By Allowing Him to Volunteer With Cycle Toronto

Tomislav Svoboda won't face further consequences if he completes 50 community service hours in the next two months.

Dr. Tomislav Svoboda (he's the one in the black blazer) poses with family and friends at the College Park provinclal court yesterday.

When Dr. Tomislav Svoboda used his body to block the removal of the Jarvis bike lanes last November, he knew his act of civil disobedience would result in criminal charges. Yesterday afternoon, a judge agreed to drop those charges—namely, mischief and obstructing a peace officer—if Svoboda completes 50 hours of community service and writes a letter explaining his actions to the court within two months. Appropriately, Svoboda has chosen to do his community service hours with Cycle Toronto, a local bike advocacy group.

The agreement, formally known as “direct accountability,” means that for the next two years, the Toronto physician will be on record as having gone through a court diversion program. As long as he stays out of trouble during that time, he’ll walk away with no further record.

About two dozen of Svoboda’s supporters, including family, friends, and cycling advocates, showed up. They were too numerous to fit into the modest courtroom. To the astonishment of the crowd, the judge exchanged barely two sentences with Svoboda’s lawyer, Peter Rosenthal, before the deal was reached. His bewildered entourage shuffled loudly out of the courtroom, as court security officers scolded them.

In a brief statement released yesterday, Svoboda remarked that although his decision to block the lane was an easy one for him, it wasn’t entirely comfortable. “It was also a difficult feeling to be at odds with the law even in an unjust system and feeling completely justified in action,” he said. He acknowledged his allies, many of them unknown to him before his ordeal, “who showered me with love and support.”

Health care professionals and active transportation advocates have seized on Svoboda’s arrest to condemn the removal of the Jarvis lanes and call on city council to speed up the implementation of bike thoroughfares across the city.

Jared Kolb, Cycle Toronto’s director, told us in an e-mail that he’s excited that Tomislav has chosen to serve out his sentence with the organization. “We plan to explore some exciting new directions for the organization,” said Kolb.

Photo by Desmond Cole/Torontoist.


  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    Why did the court officers scold the group? Do they make a habit of scolding people who show up to watch court proceedings?

    • James D Paterson

      Probably because, according to the article, they “shuffled loudly.” You’re not supposed to be loud in a court of law, despite what you may see on Judge Judy.

    • dsmithhfx

      You have to keep bikers on a short chain or, next thing you know, there’s a turf war.

    • keithalent5000

      The answer to the second question is yes.

  • Mike Wntrz

    Bike lane removal on Jarvis was dumb, but it was decided by an elected council. “Unjust” just can’t be anything you don’t like… and it’s especially rich when the judge lets you off so lightly.

    • SRC

      It was voted in council without consultation, shame on them.

      I could accept the removal if due process was followed, it was not, it was a spiteful move on Fords part to have them removed. There was no need or advantage to removing them.

      For all of Fords the taxpayers told me rhetoric he was able to ignore thousands of those taxpayers in favour of a single suburban Councillor.

      • James D Paterson

        I wouldn’t say in favour of a “single” councillor. For the thousands of those people who didn’t want them removed, there was an equal, if not greater, amount of people who wanted them gone.

      • Mike Wntrz

        They are councillors elected to represent their wards, and not everything in council requires consultation. “Unjust”? Really?

        But hey, break the law, bring your whole family down to the court house and release a statement that makes you sound like the second coming of Gandhi…

        • Mike F.

          It isn’t clear just who ought to speak for what happens on Jarvis, whether that should be local residents, car commuters, bike commuters, or the whole city. One that is certain: bikes are more vulnerable than cars on a street and thus require infrastructure to protect them. If the rule of the majority is crushing the vulnerable, that’s simply not democratic and why we have courts.

          • Mike Wntrz

            It is clear: council is responsible for civic infrastructure. People are elected to lead, not subject every last measure to a micro-vote. “Crushing the vulnerable” is just more hyperbole — we’re talking about a single bike lane.