Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2013
Thunderstorm
24°/16°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2013
Chance of Rain
19°/6°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Chance of Rain
14°/6°

24 Comments

news

Toronto’s Winter of 2040 Should Be a Nice One

Warmer winters, warmer summers, more extreme storms: a detailed study just released by the City forecasts Toronto’s weather patterns in the 2040s.

In 30 years, this could be a thing of the past. {a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lopoulin/5357433092/"}louise@toronto1{/a}, from the {a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/torontoist/pool/"}Torontoist Flickr Pool{/a}.

As Torontonians prepare for another season of slogging through snow drifts and stumbling through 5 p.m. darkness, an expert analysis of Toronto’s future weather patterns holds out some hope for more pleasant days ahead. By 2040, according to a study commissioned by the City, global climate change will ensure that we have something like 26 fewer days with snowfall each year, while Toronto’s average winter temperature will be about 5.7 degrees higher.


The study, put together by SENES Consultants Ltd. in cooperation with the Toronto Environment Office, is meant to give City officials some idea of what the local climate will be like in 30 years so they can better plan long-term maintenance of Toronto’s infrastructure. A report on the study’s findings goes before the City’s Parks and Environment Committee on November 9.

SENES used different climate modelling techniques to build a picture of Toronto’s expected weather patterns over the span of time between the years 2040 and 2049. The less-snow-in-winter prediction is one of the more cheerful ones. Less exciting is the study’s summertime prediction: namely, that Toronto will see an average 3.8 degree increase in warm-weather temperature. That would mean more sweltering days, especially for anyone who doesn’t have air conditioning. (That is, unless by 2040 we’re all walking around inside clouds of nanomachines that fan us with microscopic palm fronds.)

Also not so great: though the study predicts a slight decrease in the number of storms that will occur in Toronto each year, it also predicts an uptick in occurrences of very intense storms. Right now, according to SENES, Toronto expects a maximum of 66 millimetres of rainfall in any one day. For 2040, the study pegs that figure at 166 millimetres.

Some other predictions from the report:

  • We will have 26 fewer snow days per year, 9 fewer in December.
  • There will be more rain and less snow in winter; overall precipitation will increase slightly.
  • The average annual temperatures will increase by 4.4 degrees.
  • Average wind speeds will stay the same, but maximum wind speeds will go down, as will occurrences of wind chill.
  • Our maximum humidex will go from 48 to 57 degrees.
  • The average number of annual heat waves (more than 3 consecutive days of temperatures greater than 32 degrees) is expected to increase from 0.57 to 5.

Read the full study here.

CORRECTION: November 2, 2012, 10:50 AM This post originally misspelled the name of the consulting company that led the described study. It’s SENES Consultants Ltd., not SENSES Consultants Ltd.

Comments

  • Shar

    Global Warming anyone?!?!

    • Bill

      The data is obviously based on global warming predictions… logic fail.

      • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.fabb Matthew Fabb

        Yes, obviously using science & research is clearly a logic fail, when they should just have gotten an astrologist to look into a crystal ball and predict the future weather.

        • Anonymous

          Astrologists don’t predict weather. Meteorologists do. #fail.

  • Bill

    Hard to believe we could get LESS snow than the last few years,

    • CaligulaJones

      Unfortunately, people’s memories tend to twist things. The 70s were incredibly snowy, for instance. Most people reading this over the age of 40 will remember high snowbanks, snow days, white Christmases, etc. And obviously the last few years are easier to remember. And, of course, Toronto being the center of the universe, can’t comprehend that how a blocking low brought us a mild winter while record snow falls hit most other places.

      All my data comes from here:

      http://preview.tinyurl.com/bczf9by

      Total Snow total snow for Decembers

      40s
      253.9

      50s
      267.5

      60s
      260.1

      70s
      427.0

      80s
      233.3

      90s
      201.3

      00s
      314.0

      10s
      15.2

      I fail to see a pattern…

  • Steve Easterbrook

    The most important line in the whole article is this one, near the end: “Our maximum humidex will go from 48 to 57 degrees.”

    Forget the stuff about warmer winters. A humidex at 57 degrees will kill thousands of people. In case you’ve never looked carefully at humidex, Environment Canada usefully points out that a humidex of 40-45 means “Great discomfort; avoid exertion”; above 45 it means “Dangerous; Heat stroke possible”.

    At our current max of 48, it means in the worst case, our hottest summer days are slightly dangerous for the most vulnerable of the population. At 57, it’s dangerous for everyone, and a sure killer of the elderly and the very young.

    See Environment Canada’s guide:
    http://www.ec.gc.ca/meteo-weather/default.asp?lang=En&n=86C0425B-1#hhs

    • http://twitter.com/candleflame3 PlantinMoretus

      Excellent point. Time to build underground cool rooms.

  • Bob

    If this was written by a scientist they would have included an error range.

  • Ksenia

    Not a fan of how this article refers to global warming as “more pleasant days ahead.” Are you kidding me? No. No no no no no.

  • Anonymous

    What climate sensitivity estimate is this based on? Alarmists say anywhere between 2-6º (or more) per doubling of CO2… actual observations thus far say more like 1º. Though our area is expected to see more warmth than the global average.

    • https://paul.kishimoto.name/ Paul Kishimoto

      [citations needed]

      • Anonymous

        +30% CO2 since pre-industrial times, with observed anthropogenic temperature increase of about half a degree (assuming it wasn’t natural.)
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen#Climate_sensitivity

        Lubos has a handy table of the wide range of estimates:
        http://motls.blogspot.ca/2012/10/climate-sensitivities-in-various-papers.html?m=1

        On another topic… gauging by the chart in this article above, it doesn’t look like wind power was such a good idea for yet another reason.

        • http://twitter.com/candleflame3 PlantinMoretus

          Unlike pre-industrial times, we now have positive feedback loops, which mean the Earth will warm up faster. An example of a positive feedback loop is the melting of Arctic ice, which will release gas (methane I think), and so on.
          Anyway, your sources are wikipedia and somebody’s blog – not exactly reliable. Try James Hansen.

          • Anonymous

            There’s a wide range of sensitivity estimates, some of which are closer to actual observations than others. I’m just wondering what number they chose for the study. Are you saying the table on Lubos’ site has typos in it?

          • https://paul.kishimoto.name/ Paul Kishimoto

            The models used and their properties are detailed in “Attachment 2 – Part 1 – Toronto’s Future Weather and Climate Driver Study Volume 1″ at the link in the article. It took me about ten seconds to find them by searching the PDF. But you’re not really curious about any number, you’re trying to cast doubt on science. I’m not sure why; maybe it makes you feel “dissident”. In science, the word used for dissidence without evidence is “wrong”.

            Your claim about regional impacts (the report also gives regional methodology) and nonsensical comment about wind are still unsubstantiated.

        • http://twitter.com/candleflame3 PlantinMoretus

          Huh? I didn’t say anything about typos. I’m saying your sources are rubbish.

  • CaligulaJones

    Sorry, I stopped reading when I got to “models”. What would we do without consultants, eh?

  • Anonymous

    I cringe whenever I hear some ill-informed idiot talk about Global Warming (BAAAAAAD!)
    What you mean to say when you speak of “Global Warming” is “too much global warming” – b/c w/o global warming none of us would be alive.

  • John Meech

    We can’t even predict the weather next week with accuracy and here we have people trying to predict weather in Toronto 40 years from now. What a crock!

    • Anonymous

      You clearly have little understanding of science.

  • Anonymous

    And we will still be discussing the DRL…

  • OldManWInter

    We can sit here and debate this topic endlessly. However, if you live in Toronto, (and have been for many years), there is little to debate. Over the past few years, it has been noticeably getting warmer and rainier in the winters. (not to mention the insanely hot and humid summers). If it does snow in Toronto, you can almost rely on a rainstorm in the next few days to wash it all away. Even as I sit here in late January it is 10 C and pouring rain. Tomorrow, (Jan. 30th) it will be 15 C and raining all day. To say “global warming” I can not. However, I can clearly say that there has been a ‘Toronto Warming’. The funny part is that most of the people here still don’t see it, and continue to complain how ‘bad and cold’ the winters are here. Does anyone in this city miss the old and snowy winters anymore? We are a dying breed that does I feel.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeffrey.demaine Jeffrey Demaine

    What is even more alarming will be the broader socio-economic context that will result from a 4.4C warming. It’s not just Toronto that will experience this rapid climate disruption, but also farms across the continent. It will be nice to grow pineapples in Niagara, but the flip-side will be the desertification of large parts of the American west. I think it is great that the city of Toronto is ahead of the curve in its planning, but larger storm sewers will be a piece of cake compared to the above-ground problems.