Today Fri Sat
It is forecast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on July 31, 2014
Chance of Rain
24°/17°
It is forecast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on August 01, 2014
Clear
25°/18°
It is forecast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on August 02, 2014
Partly Cloudy
25°/17°

1 Comment

Lincoln

Spielberg tames his tear-jerker instincts to deliver a timely political procedural.

DIRECTED BY STEVEN SPIELBERG

If the phrase “Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln” conjures to mind a sweeping, cradle-to-casket hagiography of America’s Great Emancipator, steeped in stirring oratory and brimming with the director’s typical sentiment, the muddy bloodbath that begins the film quickly confounds such expectations. This prologue, depicting a mob of Union and Confederate soldiers scrabbling savagely in the mire, is utterly pitiful, and aptly sets the stage for the restrained, deromanticized portrait that follows.

As it happens, that portrait is less of Lincoln the man than the manoeuvring, cajoling, and bitter debate that constitutes politics itself—in his era as much as our own. Lincoln is effectively a political procedural, detailing the backroom machinations and bipartisan patronage that, despite fearsome opposition, produced the slavery-abolishing 13th Amendment in the waning days of the Civil War. Here, that process proves nearly as mucky and as underhanded as the film’s opening skirmish, though the resulting legislation could hardly be more laudable.

Of course, as the animating force behind the amendment, Daniel Day-Lewis’ uncanny incarnation of the revered president remains a central figure. Shying away from the sort of larger-than-life performance that has been his recent stock-in-trade, the actor tailors his portrayal to Tony Kushner’s subtle, eloquent screenplay, delivering a fine performance that evokes the folksy, fiercely intelligent, and sometimes haunted humanity behind the icon.

More than a matter of verisimilitude, Lincoln‘s subversion of its subject’s mythical aura makes his methods and achievements vividly tangible, if no less impressive. It also lends the film a clear contemporary currency, suggesting that even the most rancorous partisan schisms are surmountable, given a leader possessed of the necessary gumption and guile.

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/wklis W. K. Lis

    I wonder if there will be any mention made of the Anti-Slavery act of 1793 by Governor John Graves Simcoe in Upper Canada, or the 1807 Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in England, or the total abolition of slavery in the British Empire in 1833?