Today Sunday Monday
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM CDT on May 18, 2013
Partly Cloudy
86°/64°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 19, 2013
Chance of a Thunderstorm
88°/70°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 20, 2013
Thunderstorm
86°/68°

18 Comments

news

Redrawing the Political Map: Will Toronto End Up with 50 Councillors?

What federal redistricting means for the City of Toronto.

Yesterday, the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission announced the new riding boundaries it is proposing, to accommodate population growth since the last census. Ontario is getting 15 new federal ridings; all but one are in the GTA, and two of them are in the city itself.

What, exactly, does this mean for Toronto?

The History
When the amalgamated City of Toronto was first created in 1997, new municipal jurisdictions had to be decided on as well. After an initial start with 28 wards, inherited from Metro Council, this was done in 2000 by splitting up each federal riding, creating two municipal wards for each federal district. The idea, at its simplest, is that because councillors deal with much more fine-grained matters than their federal or provincial counterparts, we need more of them to adequately represent our interests and meet our needs. There were 22 ridings at that time—based on the 1991 census—so that meant 44 wards, and 44 councillors.

Since then, we have seen a great deal of immigration, conducted several new censuses, and gone through one federal redistricting, which created a new riding in the eastern part of the city: Pickering-Scarborough East. (This is why, if you live in Scarborough, your municipal-ward boundaries and federal-riding boundaries don’t line up: the wards are based on the 1991 census and the ridings on the 2001 census.) With this new proposed redistricting, we will add the ridings of North Toronto and Mount Pleasant as well, making for 25 federal ridings in all.

The question for the City of Toronto: does it want to follow suit, and redraw its own boundaries to yield 50 wards, and 50 councillors?

Our Current Predicament
Most councillors will readily admit that there are problems with the current ward boundaries in Toronto. Due to changes in population patterns, some wards now have significantly more residents than others—and that means councillors have significantly different workloads.

Before anyone cries out about downtown conspiracies and gerrymandering and how the latte-sipping elites clearly want to get their grubby hands on more political seats, two numbers to consider:

  • Ward 29, Toronto-Danforth, has the lowest population of any ward: according to the 2006 census (the most recent for which ward profiles are available), it is 44,420
  • Ward 23, Willowdale, has the highest of any ward: 79,435

A councillor’s workload isn’t a direct function of the number of residents he or she serves; many other factors come into play. Higher density creates additional work in many wards that have a smaller geographic footprint, for instance, and wards experiencing rapid increases in population (regardless of the raw numbers) generally have a great deal of new construction, planning, and zoning issues that need to be managed. But the number of residents is certainly a significant factor in determining just how much attention a councillor can devote to any single one of them—and right now Ward 23 has nearly twice the number of residents as Ward 29.

When it released its proposed new riding map, the federal commission explained that according to the Electoral Redistricting Act, “[t]he population of a district should remain within 25% of the average once consideration is given to communities of interest or identity, and historical and geographic factors”—basically, that no one riding should vary more than 25 per cent from the average riding population, as this creates imbalances that inhibit effective governance.

Next Steps
Though Toronto has the authority to draw its own ward boundaries, it is still supposed to stay under that 25 per cent threshold. Once a ward exceeds it, as several currently do, a petition signed by 500 voters can trigger an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board, which can then order the City to change its ward map [PDF].

In other words, Toronto is overdue for a redistricting of its own. Some on council—most notably the mayor, who included this in his campaign platform—want to take that opportunity not to increase the number of councillors but to decrease them dramatically, doing away with the two-wards-per-riding rule of thumb and having a one-to-one correspondence. If we wind up with 25 new federal ridings, that would mean 25 wards and 25 councillors, down from the current 44.

According to the City of Toronto, based on 2010 data, the average population per ward is 58,776. If we were to cut council roughly in half, that would mean more than 100,000 residents per councillor—and when residents call up those councillors when the trash doesn’t get picked up, that can sound like a scary number, both to councillors facing many demands and to residents who may already have a hard time gaining access to their elected officials. (There is also the undeniable fact that politicians are not prone to making decisions that would cut their odds of re-election in half.)

Torontonians have two opportunities to share their views on the federal redistricting proposal:

  • North York Civic Centre: Wednesday, November 14, 2012, at 10 a.m.
  • Metro Hall: Thursday, November 15, 2012, at 11:30 a.m.

Chances are, citizens will be asked to share their views on municipal redistricting not too long after that.


PROPOSED NEW FEDERAL RIDING BOUNDARIES
Grey: current riding boundaries; beige: proposed new riding boundaries.

Willowdale/Don Valley/North Toronto
This area, roughly, is currently served by three ridings (Don Valley East, Don Valley West, and Willowdale). Under the new plan, it would be served by four (Don Valley East, Don Valley North, North Toronto, and Willowdale), to better distribute the growing population, especially in Willowdale.

Willowdale

Don Valley North

Don Valley East

North Toronto


Central Toronto
The city’s other new riding, called Mount Pleasant, is created here, out of what is currently the northern end of Toronto Centre and the eastern portion of St. Paul’s.

Mount Pleasant

Toronto Centre

St. Paul’s


Scarborough
Besides the two new ridings, Scarborough sees the most change. The current riding of Pickering-Scarborough East (which is partially in Toronto, partially outside it) is split, so the new set of Scarborough ridings stay entirely within the bounds of Toronto. Many significant boundary changes here.

Scarborough-Agincourt

Scarborough North

Scarborough East

Scarborough-Guildwood

Scarborough Centre

Scarborough Southwest


Additional Boundary Shifts
Other ridings are slated for less significant changes to their borders.

Eglinton-Lawrence

Davenport

Trinity-Spadina


Maps via the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission.

Comments

  • Eric S. Smith

    More 905 seats. Super.

    • Anonymous

      Not an ounce of political motivation at all… Harper doing what he does best. Sektchbag.

      • Eric S. Smith

        Oh, I think it’s indicated by the demographics, it’s just unfortunate given that the politicians most skilled at 905-pandering are bad for the country.

        • Anonymous

          Consider also that the party in question is also has the most funds to dedicate to running new candidates (and trashing others) thanks to recent electoral funding reforms…

          I’m all for greater representation (though 100,000:1 is still 99,999 too many) but it’s hard not to be suspicious about this when it seems to favour the Cons, and factoring in Harper’s desire for absolute control over all facets of the government.

          • Anonymous

            Agree with all of the above! Very slimy tactics as I’ve come to expect from the Cons

  • Marcg

    So they look the gays, the racialised communities and the poor and put them into one riding (Toronto-Centre) and gave the rich Torontonians their own riding (Mount Pleasant). Bravo Harper, bravo.

    • Anonymous

      Actually the village is scythed in two. The boundary goes right down Wellesley. Hopefully this will be sorted out at the hearings.

      • Michael

        Just to be clear: it’s better for communities to exist in multiple wards than to be pigeon-holed in just one. This gives them MORE political power, not less. The Republicans in the U.S. (which has fully partisan redistricting) go to great lengths to create a few, mostly-black districts and a lot of mostly-white districts. If you are pushing for, say, “all the gay people” to be in one voting district, you’re pushing to minimize their voting power. Not everyone understands this when redistricting comes up.

        • Anonymous

          Redistricting should be about communities that have something in common with each other. I doubt many people in Rosedale regularly hang out at the 519, for example.

          Queers live all over this city, including myself in Willowdale. It’s a mark of progress. However, the gay village (as opposed to “all gay people”) is a definable, distinct community by anyone’s standards. Splitting it up makes no sense: no more sense than if Centre Island was in one riding, and Algonquin Island in another.

          • Marcg

            The village doesn’t extend much north of Wellesley, does it?

            Also, believe it or not Rosedale has recently experienced a surge in gay residents who frequent the village (Mount Pleasant makes it quite easy). Also, the Village and St. James town have less in common than the Village and Rosedale, in my opinion.

            The politics are still too transparent. The Conservatives think if they can create a riding filled with rich Torontonians, they can finally win in the 416 at all levels of government.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=676095140 Matt Fodor

            I for one welcome the end of the gerrymandered TC riding. Mount Pleasant isn’t likely to go Tory, it will most likely be the “safest” seat for the Liberals. If there’s any demographic that supports the LPC these days it’s people who are “too educated to vote Tory, too rich to vote NDP.” I can’t think of a riding that better fits that description than the proposed Mount Pleasant.

            I just think that the boundaries need to be shifted a bit north so the Village is in one riding. Charles St. would probably be about right – the Village is basically from Charles to Gerrard. North of Charles St. you also have 1 St. Thomas, the Windsor Arms and the Manulife building – so there’s more of a community of interest with Yorkville proper.

            A slight adjustment in the St. Paul’s/Mount Pleasant boundary, say (take the area between Chaplin Crescent and Oriole Parkway now in St. Paul’s over to MP) would compensate for an underpopulated Mount Pleasant.

          • http://twitter.com/JerikoKrasavic Jeriko Krasavić

            Toronto Islands belong to MP Olivia Chow and MPP Rosario Marchese (Both Trinity-Spadina) but Councillor Pam McConnell (Toronto Centre-Rosedale) has it on the municipal level. so the islands are split on a Federal/Provincial and Municipal levels
            If you were to keep sense, Adam Vaughan should get the islands

    • http://twitter.com/JerikoKrasavic Jeriko Krasavić

      there are a lot of gays, minorities and poor in Mount Pleasant too.

  • John Duncan

    I’ve said it before, but 50,000 constituents (or 100,000, obviously) is far too much for a single local representative. But 50 councillors is too much for how municipal government functions.

    The City would be much better off if we had 25 mini-mayors (call them reeves for old-times sake?) heading 25 neighbourhood councils (with part-time councillors) that were the authority for truly local decision-making, with Toronto-wide decisions being made by a city council made up of those 25 reeves.

    • http://circusesnotbread.wordpress.com/ Joe Blow VI

      What is a “local” issue and what is a city wide issue in a “reeve system”? I’m not sure there are neat lines to be drawn. Perhaps there are issues that only affect local areas, but I would think those issues are fairly trivial and therefore don’t address the greater dysfunction in the system.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504240773 Christopher Paul Dart

    Weird that they split Malvern in two.

    • http://twitter.com/JerikoKrasavic Jeriko Krasavić

      Malvern is split up in two municipally. Councillor Chin Lee and Raymond Cho

  • Anonymous

    If I’ve read the map correctly, I’m going to be shunted from Trinity-Spadina to St. Paul’s, a riding that has never elected an NDP member.

Our weather forecast is from WP Wunderground