Today Tuesday Wednesday
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 20, 2013
Thunderstorm
86°/68°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 21, 2013
Thunderstorm
84°/66°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 22, 2013
Chance of a Thunderstorm
75°/57°

17 Comments

politics

A Dubious Strategy to “Overprotect” Racialized Communities

Politicians prefer gun-violence solutions that involve more police.

Photo by {a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sevennine/5380372278/"}sevennine{/a}, from the {a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/torontoist/"}Torontoist Flickr Pool{/a}.

On Thursday, Police Chief Bill Blair announced that, starting with this weekend’s Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival (previously known as Caribana), hundreds of extra officers will perform mandated overtime shifts. Blair’s goal is to increase police presence in the streets. While he didn’t say where the extra officers will be deployed after the carnival ends on August 6, his remarks, and those of his colleagues, suggest more police activity in Toronto’s 13 priority neighbourhoods, where police presence is already high. Blair assured the public his officers intend to “overprotect” communities, not over-police them.

Deputy Chief Peter Sloly promised “continuous pursuit of our high-risk offenders,” as well as “continuous engagement with our young people, and our community partners in those neighbourhoods in the most respectful and development-focused ways possible.” While the police seem equipped to fulfill the first part of that pledge, the notion of “respectful” policing in Toronto’s racialized neighbourhoods, where police relations are poor and resentment is high, is much harder to imagine.

Sloly noted that in recent days, “all 17 police divisions have created and implemented operational plans that deal with gun violence and gang violence.” He did not, however, mention any specific plans to address the persistent instances of racial profiling and excessive carding that plague police interactions with racialized people.

Margaret Parsons, head of the African Canadian Legal Clinic, appears to recognize this. She noted recently that residents are “not against more security that is respectful, that is balanced, that’s not just going to stop a 15- or 17-year-old just because he’s African Canadian and he’s walking home late at night from his part-time job.” Such police contact is, as the Toronto Star put it, “a troubling rite of passage” for far too many racialized individuals and communities in our city. Increased police presence could have positive outcomes, but it could also cause permanent mistrust and fear if profiling persists.

Leaders from community groups—including Tropicana and the Jamaican Canadian Association—welcomed the increased police presence, but warned police to abandon failed profiling tactics. Tropicana executive director Sharon Shelton reminded police of an “expectation of mutual respect” within the city’s priority neighbourhoods. At the same time, Shelton urged frustrated residents to work with police, “even if you feel that they have let you down in the past.” This is the context for the latest mobilization of hundreds of additional police officers into the poorest, most stigmatized areas of the city.

It is critical to understand that our police are taking their cues from media, politicians, and residents who demand that racialized groups take primary responsibility for ongoing gun violence. In announcing a new and unprecedented search policy for this weekend’s Caribbean Carnival, spokesperson Stephen Weir gave a candid explanation: “We have been inundated with phone calls from the media—mostly white reporters—asking us, what are we going to do and what’s going to happen?”

Weir openly doubted that searching 20,000 spectators in the bleachers would lead to any weapon seizures, and acknowledged that organizers were responding to the recent mass shooting in Scarborough “even though it has nothing to do with us.” It’s likely that organizers of the recently cancelled Irie Festival events felt similar pressure to take ownership of recent gun violence. Ironically, the cancellation of an entire weekend of events at Yonge-Dundas Square means the many racialized youth who would have been paid to share their talents will now, in the name of security, have to find something else to do.

As Basics Community News Service’s Tony Couto observed recently, even the Safer and Vital Communities Program—a community-grants program recently renewed by the province as an anti-violence measure—requires grant recipients to work with the police. Politicians prefer solutions to gun violence that feature the threat of force.

Of course, if extra police scrutiny of poor and racialized people were the key to a safer city, Toronto’s guns would have been silenced decades ago. We need a new approach—one that does not betray fear of people who are overwhelmingly the victims of Toronto’s violent gun culture.

CORRECTION: August 1, 2012, 5:30 PM This post originally stated that Tony Couto wrote for Basics Magazine. This is incorrect. He writes for Basics Community News Service. We apologize for this error.

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/torontomyway Toronto My Way

    And there’s the rub – increased police patrolling without profiling. How does that work?

    If more police means faster response to calls for help, that’s one thing. If it means faster response to calls of a crime committed, the crime has still been committed by the time the police respond. How does this stem gun violence?

    Desmond, your last paragraph is bang on – “Of course, if extra police scrutiny of poor and racialized people were
    the key to a safer city, Toronto’s guns would have been silenced decades
    ago. We need a new approach…”

    Speaking of new approaches, why are all these efforts still aiming at those groups you mentioned on the demand end of the gun economy, and so little discussion of the supply end of the economy, where the money is?

  • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

    We need HARSHER sentences. The Danzig shooters should spend the next 25-30 years in jail minimum, no chance of parole. Criminals are laughing at the system.

    You do the crime, you do the time.

    Where are all the parents from these communities with crime issues?

    • Anonymous

      What if all the parents were in jail doing 25-30 years? Would that make you happy? Would that make a healthier community?

      • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

        If the parents gave those kids the guns, then yes.
        It takes TWO to tango. Why are there so many single parents? where are the MIA parents? they layed down and bang bang thank you ma’am. They should be in their kids’s lives.

    • http://twitter.com/torontomyway Toronto My Way

      Miroslav, there are several problems inherent in the proposition that harsher sentences will solve the problems. But first, it needs to be acknowledged that Desmond’s article speaks to a very real concern – is this increased policing in troubled communities just taking advantage of the fear-mongering to justify racial profiling? What is the net value of increased police presence in targeted communities in the grand scheme of things?

      In terms of problems with harsher sentences, first of all, in order to hand down a harsher sentence, someone must a) commit a crime b) get caught and c) be successfully prosecuted. That’s a long process including a whole lot of steps for a harsher sentence to have a chance to be used…but way back at the beginning of these steps, a crime had to be committed, which means a victim had to be victimized. We need solutions that will reduce the number of victims, not be harder on criminals after they’ve already done damage hurting people.

      Second of all, we’re still demonizing the demand side of the equation. Why is it so difficult to understand that the criminal element spans far beyond the demand side, the person who pulls the trigger. That person bought the gun with money, and paid that money to a seller, who himself had to have garnered supply of guns from…someone, somewhere. Follow the money, and somewhere at the supply end of the gun economy are people making a lot of money.

      If we can successfully prosecute the illegal trafficking (selling) of guns, we take many more guns off the street than if we put a kid in jail for a time.

      I’m not saying harsher sentences shouldn’t be considered. I am saying
      that harsher sentences cannot and should not be invoked as “the
      solution” to the problem; and, in so saying, if harsher sentencing is
      just one part of the solution, other parts of the solution must include
      addressing the supply issue.

      http://torontomyway.blogspot.ca/2008/02/gun-violence-has-supply-side.html
      http://torontomyway.blogspot.ca/2012/07/toronto-crime-relatively-illustrated.html

      • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

        If you look at the statistics, there will be one group that commits the most crimes.

        Harsher sentences ARE good. An example would be giving the two people who brought a gun each to the Danzing BBQ a 12-15 year sentence, and STICK TO THAT SENTENCE.
        This can prevent FUTURE criminals who think it is ok to bring guns to bbqs.

        Stricter laws/bans for guns/bullets will hurt LEGAL owners, do you seriously think those two losers who came with a gun to the Danzig bbq cared about the laws when it comes to guns? Of course not.

        You successfully prosecute these two losers for carrying a concealed weapon/illegal possession of a gun/etc…give them 12-15 years in jail. no parole/good behaviour/hug.

        I never said harsher sentences were the ONLY solutions.

        Just so you know: I live 5 minutes walking distance from Danzig Street. Amazing Community. Come visit it.

    • Eric S. Smith

      Wait, are those your own thoughts? Because they sure look like arbitrarily selected sentences from the letters page of the Sun.(Lazy! —Eds.)

      • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

        I have always said harsher sentences.

        Right now I subscribe to the National Post & Globe/Mail.

        My subscriptions to the Star/Sun ended 3 years ago.

        Yes they are my own thoughts.

    • Eric S. Smith

      Wait, are those your own thoughts? Because they sure look like arbitrarily selected sentences from the letters page of the Sun.(Lazy! —Eds.)

    • Anonymous

      Spoken like someone that’s never had anything but a parking ticket in “the system”.

      • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

        I had 5 parking tickets, just so you know.

        • Anonymous

          Haha

    • Safe Toronto

      Miroslav, you are facing a tough crowd here – these people don’t want to cooperate with the society at all. They want to blame everyone for their own stupidity and keep on their destructive path.

  • Anonymous

    For the first time ever I saw two cops walking the streets in my neighbourhood despite it being a very peaceful area, at least in recent years. Some years ago, I forget exactly when, there was a rash of shootings and car arsons in my area, 1 or 2 people were murdered but there’s been next to no violence for many years now. We could’ve used cops on foot back then but today they seem a waste of resources, especially during the mid afternoon when they were out and about.

    Sometimes when walking around my area you can smell people smoking pot in their homes since many are right on the sidewalk, I hope these foot patrols aren’t going to be harassing people harming no one in the privacy of their own home yet I suspect that will be the majority of the arrests they make.

  • http://www.facebook.com/citizenbenjamin Jesse B.

    Fact correction: it’s called Basics Community News Service. BCNS has a website, radio show/podcast, and newspaper, but there is no Basics Magazine.

    • Anonymous

      Thank you for pointing this out. We have updated the post to reflect this correction.

  • http://www.facebook.com/carmine.lemma Carmine Lemma

    Something that Balibar writes in “Race, nation,
    Class” best describes what I am thinking, which, stated simply, is ‘without
    misrecognition the violence of racism would not be tolerable to those who
    perpetuate it.’ As it relates to the overwhelming
    police presence, definably, it employs the tactic of counter violence to the
    violence in its innate antagonism to the participants of the festival.

The forecast for Toronto by Wordpress Weather