Today Monday Tuesday
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 19, 2013
Chance of a Thunderstorm
90°/70°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 20, 2013
Thunderstorm
88°/68°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 21, 2013
Thunderstorm
88°/66°

16 Comments

news

Queen’s Park Watch: The Education of Dalton McGuinty

The Toronto District School Board beat their budget shortfall, but it won't be pretty. Let the finger-pointing begin.

Budgetary restraint isn’t just rough on people who pay taxes and use government services. It can also be hell on reputations. Just ask Dalton McGuinty.

This week, the self-styled “Education Premier” lurked quietly in the background as the Toronto District School Board made budget cuts of 58 million dollars. Back in March, the board laid off almost 51 million dollars’ worth of staff (it’s not clear whether tough-but-fair principals with baseball bats and pretty white ladies who fight gang violence with poetry were included) for a total budget hit of $109 million, or about 3.7 per cent of the TDSB budget.

The cuts are wide-ranging, from building maintenance, to professional development, to a controversial plan to increase fees for groups using school properties by 41 per cent. As many as 32 cafeterias will also be closed. Ironically, they will be victims of the Liberals’ push for healthy food in schools. (When junk food disappeared from cafs, so did the kids. Generation McNugget headed en masse for greasier pastures, and took their lunch money with them.)

It’s probably impossible to find $109 million worth of fat in TDSB’s budget, so there was always bound to be an impact on the junior taxpayers students who show up every day in the hopes getting some education. If that’s so, who do we blame?

The province provides 95 per cent of TDSB’s funding. It cut that allotment by $12 million this year, while still demanding the implementation of all-day kindergarten, which is an expensive publicly-funded babysitting service that the Drummond Report recommended scrapping. Education Minister Laurel Broten counters that the Liberals have bumped TDSB budgets by 34 per cent since 2003, while the number of students has dropped by 12,000.

On balance, the Liberals have done a good job on education, presiding over higher test scores, improved high-school graduation rates, and, most recently, anti-bullying legislation (which was over-politicized, but still a good thing).

However, years of humouring public-sector unions in return for labour peace has been expensive: the majority of TDSB costs are salaries, wages, and benefits. And after dancing comes piper-paying.

The TDSB and its charges will survive, wild-eyed references to “bloodbaths” notwithstanding. But allies that the Grits might have had in the educational bureaucracies and institutions won’t be doing any canvassing for them come election day. And the next time a five-year-old brings a .357 for show and tell, it’ll be blamed on budget cuts.

The Liberals may come to wish they’d lost the last election and bequeathed the hard choices to someone else.

Comments

  • Anonymous
  • Guest

    >> However, years of humouring public-sector unions in return for labour peace has been expensive: the majority of TDSB costs are salaries, wages, and benefits.

    Too much on salaries, not enough on R&D and inventory! No wonder education is in such dire straits.

    Reality is TDSB has to close schools. Not enough students to fill them…

  • Anonymous

    If cafeterias are losing money, maybe they should bump up the prices instead of closing them. We don’t subsidise children who bring their own food – why do we subsidise those who buy at school?

    • Caligula Jones

      Answering the question: “Are people TRULY this economically retarded?”

      Thanks tomwest. Please tell me you don’t vote.

      • Anonymous

        OK, point out the big flaw in my argument:
        1) Cafeterias are being closed to save money
        2) Cafeterias therefore do not receive enough revenue to cover their costs
        3) To prevent options are (a) close cafeteria (b) increase revenue (c) decrease costs
        4) The board is proposing option a (close things)
        5) I’m guessing there’s limited scope for cutting costs (option c)
        6) That leaves option b (increase revenue) as the only alternative to option a (close things).
        So, why not bump up prices with the aim of to reducing/eliminating the subsidy?

        (Separate issue: why do we subsidise cafeteria food, but not food brought form home?)

        • Jenny

          I’m a high school teacher and let me explain why bumping up the prices for cafeteria food will not work. It’s very simple really. Lunch is approximately 45-60 minutes and here are the following places that are within 15 minutes of the school: Subway, Coffee Time, Tim Horton’s, McDonald’s, and a dozen independent eateries.

          You cannot assume that the same group of students who have been buying lunch from the cafeteria now will continue to do so when you raise the prices. They can go elsewhere and the options outside of school are cheaper, greasier, and frankly more appealing to students.

          I myself stopped buying lunch from the cafeteria because the portions got smaller, but the prices got bigger. If I want bigger portions I have to pay double and I am not spending $60 a week on lunches.

          I think the biggest shame in this is the message we’re sending to students: healthier foods mean poorly made, gross looking, over priced foods. That’s not true at all. Healthy good can be tasty and affordable.

          The other shame is that this is one more revenue stream that has now completely been closed off. Whereas before you could probably make some money to offset some of the costs of running a school, now you’re stuck with a losing business.

          (Although some have argued that the cafeterias were experiencing a decrease in business during the first semester, but then it was picking up again the second semester. But I guess it wasn’t picking up enough to justify its existence.)

          • Anonymous

            When I ate at school cafeterias which served food prepared by dietians many years ago, the vegetables were canned, the meat second rate and the food was prepared by untrained cooks.

          • Anonymous

            Thanks for the replies. I think it shows I’m not “economically retarded”, just lacking in detailed knowledge about school cafeterias, and the fact students are allowed to go off-site at lunch. (Which wasn’t the case when I was at school).

          • Anonymous

            I was allowed to go offsite during lunch. All the students wanted was to have the healthy food along with the junk food. The school board only wanted the healthy food. That is why the cafeterias are closing. I went to school at Bloor Collegiate and we had lots of junk food places there at that time. My mother knew how to cook, the school cafeteria cooks did not/can not. The Robarts library food was greasy sausages. You have to provide nutrition and good cooking techniques.

          • Caligula Jones

            Well, yeah, you’re still pretty economically retarded, even if you didn’t know that kids are allowed off site (which is inconveniently right there in the article).

            You probably think that the recording industry can recoup some of its losses by selling CDs at $100 as well…

          • Anonymous

            Gosh, thanks for the wonderful insult-free contribution to the discussion. (If kids weren’t allowed off-site, where would be the flaw in my argument?)

        • Anonymous

          Are school cafeterias really expected to break even or be profitable?

          • Anonymous

            It seems the school boards think so, because they aren’t prepared to subsidise them. Personally, I don’t mind either way.

    • Anonymous

      students groups have said that they would have preferred school cafeterias to provide both healthy and junk food. all cafeterias have to provide only health food and some were only making $32 profit a month.

  • Anonymous

    Cutting funding to education will never come back to bite us in the ass.

  • Anonymous

    4 public school boards in toronto, same number of teachers, same amount of money, parents required to fundraise for necessities, signs at dupont and lansdowne and yonge and sheppard explaining that the toronto board might not be able to provide a local school for any students moving into the area. at the same time there are fewer students at the Toronto English public board. something has to give.

Our weather forecast is from Wordpress Weather