Today Monday Tuesday
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 19, 2013
Chance of a Thunderstorm
90°/68°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 20, 2013
Thunderstorm
88°/68°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 21, 2013
Thunderstorm
86°/66°

37 Comments

news

Newsstand: June 19, 2012

If you care at all about anything, be sure it's Tuesday that you hold dear. So go on, tell her. For Tuesday will not always be here. But for now it is, and it's got some news: Little Italy shooting victim identified, coroner's report has a plan to prevent cycling deaths, the investigation into Radiohead's stage collapse, building an island, losing a principal, and hot. It's going to be hot.

One man is dead after a shooting in Little Italy yesterday afternoon. Police are saying things like “targeted” and “outlaw motorcycle gang” in an attempt to understand the incident. A second victim was sent to hospital with wounds to the stomach. The shooting happened in the afternoon, while people were crowded onto patios to watch the Ireland-Italy EuroCup match, so naturally some of the coverage includes the outcome of that game. But that seems weird, so we’ll just add that the man who was killed was apparently a 35 year old named John Raposo, and the shooter was dressed up like a construction worker.

Cycling deaths are preventable, says a new report from the Ontario Coroner’s office. Based on evidence collected from the 129 cycling deaths that happened in the province between 2006 and 2010, the report makes many varied recommendations for preventing bike accidents, like mandatory side guards on trucks and helmets for all cyclists. That’s right, based on evidence. Science says these things, and it’s always a good idea to do what science says because science can be a real dick if you don’t.

The partially collapsed stage from Saturday’s disastrous Radiohead non-concert is still standing in Downsview Park, because no one is sure how to safely dismantle it. The Ministry of Labour is investigating the accident that killed the band’s drum tech and injured three other people. Right now, the Ministry is looking for input from four different companies involved in the stage design and build. Some people from the lighting crew are telling CBC they had concerns about how heavy all the lighting equipment was; however, it was signed off by an engineer.

Hey! Who wants some new islands near Sunnyside Beach? Who doesn’t, right? Who says no to, “Hey, how about a new island?” That would be weird. Oh wait, a couple of city councillors are not super pumped about the plan to use dirt from the Eglinton Crosstown dig to build some islands down by the mouth of the Humber River. Island fans say the islands will improve the water quality at Sunnyside Beach, and also be cool. But opponents, like Sarah Doucette (Ward 13, Parkdale-High Park), are opposed over concerns like how many trucks of dirt would have to drive through their ward in order to build such an island. Probably about an island’s worth of dirt, we’d say.

The principal of the Africentric Alternative School is leaving her helm after three years. Thando Hyman was the first principal at the new school, and no one is quite sure why she’s leaving. But lots of people have theories.

City staff are looking for a way to make developers finish what they started.

And it’s going to be warm. Consider yourself warned.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    Just love the nutters at the Sun. Frank Gallagher may be a fictional character, it appears he is based on reality

  • Anonymous

    Sarah Doucette should tone down the NIMBYism on this one, because the end result is something YIMBY.

    The island construction would probably require partially closing down the Martin Goodman trail right near the east end of the Humber bridge, probably for several years, but as long as there was still a path through it would not be too bad. The trucks would roll in along the Queensway or the Lakeshore and would probably blend in with the background level of traffic.

  • Anonymous

    Oh no! Trucks with dirt in them! Anarchy!

    (Wow, those comments about Fletcher at the Sun sure are classy.)

  • Anonymous

    They could always put the dirt back in the new Eglinton cross-town subway buried LRT, like Mike Harris did.

  • http://profiles.google.com/artscanner Bruce MacLean

    One of the best shows at City Hall is when P. Fletcher takes on Hiz Honour teh Mayor. He has yet to win.
    As far as mandaTORY helmets go, I believe we could use the same logic to demand all patrons of Toronto Malls wear bullet proof vests. Or more cogently that all passengers in the right front seat of automobiles wear helmets, because those shotgun seats are the most deadly for head injuries. And what about our poor pedestrians? Has nobody thought of the need for helmets for them?
    What we do know from the statistics is 100% of the cycling fatalities involved automobiles. The cyclists are fine, it’s the car that are a problem.

  • Eric S. Smith

    Something to consider when it comes to building islands at the mouth of a river like that is whether they will, in addition to making the nearby beach cleaner, block or redirect silt that would otherwise be deposited along the shoreline, causing that (or another!) beach to shrink.

    • Anonymous

      Maybe we should stop dumping crap in the river and build those islands elsewhere.

      • Anonymous

        Where would you like the fill to go? The 905 and 705 are seemingly done being the 416′s dump.

        • Anonymous

          In the lake, but closer to downtown. Rough example made of samples from our existing islands:

          • Anonymous

            Ah. But that would only benefit downtown elites I suppose whereas the Humber Islands would have a Tim Hortons.

  • Anonymous

    Seat belts are mandatory. Why are helmets not?

    • Anonymous

      Because they ruin the perm?

      Jeesh, the nerve of some people…

    • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

      Because you can’t leave the helmet inside your vehicle when you exit

      • Anonymous

        Really? I *really* hope I’m just not detecting your sarcasm…

        • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

          If it helps your comprehension, I don’t much care for mandatory seat belt laws either (but support use of both if the user wishes to).

          Mandatory helmet laws are a barrier to bicycle adoption. Skip the fashionable hipster hairdo snarky strawmen and proceed to having to purchase one, carry one with you whenever you might be biking, and taking care that you do not drop it or bump it into something and compromise its protection (modern helmets are designed, rightly, to be single-crash use). Chances are mandatory helmet laws would greatly hurt Bixi – Vancouver is struggling with this issue as we speak. These and other factors are a hassle, result in cycling being seen as less convenient, which results in less people cycling overall, which results in a more crowded TTC and more cars on the road, more civilizational diseases resulting from drop in physical activity, and a worse Toronto overall.

          If you want to wear a helmet yourself, go for it.

          • Anonymous

            Clue: bicycling is inherently dangerous, because when you go down, the likelihood of your head slapping the pavement is excellent, heck it’s almost guaranteed — helmets provide protection. There is utterly, and I mean utterly no excuse not to have mandatory helmet laws for both bicycles and motorcycles. Or private insurance. Take your pick. Because we can’t pick up the tab for your reckless and irresponsible sense of “freedom”. Freedom is not being dead or a vegetable. Capiche?

          • Anonymous

            Let’s get the smokers and obese footing their bills before worrying about cyclists.

          • Anonymous

            Strawman aside, cyclists don’t pay premium taxes on buying a pack of helmets everyday. There’s a reason why they don’t ban cig$

          • Anonymous

            Low-hanging fruit.

            Unfortunately a $50 helmet won’t protect against addiction or obesity.

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            Thank you for your concern! You will be happy to learn that I have moved out of Ontario (to a helmet-law province, no less, where I don’t bike) and thus will no longer be a threat to your hard-earned tax monies.

            I understand you will also be extending your reasonable request to couch potatoes who walk less than a thousand steps a day, putting themselves at grave risk of obesity-related diseases. Will you also be contacting those who choose to move extensive distances from their place of employment, willingly lengthening their car commutes and putting themselves at an increased risk of a debilitating and expensive car accident and not duly notifying their insurance company? May I please request a CC when you do send these?

            You might be astounded to hear that in my experiences biking Toronto for eight months, which has included such admittedly enlightened moments as biking on College through the track tangle at Spadina hands-free, my most serious instance of going down, on Parliament – going down, no less – trying to cross streetcar tracks to get onto Spruce, did not cause me to slap my head on the pavement, and in fact, I walked away from the fall unscathed despite lack of protection more significant than jeans. Physics and probabilities, how do they work?!

            Nice day to you as well! I trust you are not too distressed trying to imagine the hairstyle I must be trying so valiantly to protect by not wearing a helmet.

          • Anonymous

            Oh. You don’t even live here.

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            Nope, not anymore! Enjoy the fatties, and Rob Ford.

            And thanks for engaging with my arguments!

          • Anonymous

            “Physics and probabilities, how do they work?!”

            Well for one thing, they don’t work by generalizing from a single anecdote.

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            But it was almost guaranteed by a guy on the internet!

          • Anonymous

            The most entitled reply yet…

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            Thanks for engaging with my arguments!

          • Anonymous

            How do you engage with someone that says “Because you can’t leave the helmet inside your vehicle when you exit”

            You need an argument first to engage in

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            Try these:

            “Mandatory helmet laws are a barrier to bicycle adoption.”

            “having to purchase one, carry one with you whenever you might be biking, and taking care that you do not drop it or bump it into something and compromise its protection (modern helmets are designed, rightly, to be single-crash use) is a barrier to bicycle adoption”

            “Chances are mandatory helmet laws would greatly hurt Bixi – Vancouver is struggling with this issue as we speak.”

            “These and other factors result in cycling being seen as less convenient, which results in less people cycling overall, which results in a more crowded TTC and more cars on the road, more civilizational diseases resulting from drop in physical activity”

          • Anonymous

            Those aren’t arguments. They are anecdotes that reek of privilege.

            And Bixi in Vancouver? They don’t have Bixi.

            http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2012/06/vancouver-bike-share-program-to-launch-in-2013/

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            Can you please explain how “Mandatory helmet laws are a barrier to bicycle adoption.” is an anecdote, that is an account which supports an argument, but which is not supported by scientific or statistical analysis? For a start, explain how “Mandatory helmet laws are a barrier to bicycle adoption.” is an account.

            The helmet requirement is one of the bigger stumbling blocks with getting a bike share off the ground in Vancouver. Supposedly they are supposed to come up with a helmet rental machine, which has not been shown or demonstrated to date despite an original planned launch date this summer.

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            “”Mandatory helmet laws are a barrier to bicycle adoption.”

            You’ll need to take the onus to prove that one”

            With pleasure. Consult the data from Australian censuses: http://www.cyclehelmets.org/1194.html

            “So if you “bump” or “drop” your bike helmet it’s rendered useless? Care to provide some sort of PROOF of that?”

            Again, certainly: http://www.bhsi.org/replace.htm

            “Even IF the above were true, how is it a barrier to bicycle adoption?”

            I want to do thing A. To do thing A, I am also required to do thing B. I do not wish to do thing B. I may then not do thing A.

            See my other post regarding Bixi.

            “The strawmen are eating red herrings for dinner?”

            I’m sorry, I don’t follow this argument.

          • Anonymous

            It’s people like you that give people the impression that all cyclists are a bunch of entitled, upper-class, militants

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            I don’t think you want to be talking about giving bad impressions, dear.

          • Anonymous

            We’re not talking about me, dear.

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            But… that’s all you ever talk about…?

          • Anonymous

            If people truly care about the environment, traffic congestion, civilizational diseases and their physical health – hat head won’t get in their way.

            ALL of the reasonings given are entitled wanker reasonings:

            OMG my hair will get messy!
            OMG I have to carry my helmet with me
            OMG I have to buy a helmet

            And Bixi? LOL. Bixi is a sham of a business model. Bixi is having problems which are completely unrelated to helmets. Bixi goads cities into buying into their model (read: Finance it) and Bixi will then leave the municipalities with the bill in the end (I’d put money on this) — just like the street furniture. There are plenty of problems with Bixi, helmets are HARDLY one of them.

            From your link:

            Did you drop it hard enough to crack the foam? Replace.

            Which is not what you said AT ALL. You are obviously incapable of debating this as a rational adult. Because of that, I’ll walk away now.

          • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

            “ALL of the reasonings given are entitled wanker reasonings:”

            You forgot the P-word!

            “oh and if you BOTHERED to actually READ it, then you would know you should get rid of that helmet of yours from the 70′s”

            I… did read it? And I don’t have a helmet from the 70s?

            “You are obviously incapable of debating this as a rational adult.”

            LOL.

Weather forecast by WP Wunderground & Denver Snow Service