Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2013
Thunderstorm
24°/16°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2013
Chance of Rain
19°/6°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Chance of Rain
14°/6°

15 Comments

news

Newsstand: June 12, 2012

Jump back! Because Tuesday's coming at ya like a horde of mangy go-karts, and it's in the mood to news. Like this: As progress is made on the Spadina subway extension, talk turns to a downtown relief line; our new bag ban makes everybody jealous, but no word on court challenges; now there is definitely no fishing allowed at the waterfront; and a second victim dies after the Eaton Centre shooting.

Holey and Moley are comin’ for ye. And be “ye,” we of course mean York Region, where a new subway line is on its way. But as the cutely named boring machines broke through the first stage of construction, everyone was over it and on to the next subway dream: the downtown relief line. While celebrating the progress on the Spadina subway extension, both TTC Chair Karen Stintz and CEO Andy Byford were talking up the idea of a downtown relief line as the next big transit project for Toronto. But with the way these things go, we wouldn’t be surprised to see Holey and Moley, after a lustrous career of boring, retire and leave the job of digging the downtown relief line to future generations, like Holey and Moley VII, once removed, esquire.

Looks like once again absolutely everyone ever is totes jeals of Toronto and her new plastic bag ban, including Vancouver and Calgary. Sure, sure other cities with similar bans, like Los Angeles, may have pondered the possibility for longer (like 8 years in L.A. versus, oh, less than a day in Toronto). But still, at least one of the industry groups potentially affected by the ban say they will not be taking the thing to court. Although Mayor Rob Ford has assured us that the ban will definitely for sure go to court, so don’t worry.

In a follow up to the fish tale that started bubbling up last March, the war on fishing at the waterfront rages on in the form of new signs. The “No Fishing” warning signs sprang up along the waterfront last Friday and are pretty much the opposite of those folksy and charming Gone Fishin’ signs you always dreamed of tacking up on your cottage wall if you had a cottage. But you don’t have a cottage, so you fished at the waterfront. But now that’s getting tricky too. So just say good bye to all your dreams, basically, is what the signs want.

The Province is blocking the sale of community housing properties after council voted to sell the 65 single-family homes.

In sad news, one of the victim’s of the Eaton Centre shooting died in hospital on Monday, which brings the death toll to two. The National Post says they can’t say the second victim’s name due to a publication ban, but that rule doesn’t seem to apply to the Star.

Comments

  • Michael DiFrancesco

    These new Newsstand illustrations are wonderful.

  • Anonymous

    What are the rules, re: sitting in a canoe in the water three feet from one of those signs and tossing in your line?

  • Anonymous

    “Looks like once again absolutely everyone ever is totes jeals of Toronto and her stupidity.”

    According to the article “Vancouver”, one alderman in Calgary and one councillor in Halifax are jealous of our plastic bag ban. Otherwise, not really. Hazel McCallion doesn’t agree that “follow the stupid” is a good way to implement policy, but she’s a million years old and maybe politicians thought differently back then.

    • Anonymous

      Single use plastic shopping bags are good for us how… ?

      • Anonymous

        i am waiting a reasonable response myself. It appears the best answer I have seen is a want of an endless supply of free plastic bags so as not to inconvenience ones selfish entitlement

        • Anonymous

          As I’ve commented earlier,
          paper bags aren’t environmentally friendlier than plastic. Plastic bags are more versatile, ligher, easier to carry and more re-usable. So they are more likely to be re-used.

          It’s sweet that you waited for me but next time I’m away on business and can’t answer your question right away, there’s this wonderful search tool you can use.

          • Anonymous

            Maybe what you say is true. Putting aside the sceintific view.
            A significant amount of plastic bags end up in the dump, people use them to wrap garbage. A significant amount of paper bags end up in the recycle bin, peoepl are getting used to recycling. When put this way it is environmentally more sound to use paper bags

          • Anonymous

            “Putting aside the scientific view”?? How should we view this, religiously?

            If it’s about landfill, that’s exactly where paper bags don’t degrade much faster at all.

            Recycling takes a lot of energy. It’s also a very dirty business. Recycling paper takes a lot more energy than recycling plastic. Re-use is better than disposal or recycling.

          • Anonymous

            Sorry if I offended, did not mean to.

            OK get rid of all non reusable bags then.

            I will continue trying to use less.

          • Anonymous

            Ok here’s the thing. What irritates me about this whole plastic bag ban cheerleading squad, and as mayor McCallion pointed out, is that it doesn’t seem that anyone, including a majority of city council, put any thought into the pros or cons of switching from plastic to paper before jumping on the bandwagon. It embarassed Ford, or it’s anti-petrolium, or someone saw a plastic bag mockumentary on YouTube, or other cities are doing it too, so that’s all “good enough”.

          • Anonymous

            I can go along with that. I try not to only follow were I am lead. I try to figure out what is the best use of what I can do.

          • Anonymous

            Let’s ignore production and materials to make an unsound diatribe.

          • Anonymous

            No, you probably shouldn’t do that. Making paper bags creates 70% more air pollution, 80% more GHGs, 50 times more water pollution and consumes 4 times the energy of plastic. Paper recycling requires more energy than producing new and twice the energy than to recycle plastic. Paper waste material is nearly twice that of plastic while degrading not all that much faster in landfill.

          • Anonymous

            The idea is to encourage people to bring their own, reusable bags as much as possible, and use less disposable packaging of any sort. Plastic is especially noxious for a whole host of scientific reasons, and we use way too much of it.

            You can still hoard as much plastic as you want for now, but try to avoid a house fire.

      • Anonymous

        They’re rarely single use. Paper bags will likely be however. See my comment below for more.