Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 19, 2013
Clear
23°/11°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 20, 2013
Clear
19°/13°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on June 21, 2013
Mostly Cloudy
21°/16°

222 Comments

news

Subways or Nothing, Angry Scarborough Residents Insist

"What are you, thick?"—TTC advisor Gordon Chong, to TTC Chair Karen Stintz, at a tense meeting last night.

Photo by {a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dtstuff9/6352684045/"}dtstuff9{/a} from the {a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/torontoist"}Torontoist Flickr Pool{/a}.

Had they not been so passionate and vocal, the over-200 residents at last night’s public transit forum at Scarborough Civic Centre might have been mistaken with fans at a Leafs home game.

Jeers, curses, and objections flowed from the packed, subway-boosting crowd inside the former Scarborough council chamber, and from spectators watching the raucous panel discussion on a broadcast in the lobby. Newly reaffirmed TTC Chair Karen Stintz (Ward 16, Eglinton–Lawrence) was the main target of scorn, thanks to her support for light rail on Sheppard and Eglinton, as well as the planned upgrade of the Scarborough RT.

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker (Ward 38, Scarborough-Centre) was similarly shunned. Toronto Sun columnist Sue Ann Levy elicited rolling cheers with her condemnations of “glorified streetcars” and former mayor David Miller. She offered the audience a not-so-subtle invitation to clarify their objections.

“I get the impression in this room, and you can tell me if I’m wrong, that you’d prefer to have nothing as opposed to streetcars,” said Levy. “You would prefer that the Eglinton Crosstown ended at Laird. That you can continue to drive down your street without an impediment in the middle,” she continued to hoots and loud applause.

During a tense and startling moment, Toronto Taxpayers Coalition president Matthew McGuire, who organized and moderated the event, called for security when an agitated participant grabbed a volunteer and yanked her hand aggressively.

Stintz was booed from her introduction onwards, and was scarcely able to finish a remark without widespread protest. She absorbed the incessant attacks, sometimes with annoyed smiles and laughter that one resident characterized as “joking around.” The TTC Chair handled the barrage without returning in kind, emphasizing instead that “we don’t have the money for subways, but we do have money for an LRT.”

Dr. Gordon Chong, Rob Ford’s appointee on a prospective Sheppard subway, defended his suggestions that private interests could partner with the city to finance one or many new subway lines.

“Is the private sector blowing smoke?” Chong asked. “Are they really BS-ing us? Or are they really gonna come in and bid? There’s only one way you’re going to find out, and that is you complete the business plan, do the RFP, and then you’ll find out for sure.”

Chong tempered his “yes we can” enthusiasm for subways with some criticisms of the Ford administration, including the mayor’s reluctance to consider revenue tools like taxes or roads tolls.

Photo of Don Mills Station by {a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pjmixer/4911379053/"}PJMixer{/a} from the {a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/torontoist"}Torontoist Flickr Pool{/a}.

Although the panel discussion, which also included former city manager John Morand, was billed as a debate, McGuire did little to frame the conversation or clarify the panelists’ statements. Said Morand of propsed LRTs at grade: “The current plan is stupid.” On raising funds for new subway lines, Morand opined that “if you want to take a step towards partial funding, think about a casino.” (The provincial government, which regulates casinos in Ontario, has already ruled this out.)

Many of the attendees we chatted with said they were frequent TTC riders, yet they consistently argued that the status quo of buses in Scarborough was better than proposed LRT lines.

Ian Hancock, a Scarborough resident who studies at Humber College and relies on transit for the daunting commute, argued that “the long-term benefits of a subway outweigh any benefits of an LRT.” Hancock described gridlock along Finch Avenue West as “a tough situation” for transit riders. He added that “if it comes to a small new tax [to fund subways], so be it.”

Yasmin, who observed the melee through a window outside of the chamber, said of councillors who approved LRT plans: “They don’t care about us.” She expressed firm support for the Ford vision. “I love him [Ford] with all my heart. Him and his brother [councillor Doug Ford].”

When we asked Yasmin if council should take funds from other transit projects in order to build transit below grade in the east end, she disagreed, saying the city should “divide whatever we have, be fair to everybody.” She had faith that Ford could keep his promise of privately funded transit. “Of course he’ll find a way.”

Widespread mistrust of city council, the newly installed TTC commission, TTC management, and the city’s transit union figured heavily in the LRT backlash. Chong was clear from the outset, “I do not trust the TTC numbers,” referring to staff figures that suggest Chong’s report underestimates the cost of building a subway on Sheppard Avenue. “It’s for years that I haven’t trusted them.”

Levy piled on that the TTC is “mismanaged, inefficient, and I wouldn’t trust them to run a hen party.”

McGuire asked security to remove a man he accused of grabbing a volunteer who was keeping track of the speaker’s list. “Hey, hey! Let go of her! Did you just grab her?” McGuire shouted from the moderator’s seat before hailing security. An argument ensued, with McGuire yelling into the microphone, “Are you going to stand here in front of the cameras and call me a liar, in front of 200 people?”

People standing near the man claimed he only grabbed the speaker’s list, and some advised him to settle down. The participant was allowed to stay after security entered the chamber, but the confrontation only fuelled the crowd’s frenzy.

When Stintz stepped into the lobby to address the media, some residents rushed up to the media scrum and shouted angrily while several police officers and private security guards stood close by.

Residents repeatedly shouted down suggestions from Stintz and De Baeremaeker that LRTs could reduce congestion, boost ridership, improve service, and provide the most value given existing provincial funding.

Ahead of the meeting, some attendees of Sunday’s transit meeting in Malvern had expressed misgivings to us about showing up to the mainly pro-Ford event. As the smoke cleared late Thursday night, a composed McGuire suggested he was “extremely disappointed” with the evening’s divisive tone.

Joyce Kerr, a rare subway skeptic among audience questioners, asked the panellists to detail the plan for financing subways. “Subways are nice, but I’m concerned with cost. Let’s say you build only subways: where are you getting the money from?” Stintz answered that the only option was to raise taxes.

Kerr made a point of shouting above the hecklers, “I have come to this meeting, and I’m leaving more confused than when I came in,” before exiting the chamber.


CORRECTION: MARCH 13, 6:52 PM We originally reported that an agitated meeting participant intimidated a volunteer. We have since confirmed that the situation was more serious, as there was physical grabbing of her hand.

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/MisterSafetytoe Patrick Smyth

    I see now why Miller shyed away from communicating more widely before the NDP on Council decreed that Transit City was all Scarborough deserved.

    • Paul

      It’s a joke to suggest that you could effectively ‘communicate’ with these people. They clearly are not interested in listening to facts or reason. These people are making Scarborough look like a community of dimwitted yokels.

      • Anonymous

        You can find dimwitted yokels everywhere — even downtown. There’s no proof that all the folks at the meeting, most or even many actually came from Scarborough.

        It’s fairly clear they were a Ford Nation flash mob, who don’t actually use transit and are far more concerned about the St Clair streetcar disaster bogeyman landing in their neighborhood like an h-bomb, and ruining their drive to the mall.

        One could infer anything or nothing from this meeting — but just remember how Ford & co dismissed all the people who showed up at the budget hearings as ‘special interest groups’.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

          lies.. Ford not even involved in meeting…..These are real citizens like me who have not been consulted in 2 years regarding this LRT Crap..We don’t want them…We don’t want to tear our roads and bankrupt businesses..We would prefer more buses.

          • confused reader

            More buses? If you really are a TTC user don’t you want to have a lane dedicated to transit? A subway or an LRT will make your travel along Sheppard faster, but nooo you want more buses, that will gets stuck in gridlock. Uh, ok you really make sense here.

            The only reason you might hate LRT is if you only drive and you think you will be inconvenienced when you drive along Sheppard. If that is the reason say it.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

            i am driving …I got high taxes to pay in Toronto Union boy….Which government union do you work for TTC or Toronto city hall? closing roads for 5 years makes so much sense…YOU ARE STUPID

          • Anonymous

            Closing a road for 3 years, but only section by section by section, as against closing a road for 7 years, which is what will happen with a Sheppard subway.

            That, and how the heck do you plan to pay for the operating costs?

            Road tolls?

          • Andrew

            Ladies and gentlemen, I believe Josie is the troll that goes by the handle ‘socialactivist” on the Toronto Star website. The horrible spelling, grammar and overuse of ellipsis all match.

          • Anonymous

            You gotta wonder who these people think they are persuading. I mean, The Star? Torontoist? This demented drivel might find a more sympathetic readership on The Sun and Newstalk 1010. Well, I must say I find it most revealing and even kind of amusing, but that’s just me.

            Regardless, a recent Sun poll puts Stintz head of Ford in a mayoral race, so they must be doing something “right”. Keep up the great work, folks…

          • Anonymous

            Then pay road tolls and higher taxes and let’s build the subway lines. But I bet you’re strongly against that. So your perspective sounds dumb and anti-transit. The LRT lines must be built for the sake of improving transit in more areas. Driving will be a little bit more difficult, but without the LRT, the congestion will be a lot worse. Businesses won’t have many opportunities to grow when people can only drive and are stuck in traffic.

          • Anonymous

            wow. You are just way over your head. Transit City, which had years of study and consultation which you somehow missed, is described by the Globe and Mail (the Biz paper) as being the true fiscally conservative option; a true “respect for taxpayers”. You on the other hand seem to want new subways but with no plan or ability to pay for them. Your “plan” seems to be to call people stupid and hope for pennies from heaven. Thats not “respect for taxpayers”.

          • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

            TFD and EMS don’t like LRTs as they have to slow down to jump up the curb of the ROW.

          • Anonymous

            They also don’t like cars, which they have to slow down to deal with at every intersection.

          • tablogloid

            EMS and TFD vehicles have to stop at stop signs too. What’s your poit?

          • Anonymous

            Actually they like them. I have seen emergency trucks driving on the St. Clair and Queensway ROW avoiding traffic.

          • SMurphy

            You don’t want to tear up the roads? How do you think subways are made? Did you travel on Sheppard during the making if the subway stub? It was a construction zone for years.

          • Anonymous

            “Real citizens”… people on the Toronto Taxpayers Coalition mailing list don’t have a monopoly on that description.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

          SORRY Angry Honest Middle aged Scarborough citizens…mad has heck…with no real public consultation from Ontario Government or the city of Toronto…We pay taxes…This is not suppose to be a Liberal Dictatorship…or Toronto TTC banana republic run by idiot Karen Stintz.

          • Anonymous

            Are you SORRY, Angry, or just confused? No offense, but it’s kind of hard to make out your point here. Deep breaths.

          • Anonymous

            Josie Erent there were extensive public consultation done on creating an LRT network then called Transit City. However they didn’t go to every individual’s home with their presentations and to get feedback, it was up to those interested to go to the numerous consultation sessions, located all over the city, where plans were shown and feedback taken.

            You also had a long period when you could go online to see the presentations and give your feedback so you didn’t even have to leave the comfort of your own home. Obviously you didn’t even bother to do that. You knew that an LRT network was being planned and that it would affect your part of the city and you were given so many opportunities for consultation, online and at many locations all across the city. If a citizen can’t be bothered engaging in the consultation process made so easy to participate in then they have no right to complain they weren’t consulted.

            I took the time to go to one of the many consultations several years ago and was extremely impressed with their plans, my only concern was that my neighbourhood wasn’t going to get an LRT line, the Lakeshore West LRT line, until the 2nd or 3rd stage, if ever since it was the last line on the list by projected ridership. I was hoping it’d get done much sooner since it would make it so much easier and faster for me to go back and forth from New Toronto where I live to the southern downtown area, where I often go. Plus it’d provide improved transit for the booming Liberty Village and on the old railway lands.

            Why should anyone in Toronto tolerate making transit worse across most of the city so it can be made a little better than LRT along Sheppard? Riders on the Sheppard subway are subsidized approximately $8/ride while riders on the rest of the system are only subsidized approximately $0.57/ride. I cannot believe the nerve of some people in that part of the city screaming they’re being treated unfairly because they think they’re owed the best of suburban life and the best of urban life at the same time and damn the consequences for every other TTC rider, car driver and tax payer in Toronto.

            If you want easy access to a subway give up your large lawns and single family homes and move to a denser urban area that is capable of supporting a subway. Or you can lobby that the zoning be changed for at least several blocks on either side of Sheppard so that single family homes on large lots are no longer allowed and whole subdivisions can eventually be converted to all townhouses/row houses and low to medium rise apts. or condos, that is the minimum type of density needed for a subway. There is no city in the world that has ever built a subway line entirely through low density suburban areas.

          • Nina

            But Subway will bring density, people tend to move to areas close to subway. People keep using low density as an excuse are really short sighted, to say the least…

          • Richy7

            Well said Rich, one Rich to another Rich. The other problem with this city is people loving their cars too much. You live in a city, and you think you’re being wronged by traffic?! A subway will bleed money up there and so fares increase exponentially and then no one will take transit. Why do they ignore the facts?

          • blues guy

            building one subway at a cost of 8 billion and not building other lines makes no sense,leave the planning to the planners and the politics to the politicans,torontos a mess because of politics.mel lastman bulit a subway in his riding to get relected nothing else.the leading cities in the world have a combination of lrt and subways you need both.if its good enough for london england i think its good enough for toronto.no city in the world has a subway in every neighbourhood,its physically and financially impossible .you can have a network of lrt’s serving every neigh bourhood feeding a subway system that serves that region.ford is feeding of people to get re elected thats it.fords own dad stopped the eglinton subway when he served under mike harris.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

            You can extent the Bloor/Danforth line the 9 km from Kennedy to Scarborough Town Center for under $2 Billion of additional funds leaving $6.4 billion left.
            This is a much better use of the money and makes perfect sense.

          • Anonymous

            Troll

          • Anonymous

            There were over 30 town halls during the Transit City consultation process. How many town halls has Ford held about transit?

          • Anonymous

            And talking to a couple of people at Tim Horton’s doesn’t count.

          • Anonymous

            Are you OK?

        • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

          actually most people at the Scarborough Transit Town Hall DID come from Scarborough.

          People who came at that 7 or 8 pm budget talk at the Civic Centre months ago…most were NOT from Scarborough.

          I recognized most ppl at the Transit Hall. Many of them are neighbours/friends.

          The Budget Town Hall was mostly filled with downtowners who CLAIMED they were from Scarborough.

          • Anonymous

            Yeah right, and they were all members of unions. Generalizations aren’t cool. It’s getting hard not to assume that the people of Scarborough are simply stupid, demanding subways and rejecting all ways of paying for them, naively believing in the private sector fairy tale. And if someone suggests otherwise, they must be from distant downtown! If condo developers were willing to build subways for us, how come no one has come forward? Aren’t they interested in making money?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

      he is a coward….who ruined and divided this city..Worst mayor In Canada…

      • Tommy

        Re-read this statement with Rob Ford in mind…

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

          you must a be union boy…Sorry…Don’t support the idiot mayor who allowed the harassment and bullying our our citizens during the 2009 strike? Don’t like the truth ..That is your problem.

          • Anonymous

            Meh…if you want to fight it out over Miller, can we have our discussion about what to do with scarce city $’s back?

          • Anonymous

            “you must a be union body” < you are Giorgio Mammoliti and I claim my five dollars

  • Guest

    Sounds like the crowd was largely planted…..one thing I have to say though. Stintz is an idiot if she doesn’t see the poltics that are going on. Councillors (in Scarborough as an example) are telling residents that the LRT is the same as a streetcar….it isn’t but I have yet to see anyone clear that up for anyone. Councillors are openly giving misinformation to residents…..they are stirring up the crowds and inciting this division. Stintz needs to understand that the ‘high road’ is for chumps, not saying that she should get in the muck with the anti-transit crowd (see what I did there Karen?) but she needs to be aware and counter these types of set-ups……

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

      corruption alive and well at toronto city . I was at the February 28 Meeting…Karen Stintz is a liar……NO plan to deal with potential lawsuits…..What about the businesses….? LRTS slower than businesses on surface….These councillors eager to give misinformation…and they continue to give misinformation…Karen Stintz, John Parker….don’t not trust them.

      • confused reader

        What are you talking about? Do you think there will be no disruption along Sheppard when you build a subway? What ever system you build it will take a while and be disruptive. You all want a huge capital project to be installed in a weekend while you are out of town. Get real.

      • Anonymous

        What lawsuits? The one some keep mentioning over St Clair was thrown out of court for being baseless 1-2 years ago and the appeal of that decision was also tossed out maybe 6months to 1 year ago. There are no grounds for anyone to sue the city over the construction of city infrastructure.

      • Anonymous

        Trolls be a’ trolling

      • Anonymous

        I’ll take a Stintz “lie” over a Ford/Chong delusion any day. I can’t believe a person enriched by the City of Toronto with a six figure sum to write a cut and paste report called a City Councillor “thick” during a public meeting.

    • Mohearn4

      Plants my ass. this was a small sampling of the 600,000 strong Scarborough population that are outraged their transit goals are being overlooked once again. Stintz is a backstabbing two faced liar and should resign. Sorry but the silent right have been silent too long and have allowed the trough feeding left to things with no regard for all of Toronto not just the 10 blocks east and west of Yonge Street. And any Scarborough Councilor who voted for Stintz and against subways should hand in their resignation. Hopefully there will be no more piles of manure handed out free, while using our tax dollars.

      • James

        I think the best plan and the one that would make everyone the happiest would be to allow Scarborough to come up with their own transit system. Why pay for an LRT that you don’t want? In fact, why pay for anything downtown? Go it alone. Write to Rob Ford and ask him for annexation. It means no more listening to lies from communists on council and bad people at the TTC. Annexation is your friend.

        • Anonymous

          The word you’re looking for is secession, not annexation.

      • Anonymous

        Mohearn4 please name one other city that has ever built a subway line entirely through a low density suburban area. Any of the subway systems I’ve seen from around the world only have subways in the dense parts of their cities. The LRT and massive zoning changes are the only way a subway will ever be built along Sheppard east. A thin strip of density along Sheppard isn’t nearly enough density, it has to be at least large blocks on either side of Sheppard where single family homes on large chunks of property are banned and replaced with townhouses, or at most small single family homes on small parcels of land along with low and medium rise apt buildings or condos.

        As it is now every rider on the existing Sheppard subway is subsidized approximately $8/ride while the average for the rest of the system is just approximately $0.57/ride. That massive annual subsidy is a big part of why most Torontonians saw their transit service slashed recently. Even along the existing Sheppard subway density hasn’t increased anywhere even close to enough after its been running for ten years so far.

        Mohearn4 also please explain why the rest of Toronto should have its transit service cut and taxes massively increased so those living along the Sheppard corridor can enjoy the best of suburban life and the best urban life at the same time? I live in Etobicoke and I have recently lost a significant amount of transit service in big part due the all the money the existing Sheppard subway is soaking up, please explain why me riding the TTC, along with the rest of Toronto, should only be worth $0.57 subsidy per ride while those along the Sheppard corridor between Yonge and the STC should get approximately $8/ride? How is that even remotely fair? Please explain.

        I guess “the silent right” as you call them are not the least bit concerned about financial sustainability of the TTC or Toronto. Its odd isn’t it that those claiming to be financial conservatives, who claim we cannot afford to feed hungry children, scream and demand that the gravy train be buried and run right to their front door. I’m pretty certain too that of the 600,000 in Scarborough not too many support getting no transit improvements at all east of the STC, or really east of VP since that’s the absolute most the Sheppard subway will ever be extended in our life times. Those who claim that nothing is better than LRT obviously are not transit riders, or are so willfully ignorant of the realities of LRTs in spite of all the constant evidence about them over the past 8 years or so now, the new LRT lines will be nothing at all like the SRT. One thing they do have in common with streetcars though is that when the winter weather is awful and our roads bogged down they will still be running when even our buses are having difficulty moving and our subways get short turned due to frozen switches thanks to the overhead power supply of LRTs.

      • Ian MacIntyre

        “Mohearn4 also please explain why the rest of Toronto should have its transit service cut and taxes massively increased so those living along the Sheppard corridor can enjoy the best of suburban life and the best urban life at the same time… I guess “the silent right” as you call them are not the least bit concerned about financial sustainability of the TTC or Toronto. Its odd isn’t it that those claiming to be financial conservatives, who claim we cannot afford to feed hungry children, scream and demand that the gravy train be buried and run right to their front door.”

        This is pretty much the most succinct appraisal of the “Scarborough deserves Subways” debate I’ve ever heard. Rob Ford got elected by appealing to the suburbs’ resentment and vanity, promising them things he didn’t know and frankly didn’t care if he could actually deliver. If he somehow gets subway construction started, he’s a hero (and long gone before the true costs of it are ever apparent). If no subways get built, or an LRT which he has poisoned the residents of Scarborough against, Ford is a martyr who’s fighting those “downtown elites who think they’re better than Scarborough”. I’m sorry, but that elitist, silver-spoon Daddy’s boy isn’t in it for you, and he probably couldn’t care less whether this subway ever gets built. After all, it’s his project – why was he too scared to show his face at the Town Hall meeting?

      • Anonymous

        What “transit goals”? These people sound like they’re terrified of having to make an extra u-turn in their trusty cars. They’re railing against real improvements to the transit network. They say buses are fine because they don’t ride them.

      • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

        I’m sorry, how are you exactly getting that Stintz is a liar? Stintz stumped with Miller for Transit City at Eglinton station, for god’s sake, what do you think her constituents were thinking she was going to support once voted in?

  • Anonymous

    Just shows what fools people can be. There is no plan and no money.And in a perfect world a Downtown Relief Line is needed way more than anything the burbs. This wasnt a debate, it was a pro Ford rally led by his shill Sue Ann Levey.

    • maven

      Where did the money come from after WWII when there was men back from the War with no work/high unemployment, a recession on and congestion all up Yonge st? sound familiar? Now imagine what Yonge would be like today and Bloor/Danforth without a subway/ If councillors and gov’t were as short sighted back then as they are now? The streets are chaos when the subway shuts down for a few hours. Imagine the congestion on Yonge/bloor without subways all the time. 20 years from now it will worse in the city and in the suburbs. The city’s not getting smaller. Transit won’t get cheaper. Just get the subways done and start now, as much as possible. Finish sheppard to STC at least, so people have access to a subway if the Scarborough RT is pretty much done. That’s a start. We might be able to handle a Pan Am games or Olympics like the other ‘world-class’ cities instead of being wanna- be’s.

      • http://twitter.com/blernsball Bill H

        Actually, there are numerous ‘world class’ cities that use LRT. It works, and works well.
        Does nobody understand that you need to take into account projected population density when building mass transit? If you don’t you are left paying for capacity you’ll never use (see: the Shepard line). The suburbs will never have the density that the core does, it’s just a fact. Use less money, build more LRT lines, and more more people around. Why is this still a debate?

        • Mohearn4

          I’m guessing you live relatively close to downtown.

          • http://twitter.com/blernsball Bill H

            East end of East York. Not that it matters, because where you live has no bearing on your ability to read the projected population density numbers. Explain how the population in the suburbs justify the massive extra expense that a subway will bring.

          • Anonymous

            I live at Yonge and Finch, and I agree with Bill.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

            One Downtowner and one living on at existing Subway Stop. Why would they want anything else other than to see the rest of the “burbs” “Eat Cake”.

          • Anonymous

            I don’t know. Perhaps because we’re interested in city building right now, with costed, planned solutions. That kind of crazy stuff.

          • D Lorac

            I guess it doesn’t matter if the plan makes sense or if it is a total waste of money, as long as it’s “planned and costed”

          • Anonymous

            Ford has had over a year to get a costed plan in order. He hasn’t. He can’t say he wasn’t given plenty of time to fashion one. That’s his fault, not mine.

            And oh, yes. Please show me ridership projections for Sheppard Ave E that justify the subway being extended. Even Chong wasn’t able to dig them up, so I doubt they exist.

          • Jay

            I live near London, ON (left TO due to new job last year) and I agree with Bill.

      • James

        You obviously have no clue what an LRT is. Regardless, this isn’t a debate about LRT vs.subways. The two are designed to work together. What this is about is improving a bad transit system incrementally by addressing the greatest need first. It’s about moving as many people as possible from as many neighbourhoods as possible as soon as possible. It’s not about SCARBOROUGH. It’s also about moving forward with a fully costed plan that has already been agreed upon by council, not once, but twice.

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

          To spend $8.4 Billion on a flawed and biased plan, that forces people to accept something they Don’t Want and is of limited utility to them, is not what I call moving forward. Nor is it in the best interest of Toronto.

      • Michael DiFrancesco

        “Where did the money come from after WWII when there was men back from the War with no work/high unemployment, a recession on and congestion all up Yonge st?”

        The Federal Government.

        You want funding for subways – not just for construction, but subsidies for the next half-century of operating losses? Start there.

        • Anonymous

          Actually, when it came time to build the Yonge line, the feds did what they do best: renege. They were supposed to pick up the tab for 20 percent of the cost of construction of the Yonge and Queen lines. Because the promised funding didn’t materialize, the city cancelled the Queen subway and only built Yonge, and had to wait four years to put a spade in the ground. The Yonge line was funded almost entirely from the farebox — the streetcar farebox, in fact, because up until WW2, the TTC network was dominated by streetcars, and primarily served the former City of Toronto, with a line branching out to Long Branch or Leaside here and there. When Metro was organized and took over the TTC in the ’50s, and the suburbs started growing, the TTC had to start providing money-losing bus service. But yes, the federal and provincial treasuries should be making investments in urban transportation.

          • Michael DiFrancesco

            I should have guessed. Reading histories of the Great Depression, the sheer level of political procrastination within the federal government is truly a sight to behold. But thank you for the clarification.

            And yes, I agree – as always, if you don’t want to give municipalities significantly more options in revenue collection, then you shouldn’t be expecting them to foot the bill for such capital-intensive projects of which your government (Mr. Harper) is apparently such a big fan.

      • Tommy

        The congestion on the Yonge and Bloor/Danforth streetcars necessitated building a subway. The ridership was there to fill subway cars and pay for the line. The ridership on Sheppard is nowhere near the levels needed to justify a subway. Maybe the LRT line can draw enough people over time to justify a subway. Probably not. Scarborough has NOT been able to file the Sheppard line as is, and each rider is subsidized to the tune of 8 dollars PER RIDE. That is money that is taken away from the rest of the system, and causes bus route cancellations. A fiscally sound TTC would mothball the entire Sheppard line as is, and run buses again.

        Oh, and giving the option to travel from STC to the Yonge line due to an RT breakdown is a terrible idea. The Yonge line is already at 105% capacity. There is no room for masses of people traveling from the east.

      • Testu

        I love how our collective inferiority complex re: “World Class Cities” keeps getting drawn into this. Toronto is not New York or London or Paris. We have a distinct geographical, social and political identity.

        Claiming that transit experts (people who are paid for their knowledge of transit planning, design and implementation) are being short sighted because you want a subway doesn’t make it so. There is actual science behind their projections, most of the data they’ve used and their findings are available for review. So far no one has come forward with any fact based reason why the lower density regions of Toronto require a subway.

        We can afford LRT for these regions now, the LRT will provide a significant improvement in transit service over the current bus routes and will allow for a large increase in ridership in the future. That’s why LRTs are being recommended.

        It’s worth noting that in over a year no one has come up with anything more than a vague outline of how to implement a sustainable or affordable subway system in these same areas.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

          baloney….SUBWAY in vaughan Population 300,000 2011. Scarborough Population 600,000 Vaughan get subway and special treatment by Greg Sorbara and the Ontario LIberal Party…Scarborough and Toronto citizens 2nd class citizens…Shame on the liberal party..shame on Karen Stintz…SHAME>>SHAME>>>SHAME

          • Tommy

            Blah Blah Blah. If you’re going to play ball, come with a bat; don’t just slobber all over the field. Here’s something we can work with: http://i.imgur.com/ch4F6.gif

            It’s a map of locations of JOBS in Toronto. Mapping jobs is important because they are the primary driver of transit rides in the city. Notice the job clustering along the University-Spadina subway route all the way up to Vaughn. Also note that the 905 region has been siphoning off jobs from Toronto, and reverse commutes are becoming more common. The subway to Vaughan will also take pressure off from Finch station and the Yonge line (because it is dangerously overcapacity), not to mention clear up the hundreds and hundreds of buses (TTC and 905) from the York campus every day.

            Feel free to use the map to try to justify the Scarborough subway if you want. Presenting facts is better than farting out tired old “SHAME” drones. Scarborough certainly has some areas that could use improved transit, but none have the need or urgency of a subway.

          • Mohearn4

            Blah, blah, blah. Another lefty downtowner. Probably thought Miller was a great mayor. If you’re going baseball analogies you’d better know how to swing a bat. I think your game is probably checkers.

          • Anonymous

            It isn’t a downtown/inner suburb thing, first off LRTs are only being built for the benefit of the inner suburbs, not downtown. That’s $8.7 billion being spent to improve transit in Toronto’s inner suburbs. I live in Etobicoke and hope that one day there will be an LRT line for my neighbourhood too. Its just financially responsible to build LRTs over as much of our inner suburbs as possible since they will never be dense enough to come even close to justifying subway lines in any of our lifetimes. LRTs would do so much to make traveling by transit in the inner suburbs way more tolerable than by overcrowded buses, or even streetcars which I much prefer to buses. At least LRTs won’t get bogged down by single occupant car drivers turning left at every little side street like happens on the downtown streetcar lines now.

            The reality is that it makes way better business sense to build any new subway line in the old city of Toronto, the vast majority of which is not served by subways but streetcars and buses. Besides the DRL and King and Queen Sts which are often mentioned as in need of subways which wouldn’t be money losers like the Sheppard subway but even Dufferin from the CNE grounds to Eglinton is more justified from a business perspective in getting a subway line than the existing Sheppard subway line that’s already been open 10 years and still costing about $8/ride to subsidize while the rest of the system only needs $0.57/ride in subsidy.

            The main reason I do most of my shopping either in my local neighbourhood or downtown is because I hate taking buses and will not do so for any length of time so I go where I can travel in comfort by rail, whether its streetcar or subway. Rail attracts new development, buses do not. The vast majority of condos in Toronto are being built on streetcar lines and not on subway lines. Besides there is no guarantee that a subway will bring density, especially along Sheppard where zoning prohibits the sort of density needed to support subways once you get off of Sheppard itself and that little bit of density will never be enough to make that subway pay for itself.

            No one can have the best of low density suburban life and the best of high density urban life at the same time, no matter how loud you yell and stomp your feet in anger.

          • Ian MacIntyre

            Wow, you make a lot of great fact-based arguments in your comment, Mohearn4. Real food for thought there.

          • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

            that map is outdated. jobs ARE being created along Sheppard.

            Yonge, Bayview, Leslie, Don Mills, VIctoria Park. There are studies being done for Warden and Kennedy right now.

          • Ian MacIntyre

            Can you actually link to any of those studies, or just throw out vague assertions and run away?

          • Eric S. Smith

            that map is outdated. jobs ARE being created along Sheppard.

            That map’s from 2010. Unless those jobs are being created at brand new multi-tower office parks, the analysis stands.

            There are studies being done for Warden and Kennedy right now.

            The Golden Mile deserves subways! Sorry, man, when I lived up Warden I wished the 68 came more often. Replace it with a 6-car heavy rail train, and they’d probably run it once every couple of hours.

          • Anonymous

            I get the feeling you are into partisan politics here. Call it a hunch. And please, continue with your most edifying comments.

          • M Gold

            Yes the subway to Vaughan is a waste of money and due to Sorbara’s political clout. David Miller went along with it for the tradeoff of building Transit City to try and improve transit for the most people esp in the priority neighbourhoods he worked hard for. Just because one political line was built to Vaughn (which is going to be an operational drain like the Shepard Stubway), does not mean we should repeat the mistake and double down by expanding subway’s where they aren’t warranted because ‘people want them’. LRT is not 2nd class if built and operated right, and LRT is not the same as RT (another politically determined technology foisted on TTC by Queen’s Park).

          • Anonymous

            Vaughn and York University are part of Metrolinx’s Mobility Hubs program. Also Vaughn paid for part of the subway extension cost. Take it up with them.

          • Anonymous

            Canada population 30,000,000+. Why no subway from St John’s to Vancouver? Canadian citizens 2nd class citizens. Hint: density.

          • Jamie

            That was my exact question! They have money to extend the subway into Vaughan..Vaughan is not even part of the GTA, and those few stops would be better served either connecting yonge/sheppard station to downsview, or the other direction th STC. It is better to build something now, that 20-30 years from now they will need to rip out and rebuild..oh I don’t know..SUBWAYS!? makes perfect long term sense lol
            This serves as short term goals for Stintz and likewise, as well as the fat cats at TTC to justify raises 20–30 years from now when they require more funding. How is an above ground system more efficient than a bus? You could argue in the best of weather conditions ..yes, but during real world issues (accidents, snow storms) it is a disaster.At least a bus can get around traffic when required, so no, it makes little sense to build something with the money you have, just to build something and use as your obvious election plaform next election Stintz..

      • Anonymous

        The money for the Yonge subway came from the fare box from the TTC’s then-profitable surface rail routes like, for example, the Yonge streetcar.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gregory-Flynn/792510472 Gregory Flynn

      Yup, feel sorry for anyone that walked into this nut house. It’s like Lord of the Flies or Kingdom Come – rabble rabble SUBWAYS rabble rabble LEFTY rabble rabble TAXPAYERS rabble rabble COMMIE rabble rabble… fools indeed.

      I did enjoy that Chong was using a metaphor about blowing smoke, and that Levey was using a metaphor about a hen party. Thanks for picking up on that Cole.

      Life is good.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

      Toronto/EastYork has a declining population of 0.7% on a 5 year basis where as Scarborough’s population is rising at a rate of 2.4%. How can you with a straight face claim Downtown relief is needed more than “anything” in the burbs?
      Disgusting narrow-minded downtown thinking!

      • Anonymous

        2.4 % of an existing low density doesnt add up to much. 2.4 % of high density does. You also fail to take note that the DRL line is taken by people who live outside of downtown to get to work. It is not for people who live downtown. Every single transportation study done in the last 15 years on a municipal and provincial level mentions the need for a DRL to get people to work easier. Nothing disgusting about that.

  • Guest

    Just another thought…..We have heard now from Etobicoke and Scarborough that it’s subways or nothing…….Toronto is a big city, plenty of places need transit, wonder what would happen if someone said…”OK, nothing”

    • http://www.iterativearts.com bud latanville

      my thought exactly.

      • Anonymous

        Fine by me. We’ll build a downtown relief line with the cash which’ll make us happy, and you can rest on your laurels while waiting for a jam packed bus to come by (maybe) every 30 minutes. I’m not shedding a tear for you..

        • Anonymous

          To be fair, the billion dollars we have to spend on a full Sheppard LRT or two stop of stubway would barely make a dent on a DRL. Best put that money to use on a Queens Quay E. LRT, out to the portlands.

        • Mohearn4

          As long as you downtowners are happy…..I mean after all isn’t that what’s expected and the way it’s been the last 7 years. We don’t want your tears, just some of the benefits from the taxes 600,000 of us have been paying under that fool Miller.

          • Anonymous

            The entire $8.7 billion in transit improvements is only being spent in the inner suburbs and nowhere near downtown. As well the claim that the inner suburbs got less money spent on them under amalgamation has been proven to be BS by a couple of studies in recent years. Money was spent on different things in different parts of the city but on a per capita basis city spending under Miller was very even across the city. As well it was Miller’s plan that LRTs be built to improve transit in the inner suburbs, originally that was $12 billion he planned to spend on the inner suburbs alone and not downtown. Most of the old city of Toronto isn’t served by subways at all but instead by streetcars in mixed traffic and buses and recently the entire city has lost transit service in part to pay for the massive subsidies required to keep the existing Sheppard subway running.

            There never should have been any subway built on Sheppard at all, its a massive money loser and will continue to be so until zoning is changed for several blocks at least on either side of Sheppard to allow for much denser housing and commercial uses than currently exists but considering the way local people have been fighting condo towers at Yonge and Eglinton and how fierce the opposition to even small townhouse complexes I don’t see that ever happening, at least not until the local residents decide they rather live in an urban area with a subway or in a suburban area without a subway. LRTs are an excellent form of transit for such suburban areas and at the projected rates of growth will not be anywhere near capacity in any of our life times, not even on Eglinton which is much busier.

    • D Lorac

      Being from Scarborough, If you put it that way, I’d take the Nothing rather than having to put up with LRT’s.

      • Jacob

        As a Scarborough resident who currently drives, but has awful memories of waiting nearly an hour for the Eglinton bus in the past, I would be very happy with an LRT. Smooth, modern, rapid transportation is what we need. Badly.

        Subways are nice, but expensive and not necessary.

        Edit: Also, let’s get an LRT up Kennedy or Victoria Park while we’re at it.

    • Bradley

      This was just a very loud group of maybe 200 people. It’s to the whole city’s benefit to improve transit along Eglinton, Sheppard, and Finch.

    • Anonymous

      Uh no, I live in Etobicoke, well southern Etobicoke and everyone I’ve talked to about this in my neighbourhood, except some store owners who don’t live here and don’t take transit, are all eagerly awaiting the day that maybe the Lakeshore West LRT line gets built. In one of the many pharmacies along Lakeshore west I was called a stupid idiot by the pharmacist for supporting LRT lines, first off I haven;t been back there since I’m not going to do business with someone who insults me when I have so many other choices, but all the stores in this area, especially the pharmacies, attract about 99% of their business from the local population, after all who would drive past several other pharmacies and the many small stores out here just to go to one particular one? It doesn’t happen, an LRT line would do far more to bring in more people to this meighbourhood than cars do.

      As well I’m sure there are many people in Scarborough who desperately want LRT or any improved transit but are too busy working several jobs and commuting across the city to have time to show up at such an event as held the other night. especially those who live east of STC and in Malvern who aren’t even being considered by Ford or those who realize that the very most they’ll ever see in their life times is the Sheppard gravy train extended to VP.

      No city anywhere in the world has ever built a subway line entirely through a low density suburban area and it just isn’t going to happen in Toronto either. Besides the Sheppard LRT will provide far more service to many tens of thousands more people on Sheppard east and will help increase development and be an economic boost to local businesses. As a city we just cannot afford not to improve transit throughout our inner suburbs and LRT is the only way that’s going to happen in the next 100 years or so.

  • Guest

    I guess the answer is “nothing”.

  • Anonymous

    Does this mean Gordon is gonna get paid?

  • Anonymous

    Holy Jesus. That is nuts. All this did was fuel their pure irrational delusions even further. Who will be the first Scarborough resident to self-immolate in front of city hall for the subway cause?

    • http://twitter.com/Welshgrrl Vashty Hawkins

      I know she doesn’t reside in Scarborough, but if professional hack/Ford buttkisser extraordinaire SAL could light a match and take one for the team, I’d be all for it!

    • Anonymous

      I’m thinking they’re more in the chaining themselves to bulldozers camp.

      Call me cynical, but I don’t think McGuire’s at all disappointed. He got 200 people riled up with misinformation, and death-or-glory backers of subways. Sounds like a good evening for the Toronto Taxpayers’ Coalition (do they have a progressive wing?).

  • Anonymous

    When did Scarborough start having Kool-aid instead of water coming out of it’s taps? God.. these people are as scary as they are uninformed

    • D Lorac

      No they are not Uninformed, they just don’t want idiot LRT’s being forced on them; If they can’t have subways they want another solution but NOT LRT’s!

      • TorontoDan

        why not LRTs? why are they so bad? do you have a single cogent argument against LRTs?

        • Anonymous

          Of course not. D Lorac is just your usual dose of someone who is uneducated on the topic and has misplaced anger.

      • Anonymous

        You do know D Lorac that Ford was all for cutting bus lines too, right?

        And that his transit advisor actually believes in ditching the TTC all together and suggests you get a taxi, right?

      • Anonymous

        No. They want nothing. Heck, take the buses away.

        • Anonymous

          I really have to wonder: given that all these people want SUBWAYS and only SUBWAYS, why don’t we just eliminate all surface transit in the city? Without all those nasty buses and streetcars cluttering up the streets and impeding the forward progress of cars, surely the city would be a free-flowing traffic paradise…

          • Anonymous

            That is the backgound to all this, actually. Ford’s TTC advisor is the guy who wants to just stop funding the TTC and sell it off.

      • Anonymous

        So, would you like some flying unicorns? I mean, they’re probably just as feasible as the non-existant subway everyone keeps yelling about.

  • Testu

    Who’d have guessed, once you politicize transit planning the only thing people listen to are sound-bites and slogans, any kind of nuanced explanation gets drowned out.

    The people have been promised subways and they honestly believe they’ll get them if they shout loud enough. Besides, all those studies and usage based policies are just politics, right? Anyone who says subways are not affordable has an agenda.

  • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

    Matthew McGuire must be so proud.

  • maven

    Where did the money come from after WWII when there was men back from the War with no work/high unemployment, a recession on and congestion all up Yonge st? sound familiar? Now imagine what Yonge would be like today and Bloor/Danforth without a subway, If councillors and gov’t were as short sighted back then as they are now? The streets are chaos when the subway shuts down for a few hours. Imagine the congestion on Yonge/bloor without subways all the time now. 20 years from now it will be worse in the city and in the suburbs. The city’s not getting smaller. Transit won’t get cheaper. Just get the subways done and start now, as much as possible. Finish Sheppard to STC at least, (as originally planned) so people have access to a subway if the Scarborough RT is pretty much done and over to Kennedy. That’s a start. We might be able to handle a Pan Am Games or Olympics like the other ‘world-class’ cities instead of being wanna- be’s, and whiners and actually be able to make a decision amongst politicians. We might even get the reputation back of being a model of transit amongst the world as TTC was back up to the mid ’80′s before funding was cut. (More short sightedness. :P

    • Anonymous

      Uh, you already posted that. Posting it twice does not make it less nonsensical.

    • Anonymous

      The subways were built when there was a need for them. Before that streetcars ran along Yonge/Bloor/Danforth. At the time it was funded by the federal government.
      We are having the Pan Am games, and the transit needed has been stalled, nothing built yet. No need to build for the Olympics when there is none planned, even if they do happen you have to plan the Olympic sites first before you plan a transit system to serve them.
      There is no need for a Sheppard subway, the volume is not there and there none in the foreseeable future.

  • Anonymous

    “Is the private sector blowing smoke?” Chong asked. “Are they really BS-ing us? Or are they really gonna come in and bid? There’s only one way you’re going to find out, and that is you complete the business plan, do the RFP, and then you’ll find out for sure.”

    LOL. Chong knows full well that Ford met with “the private sector” and they told him to smoke rope, they ain’t gonna pay a penny for his subways. He’s had a year to put together a business plan, and all he came up with was a report full of numbers he made up because he doesn’t trust the numbers from TTC. Let’s see, I’ll take TTC’s cost and subtract….a billion, yeah, a billion, that’s the ticket….

    • Eric S. Smith

      He subtracts a billion, handwaves all over the place, and still can’t make the numbers work.

  • Anonymous

    I grew up in Wexford (west Scarborough) and often visit my mother who still lives there. Things have changed in 40 years. The factories that once employed thousands, with well above minimum wage jobs have all been replaced, with partime min. wage, big box retail jobs. Also, most residents no longer waik to their place of employment, like my parents did. If you’re going to think about the future, long term, then Scarborough residents shouldn’t be pushing for subways that might get them somewhere else faster. They should be thinking about building neighbourhoods that are first liviable, and second, interesting enough that they may become destinations for others. You can’t see places of interest from underground. They may as well not be there.

  • D Lorac

    WOH! I am from Scarborough and I find a lot of the comments an insult. I can assure you that the sentiment at that meeting was typical of those whom I have talked to.
    I don’t think most who are writing on these pages (and for that matter the Planners at TTC) have any concept of the needs of the outer regions of Scarborough. If they did they wouldn’t be trying to force LRT’s on them.

    • James

      Yes, please. What are the transit needs of Scarborough and how does the plan for an LRT system miss the mark? Please frame your answer in regards to the greater transit needs of the city as a whole. You have the mic.

      • http://twitter.com/Welshgrrl Vashty Hawkins

        I think you’ll be lucky to get any response other than variations of the following:

        http://fordfortoronto.mattelliott.ca/2012/02/06/return-of-transit-city/

      • D Lorac

        Without going into detail the main need is for “SPEED” to get to other parts of the City and particularly downtown. Subways are the fastest public transit and don’t interfere with traffic. Express Buses to Subways would be the next fastest option, would have minimum or no effect on vehicle traffic. LRT,
        although a little faster than local buses, would take away two lanes on busy streets, and overall would result in the slowest overall commute times of the three.

        • James

          You failed to illustrate how the greater transit needs of the city are served by a single subway line to Scarborough.

        • Tommy

          If it’s speed you need, then this needs to be stated more by the residents of Scarborough. I have a feeling that the two sides are coming at this issue from two different directions. LRT advocates are using population density and funding models to come up with their option. Anti-LRT advocates just want speed, no matter what. Installing a subway for speed and road space reasons alone is not fiscally responsible (as we have already seen with the Sheppard line).

          If the transit requirements of Scarborough are speed and road space, and we want to have a financially realistic plan, then maybe we should forget the LRT down main roads, and instead build bus rapidways along hydro corridors. Scarborough is not rich enough to support subways.

        • John Duncan

          I think you’ll find the GO is much faster than the subway.

          If you’re going downtown from Scarborough, you’d be much better off pushing Metrolinx to reduce GO fares within the 416 and increase its frequency. It would be much cheaper than a subway and faster.
          If you want to go from Scarborough over to Etobicoke, you’d likewise be better off trying to get GO to build an express line along the 401.

    • John Duncan

      ???

      But the LRT plan will provide service to “the outer regions of Scarborough” while Ford’s subway would only connect back to Scarborough Town Centre, if it was ever even built.

      • Tommy

        This is an important point. The LRT would go almost all the way to the zoo. The subway dives back south of the 401 and ends at STC. So much for helping the outlying suburbs. Too bad for people past McCowan and Malvern. I also can’t help but laugh when I see that a subway station is planned for Warden/Sheppard. There are 3 gas stations at that intersection and low rise housing. Ridiculous.

  • http://twitter.com/blernsball Bill H

    Explain what you think LRT is and how it will work.

  • James

    This is what happens when you elect a guy with the political savvy of a football coach.

    • D Lorac

      Sounds like a comment of someone with the IQ of a Moron!

      • Anonymous

        comments like that make anything you say not worth listening to, you lost the discussion, now go home and watch TV .

  • Tom

    See this is why nobody likes to venture north of Eglinton. :)

    • Kgrander

      Um, no body likes to venture north of St. Clair.

      • latte sipping downtown elite

        whoah, whoah, whoah – when did they put streets above dupont???

        • Eric S. Smith

          I think you mean Dundas.

  • Anonymous

    It’s always fun to see how the conflicting views of the urban conservative conflict. “We demand this needlessly expensive thing that we won’t use and won’t pay for!”

    A further irony is that the only way a subway would work in Scarborough would be with a huge investment into employment in the community.

    • D Lorac

      Being from Scarborough, I think the sentiment is more “Anything But LRT’s” and if the only alternative being put forth is Subways then either give us those of forget about it and don’t bother forcing LRT’s on us!

      • Anonymous

        You obviously don’t take transit daily, if you did there’s no way you’d prefer standing on a crowded bus being bounced around for a long trip when instead you can travel much faster and in much more comfort on a LRT line.

        We need to be making transit decisions in Toronto that benefit the transit riders of Toronto. Especially since transit is the only way we can effectively move more people around Toronto.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josie-Erent/1074278927 Josie Erent

    Vaughan population 300,000 2011. Scarborough Population 600,000. Vaughan thanks to Ontario liberal party gets subway…Scarborough gets the finger…..Yes karen tell us again why density matters and explain to us my MPP liberal Greg Sorbara is ignoring your U of t biased experts and putting subway in Vaughan. You are misleading the public with your facts and should resign…You don’t represent the Ontario Government and you do not have a legal contingency plan to deal with the multiple business lawsuits….resulting from lack of public and business consultation in 2 years…You are an embarrassment to this city and should resign.

    • Tommy

      You already posted this above. Take a look at my response.

      • Testu

        Originally I thought the double posts were due to a bug in the DISQUS software combined with mashing the “Post as” button.

        I just noticed they’re slightly different posts, same content, different wording. The Ford principle at work, say it loud, say it often. Eventually it’ll be true.

        The problem is, just acquiescing and leaving Scarborough with limited bus service punishes everyone in the area that actually relies on public transit. The vocal my-way-or-the-highway crowd seem to forget that they’re not the only ones affected by these decisions. I guess “everybody wins” versus “a few of us win and a lot of people lose” seems like an easy choice as long as you’re one of the winning few.

        Unfortunately even “after the carnage” St. Clair testimonials don’t seem to convince people that improved transit might be a good thing all around.

        • TD

          The people of Scarborough are all for improved transportation. The problem is that they do NOT think LRT’s are an improvement!

          • Anonymous

            Well I do think LRTs are a huge improvement over our lousy bus service here in Scarborough. It’s time for you road hogs to move over and share the road. Leave your car home and you’ll save a ton of money, trust me on this.

          • TD

            I have met the odd person in Scarborough who likes LST’s but certainly they are in the vast minority. I am afraid I have never met one as adamantly in their favor as you.

          • Testu

            Fair enough. The point of these public consultations is to help our counsel representatives understand the needs of the people they represent. The problem is, without viable alternatives they can only argue by rhetoric. There is no way of paying for a subway that doesn’t increase fares or increase taxes.

            Busting the TTC union or privatizing the infrastructure doesn’t make it any more viable. A subway in Scarborough will not have enough riders to cover its costs (immediate or long term). Making it viable would involve raising the fares to the point where the people who rely on the service could not afford it or getting additional subsidies the provincial government (which are not available).

            We’re in a recession. Getting people to where they work and where they shop in an affordable way is critical to improving our economic situation. Delaying improvements to transit because they don’t meet your ideals helps no one.

          • Ted

            Don’t speak on behalf for me. I believe LRTs can work here in Scarborough. It just takes a little (a lot apparently) of understanding the costs and benefits, and what money we have. If you really want a subway to Scarborough Town, then power to you… but in the end we all have to get on a bus in the end.

            Having an LRT down Sheppard can eliminate that, and that’s what I’m looking forward to.

  • TD

    I can only say one thing! If the Liberals who hold most of the Provincial seats in Scarborough let Council’s proposal to build LRT’s in Scarborough go ahead, they can KISS most of these Goodby in the next election!

  • Anonymous

    We’re so luck to have a Mayor, that not only knows more about public transit than all of the experts that have studied and proven that LRT give the biggest bang for the buck here in Toronto, but knows more than the 100 plus (see attached lists) experts in Amercian cities that are building LRT lines. Not to mention the 250 major cities worldwide that are opting for LRTs over subways. Ford must be a f**king transit, genius god. I would never have guessed. All along I just thought he was pushing subways because it was the opposite of what the ex mayor wanted.

    • TD

      Forget LRT’s in Scarborough! The people don’t want them! The Metrolinx Report “Sheppard Finch LRT Benefits Case” which everyone is claiming as justification of LRT’s is severely biased and flawed. It was done by a British Consulting firm which considered only 5 scenarios, all of which included LRT’s. It did not consider other possibilities. To force LRT’s on Scarborough would be one of the Biggest waste of Taxpayers Money ever seen in this Province.

      • Anonymous

        As much as I would like to say fine then lets not build anything on Sheppard and instead use the money to extend the Eglinton and Finch LRT lines or to add another LRT line, preferably a north south one. But the reality is that we cannot let the car driving loudmouths dictate what transit improvements are made for those along the Sheppard corridor who do take transit daily, especially in the east end where the need is the greatest for improved transit. Besides if no LRT was built on Sheppard it would also be a major problem for anyone for any other part of the city who has to travel out that way and an LRT would help development and businesses along Sheppard. We cannot afford to let Sheppard sink just because some loud mouth car drivers don’t want improved transit on Sheppard. Areas like Malvern would benefit massively from a LRT line since it would make life so much easier for working people who rely upon transit and allow them to spend more time with their families than on the buses, or waiting for a bus to come along that they can squeeze on to.

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

          Typical “Downtown” naive outlook. To refer to Scaborough residents as “loud mouth car drivers” is not nice! Whether one likes it or not, a car is almost a necessity in the outer suburbs, unlike the downtown areas. In the suburbs one does not expect the kind of “door to door” TTC service that is present downtown. Instead it is common to either drive drive oneself to, and park at the nearest Subway enterance, or get a family member to drive you and drop you off at TTC’s “Kiss and Ride”. LRT’s will have little effect on this practice but will probably slow the drive to the Subway.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

            PS: If Toronto can’t (or won’t) extend the Subway in Scarborough, for the betterment of the City as a whole, I would favor using this money to for the construction of the Eglington SUBWAY (not LRT), which should have probably have been built instead of extending the Spadina Subway into Vaughan.

          • Anonymous

            So you’re fine with Scarborough being just a bunch of bedrooms? LRT’s would provide Scarborough residents with the same “door to door” TTC service that is present downtown. The problem is that people are buying Ford’s lies about what an LRT is. It certainly isn’t a streetcar circa 1980, like he would like us to believe. It is, though, nearly as fast as a subway. With 2/3′s the capacity of a subway and the choice mode of 21st century, public transit in over 300 cities worldwide. Don’t believe it? Don’t care? Then you’re not really interested in Scarborough”s future and are content with the status quo. Which is, like you said, having to drive a car everywhere.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

            LRT’s are s SLOWER solution to how the Suburbs currently are functioning. You can spend a lot of Taxpayer’s money building your to quote “door to door” service but it is not faster than driving to the nearest Subway it is money flushed down the tube.

          • Testu

            Unless you and your family don’t own a car. But hey, no one in Scarborough is poor right?

            There is just no way for you to conceive of someone who lives in Scarborough and actually relies on transit, is there?

          • Anonymous

            We don’t have any LRTs in Toronto, so how can you say it’s a slower solution? Spadina is sort of a LRT and auto traffic hasn’t changed much on it in over 40 years. It’s a busy place. But the people using the TTC on it are moving much quicker since it became a dedicated line. I know Scarborough pretty well, grew up around the Golden Mile and still have family living there. Traffic has only become heavier in the area since all of the big box reatail was built. Prior to that, when it was all factories, you could play road hockey on Eglinton after 6:00. Re-develop the big box areas, build linear retail/ residential/ commercial spaces close to the road and in 50 years, people in Scarborough won’t have to drive to get a bottle on milk. Maybe a good number of them might even be able to walk to work. Yeah, I know, I’m dreaming. Nice dream though. Much better than believing the best solution for Scaroborough, is a quicker way out of it.

          • Testu

            He referred to some Scarborough residents, not all of them. Specifically the ones who feel the need to sound off about a transit system they don’t use because they’ve decided that this is a political game and their “team” is losing.

            This isn’t a downtown versus the suburbs issue. This is an issue of screwing over everyone on Eglinton, Finch and Sheppard across North Toronto (that use the TTC) for the sake of building a few KM of subway in one small area of Scarborough.

      • Anonymous

        Here’s a quote from the Benefits Case:

        Consideration was given to bus rapid transit, but as shown in Figure 2, the forecast demand is too large to be effectively serviced by bus. Rapid Bus is also considered less effective in promoting densification in key areas along the corridor. Similarly, higher capacity transit alternatives (such as ALRT and subway) were eliminated from consideration as the ridership projections do not warrant the higher capacity technology along the entire corridor.

        They did consider heavy rail, but the projected ridership didn’t support it.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1291384290 Steve Peeve

      Not to mention the extra costs of drilling thru the canadian shield!
      You are right, Ford is a do nothing Mayor who is costing the city with his so-called savings!

  • Benj Goldstein

    Technically speaking, that whole meeting was irrelevant.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

      Technically speaking the meetings of both the TTC board and Council are irrelevant.
      It is Provincial money and they will make the final decision.

      • Anonymous

        Technically speaking, the “Provincial money” is largely derived from GTA tax revenues. In other words, it really is our money. The provincial government has said it will respect the decision of city council to spend the money on building a larger network of LRT.

        Buddy, it’s all over but the shouting.

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

          Very SAD if that were true! But it’s never over till the fat lady sings.
          PS: The Liberals have a minority government!

          • Testu

            It would be hilarious if the provincial Conservatives chose this particular hill to die on. Fitting too. Screwing over everyone who would be served by the three LRT lines and everyone who pays a TTC fare to build an unsustainable few KM of subway in the middle of Scarborough.

            We could spend the next decade remembering how the PCs screwed Toronto transit once again.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

            I think you may have failed PolySci 101. The Conservatives hold no seats in Toronto and thus don’t have anything to lose. On the other hand if they can pick up a few from Scarborough, not to mention the odd one in the other Suburbs who hate LRT’s and they are Big Winners regardless of the feelings of “Downtowners”.

          • Testu

            At least you’re honest about it. Screw the transit users, maybe the PCs can get a couple of seats out of it. I love the “salt the earth” strategy you’re implying too, after all the PCs could never get seats in the affected ridings anyways, right?

            Just out of curiosity, what the hell is this “Downtowners” BS?

          • Testu

            Also, I just realized that DRC, Lorac and D Lorac are the same user. Could you stick to one alias? It makes it a bit easier to converse.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

            PS: If the Liberals decide to support the LRT proposal, the NDP will realize that a lot of the Scarborough and Suburb vote which leaves the Liberals will go to them and they stand to make significant gains. Almost sounds like the perfect storm for a quick defeat of the Liberals in Ontario and another election.

          • Anonymous

            Hahaha…you really think that if the conservatives were to ever win in Ontario they are going to help the GTA with transit? Are you a stand-up comedian? Because that’s the funniest thing I’ve heard all week.

          • Anonymous

            You mean the NDP that has consistently backed Transit City? That one?

  • Anonymous

    Can we Toronto please trade Scarborough for Vaughan? All this debate has proven is that people in Scarborough may be less intelligent then in the rest of Toronto.

  • Anonymous

    How about nothing for Scarborough. They’ve made it clear that they don’t want, nor deserve rapid transit. Lets cancel all subway, bus, and LRTs west of Victoria Park.

    • Anonymous

      That would be east of VP.

      • Eric S. Smith

        Don’t let geography get in the way of spite.

  • LoveToronto

    Toronto is going to put the Province in a No Win situation if they put forward a LRT solution to them and ask for the money!. No mater which way the Liberals choose they will alienate voters in key Liberal riding’s which they will be reluctant to do. In these cases governments, especially ones in a minority, tend to delay decisions and hope they will resolve themselves eventually. All I think Council has done is delay getting any transit built in this City.

    • Anonymous

      Nope. Council has put transit back on track, and the provincial government has affirmed it will abide by council’s vote.

      The delays are over, huff and puff all you want.

      • LoveToronto

        I am afraid that you have much better faith in affirmations and promises made by politicians than I do!

        • Anonymous

          If that’s how you feel about it then why are we even having this discussion?

  • http://www.miroslavglavic.ca Miroslav Glavic

    We CAN build subways, look at all the construction Yonge-Kennedy. Many of those towers have been build, 6-7 towers around Sheppard/Bayview alone.

    What this meeting was, Scarborough residents to have a voice. Instead of the usual Jamie Kirkpatrick (who livesin Gord Perks’ ward) from TTC Riders who presents a biased OPINION, can’t even meet up to have an actual discussion.

    ALL Transit Plans have PROs and CONs. Jamie can’t admit that Transit City plan is not fully funded. Heck, Finch is not fully funded. Only Humber/Hwy. 27 to Finch West. Finch West to Finch/Yonge is not, that part went into “Phase 2″ which means, we will build it some day because there is no money for it.

    • Anonymous

      Are we having fun yet?

    • Eric S. Smith

      Many of those towers have been build, 6-7 towers around Sheppard/Bayview alone.

      Wow, enough to fill several trains per day.

    • ford_for_salvation

      are you about done yet? please stop your nonsense about the towers at sheppard and bayview justifying an extension of the sheppard subway line. check sorensen’s report, ffs.

      http://www.citiescentre.utoronto.ca/Assets/Cities+Centre+Digital+Assets/pdfs/about/transit_sorensen.pdf

      reasonable people who don’t want their taxes wasted object to a sheppard extension because our current transit funding approach, needs a hell of a lot more ridership to not blow up the ttc’s budget

      no one said transit city is fully funded. no one said finch is fully funded, this is about spending 2 billion dollars burying eglinton, or spending that elsewhere, and if that elsewhere should be on a money-losing sinkhole of a subway on sheppard, pun intended.

    • Anonymous

      Um, all transit plans are built in phases.

  • GTA Guy

    I use the Subway every day to go to work. Don’t live in Toronto as such but drive to nearest Subway stop. When I hear that you Toronto Idiots are going to spend $8.4 Billion of my money (Provincial) to build a bunch of glorified streetcars which will only make my commute to work longer, I get MAD AS HELL!! Building Subway extensions is the only thing that will shorten my commute each morning and this is the only thing I want my money spent on. If Toronto wants to waste Money on LRT’s let them pay for it out of their pocket but put the $8.4 Billion of Provincial dollars into Subways.

    • Anonymous

      It’s not your money. Too bad that makes you MAD AS HELL!!

    • Anonymous

      If you don’t live or drive in Toronto but you take the existing subway, how could and east-west LRT possibly affect your commute at all?

  • Anonymous

    The easiest option for Stintz was not to bother going. It was not a City of Toronto meeting (quite the opposite) but she went anyway. Will Rob Ford and Gordon Chong go to meetings organised by CodeRedTO?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vote-Ndp/547678963 Vote Ndp

    These Scarborough residents have got to be one of the most stupiest on the planet. Looks like they’ve been hypnotized by the Ford vision that they cant seem to go in with an open mind. And Scarborough residents would rather have nothing than an LRT. Just WOW! So they want to spend generations in buses in mixed traffic for decades. Looks like Scarborough residents are just shooting themselves in the foot.

    • Anonymous

      Look who put the cat amongst the pigeons…

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

    It not nice to call people stupid but it you lived in to outer part of Scarborough you would have a better understanding as to why LRT’s are a worse solution than nothing at all.
    It certainly doesn’t help that the TTC and Toronto stiffed Scarborough once before with that sorry excuse for transportation they called an LRT which goes between Kennedy Station and Scarborough Town Center. If you add up all the costs put into this and the cost of replacing it which they are now planning, I am sure the City would have been miles ahead if they build a Subway in the first place.
    The City will have $8.4 Billion in it pocket for the TTC and surly it can at least find enough out of that to replace this Rat Trap of a line with a proper Subway. PLEASE don’t stick us with any LRT Half solution. By far the majority of those I know would much rather stay the way we are now, with the possible addition of a few Express Busses, rather than endure LRT’s going down our streets.

    • ford_for_salvation
    • Anonymous

      This is really about keeping LRT off “your” streets. Well guess what: you don’t own any streets, and now you’re going to have to move over and share the streets with other taxpayers who have every bit as much right to use them as you have. In fact, an LRT with 300 passengers easily trumps your car’s right to the whole road.

      Please stop being a road hog, and stop pretending you give a damn about transit in Scarborough..

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

        If you want to be a bully in your neighborhood fine but please don’t come into my neighborhood and try those tactics..

        • Anonymous

          It’s not “your” neightborhood, and you don’t get to tell your neighbors, including me, what kind of transit we may have.

          We have elected representatives for that. They’re called councillors, and they’ve done their job and made a decision for everyone’s benefit.

          If you don’t like it, maybe you shouldn’t live in a city.

        • Anonymous

          Lorac, how come people in the Malvern part of Scarborough get nothing under Rob’s plan, but they don’t coutn?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1291384290 Steve Peeve

      Don’t forget that Rob Fords election promise of subways was based on a plan that could never be realized. Downsview to S.T.C. for 300 million, fully funded by the private sector. He is a fraud. He is a liar.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xfsIj6gYAw

  • Andrew

    Given that Highway 401 carries far more people than DVP/Gardiner a suburb to suburb subway line parallel to the 401 (Eglinton and/or Sheppard) is needed just as badly as a downtown relief line which would reduce overcrowding on the existing subway system.

    • Anonymous

      Um……People who take the 401 do not go to Eglinton or Shepard…….they go all over the place.

      401 congestion will not be solved by a subway within the 416.

      Yonge subway congestion will be reduced by a DRL.

      That’s why.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

    I have read Sorensen’s report. I would agree with you it is nuts to build a subway where ridership is unlikely to justify its existence however this did not stop the original building of the Sheppard Subway or the building of the Spadina York extension which goes through a low density industrial land to York U and then into vacant fields in Vaughan. Yes I think this is a monumental waste of Taxpayers money funded 100% by the Provincial Liberals.
    The Sheppard Subway is just now getting to the point that ridership justifies its existence. I agree with you that extending this to Scarborough Town Center at this time is not economically sound. That said I believe there is very sound justification for extending it to the short distance past the DVPto the Scarborough boarder at Victoria Park to relieve if nothing else to relieve traffic congestion across the DVP. I also believe that LRT’s, like a subway along Sheppard at this time, are a waste of Tax Dollars and are not needed or wanted.
    This plus replacing the over-crowded Old Rat Trap of an LRT going between Kennedy Station and the Scarborough Town Center with a Subway, while forgetting completely about LRT’s would go a long way to getting Scarborough on side.

    • ford_for_salvation

      where are you getting that sheppard ridership is at all justifying its existence economically? i’d be interested to see the sources.

      also, the scarborugh rt is not an lrt. pretty sure that the 5 in 10 plan from metrolinx replaces the scarborough rt.

  • Bo Ngan

    For those boisterous people be real: no money no talk. continue to talk you end up with a long walk.
    This issue is not the members of council. it is the lack of funds.
    hiking money, no one is against it unless some politicians have the idea of a payback favouring some private developers or contractors. auditors must follow the money.

  • Dave Kates

    Folks, folks, please! Why all the fuss when there’s a perfect compromise that’ll satisfy everyone! Build a monorail! It’s fast, elevated – and futuristic! Best of all, Scarborough residents are familiar with them – they’re similar to the RT and that Zoo train-y thing (that broke down years ago and injured people).

    Can I hear a “monorail”? Yeah, I thought so!

    Well, at least then we’d be able to stop all this “subways vs. LRT” nonsense.

    No, honestly. Can someone please hit the “reset” button? We’re getting absolutely nowhere with this back-and-forth. What’s it going to take to pull this discussion back down from the rage-o-sphere?

    • Anonymous

      There is no reset. March 21st a decision will be made. Then it will end (which is why Ford is so adamant here because LRT will be unstoppable by 2014).

      • Dave Kates

        By “reset”, I was merely bemoaning the sad state of our public discourse on this issue, as was so terrifyingly demonstrated by this Toronto Taxpayers’ Coalition-sponsored pro-Ford rally in Scarborough.

        There is no discussion going on right now. There is simply a rational side – talking about what our best options are given demographic realities and finite resources, arrived at through years of careful study and reiterated in a recent report (that Ford subsequently tried to bury) – trying to reason with a bunch of toddlers screaming “I want it” over and over again. Yet I get the sense that if Ford & Co. hadn’t poisoned the well, we might be able to have a level-headed debate about pros and cons. I was reading the comments here and was seeing this same pattern over and over again. It’s extremely frustrating.

        It would have been nice if such a discussion could have taken place years ago – without the politically-charged temper tantrums. As it is, let’s just go with the option that makes the most sense – the one that’s already fully-funded, fully studied and ready to go – and get going!

        I don’t understand these self-styled conservatives all of a sudden have come to the position that, when it comes to public transit, money is no object – and refuse to be told otherwise.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1291384290 Steve Peeve

    The real cost of Subways, page 85.
    Every penny comes ultimately from the Taxpayer.
    Parking tax, road tolls, gas tax etc.
    The war on the car may be over but the driver better be rich!

    http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/​mmis/2012/ex/bgrd/​backgroundfile-44984.pdf
    http://www.toronto.ca

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YYXPTHDEJIU574GZNBUWHHGLII CCM

    To let the rest of Toronto have idea why Scarborough is so MAD below are a few facts.
    One would think that the # of Subway Stations would somewhat in proportion to population.
    (Population statistics are from City of Toronto website)

    Scarborough Population — 602,575 ————— # of Subway Stations — 2
    Etovicoke/York ————— 595,320 ————— # of Subway Stations — 7
    North York ——————— 635,220 ————— # of Subway Stations — 10
    Toronto/EastYork ———— 643,890 ————— # of Subway Stations — 43

    Note: Etobicoke/York will receive 4 more with the Spedina Extention. The Subway Stop on the boarders of Toroto/EastYork & Etobicoke/York plus Toronto/EastYork & Scarborough were not included in the above chart.

    • guest

      If you look up the population density, you’ll see something different.Scarborough has a density of 3161 people/km2, while Metro is 5838. The stations go where the density is.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

        True, population density is a consideration but not the only consideration. A truer measure of justifies is a combination is a Subway km built and stations.
        With all four Toronto community regions having roughly the same population, the approx number of Subway km is as follows:

        Scarborough ———- 5 km
        Etbocoke/York ——- 12 km (Includes Spadina extension)
        North York ————- 12 km
        Toronto/EastYork —– 30 km

        Any way you look at it Scarborough is being shortchanged on Subways. For Scarborough this is especially bad as Subways are only vehicle option TTC has which offers speed critical to Scarborough’s needs.

    • Anonymous

      Here are some more relevant numbers:

      Scarborough – size: 187.7 sq.km – pop.density: 3,160.9/sq.km
      Etobicoke/York – size: 147.11 sq.km – pop.density: 9,210.4/sq.km
      North York – size: 176.87 sq.km – pop.density: 3,439.2/sq.km
      Toronto/East York – size: 118.4 sq.km – pop.density: 7,169/sq.km

      If anyone deserves to be first in line for a new subway just based on these numbers, it would appear to be Downtown and Etobicoke/York, not Scarborough. Scarborough isn’t that much larger than North York, but is significantly less dense than anywhere else in the city – even East York and York, taken separately, have population densities around twice as high as Scarborough.

      (Edit: a miscalculation fixed.)

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

        According to the City of Toronto web site you got the size and density of these Community areas wrong! Correct figures are as follows:

        Scarborough —- size 188 sq.km — pop.density – 3,205/sq.km
        Etobicoke/York – size187 sq.km — pop.density – 3,183/sq.km
        North York ——– size 163 sq.km — pop.density – 3,897/sq.km
        Toronto/EastYork – size 102 sq.km – pop.density – 6,312/sq.km

        True the Toronto/EastYork has by far the highest density. Does that mean all Subways should go to them only. I hardly think that is fair to the rest of the City.
        Scarbough has a slightly higher density than Etobicoke/EastYork but Etobicoke/EastYork has 7 Subway Stops with 4 more under construction. What does this say about TTC planning and the fairness of the City as a whole.

        • Anonymous

          Well, that’s what I get for relying on Wikipedia.

    • Itisi

      One more salient bit of information from City of Toronto website.

      Scarborough and North York have expanding Populations while in Toronto/EastYork and Etobicoke/York the population is declining.

      Five years Rates as Follows:

      Scarborough ——— plus 2.4%
      North York ———— plus 3.1%

      Toronto/EastYork — minus 0.7%
      Etobicoke/York —— minus 1.5%

      If we’re looking to Spend money it makes sense to pit it into the growing areas of the City and not into those that are shrinking! (ie. Forget about the Eglington LRT/Subway until we can afford it.)

  • http://popthestack.wordpress.com Ratel Dajer

    This is depressing. This is not what debate about important policies should be like. If you can’t make an argument without yelling you should get out of the discussion.

    • D Lorac

      Scarborough does NOT want LRT’s!!! The TTC will not listen or discuss but is determined to spend a lot of money to force-feed this Scarboutough.
      If the donkey sits on your lawn, won’t move or listen, and is only interested in drowning out your voice with its own belches, other that hitting it with a 2×4, what is one to do!

  • Dev

    The “Toronto Taxpayers Coalition” has about 650 Facebook Friends. That’s their entire “membership”. This event was astroturf, pure and simple. Stintz was wise to not get shaken by the misinformed bluster and Ford-friendly talking points. The LRT vote for Sheppard will pass and these loudmouths will fade into the distance. (hopefully the trolls will fade too…)

    • D Lorac

      It will be a VERY SAD day for Toronto and Ontario if you are correct. To throw $8.4 billion Provincial dollars down the drain to build something the People Do NOT Want only because the Stintz and some Downtown EGO Centric TTC planners think they know better than the people who have to live with this decision is disgraceful
      Save us all some Money and scrap LRT’s for Scarborough.

  • Andrew

    LRT is a waste of money. Slow streetcars that stop at every minor stop along the way and are only trivially faster than existing bus routes are too slow to get across the city in a reasonable amount of time and cost billions of dollars. If it takes 2 hours and excessive numbers of transfers to get across the city using slow streetcars then people will drive cars. We need grade separated transit (subways, elevated rail, trenched rail and more frequent GO trains) which are fast enough to get people to stop driving. Subways along Sheppard and Eglinton serve major suburban employment areas such as North York Centre, Scarborough Centre, DVP/Eglinton, Consumers Road, and Pearson Airport with the phase 2 extension of Eglinton and will get people off the congested 401 & congested Eglinton and other arterial roads. If we cannot afford subways we should buy articulated buses and build bus only lanes to increase capacity which cost a fraction of the cost of light rail and these can be put on ALL busy bus routes (Steeles, Finch, Sheppard, York Mills/Wilson, Lawrence, Eglinton, Don Mills, Dufferin etc.) whereas costly light rail is too expensive to put on every major bus route and is not much faster than buses.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/LZE2VWRUALBZTYFWQOTEXKT7TM DRC

    It is hard, based on the statistics below, to conclude anything other than Scarborough is very much under -serviced by fast Subways. LRT’s are not the answer!
    It is time for the TTC to get in some fresh blood and do much better job of their planning process.
    If the TTC wants to rush to spent the Provinces $8.4 billion I would suggest that it start by extending the Bloor/Danforth line from Kennedy to Scarborough Town center. This 9km stretch would cost less than $2 billion extra (if you exclude the current LRT plans) and still leave $6.4 billion uncommitted.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

    Toronto/EastYork has a declining population of 0.7% on a 4 year basis where as Scarborough’s population is rising at a rate of 2.4%. How can you with a straight face claim Downtown relief is needed more than “anything” in the burbs?
    Disgusting narrow-minded downtown thinking!

  • Anonymous

    Scarborough is a little too close to redneck Oshawa for my liking.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

    If we took your argument to its conclusion we would never build a subway line outside of Toronto/EastYork. Density is only one of the factors to be considered in the placement of Subways. Adding confusion to the the topic by adding DRL studies only murkies the waters and discussion more. Metrolinx report “Sheppard-Finch LRT Benefits Case” which most are using as justification for building LRTs is a severely flawed document done by a British consulting firm. I am afraid I don’t buy your argument’

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

    If we took your argument to its conclusion we would never build a subway line outside of Toronto/EastYork. Density is only one of the factors to be considered in the placement of Subways. Adding confusion to the the topic by adding DRL studies only murkies the waters and discussion more. Metrolinx report “Sheppard-Finch LRT Benefits Case” which most are using as justification for building LRTs is a severely flawed document done by a British consulting firm. I am afraid I don’t buy your argument’

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YKKNYX5Y3YSHNBIQR46PUYP2MM Lorac

    If we took your argument to its conclusion we would never build a subway line outside of Toronto/EastYork. Density is only one of the factors to be considered in the placement of Subways. Adding confusion to the the topic by adding DRL studies only murkies the waters and discussion more. Metrolinx report “Sheppard-Finch LRT Benefits Case” which most are using as justification for building LRTs is a severely flawed document done by a British consulting firm. I am afraid I don’t buy your argument’

  • http://twitter.com/torontomyway Toronto My Way

    Is it time for Scarborough residents to consider suing the TTC? http://torontomyway.blogspot.ca/2012/04/scarborough-fair.html

  • md

    I have lived in Scarborough for more than 45 years. It always takes me hours to get anywhere. I am tired of Scarborough residents being treated this way. We have waited long enough. We need a subway now. You cannot put a LRT line on Sheppard. Have you seen how busy Shepaprd is.