Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Thunderstorm
30°/16°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
27°/19°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
30°/16°

7 Comments

news

Outside Workers Reach Tentative Deal with the City

No details yet, but a "working framework" has been agreed upon.

CUPE 415 president Mark Ferguson speaking to the press on Friday. Photo by Hamutal Dotan/Torontoist.

In a press conference at 8:30 this morning, CUPE 416 president Mark Ferguson announced that negotiators has reached a tentative deal with the City of Toronto. CUPE 416, which represents approximately 6,000 outside workers, had been in the midst of what everyone described as an incredibly contentious bargaining process—a view Ferguson reinforced today when he called the course of discussions with the City “one of the toughest labour negotiations in Canadian history.” No details of the deal were released this morning but Ferguson called the agreement thus far a “working framework” and added that the union had made “numerous concessions” in order to get to an agreement.

Negotiators, who worked through the night, will be taking a break for a short while; they will reconvene tomorrow at 9 a.m. to finalize the details of the agreement, at which point it will be presented to the members of CUPE 416 for a ratification vote, and if approved go on to city council for a vote there as well. The most contentious matter in negotiations has always been job security provisions—provisions the City said it would unilaterally strip from workers starting at 12:01 a.m. if no deal was reached—which prevent the City from implementing any sweeping moves to privatize a significant portion of the government’s workforce. By contrast, pay rates were not a sticking point, with the union offering a three-year pay freeze and the City offering increases (lump sum payments of 1.25 per cent, 1.5 per cent, and 1.75 per cent in the first three years, and a base pay increase of 1.75 per cent in the fourth). From the beginning, both sides have been saying that this negotiation was so fraught because it was about the future of organized labour’s role in government as such—and when the details of today’s deal are released, all eyes will immediately turn to that. “There is no doubt that our members are making sacrifices,” Ferguson said today. Governments, workers, and negotiators across the country are now wondering whether those sacrifices involve ceding substantial ground on the question of job security.

“I am very, very happy,” said Mayor Rob Ford, speaking to press outside City Hall at 9:30 a.m. about the deal. Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday (Ward 3, Etobicoke North) released a statement which summarized: “I’m pleased that we have been able to reach an agreement that is fair for the employees and reasonable and affordable for the taxpayers of Toronto.” “We worked well with the union team,” Ford said, after he expressed confidence that both sides would ratify the framework that had been agreed on overnight. He carefully avoided any divisive or inflammatory rhetoric, answering every question put to him by the media about who had sacrificed what with thanks to the union and the negotiators for working well together. Added Holyday: “it could only be solved at the table, and that’s what happened.”

Still outstanding: a deal with the City’s more than 23,000 inside workers, represented by CUPE 79, since contracts with both bargaining units expired on December 31, 2011. Today the City said that bargaining with CUPE 79 continues; the working framework with CUPE 79 is widely expected to set the stage for talks there.

Comments

  • blahblah

    Please stop saying this is a win for the tax payer!! This is a win for fat cat white guys, how about we say that instead.

    • Anonymous

      It is a loss for fat cat union cult members how about that?

  • http://twitter.com/quinkster Charles Melvin

    So … no strike? Does this mean I can stop dumping my garbage in Christie Pits Park?

    • Anonymous

      You can stop, but you don’t have to.

  • The Analyst

    $9.4 billion operating cost and with $3.85 billion (roughly) for labour if everyone was paid $70k/year benefits included (which is NOT true as many are paid far less – this is an embellished figure), so where does the remaining $5.55+ billion go? This is in regards to the operating budget ONLY and apart from the capital budget which is a whole other mess (Ford’s train obsession – wonder why and who’s being paid?). That’s the real question here and one everyone has been blind to. Unions are pinned as fat cats, but people should look at the numbers more carefully. Those in power, those with money power, count on the public to be dumb and not realize the actual figures here, and they’ve been really, really lucky. Has anyone who owns a restaurant or bar dealt with really unfair inspectors? You know the kind I mean. Now imagine this mentality at higher levels. This is the real problem. If you want to see savings, rotate by removing and replacing those who deal directly with, who have any form of authority over, money at the City. This would also mean limiting the number of terms in council for Councilors (say 2 terms max). Establish three levels of oversight on every dollar spent, every product or service ordered, and rotate these individuals and make their reports absolutely 100% public (every line item). Then maybe you’ll see if there is any mismanagement of tax payer money. As I gather, anyone in the “right” position can be bought to mismanage your money, remove those “right” positions (disperse them) and things will be more difficult to corrupt. Need I say more than looking at Adam Giambrone, or even the Fords and how they’ve gone about negotiating private business deals with public land. I have love big love for unions as they can also be bought, but they play a vital roll in balancing corruption, protecting the majority of workers, and setting a benchmark for the rest of workers in the economy to measure against. Those who complain about unions due to shear jealousy that they don’t get the same level of income or benefits shouldn’t be jealous BUT instead question why doesn’t my employer pay me the same. They should be considering forming their own unions – ALL of us should be. The rich 1% own 99% of the money. It’s time they pay it back with fair income and benefits and stop the hording of wealth BUT we have to demand it. As I see it, those that complain against unions are wusses because they should be complaining against their employers that pay them crap which makes them resentful.

    • Eric S. Smith

      Establish three levels of oversight on every dollar spent

      Now you have two problems.

    • Anonymous

      tl;dr.