Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2013
Thunderstorm
24°/16°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2013
Chance of Rain
19°/6°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Chance of Rain
14°/6°

14 Comments

cityscape

Could the Junction Triangle Become the Next Liberty Village?

An ambitious development could introduce major change to this tiny west-end neighborhood.

Rendering of Perth Street townhome, courtesy of Castlepoint

While the brownfield on Sterling Road just east of the West Toronto Railpath is known to most as a first-class eyesore, a proposed development might not only revitalize the property, but possibly also the chronically underdeveloped Junction Triangle neighbourhood that surrounds it. That is, if the City of Toronto and corporate interests can agree it should be built.

The Junction Triangle is enclosed by three sets of railway tracks, a tall, skinny area that roughly runs south and west of Lansdowne and Dupont, narrowing to a point at Dundas West. It’s a bit south and a bit east of the Junction—the two are distinct neighbourhoods—and hasn’t yet seen the same revitalization the Junction has. The brownfield in the Junction Triangle was formerly Tower Automotive, a sheet-casing facility built in the early 20th century that closed in 2006. Its machining buildings have since been razed, though a 10-storey tower, designated a heritage property and popular with urban explorers, still stands. Castlepoint Realty Partners purchased the property in 2008. Their hope is to turn the area into a mixed-use neighborhood, in the vein of Liberty Village or the Distillery District.

The existing community itself–staunchly divided between residents who prefer the character of the mixed-income neighborhood that’s already there and those longing to live in the next Junction–appears to be of two minds regarding the development. Castlepoint has hosted a number of town halls to solicit input and support, and local residents have come out in droves: one meeting held during a massive snowstorm still attracted 75 people.

As it stands, the Junction Triangle is host to a motley crew of businesses and services, including a circus school, an axe throwing league, a tea shop with errant opening hours, the Academy of the Impossible, and bizarre concert spaces. It has a unique liminal character amidst the usual well-traversed neighborhoods; whether the development augments or destroys this character is the question at stake.

Sterling Road and Castlepoint property. Photo by {a href="https://twitter.com/#!/suckingalemon"}Aviva Cohen{/a}.

Some residents, such as South Perth and Sterling Road Residents Association co-chair Philip Share, look forward to the redevelopment of this grimly industrial and formerly crime-ridden corner of Toronto. Others, such as Kevin Putnam, co-founder of the Fuzzy Boundaries project that gave the Junction Triangle its name, who enjoy the unpretentious nature of their ‘hood, are less optimistic.

“Gentrification will only ever be very limited here. We’re not Roncesvalles, or the Junction,” said Putnam. “We’re a neighbourhood surrounded by train tracks, we have three public housing projects and a housing co-op. This neighborhood will always be a mixed income neighborhood, it’s never going to get gentrified.”

The proposal is nothing if not ambitious: modern townhouses would co-exist with multi-story residential buildings, housing 1,500 people in total. Castlepoint has also promised, in partnership with Artscape, to include approximately seventy affordable live-work spaces.

The development’s commercial space would house high-tech businesses dedicated to cloud computing and solar technology, and there would also be boutique-style retail, facing on a central square with a fountain that converts to a skating rink in winter. At any rate, that’s what Castlepoint Managing Partner John O’Keefe hopes will happen. He estimates the project, when complete, would add 3,000 jobs to the area.

As the Junction Triangle is notoriously cut off from the city by its multiple train tracks, the development would link to the Railpath, and would include a pedestrian bridge over the east set of tracks.

Castlepoint’s plan is robust, but its execution hasn’t been easy, nor is it assured. Contamination of the land was extensive–Castlepoint partnered with Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. to remove existing hydrocarbons and VOCs. A ground water filter was installed, and 50,000 tons of soil were removed and replaced. Well testing and monitoring will be ongoing.

Zoning and environmental approvals are still pending. Though Castlepoint plans to begin construction this fall, with completion scheduled for the next two to three years (according to O’Keefe), the area is still largely zoned for business activity. While the developer has filed for a zoning amendment, a preliminary report issued in January by the City put off a definitive decision until after June 18.

That is the date when the results of a city-wide review will be released that will look at all land intended for business. It may be that the Sterling Road property’s fate will hinge on a broader City mandate.

Heritage building on Castlepoint's Sterling Road property. Photo by {a href="https://twitter.com/#!/suckingalemon"}Aviva Cohen{/a}.

Objections raised by Nestlé, the owner of a chocolate manufacturing facility directly south of the Castlepoint property, will also come into play. A letter dated August 19, 2011 from Nestlé’s legal representation objected to their facility co-existing with a significant new residential neighbourhood.

“[T]he inappropriate or thoughtless juxtaposition of industrial and residential uses inevitably leads to complaints by the residential occupants,” the letter states. “[A] handful of sensitive persons can set in motion a process that could ultimately hamper the normal industrial operation of Nestlé and other industrial users on Sterling Road.”

Nestlé’s lawyers said further, in a February 7 email to Torontoist, that “All of the [sic] Nestlé’s concerns remain intact and continue to be advanced.”

The City appears to be listening. Lynda Macdonald of the City Planning department acknowledged that her office would be looking closely at how the Nestlé facility would be affected by a new mixed-use development.

“[Nestlé’s] not the deciding factor, but they are important,” said Macdonald. “So the process we need to go through is: what’s the effect of this project on Nestlé staying there and what can we do to make sure they’re protected, long-term, and that they don’t make a decision to move outside of the city, because that’s clearly not in Toronto’s interests.”

With a number of government, corporate, and community interests at stake, whether the Junction Triangle will become the next Liberty Village or not remains to be seen.

Junction Triangle map by SimonP, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Comments

  • Michelle

    A development has just been proposed for the North end of the neighbourhood at 362 Wallace. A mix of light industrial/employment, residential and a community centre. The plans look a little like a subdivision of it’s own which is a bit odd to me, and involves a new road parallel to the railpath.

  • Bruce Gavin Ward

    A pretty accurate description of the current situation, a few other points though; the City needs to get it’s act together [admittedly difficult with it's present 'leadership'] and decide how to help positive change happen, and dissuade poor development, with a larger kit of tools than just meaningless zoning frm bygone eras, and section 37 driblings from developers, admittedly well usBed by savvy councillors but unreliable and difficult to spread equally around a ward. Good development leads to large profits for all, and a more vibrant community where all representatives of Hulchanski’s Three Cities (fast becoming Two) share the benefits of the massive findings of social research and environmental developments and savings, while poor development merely lines the pockets of a few short sited and greedy (always) men.
    I hasten to add that with their interest in the existing amenities, TOwest railPath, the Tower Bldg., the existing art community, and the area wide activism of numerous pro enlightened development groups, i tentatively place Castle Point in the ‘positive’ group, until proven otherwise, and expect them to come through for the junctionTriangle with a development that will make Toronto and beyond take notice.

  • http://adamgorley.blogspot.com/ Adam Gorley

    I find it pretty unlikely that the JT will become anything like Liberty. Most of the area is already well established with Toronto-style “single-family” rental housing, and only disparate pockets remain to be developed. The Sterling plot is certainly the largest of these pockets, and I will welcome a mixed-use development, but the scale will be far different from Liberty, which is effectively downtown and surrounded by highrises. If that ever happens around Sterling Rd., it will thankfully take place over decades rather than a few years like Liberty.

    That’s not to say there’s no room and need for positive growth, as the author mentions, and development is happening all around the area, positive or no. But this is one of the things that’s so interesting about the neighbourhood. There’s lots of progress, and it’s all relatively close together, but also quite spread out. And it’s all likely to take place over decades rather than months or years. Hopefully, this way, each area will have its own signature and add its own value to the area.

    I should say that when I think of the JT, I tend to expand its boundaries somewhat to include areas like Lansdowne and Dupont, Dundas W. and Bloor (e.g., the Loblaws plaza), the rendering plant/former TTC lands, Symington north of Dupont, etc.

    I hope Nestlé’s concerns don’t delay the Sterling project.

  • Scottd

    I dont think there is much of a divide in my community about this. Most people are happy that an industrial area will be cleaned up and become mixed use. The bridge over the east rail line is a no go; wont happen.

    The writer seems to be judging all of JT based on only the southern tip. That is a mistake.

    Overall Castlepoint has been open to meeting with residents and groups and their mixed use vision will bring homes and jobs to the area. Far better than storage shelters or other industrial uses.

    • Anonymous

      Why won’t the pedestrian bridge happen?

      • Anonymous

        1. Too expensive for who ever has to pay for it as it must be usable by all people. Could cost a few million as it needs to have crash protection and other rail features. Dora and Dublin both have issues where the bridge would land on the east side.
        2. Compromise idea was a level crossing for non-vehicle traffic which would be great but requires changes to the Official Plan and a policy change at Metrolinx who owns the line.
        3.Metrolinx is reluctant, like all rail lines, to put bridges over tracks and 100% opposed to level crossings in urban areas.

        • http://adamgorley.blogspot.com/ Adam Gorley

          Shame. A crossing south of Bloor would be a real improvement.

  • Anonymous

    “Could the Junction Triangle Become the Next Liberty Village?”

    Christ, I hope not. One LV-style disappointment is more than enough.

  • wallaceave

    oh gosh, the city of toronto doesn’t need another liberty ‘yuppie’ village!! that would be such a tragedy!

  • junctionist

    This development sounds very interesting. It’s too bad they demolished the warehouse facades along Sterling Road that were originally supposed to be preserved. Those facades followed the curves in the road nicely and had a lot of character to them. I hope that the new proposal has buildings with similarly curving facades along Sterling Road because it looks like the most attractive way for the architecture to engage with the street. I’m quite thankful that this redevelopment proposal is ambitious; BeBloor is in the neighbourhood, and it’s rock bottom both in terms of architecture and urbanism, as well as the long block of townhouses on the other side of Bloor without any retail. It would also be good if this development embraced the Railpath, too, offering users something more interesting to look at than another blank wall.

    In the meantime, the city and Castlepoint ought to do a better job of maintaining the area. I walked by a couple of weeks ago, and the sidewalk by the fence was lined with a heavy concentration of litter and the grass in front of the tagged-up heritage building was high. A lot the remaining industrial streets in old Toronto are crumbling and badly maintained, even though industrial users pay the highest tax rates. For people living near such streets, it means a lot of 311 calls, but that’s just to keep them from looking like absolute dumps (with piles of household and renovation garbage in random spots).

    • hugo

      The Castlepoint person I heard speak said they couldn’t maintain the old facade due to the need to remediate the earth below it and that there was no way to remove and clean all the earth while keeping those structures in place. They said they had the original architectural plans and had/are considering rebuilding them to a degree.

  • Anonymous

    “It’s never going to get gentrified,” says Putnam. Keep that quote on hand and trot it out again in ten or fiifteen years.

  • Anonymous

    Nestlé is full of it (though their chocolate, I’m told, is delicious)! Just a few blocks away on Gladstone, Cadbury has been running its own chocolate factory smack dab in the middle of a neighbourhood for many many years. They’re a beloved part of the street, contributing that sweet, sweet smell, they give away chocolate to area children on Hallowe’en, and many Gladstone Avenue residents are in fact employed as oompa loompas.

  • Joey

    You are way off on this article… the neighbourhood has flourished in the 10+ years I’ve lived here. I now own a couple of houses with plans for a third. And in that time my property value has tripled. Sounds like gentrification to me – maybe do a little more research next time.