Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 19, 2013
Clear
23°/13°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 20, 2013
Clear
25°/14°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on June 21, 2013
Partly Cloudy
25°/16°

8 Comments

news

Newsstand: December 9, 2011

Friday is like the uncle who always sends you $50 on your birthday. It might be the same thing every time, but it's always awesome. In the news: Doug Ford wants the public to do the government's job, libraries might cut their literacy programs and reduce book acquisitions, Karen Stintz says no to a 15-cent TTC fare hike, and Mike Del Grande fights for your kids.


Two days of public deputations on the 2012 budget have come and gone—with Torontoist liveblogging the hell out of them—and, unless our watches are off, it’s now time for councillors to ignore everything citizens said and push the same agendas they had before the deputations started. Because anyone who comes to council to plead against service cuts doesn’t really represent Torontonians, most of whom would rather spend their time scarfing down some Swiss Chalet, especially during the holiday season when they get free chocolate. Councillor Doug Ford (Ward 2, Etobicoke North) did show a willingness to listen to deputants though, and actively solicited any magic fixes they might have that don’t involve doing anything the Fords disagree with.

Speaking of service cuts, remember libraries? Those things everybody and Margaret Atwood objected to cutting? Well, the library budget got cut anyway, but the city’s chief librarian thinks she’s come up with a plan to prevent branch closings and reduced hours. All it will take is creating new fines, reducing the budget for acquiring new books and eliminating literacy programs. In her defence, there are already, like, tons of books in libraries, and everybody uses tablets now anyway. Also, why should a service centred around lending books be reaching out to people who can’t even read? That’s just making work for yourself.

Meanwhile, on the TTC front, commission chair Karen Stintz (Ward 16, Eglinton-Lawrence) says transit fares will not go up in 2012 by more than 10 cents, because that’s just too much more money to charge riders for the crappy service they’re almost certainly going to get once routes are cut next year. And the province’s Liberal government, still in power and kicking back after calling the Ford Nation bluff earlier this year, doesn’t plan on giving the city more money for transit. If there’s one obvious solution to all these problems, it’s to just get rich.

Another possible solution might be to sue rapper Drake, who has copied elements of Toronto’s logo in a billboard promoting his new album. After all, Drake’s got a lot of money, not to mention the connections to hook up soon-to-be-snackless schoolkids with all the Sprite they can drink.

Actually, we might have spoken too soon on the subject of snacks, as budget chief Mike Del Grande (Ward 39, Scarborough-Agincourt) has announced he will be looking for ways to avoid cutting Toronto schools’ food programs in the 2012 budget. No word yet on whether Doug Ford will want his $1,000 back if the programs are saved.

Filed under: ,

[pinit] Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • Anonymous

    You know, Doug and the LCBO could really use that money for mom’s christmas party.

  • Hrothgar

    How come the library doesn’t cut the $850,000 used to purchase movies. I’m so sick of hearing the only way we reduce our budget is by cutting services. It’s more like the only way to blackmail tax payers is to cut services that are needed, and ignore other efficiencies and pet projects that could be cut without service degradation.

    • Anonymous

      Or how about we don’t run the city based on making arbitrary across the board cuts?

      There was absolutely no valid reason to cut the library budget other than political posturing. No one was ever crying foul about library overspending at any point in the last decade, because it has never been a problem

    • Anonymous

      I’m so sick of people appealing to the “efficiencies” myth.

      • Seriousfun

        Efficiencies are not a myth. Sell any of the services done by government and it will be done more efficiently. The private company will make tons of money and provide the same or better service. The problem is that all you pinkos will then complain that the purchase price was too low or that companies shouldn’t make a profit running basic services. Doesn’t matter that we will be saving taxpayers money.,

        • Anonymous

          “The private company will make tons of money and provide the same or better service [and] we will be saving taxpayers money ”

          Provide one, real-world example of where that has happened, and it wasn’t based solely on massive wage theft (even without the caveat I think you’ll be pretty hard-pressed).

        • Anonymous

          “and provide the same or better service.”

          People in Walkerton, Ontario died when water inspection services were privatized. Privatization of water and sanitation in Bolivia lead to a 2% increase in poverty, water shortages and increased tariffs. Privatizing rail service in Britain didn’t produce any change in reliability and didn’t reduce costs at all, but did lead to inflated ticket prices (on the ones the gov’t didn’t regulate to protect commuters from gouging). The privatization of trains in New Zealand was a financial failure and resulted in the government buying back both rail companies. Privatizing food and custodial services in public schools across the US has resulted in numerous terminated contracts and bringing services back in-house after financial mismanagement and complaints about the food offered.

          Privatization of public services shifts accountability. The provider is no longer accountable to elected representatives or the people they service, but to an unassailable horde of shareholders and directors whose only concern is increasing profit at any cost.

  • Anonymous

    I actually listened to some of Drake’s rhymes once. He’s not very good.

    Kudos to him for using the city logo for the billboard. I appreciate the gesture.