Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 22, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
6°/0°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 23, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
6°/1°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 10:00 PM EST on February 24, 2012
Chance of Rain
4°/-1°

7 Comments

culture

“Catvertising” Swipes at the Internet

How Toronto ad agency John St. attracted international attention with a YouTube advertising spoof.

The savviest theorists of our modern media age have suggested that the internet is, in fact, made of cats. Toronto-based advertising agency John St. has taken this idea one step further: “Catvertising,” the firm’s YouTube parody of overeager marketing strategists, hit the tubes on November 10 and has already received attention from international media outlets, including Time and New York Magazine, for its comically spot-on assessment of digital-age attention seeking.

The video itself, with its glossy production and heavy industry-speak, is convincingly deadpan. “In 2012, John St. will lead the industry into a brand-new communications era with the launch of the world’s first, and only, catvertising agency,” a cool female voice-over narrates as cats tumble over paperwork piles, supervised by a legion of agency keeners.

“Cat videos provide an excellent return on investment,” says a poker-faced Angus Tucker, one of John St.’s real-life partners and creative directors. “The costs are minimal. It’s win-win.”

Stephen Jurisic, a partner and creative director of John St., says that the idea for the “Catvertising” video developed organically. “In our industry, everyone’s saying ‘Do something with Facebook! Do something social! Find a new way to get people’s attention!’ It’s an overall issue with advertising, that everyone’s always finding a way to communicate better. And look at cat videos—they’re 27 million views, 30 million views. ‘Let’s just use cats!’ We had fun with it. We’re not taking ourselves too seriously.”

Sure, it’s not the world’s most original concept: YouTube commenters have already pounced on John St. with accusations that “Catvertising” borrowed from another YouTube offering about a cat-centric production company, “Kittywood Studios,” posted three months earlier on YouTube channel Pixelspersecond. A representative from John St. replied on the site that the similarities, while striking, are an “honest coincidence.”

“Catvertising” gave the agency a chance to poke fun at itself and the industry it represents, but it was also John St.’s way of showcasing its creative pulse to a broad and sympathetic audience—an advertising spoof that was also, by default, an ad for a company that makes ads. Circular thinking? Maybe, but for a firm whose mandate is to “make our clients’ brands unignorable,” attention is the nature of the beast. And if the Internet has taught us anything it’s that, where cats are involved, we have a hard time looking away.

“We do these things a lot of times to attract talent,” admits Jurisic, who, along with his colleagues—and nine of their cats—is also featured in the video. “It’s a way to kind of show the world what we’re made up of and who we are.”

Jurisic notes that another spoof video the company made last year, about a girl’s birthday party, also received a fair amount of notice. Yet, nothing compares to the response that has poured in from their latest effort. There’s something about those cats.

Says Jurisic: “It’s kind of crazy how it’s spreading. It is a big surprise for us. We really loved making it.”

Filed under: , , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    To quote a commenter on the Kittywood video, “I firmly support Kittywood Corp. in its war against John St. for World Cat Domination.”

  • Anonymous

    Preposterous, stupid:
    One of Canada’s top ten ad agencies saw Kittywood and then said hey that’s funny let’s make one too surely nobody will ever see the other cat video.

    Not preposterous, reality:
    Coincidence

  • Anonymous

    They’re all ripping off clearly inspired by Catbank.

  • Bob

    Here’s why John St. sucks – when you’re paying an ad agency a ton of money for their creative ideas, you want to be sure that you’re not getting something that’s rehashed and derivative, even if it is an “honest coincidence.”

    I would hire the studio that produced Kittywood – better production value, funnier, and most importantly they’re original!

    • DRYDRY

      Again, to suggest that a top 10 ad agency would see kittywood and copy it knowing full well that the internets would find out is beyond absurd.

      The obvious truth is they came up with it, made it, put it out there, and then found out someone had made something similar. They ain’t happy about it, but it happens.

      I can show you tons of examples of identical ads made at opposite corners of the earth.

      • a creative

        As a “Top 10 Ad Agency”, they should do their research, regardless of if it was a coincidence or not. Kittywood was posted 3 months prior which means someone wasn’t cautious enough.

    • Anonymous

      You don’t hire an ad agency for their creative ideas, nor do you pay them a ton of money. You nickle and dime them to execute the brilliant ideas of your wife, who took art in college and really likes Papyrus, make the starbursts in your ad bigger than anyone else’s, and stay to 7:30 on Christmas Eve because you got a last minute spot on page 19 of the Boondock Gazette.