Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 22, 2013
Thunderstorm
24°/16°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2013
Chance of Rain
19°/6°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2013
Chance of Rain
14°/6°

21 Comments

news

A Cost Too High

How the tragedy of Jenna Morrison's death could, and should, have been prevented.

It’s every cyclist’s worst nightmare: you come to an intersection alongside a gigantic truck, and as the light turns green, you both ease forward. But as you crank towards that first gear change, still wobbly as you gather momentum, the truck is already half its length into the intersection. It’s slowly turning right, directly into your path. With its enormous blind spot, or because the driver’s attention is fixated on traffic approaching from the left, he or she can’t see you; you make contact.

Maybe the side of the larger vehicle just brushes against you as you’re moving forward, but that’s all it takes. Suddenly you’re swaying, struggling to maintain balance. The truck’s still turning, picking up speed, and as the space between you, the truck, and the curb narrows, you feel that unsteadiness pulling you to the left.

In altogether too many cases, the most recent of which being the morning of November 7, 2011, the story ends there.

The tragedy of Jenna Morrison casts its shadow over Toronto’s cycling community for a lot of reasons. The 38-year-old died Monday morning at the corner of Dundas and Sterling, an intersection notorious among cyclists. The heartbreak of a young life cut brutally short is bad enough, especially when children are involved (Morrison had one small child and was pregnant with a second), but what makes it so palpably, infuriatingly overwhelming is the knowledge, shared and sometimes shouted by others, that it shouldn’t have happened at all.

“I’ve heard many people in the aftermath of this issue saying, ‘I’ve always thought that was a really dangerous zone,’” Yvonne Bambrick, urban cycling consultant, told Torontoist, “and I’m sure it’s been identified to City staff by cyclists that are regularly in the area.” As any cyclist familiar with the neighbourhood is aware, the intersection is near where College Street meets Dundas, ascending over the rail line into Roncesvalles, with confusing turns, a cross-hatching network of streetcar tracks to trip up cyclists, and frighteningly blind corners. “There’s a lot of heavy traffic, truck traffic, that comes in and out through Sterling as well,” Bambrick adds, “just because of the industrial nature of the space down there. There’s been a number of collisions in and around that area, specifically the Dundas/College/Lansdowne triangle.”

This density of industrial traffic in the area and elsewhere underscores another way that Morrison’s death could have been prevented, highlighted by years of advocacy, official endorsement, and a startling lack of government initiative: the installation of side guards, or “under-run guards,” on trucks this size. When Jack Layton first made the push for a thousand kilometres of bike lanes in Toronto, it was after two identical deaths in 1996. Recommending that Transport Canada move forward with the initiative, the regional coroner for Toronto, in a 1998 report, pointed to the status of side guards as a compulsory, beneficial requirement in the United Kingdom and Europe. “I never failed to be surprised by the fact that, during my time in Canada, I rarely if ever saw a semi with side underrun bars attached,” says John Ivory, an Irish ex-pat and medical science student, and also a long-time former Toronto resident. “You never see trucks here in Ireland without side and back under-runs.”

Locally, the campaign to see side guards on Canadian trucks hasn’t lost any steam. Before the case of Jenna Morrison, an accident outside the Gladstone in 2006 had Torontoist, among other publications, calling for their immediate introduction. Mike Layton shares the goal at the council level. “I like this idea of making trucks install these,” he told us. “It can be pretty scary when you’re next to a big truck.”

Notably, Dave Meslin has been on the front lines of this issue for years. A local activist and co-founder of the Toronto Cyclists Union, he was an early arrival at the scene of the tragedy. “That is the most frustrating thing,” he told us, addressing the decade-plus foot-dragging over the installation of side guards. “I spent a lot of time at the site, beside the truck, and the gap on that truck is so high. You can almost walk underneath these trucks; they’re four or five feet off the ground.” Considering the side guards’ proven effectiveness, stories like Morrison’s, he says, are “totally, one hundred percent avoidable.” But in their absence, cyclists remain vulnerable.

“If you lose your balance and fall to your left,” he says, “you’re toast. Nothing will help you.”

But even with stories like Morrison’s over the last 13 years, cyclists are still pressuring their government to act on the issue, albeit with prominent support. In May 2006, Olivia Chow, then co-chair of the Toronto Cycling Committee, presented a petition to Parliament to have the use of side guards legislated nationwide. As MP for Trinity-Spadina in 2010, her efforts were renewed with her seconding of a private member’s bill, C-512, which died after its first reading when the government fell in March 2011. Starting from scratch, she presented a letter earlier this week to Denis Lebel, Conservative MP for Roberval-Lac Saint-Jean and Harper’s minister of transport. Demanding that “Transport Canada finally make truck side guards mandatory,” she condemned the Ministry’s position that “side guards would result in ‘decreased competitiveness for Canadian trucking companies.’”

This, despite years of vociferous support from cyclists, activists, and the Ministry’s own statistics showing that 19 per cent of all bicycle fatalities in Canada involve heavy trucks. (The Toronto area coroner’s report found the rate to be 21 per cent in the city.)

Punctuating the tragedy, this happened during the first year that Toronto has seen a net loss of bike lanes, Meslin noted, sacrificed for similarly shallow, cynical purposes. At one level, we have the resistance of a federal government to what may be the least costly of infrastructure changes; at the other, the willingness of a municipal government to compromise cyclists’ safety in the name of efficiency. Torontonians, and indeed Canadians, are under governments preoccupied with the wrong numbers.

One cyclist died on Monday. That should be the only number that matters.


Advocacy for Respect for Cyclists (ARC) will hold a memorial bike ride for Jenna Morrison on Monday, November 14, starting at 7:30 a.m. at Bloor and Spadina. The ride will arrive at Dundas and Sterling at 8:00 a.m., after which a ghost bike memorial will be installed.

A trust fund has also been set up for Morrison’s family. TD Bank customers can make a donation using branch number 0246 and account number 637 2358. All others can send donations via their own banks, using the following information: transit number 02462, institution number 004, account number 02466372358. The name associated with the account is Kimberlee White. To donate by phone, call TD EasyLine Banking at 1-866-222-3456.

Filed under: , , ,

[pinit] Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • Perspecticus

    I agree with this article but not the first paragraph. It’s never a good idea to come up beside a giant truck. Cyclists should either move in front of the truck (if there’s space & the driver can see you) or stay behind the truck and let it go forward before you do.

    Visibility is key, as is keeping yourself out of vulnerable situations.

    • Arthur Hanks

      Because of size and speed, I think the cyclist should always try to be behind. If you are ahead then your slow start from the stop means the truck will quickly accelerate past you, putting you into another dangerous position as it passes. Pole position does not matter here.

      The other alternative on busy crazy corners is to go on the sidewalk and ride there until traffic thins out and it is safe to rejoin the traffic stream. Yes, it’s illegal, and you will have to give right-of-way to all pedestrians that may or may not be there, but you’ll be safe and that is what matters.

      .

    • Kelehb

      It is more likely the truck came up on Jenna rather than the other way. There is a very steep grade to get to Dundas and I can’t see her powering up it to catch the truck before it was able to clear intersection.

  • http://twitter.com/theninjasquad Tyler

    Has it been determined who creeped up on who here? Not that I want to lay blame, just curious.

  • Chantelle

    From what a witness told me immediately following, around 12 PM that day, she had begun turning before truck. Unfortunately, even if the bike is in front of and starts moving first, if the driver is focused on oncoming traffic from the left, it is easy to fail to see the much smaller vehicle to its right. in a 5-tonne truck, you’re sitting easily 5 feet off the ground, thats taller than someone standing up, let alone seated on a bike.

  • W. K. Lis

    The railpath ENDS at Dundas & Sterling. The next phase is to extend it down to Strachan & Wellington, if and when. As it was, the cyclist HAD to get off the bike path and join traffic.

  • http://ThumbShift.com Jo

    Trying to cycle through a right-hand turn alongside of a truck is at best foolhardy.

    Incidents like these will soon make it illegal for cars and bikes to sit next to one-another at intersections.

    BTW: I’m a yearlong rider and huge cycling advocate, but in this case the cyclist seems to be at fault for putting herself in such a dangerous position and perhaps not making certain that the driver could see her before he started his turn, or not put herself in harms way by changing the circumstances after the driver had already seen her. As someone who rode a tandem (trail-a) bike with my daughter, I strongly suspect the following scenario:

    This “collision” happened behind the stop line. Clearly the back wheel of an already lengthy tandem-bike got caught in the wheel of an advancing truck and tragically toppled the bike to the left, and killed the rider. A horrific forced-fall.

    I strongly suspect that the rider may have started to back away from the intersection, but since backing a “trailer” is tricky and requires experience to not turn the back-end the wrong way…I’m afraid that the rider may have simply rolled/turned the back of this hinged half-bike to the left and in front of the trucks rear-wheels…just before it started to roll/lurch forward up the incline.

    I’m writing about this, and other associated risks behind this tragedy in hope that something good can somehow come from all this.

    http://thumbshift.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/jenna-morrison/

    Please let me know what other factors we can consider here as well.

    Peace

    • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

      You should start with considering whatever factors might contradict your entrenched beliefs about what will soon be illegal, your assumption of prerogative for assignment of blame, your “strong” suspicions of what “clearly” happened, etc.

      Claiming to be a “huge cycling advocate” doesn’t make political manipulation of this death OK. Observe how the author and the public figures he quotes were able to make their points without resorting to speculation.

  • http://hame.ca/one/ Hamish Grant

    You know these signs that big trucks have on the back of them: http://www.mytrucksigns.com/img/lg/S/Wide-Right-Turn-Caution-Sign-S-4470.gif

    Now we know why they’re important.

    • Anonymous

      Because she was hit by a truck making a wide turn, as opposed to getting closed off by a truck making a turn close to the curb? What?

    • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

      The reports state pretty clearly that it was an unarticulated “cube” truck.

  • 2raggedclaws

    But here’s the problem, right in your opening sentence: “It’s every cyclist’s worst nightmare: you come to an intersection alongside a gigantic truck…”

    A cyclist should pretty much NEVER be right next to a vehicle at an intersection like that. At an intersection where you are in danger of right turning vehicles, you should take the lane and position yourself behind the vehicle. When it turns right you are safe, and can proceed through the light / intersection. This sort of lane positioning is taught by CAN BIKE and is printed on the reverse of all Toronto Cycling maps, yet I see several instances every single day of bikes occupying unsafe positions in the lane. Proper lane positioning keeps you safe!

    • 2raggedclaws

      For the record, I don’t mean to diminish the tragedy here. It’s just that in all the clamour in the media when these things happen, we very rarely see a legitimate discussion of how one should operate a bike in order to be safe. Bikes DO belong on the road, but there are best practices that ought to be followed both for safety, and for creating a better climate between cyclists and drivers. There must be someway to deliver basic cycling safety information more broadly.

      • http://twitter.com/elenacpotter Elena Potter

        I want to share these two comments with everybody. They perfectly encapsulate the outcome I would like to see on the part of all cyclists.
        Just because we have the right to be on the road (and indeed we do, as drivers and as cyclists), does not mean anyone should be riding or driving recklessly and expecting not to be hurt. And of course I could never assume that anyone was reckless in this situation, but I do witness dangerous driving and cycling almost daily.

        Since I didn’t witness the accident, it’s impossible for me to know who is “at fault”. But I do think we as cyclists are better served by relying on best practices and courtesy, as you point out, than relying on the letter of the law.

    • Anonymous

      Note that it’s possible to be stopped at an intersection, and have a truck pull up alongside you. It’s also possible (but rare) for a truck driver to be tired, looking left for traffic, and forget to signal.

      These situations can happen, even to wise bicycle riders. The fact that a coincidence can lead to instant death is what’s being discussed here.

      • 2raggedclaws

        A truck can’t pull up beside you if you are positioned correctly in the lane. When arriving first at an intersection, a cyclist should not hug the curb, but should occupy the centre, or centre-left portion of the lane. This is for a few reasons:
        1) to prevent what you outline above.
        2) by occupying the centre-left portion of the lane, you allow drivers to make a legal right turn without endangering you. you also don’t hold up traffic waiting to turn right, which increases good will for everyone.

        Of course, this is when you arrive at the intersection first. When arriving after traffic, filter only when very sure that it is safe, and NEVER occupy the blind-spot of a car that is, or even MIGHT be turning right. It’ll cost you 30 seconds to wait behind a car, but it could very well save your life.

        I’ve been right hooked once, and it was at least more my fault than the drivers at the time. That was 7 years ago, and by following the above advice I have NEVER had so much as another close call. And yeah, I’m a car free, 7 day a week cyclist.

  • http://hame.ca/one/ Hamish Grant

    larger, longer vehicles (such as delivery vans and cube trucks) need more space to turn – it’s simple geometry.

  • Anonymous

    “side guards would result in ‘decreased competitiveness for Canadian trucking companies”
    Firstly, installing these things is a simple one-off cost, and probably less than filling the tank with fuel.
    Secondly, these should be installed on trucjks opearting in Canada, regardless of which country they are from.

  • Anonymous

    It’s worth noting that highway trucking companies that own their own trailers (e.g. moving vans, etc.) already use side guards. This manufacturer claims 7% fuel savings at highway speeds:

    http://www.freightwing.com/on-aerodynamics.php

    The problem is that many trucks don’t run on the highway much, or the trailers are owned by different companies than the tractors, or else the owners are short-sighted and don’t trust they’ll recoup the cost in fuel savings.

    Or, they’re never hit with fines for killing pedestrians, so it’s of no financial consequence to them.

  • Guest

    The opening paragraph describes a cyclist operating their vehicle in an unsafe manner. You don’t move to the right of right-turning vehicles — you either move to their left if you’re going straight, or you fall in behind them. Sets the wrong tone for an otherwise commendable piece.

  • Marine

    I’ve had a couple of close calls and minor run-ins with trucks. I even once got hit when I was *behind* a truck: the driver couldn’t turn right because he was at a wrong angle (I suppose), so he backed up — faster than I could — and scraped a bloody scrape up my left arm. The driver couldn’t see me or hear me scream, and made the right turn as if I weren’t there. Anyway, now I simply stay far away from trucks: I always give them the right of way even when it’s technically mine, and I never let myself get close to them.