Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
20°/16°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Partly Cloudy
21°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
22°/12°

7 Comments

cityscape

A River Runs Through It

In the midst of uncertainty over the development of Toronto's waterfront, landscape architect Michael Van Valkenburgh explains the approved Lower Don Lands plan.

A rendering of the approved Lower Don Lands plan from Waterfront Toronto.

To listen to Toronto city councillor Doug Ford (Ward 2, Etobicoke North) and landscape architect Michael Van Valkenburgh speak about the development of Toronto’s Lower Don Lands is to listen to two very different things. One speaks of Ferris wheels and monorails and megamalls, while the other uses words like “carefully considered” and “metrical analysis” and “multiple interrelationships.” Can you guess who is who?

Today at the Royal Ontario Museum, the Toronto Society of Architects brought Michael Van Valkenburgh of MVVA Inc., the architectural landscape team that won the 2007 international Waterfront Toronto design competition to develop a plan for the Lower Don Lands, to speak about the specifics of that plan. It was a strategically placed talk, as city council meets this week to discuss the alternate plan put forward by Doug Ford that was revealed with much fanfare and promises of dropping jaws just a few weeks ago.

Jaws have dropped, but not quite in the way Doug Ford had hoped.

Since Ford’s announcement, concerned citizens, in the form of a campaign called CodeBlueTO, have organized and petitioned for council to stick with the plan it unanimously approved in 2010.

That plan, as explained by Van Valkenburgh, consists of an extremely intricate and thoughtful design that was developed over an extensive public consultation period. The plan centres around what Van Valkenburgh characterized as the “three legs of a stool” of flood protection, re-naturalization, and city building. Not only does the re-naturalization of the mouth of the Don River, which was artificially redirected into the Keating Channel in the early 20th century, help with flood control for the area, but it will create a sustainable and beautiful natural attraction that will run right through the heart of the new neighbourhood. “This is a careful piece of science, which has been folded into the design,” Van Valkenburgh said.

For those concerned about a preference for parkland over development in the plan, Van Valkenburgh said that the structure of their plan raises the linear metres of frontage onto open space from 4,400 metres to 5,200 metres. The new river, he said, has helped structure the urban form. Basically, what this means is that more developments will front directly onto open space, thus raising real estate values in the area. Well-designed parkland and open space isn’t just a “nice to have,” as Mayor Ford might say, but a “need to have” if you are looking to raise real estate values as well as create a livable neighbourhood.

What was clear from watching the presentation was that the current approved plan for the Lower Don Lands, if built out according to the design, will be one of the most ecologically sensitive and intelligently designed dense neighbourhoods in Canada. Himy Syed, once a mayoral candidate, asked in the question period afterward, “How many cities have walked away from something like this and what the hell do they look like now?”

To be sure, the timeline for building the site is a source of frustration, as evidenced by one woman in the audience who expressed this very concern. Paul Bedford, former chief planner for the City of Toronto, attempted to minimize concerns over timelines, suggesting that full build-out could happen in 10 to 15 years, but that this really depended on the market.

It would be a travesty to scrap these approved plans, starting the process of waterfront development over with the goal of maximizing profit and speed, likely to the detriment of public consultation. As Sugar Beach and Sherbourne Common show, Waterfront Toronto is moving forward and producing results. Van Valkenburgh showed an image of Don River Park, currently under construction. Even without the trees and grass, it looked impressive.

Sometimes good things really do come to those who wait.

Comments

  • John Duncan

    I really like the MVVA design, and think it was easily the best proposal put forward for the Port Lands. It’s beautiful, allows for very effective flood protection (thus saving us hundreds of millions in repair & insurance costs down the road), and really gets the details right too.

    For example, it was the only plan that truly connects the Port Lands to the rest of Toronto at a pedestrian scale–the length of the bridges connecting across parks and water is always short enough to encourage walking across them, instead of so long that it becomes a chore for those on foot.

    All that said, buildings fronting on to open space isn’t a 100% win. That means you only have development on one side of a street, which means you’re putting in a full road’s worth of infrastructure, but are only paying for it (original cost + maintenance) with half a road’s worth of property tax.

  • Anonymous

    It strikes me as a gross inefficiency that Council is even able to scrap plans it commissioned, approved, earmarked funding for, and/or may even have shovels in the ground in anticipation of, just a year prior.

  • Bamboocanuck

    Please reassure me that this new neighbourhood won’t become another elitist Toronto community that is accessible only to those who run Bay Street. I love the concept, but on my meagre salary I can’t see how I would ever be able to afford a place here, let alone rent one.

    • Nick

      Don’t seek any support from Ford for new affordable housing, whatever you do! And the mall that they’re proposing would contain Macy’s, a Nordstrom, and other high-end retail, so you could forget shopping there too.

      • Bamboocanuck

        “Basically, what this means is that more developments will front directly onto open space, thus raising real estate values in the area. ”

        Nick, my concern has nothing to do with whether we’re talking about the Fords’ plan or Mr. Van Valkenburgh’s. My concern is that Waterfront Toronto is creating another elitist neghbourhood (have you seen recent renovation and construction in the Toronto Islands community?). If property values are going to so high, then I’ll have to win a lottery to get a place there.

        • Nick

          Point taken, Bambocanuch, although you’d probably be able to pick up a 30 square metre place for a mere $200k ;-) like anywhere in downtown Toronto. Maybe some of the new places will be more affordable co-ops?

        • Nick

          Point taken, Bambocanuch, although you’d probably be able to pick up a 30 square metre place for a mere $200k ;-) like anywhere in downtown Toronto. Maybe some of the new places will be more affordable co-ops?