Today Sunday Monday
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM CDT on May 18, 2013
Partly Cloudy
86°/64°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 19, 2013
Chance of a Thunderstorm
90°/68°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 20, 2013
Thunderstorm
88°/68°

9 Comments

news

One Saturday Afternoon at the New Sherbourne Common


Hemmed in by multi-lane roadways, a parking lot, and a construction site, the freshly completed Sherbourne Common, Toronto’s new waterfront public space, seems strangely orphaned from the city. Don’t be fooled. If Sherbourne Common seems a bit like an oasis amidst industrial land now, the hope is that in a few years time it will be at the heart of a thriving new waterfront community.
Investments in public space, much as some in our city council may deride them, are crucial to the future development of our city, especially our often neglected waterfront. Slowly, but surely, something is happening here, and it is because of the public investment by Waterfront Toronto.
Designed by Vancouver landscape architects Phillips Farevaag Smallenberg, the south end of Sherbourne Common opened back in September 2010, while the north end was completed just recently and officially opened one week ago, on July 26. The park features grassy expanses, a splash pad that can convert to an ice rink in the winter, trees, benches, a building that will soon house a café, and a children’s play area, complete with water sculptures by artist Jill Anholt.
Anholt’s sculptures, which remind us of something usually found on the tail of an airplane, drip water leisurely down a mesh screen and into an elongated pool that takes it toward the south end of the park. In the winter, ice crystals will form on the screens, creating unique patterns. Lights are turned on at night, illuminating the trickling water in nightclub blue, which, on one bridge across the canal, turn green as they detect movement. (Wondering what that looks like? Here is a full set of photos.) In other words, it’s really freakin’ cool.


The two parts of the park are separated from each other by Queens Quay East—a road that invites crossing about as much as an airplane runway does. In fact, this road, cleaving the park in two, represents one of the biggest hurdles the new park will have to overcome. As it stands, there is not even a crosswalk or a light to allow people to venture from the north to the south end of Sherbourne Common or back again. A planned redesign of Queens Quay East will hopefully work to stitch the halves together.

The north end contains a whimsical, Tim Burton-esque children’s area with play equipment that looks strangely like metal worms emerging from the ground, each with their own giant pupil-dilated eyeballs. This Saturday saw children climbing onto the worms, while another kid who was pumping water into a sand pit, shared the streaming water so a cyclist could have an impromptu hand-washing. Two adults stood, hands on hips, surveying the scene. “This is a great park,” said the woman. “Meh,” the man replied. “It’s all right.”
The maple trees at the south end are new and scrawny, and on this hot day people were huddled together in the shriveling piles of shade provided. Dogs ran unleashed, tongues lolling. Cyclists coasted by, some riding through the splash pad for a good soaking. A few oiled people lay sprawled out in full view of the deadly sun, cooking.
A cement canal that contains a few inches of running water cuts its way through the eastern portion of the park. Closer inspection reveals a good spot to sit and dip your feet on a hot day, but many signs bolted to the cement canal discouraged this activity. One gets the impression the signs are merely there to save the City from any liability should someone somehow manage to drown themselves in three inches of water. Regardless, the warning went unheeded.
Water is one of the most prominent features of the park. And appropriately so, as the park also functions as a storm water treatment facility, cleaning the water underground with ultraviolet light before sending it up through Anholt’s sculptures and then streaming down the canal through the south end of the park where it gurgles back into Lake Ontario, clean as a whistle. It’s the kind of innovative design—combining public space with crucial city infrastructure—that will be sure to turn a few heads outside of Toronto. If anything, it’s certainly deserving of more than a “meh.”
This water treatment design speaks to one of the greatest accomplishments of Sherbourne Common: its diversity of uses. This is a park that invites all kinds of different activities, whether you’re a kid who wants to play in the sand or run through the splash pad, or an adult relaxing on the grass, getting a tan or reading a book on a bench. And soon, when the café opens, it will provide even more.
Indeed, its design even invites some activities that the architects probably didn’t think about—such as the man who decided the canal was an appropriate place to strip down and bathe himself naked. After splashing himself like something out of Animal Planet, he got dressed, climbed on his bike, and rode off.

Filed under: , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/natekelly Nathan Kelly

    Very cool park. I agree though, the biggest challenge is its relative isolation. Once the area gets built up (the new George Brown building is already underway) it should become a neat little oasis.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=610965320 Jürgen Wiechmann

    The park is merely waiting to be discovered by the thousands of nearby residents, who live north of the park a mere five minute walk away. One problem with the south section, the geese population have already discovered the large lawn patch and decided to utilize it as a giant toilet.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    I love this new park. But I'm really annoyed at how there is no proper sidewalk to get to it from Harbourfront area. Instead of sidewalk, there's defunct train tracks. Check this Street View that nicely captures the problem: http://goo.gl/dbO3O

  • Toronto_Dave

    I was down there recently; impressive little development. One problem cited in a recent article (can't remember which), however, is the way Queen's Quay cuts across it with no proper traffic lights or crosswalk to connect the north and south sides together.

    I'm really excited about all the great projects in the works on the city's waterfront. Admittedly, though, it still requires of us a little bit of imagination and foresight when placing Sherbourne Common in the greater context of building a new neighbourhood. Its relative isolation has been noted by others above, and I worry the Fordistas might exploit the current state of things – a multi-million dollar park with very little around it – as a pretext for the selling off of waterfront property and the divestment of Toronto from the activities and plans of Waterfront Toronto.

    It's very easy to ignore all the great plans for that area and exploit the average Torontonian's ignorance about them to concoct a Ford-ish argument: something along the lines of “the government's wasting your tax dollars on frivolous waterfront projects in the middle of nowhere.”

  • Richard Sigesmund

    It would be nice if the waterfront had natural tree species, since our side of Lake Ontario's incredibly important for migrating birds (see Ashbridges Bay as  a great example). Guess its a park for humans, not birds. WOuld be nice if it could be for both.

  • Yakov Karchev

    People! What's gotten into you! nothing to do there… checked it out with my kid… got kicked out right away by a policewoman… (which was FINE). the “children's play area” is most unimaginative. nothing to play with, basically. and not shielded from traffic. the play structures are marked “for children 12+” (what kid of 12 in their right mind would “play” with a steel rod sticking out of the ground and which does not even rotate?) the building “soon to be a cafe” is the worst (and indescribable, nondescript) shape i've seen… a simple block warehouse would be better there… those fountains are sculptures? OMG. a similar fountain in Yorkville from the 70s looks way better… who cares if they are lit at night? I am not venturing in that area after dark… what for? to see patches of rolled granite gravel? they are amazingly disgusting. one thing is appropriate – some reeds by the water… exactly what i would expect in an abused piece of land.

  • WanderingPenguin

    My better half wants to go here. She might have managed to convince me to tag along, too, until I read this telling line: “Dogs ran unleashed, tongues lolling.”

    Sigh. Why does every park have to become a “dog park”? Why do dog owners have to always have the right of way? What the hell is wrong with this city?

    Yet another bit of greenspace ruined before it ever really got started.

  • http://twitter.com/jaketobin Jake Tobin Garrett

    I wouldn't give up on in that quickly. There were several people with dogs that were leashed up. I suspect the few people that let their dog run unleashed were doing so because the open grassy area was mainly unpopulated of people due to the heat (aside from the two oily people mentioned). Time will tell. 

    Anyway, it's not officially an off-leash area.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=611745887 Nicholas Fitzpatrick

    Visited it with my 3-year old last week. Park is great. Trying to cross 4-lanes of Queens Quay in rush-hour …

    Good grief, what on earth were they thinking to open this without putting in some kind of crossing or stop sign between the two parts of the park?

    When the first kid gets run over here, whoever designed it like this should be put in jail for manslaughter.

The forecast for Toronto by Wordpress Weather