Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
20°/16°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Partly Cloudy
21°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
22°/12°

7 Comments

news

Eye to Disappear a Second Time?

20110414firsteyevcover.jpg
Eye Weekly, October 10, 1991.

Eye Weekly published its last issue on May 5, 2011. It was a milestone in the life of Toronto media, and as the 20-year-old alt weekly was replaced with a markedly less alt Grid, many of us who grew up learning about the city from Eye were sad to see it go.
Eye is where many of Toronto’s best writers got their start, and where many chose to stay because they were perhaps able to speak more freely than at other publications. More importantly, it provided a chronicle of the city that reflected many communities and points of view far better than the mainstream media ever did. If, as the saying goes, journalism is the first draft of history, Eye was the first draft of indie rock and new urbanism and so much else in turn-of-the-21st-century Toronto. And though the paper is no longer in print, that history is still available for us to browse through, thanks to the now commonplace practice of storing newspapers online.
Yesterday, writers who had contributed to Eye over the years received an email. In it: notification that the digital archives of that publication would be going offline September 1.


The purpose of the email was to give these contributors sufficient notice to make copies of their work and file them away safely, but the effect was very different. Soon after: anger and fear started spilling out, with many (both Eye contributors and those in the city more generally) aghast that such a resource would be disappearing. “Writing needs history. Writing without history is untrustworthy,” tweeted Shawn Micallef, who wrote a longstanding psychogeography column for Eye. Offers of help, financial and technical, began coming in, with at least one software designer announcing that he’d started mirroring the full Eye archive.
Noble though that effort is, it misses the point. Torstar, the company that owns Eye and the Grid, is the guardian of this bit of Toronto history; keeping it readily available to the public is part of its duty as a responsible publisher and important to maintaining its role in the life of the city. As a matter of principle, it is incumbent on Torstar to take charge of preserving this archive.
And there is still reason to hope that they will. As explained to us by a senior staff member at the Grid, the problem is that the publication is paying a considerable amount each month in server and hosting fees for maintaining the Eye archives. Those fees, right now, are paid to Torstar Digital, an independently managed company within the Torstar corporate umbrella. The Grid will be exploring alternate hosting options in the coming weeks and hopes to find a more affordable solution soon.
The most important thing: even if the archives go offline September 1, they will not be lost. Eye‘s online editions will be preserved internally, and most of them will be easily transferable to another server. We hope this happens soon. And for the next two weeks, browse a bit of Toronto history at Eye‘s current site.

Filed under: , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=513128009 Gordon Yarley

    Sad to hear, perhaps they can make it more streamlined and not require as much bandwidth.  Hosting a website is expensive.

  • http://twitter.com/thatlaasiam Laas Turnbull

    It is not Torstar's “duty” to continue financing something that has no business value. Furthermore, that in no way dictates whether it is or is not a “responsible publisher” (though it certainly makes it a responsible business). I can tell you that traffic to the site has slowed to a trickle–a trickle that will soon become a faint drip and render every page view intolerably expensive. That's likely why I can't think of a single case in which a shuttered publication has continued to host its archival material online.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XYF3QSKFNHJ6PSNNHJBRFTT7AM Joe

    Laas Turnbull, true to form. I wonder if he understands how many in his industry, and his office, despise him, especially having given them and us another reason to.

  • Trachevin

    I can't swallow the premise of this article, that Eye Weekly was a beacon of great journalism, a home for great writers….I and everyone I knew just saw it as a waste of trees

  • http://twitter.com/svanegmond Stephen van Egmond

    There is nothing new here. Eye has an established pattern of destroying their online history. 

    Their worst move was destroying almost 15 years of movie reviews, extensively linked from IMDB and placed quite prominently on movie-review pages. Given Eye's publishers were Internet traffic whores, you'd think they would love the product of this sort of thing, but they never fixed it.I challenged the editor about it, who said they'd be fixing it Real Soon Now; they never did.

    I hope they remember their roots and find more interesting writers. Let Now be a bunch of whiners who alternately complain about Capitalism and Everything It Stands For, while running multipage shopaholic spreads.  At least Eye (and, it seems, The Grid) has an ounce of integrity.

  • http://twitter.com/svanegmond Stephen van Egmond

    Laas-
    Perhaps you are unaware of the SEO value of good-quality content, extensively linked from elsewhere on the Internet.  You should hire someone who is aware of it.

  • nevilleross

    Excuse me? NOW has a purpose in opposing what's wrong about capitalism (along with Eye way back when); we should know what's wrong with the world, and how to change it. (I will say this though; I don't care for Sheila Gostick, and want her gone from NOW, or at least, spewing her opinions on her own blog.)

    As for the 'shopaholic spreads'-at least, those are for local businesses and not big chains, and come only a couple months a year. And NOW has shown its integrity in posting all of it's old issues from 1982 online, unlike Eye/The Grid, who seems to want to forget its history.