Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
20°/16°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Partly Cloudy
21°/14°

14 Comments

news

A Kinder, Cheaper, Prettier Pearson?

20110608pearsonrebrand1.jpg
Pearson’s new website, launched yesterday.


You probably thought Pearson was just a grim necessity of life in Toronto, but no! Now, subsequent to yesterday’s launch of the airport’s new website and logo, it’s a “leading international gateway,” committed “to being the ultimate host.”
Why the change?


Pamela Griffith-Jones, chief marketing and commercial officer for the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (the nonprofit that operates Pearson) told us it all boils down to staying competitive. Torontonians, she explained, can go elsewhere.
“They do have choice,” she said. “They have choice locally. They could try out the Island for certain domestic and US flights. People do go down to Buffalo.”
“But really what our goal is, is to get people to choose to connect through Pearson, versus other airports potentially south of the border.” Griffith-Jones says connections currently account for about 26 per cent of Pearson’s traffic. They’d like to bump that to 30 per cent.
That’s what the new brand identity, created by local design firm OVE, is trying to communicate. All those multicoloured lines are supposed to represent happy travelers from all over the world convening at Pearson—by choice. (They also look a little like a crime-scene outline done in sidewalk chalk. Cute!)
It’s a far cry from Pearson’s former brand image, which was essentially non-existent. GTAA’s staid grey and blue logo was on all the airport’s publicity materials, including its website.

20110608pearsonrebrand2.jpg
Pearson’s website, before.


“This is about creating an awareness and an image around why you should choose Toronto as a place to visit, and Toronto Pearson as a place to fly through,” said Griffith-Jones.
As part of the branding relaunch, which began about a year and a half ago, GTAA has been ramping up Toronto-related art installations for guests to ogle, and has even begun the process of improving retail at the airport, both by luring new merchants into the terminals and by casting a critical eye on pricing.
“We have a program where we’re tracking what the average cost of a bottle of water is outside [the airport],” said Griffith-Jones.
“We’re saying to our retailers, you’ve got to sell that within a certain range. We don’t want people to think that all of a sudden everything costs three times as much in an airport.”
If you’re like us, purely for lack of choice you’d continue to use Pearson even if a pre-wrapped sandwich and a bottle of water cost $13—which they did when we swore off Pearson food two years ago, and we probably have the receipt somewhere to prove it—and even if the only amenity in your terminal was an uncomfortable seat.
But at least somebody’s trying to rectify the situation.

Filed under: , , , , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • ethel77

    Sorry, but the phrase “lipstick on a pig” springs to mind here. 

    I appreciate a good, user-friendly website, but how about you also train staff in basic manners and customer service, and stop charging me an arm and a leg for everything except the air I'm breathing while you're at it?

  • Nick

    I believe Pearson's landing fees are among the highest in the world…how about doing something about that!

  • http://philiplitevsky.com Philip Litevsky

    I don't care about expensive water. Please reduce the airport landing fees.

  • SteveKupferman

    Griffith-Jones said GTAA hopes to use any increased revenue that results from this to lower those fees.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    People go to other airports because it's cheaper to drive several hours (and wait at the border for several hours) than to fly through Pearson. It has nothing to do with their logo or motto or branding.

  • http://twitter.com/brianyyz Brian B

    I just go strait for the lounge and bypass the shops. NEXUS allows me to bypass the crowds. What is there not to love?

  • http://twitter.com/maharper82 Matthew Harper

    Toronto Pearson, eh? Does Pearson pay municipal taxes to Toronto or Mississauga?  Or do they have some kind of provincial or federal exemption from paying either?

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    Mississauga, if anyone.

  • http://twitter.com/mark_dowling Mark Dowling

    Still picking the Island over Mississauga International where possible.  Sadly since the United merger Continental won't be flying to YTZ after all which would have hooked into their huge Newark base.

  • http://twitter.com/maharper82 Matthew Harper

    I answered my own question via google.  http://www.wannanetwork.com/20…
    It seems that having been built on federal land exempts them from municipal taxes.  I wonder how much Pearson costs Mississauga and Toronto?  Sure, one could make the case that they stimulate these cities' economy, but that's true to some extant of almost any property owner.

  • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

    Sorry, what's the alternative, not having a major airport in the largest metropolitan area in Canada? There's a very deep codependency here; the airport wouldn't have 74% of its business if not for the GTA, but the GTA wouldn't have become the region it is today without the airport.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    I'm puzzled by the calls to lower the landing fees. It's a non-profit—what objectionable thing (besides pig lipstick) could the fees be spent on?
    Landing fees are also a means of demand management. If it were cheap to land a plane at the airport, airlines would do so just for the fun of it, and we'd be complaining about the delays caused by mostly-empty aircraft instead.

    Unlike transit, air travel is mostly a luxury. It's a lack of choice in places from which to fly to X other airport on vacation, not a lack of ability to get your place of employment. Those are very different things.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    Or GTAA could just say no, you can't land so many planes here because we said so.

  • http://www.bradfox.com Brad Fox

    I'm not going to argue that YYZ is a bargain or anything – but it's got nothing on the concourse gouging in major US hubs… heck Phoenix Skyharbor literally had to start a “We'll do something about the prices, promise” ad campaign it got so bad.

    I'll always get my bottle of water at pearson if I'm conncecting in the US… always cheaper.

    Also – I agree that lowering landing fees doesn't really solve anything… current tennants cluttering up the board with lower-margin flights isn't going to improve ticket prices or quality…