Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
20°/16°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Partly Cloudy
21°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
22°/12°

45 Comments

news

Prisoners’ Portraits Show Another Side of the G20

Eight months after the G20 shook Toronto and resulted in the largest mass arrest of citizens in Canadian history, the events of the weekend continue to make headlines. Yet despite ample coverage and hours of evidence of police actions, nothing much has changed. Premier McGuinty recently shot down requests for a comprehensive public inquiry, the Toronto Police Service has deflected responsibility through a lone charged officer, and many Torontonians—and members of the media—have remained unsympathetic to the over 1,100 individuals who were arrested and held without cause in our city.
Little light has been shed on their stories, possibly because the disturbing details say something frightening about what the G20 meant for our city, our country, and our rights as citizens. Photographer Brett Gundlock wants this to change, and he’s using the very tool that got him in trouble in the first place: his camera. Gundlock’s series Prisoners, which runs from March 11 to March 31 at Communication Art Gallery, is a series of portraits of “the casualties of Canada’s largest mass arrest.”


20110307g207.jpg

20110307g208.jpg
Eric Sylvester. Arrested at Queen’s Park on Saturday, June 26, 2010.


Gundlock is a tough guy. As a photographer for the National Post, it’s his job to shoot tense situations and provide the public with photographic reports of controversial events. It’s a position that’s landed him a few punches at the hands of unhappy subjects throughout his career—though usually from criminals, not the officers of the law.
When Gundlock was assigned to cover the G20 protests in downtown Toronto on Saturday July 27, 2010, he wasn’t worried; he’d spent the previous few days shooting the G8 convention up-close in Huntsville without any problems. Plus he was sporting his large, bright yellow government-issued press badge, given to him directly by the RCMP.
By early that afternoon, Gundlock’s colleague Colin O’Connor, who was shooting on a Post contract that weekend, had already been arrested.
When Gundlock headed over to the designated free speech zone just south of Queen’s Park, he wasn’t nervous; he’d been photographing peaceful protesters all day. It was at Queen’s Park, though, that Gundlock first noticed a palpable shift in police action as the “snatch and grabs” began, with officers targeting individuals in the crowd and dragging them behind the barricade of riot cops. As Gundlock attempted to photograph the action, he says, an officer pointed a pepper spray gun directly in his face. “I held up my badge, and said ‘Media!’ and held up my cameras,” Gundlock told us. “Ten seconds later, the cops grabbed me. I was punched in the head while my hands were raised [in submission]. I wiped out, and four cops began kicking me on the ground. My cameras fell, and a cop kneed me in the back.”
After police cuffed Gundlock and threw him into a wagon full of other “beat up dudes and plenty of blood,” he arrived at the makeshift detention centre at Eastern Avenue. When he tried to ask what he was charged with, the cops wouldn’t give him a straight answer. “They were like, ‘Uh, I don’t know. Maybe obstruction? Maybe assembly?’ It could have been anything. It could have been assault on a police officer. They were charging me the way you would throw darts at a wall,” he remembers. “It was totally arbitrary to them.” (Gundlock was eventually charged with unlawful assembly—while in the free speech zone—and obstruction of an officer, felonies that could have landed him six years in jail.) When Gundlock pulled out his American Express card, which identifies him as an employee of the Post, the officers dismissed it. “They kept saying, ‘You’re not a real journalist, we don’t believe this,’” Gundlock says. He recalls other officers standing around laughing, and one taking pictures of the prisoners with his smartphone.
Gundlock’s account of the next twenty-four hours is an appalling narrative of abuse and humiliation. He describes cement cages filled with over thirty individuals each and one porta-potty with no door, guards who refused requests for water and denied prisoners phone calls to their lawyers for over eight hours, and level-three strip searches. Prisoners were cold and wet, and there were no blankets. Gundlock and O’Connor, who wound up in the same cell, tried to keep one another sane. “Colin and I tried sleeping back-to-back to keep each other warm, but if was freezing. We realized the warmest place was inside the porta-potty, so we all took turns trying to sleep in there.” Prisoners requesting everything from medical supplies to information were repeatedly ordered to “shut the fuck up.” Gundlock recalls guards ordering take-out and eating it in front of the cages, taunting prisoners who had been without food all day. “I’ve never seen a Canadian citizen act like that towards another Canadian citizen,” he says. “At that point, I wasn’t a Canadian citizen. I was on the other side of this democracy.”
The ordeal that Gundlock and hundreds others endured, however, did not result in an immediate public outcry. As the mainstream media spent the bulk of the weekend focusing on black bloc protesters, the Toronto public overwhelmingly sided with the police, as did then-mayor David Miller, who praised their actions. The public’s anti-activist sentiment was summed up in last month’s Fifth Estate episode, satirically titled “You Should Have Stayed At Home,” which attempted to show the weekend’s suspension of freedoms. “People are so passive when it comes to system,” Gundlock says, recalling the indifference that most of the city expressed towards the weekend. “No one cared that there was a full military-type operation in downtown Toronto.”
Gundlock wanted some sort of justice for the complete suspension of his civil rights, but he wasn’t sure how to get it. “The SIU’s [inquiry] is a complete joke, and I didn’t feel I had anyone who I could complain to. I was completely unsatisfied with how the media reported the weekend,” he says. When it was time to face his charges several months later, however, Gundlock had an idea. “That weekend changed my views on photography, on how incredibly important it is,” he says. He decided to bring his camera with him to court.
20110307g209.jpg

20110307g2010.jpg
Vanja Krajina. Arrested at Queen and Spadina on Sunday, June 27, 2010.


Outside of the Metro West Etobicoke Courthouse, Gundlock set up his equipment along with signs asking if any of the 303 others who were also facing charges that day wanted to be photographed. The people whose pictures he took are his fellow detainees—the majority of whom also found out that day that their charges had been dropped.
In addition to the photos, Gundlock wanted to create a way for the former prisoners to share their own experiences. “These people would never have had a voice, they were just pushed aside and forgotten about,” he says. “The reason I’m doing this is because no one else is.” After Gundlock shot the portraits, he invited his subjects to write out short descriptions of their treatment. This text is paired side-by-side with the seventeen portraits that comprise Prisoners. At the exhibit, Gundlock has arranged to have blank index cards available, so that visitors can jot down their own G20 memories, which will be posted alongside those of the detainees. In conjunction with the show’s opening, he will also be launching a website, G20stories.ca, to which readers can contribute their experiences. “I want to further the documentation of the stories of citizens,” he says.
The haunting images and stories in Prisoners echo Gundlock’s frustration, both with the lack of progress in established procedures that are meant to investigate such events and with the ambivalence of the public. The shots forecast a bleak future for civil rights in Canada, revealing a nation that punishes its citizens for exercising their rights to freedom of speech, assembly, and association—the very freedoms that are supposed to define Canadian democracy. As we watch nations across the globe fight for access to civil rights, it’s troubling that Canadians have little interest in examining the state of our own.
Still, the aftermath of the G20 has led to a small but dedicated opposition movement. Backed by the support of individuals like Ontario Ombudsman André Marin, who called the G20 weekend “the most massive compromise of civil liberties in Canadian history,” many people who were beaten, arrested, and abused throughout the weekend are refusing to remain silent. Gundlock, who claims he wasn’t much of an activist before the G20, is now fully committed to publicizing what happened to him and the 1,100 others. “This was a huge growing experience for me, but I wouldn’t want anyone else to go through it,” he says. “The police didn’t have one thousand-plus criminals during the G20, but they made a thousand activists. This show is my form of activism.”
Images courtesy of Brett Gundlock.
Prisoners runs from March 11 to March 31. Communication Art Gallery (209 Harbord Street), Monday through Friday 12–8 p.m., Saturday and Sunday 10 a.m.–6 p.m.

Comments

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    As much as I don't want Harris 3.0 as premier, I've told the Ontario Liberals I won't be voting for them in the next election if McGuinty is their candidate. If turfing him is the only way to make him pay for his role in the G20 then so be it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ILZOWXX5IU26V2ZPZYMPKLWMSA Randy

    So, even if Eves would be less likely than McGuinty to do anything about it, and notwithstanding the risks of Harris 3.0 as premier, it'd be worth it to make this point?

  • isyouhappy

    I just did the same.

    http://www.ontarioliberal.ca/C…

  • http://www.facebook.com/mkolberg Mikey Kolberg

    This provincial election is going to be interesting for this exact reason. Even though I feel for most of his time as premier he's acted with good intentions, people have legitimate reasons to dislike McGuinty. But when the most popular alternative is Hudak, the left starts to waver and we get into this perennial conversation about strategic voting vs. voting with your ideals. Add to that the strange, enduring mainstream perception that the NDP are unfit to govern, and you've got a lot of left of centre voters who don't know where they fit. All three major parties have so much baggage that it's hard to look forward with confidence. Ontario voters have much soul searching to do. Maybe it's time we seriously considered some alternatives.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    Very nice project. I'm glad people are keeping this in the media and in the public's mind.

    I'm not sure the province should be the right target of protest. Yes, the province secretly passed the PWPA (that 5m from the fence law), but the entire G20 meeting was all at a federal level. I've also heard -maybe someone here knows better- that the police brought in for the G20 were RCMP and none/few were OPP. Further, the infractions of civil liberties (random searches, unlawful detention, charged for protesting, etc.) are all Charter violations – and the Charter is a Federal document. My fear is that a Provincial inquiry, or seeking to hold the Province responsible, would miss a very large part of those who are responsible. I'd think a Federal inquiry would include the actions of the Province, whereas a Provincial inquiry would NOT include the actions of the Federal gov't.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    I don't vote strategically at the federal level, as I feel the closest we can get to a meaningful democracy in Canada's outdated system is a minority or coalition, so the NDP gets my vote. Provincially, though, it's been 35 years since the NDP have been remotely close to holding the deciding votes at Queen's Park (not including 1990-95), so it really does feel like a waste ballot.

    (I absolutely loathe the idea of a “unite the left” movement that would see the Liberals and NDP merge, reducing our system to an imitation of the circus south of the border.)

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    The alternative – the province can fuck up our rights and get away with it as long as a single officer can be blamed – is worse.

  • Toronto_Dave

    Kudos to Brett Gundlock for putting together this exhibit. We need to keep this issue alive. It's shameful how little most of our fellow Canadians seem to care about their constitutional rights and how misinformed (wilfully ignorant?) many continue to be about the events of the G20 weekend.

    Keep fighting.

  • http://twitter.com/maharper82 Matthew Harper

    If you watch the video of the citizens kettled at Queen and Spadina, you'll see OPP insignia on the officers responsible. Of course the dude running the OPP at the time is an MP for the Conservatives now, so I tend to agree with your point and I firmly believe the G20 and subsequent aftermath worked out exactly as the Federal Conservatives had planned.

  • http://twitter.com/statmyles mvalentin

    how come all the protesters are white?

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    I didn't say I was holding McGuinty solely responsible, but he did play a role in it and is now refusing a public inquiry. I can't take a similar stance against Harper because I wouldn't vote for him or his party under any circumstances.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    But doesn't this issue go beyond gaining voter support? I think it's more a matter of being held criminally responsible for violating basic civil rights as defined in the Charter.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    Establishing (by example) that coalition government is valid and appropriate in Canada would be a greater accomplishment than constructing a Frankenparty.

  • MichaelOrnot

    Has anyone seen the insides of the “Working Families” organization? It's actually running as a Party in New York State, but seems more like a lobby group here in Ontario.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    It does, but what else am I going to do other than ad my name to various petitions and speak out (which I've done/am doing)? I'm not a lawyer of any stripe, so a constitutional/law approach is better left in the hands of someone qualified.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    Why does it matter? The same civil rights were violated for all; black, white, queer, female, male, physically handicapped, rich and poor alike.

  • Eric S. Smith

    Unfortunately, the getting away with it part applies no matter who wins. The Ont.Tories are still, as far as any of us can tell, on a Harrisite trajectory, and that means they're still a pack of Cops Is Tops barrel-suckers. My conclusion is that they would be even more likely to abuse the lesson of the G-20 than the McGuinty-led Liberals would.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=501196942 Jay Wall

    “The police didn’t have one thousand-plus criminals during the G20, but they made a thousand activists.”

    Well said. Similarly, my own experience of illegal arrest and detention during the G20 has made me into an activist. I'm sure the cops and politicians would hate to know that – and there's our poetic justice.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    If they're stupid enough to try it again I think they'll pay dearly for it.

  • http://twitter.com/statmyles mvalentin

    who's civil rights? upper middle class kids with arts degrees?

    all I can say is most of Scarborough was happy no cops was bothering them on this day and that most ethnics were most concerned about Ghana beating the USA in the world cup. Man that was a good game (same day too as these protests)

    sure these kids got arrested, but they go home and do yoga after and eat organic food

  • Toronto_Dave

    *Big sigh*

    So….Let's assume you're right in your sweeping generalization about just who got arrested that weekend (you're not). Why would it matter whether it was a bunch of “upper middle class kids” or anyone else? Police violated their rights, period.

    And yes, most Torontonians probably cared more about the World Cup. It's much easier to sit at home and watch sports than it is to generally give a damn.

  • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

    Quick! Count the number and percentage of upper middle class kids with arts degrees in this article: http://1431731ontario.net/Curr…

    But I mean, most of Toronto is pretty happy these days so who gives a fuck about these Libyans anyway?

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    Do civil rights only matter when it's non-white lower-class people being arrested?

    “who's[sic] civil rights?”

    Everyone's.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    “And yes, most Torontonians probably cared more about the World Cup. It's much easier to sit at home and watch sports than it is to generally give a damn.”

    It's especially easy to do when you take those rights for granted – rights that “most ethnics” only enjoy because white upper middle class people fought for and with them decades and centuries ago.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=819570037 Simon Carr

    I can't figure out who this comment is slamming, the “upper middle class kids” or the “ethnics”. Seems both?

    Seems the upper middle class kids are being sneered at for giving a care, and the “ethnics” are slammed for not.

    I dunno, someone clarify this one for me.

  • Eric S. Smith

    Don't get caught up in the details: I'm pretty sure that the point of that comment is that mvalentin is better than everyone.

  • 12hournap

    wow. that's one of the most ignorant statements i've ever heard.

  • 12hournap

    wow. that's one if the most ignorant things i've ever heard.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1azy7ySU Charles B Wrong

    Eric Sylvester needs a high school education and Vanja Krajina is not even hot. can someone please tell me why does this matter and what significance does this actually hold in canadian, or even torontoian history? do something positive with your life, protesting is the armchair's activist game.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1azy7ySU Charles B Wrong

    Do you even know what purpose does the charter hold in governance? i'm sensing someone ignorance is showing and i'm pretty sure i have all my bases covered. But seriously dude, have you ever read a book? Sorry, did i say book? That's probably way over your level, that level, you know, the level of comprehension. What i should be asking, really, is whether you ever bother to read the charter and bother to try to comprehend what exactly does the first part of the first section mean. I am not going to ask that because i know you haven't.

  • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

    > do something positive with your life, protesting is the armchair's activist game.

    Like comment anonymously but profusely on internet blogs days after the discussion ended?

    Or like writing “You'll never see me cycling to work, i am not Chinese.”?

  • sadp

    Perhaps you should change your alias to “Charles B Rambling” due to your tendency towards incoherency and inability to employ brevity in your posts.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    “Vanja Krajina is not even hot.”

    Civil and human rights aren't just for the attractive, you stupid, stupid person.

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1azy7ySU Charles B Wrong

    Me so funny. ;)

  • http://openid.anonymity.com/1azy7ySU Charles B Wrong

    Oh what, you don't like people who problematize your 'definition' of civil rights? Do you want coherence from the fruits of simplified complexities? Want yet another 'banner' to represent your position, something you can chant while protest against 'the system'? A place where you can hide out and feign work in relation to it? Want to pretend that you are contributing, that you are significant for carrying and chanting this banner, that it signifies real work, and you are willing to do this while being too lame to realize that ultimately this form activism is just as anonymous, useless and non-existent as typing shit online? Do want coherence brah?

    These people are not hot, these people are not even relevant and i still have no clue why someone would go through all the trouble of putting on this exhibit. Maybe he is doing this to further his own career through pimping out 'victims' of civil rights abuse to capitalize on his experience. Maybe.. Maybe the answer of to my question of relevance lies not in the subjects itself, but in the artist intentions, in his monetary and reputation intentions…

    Nothing spells critical acclaim like pimping out the faux-exploited.

  • http://piorkowski.ca qviri

    For the record – the exact quote in my post was posted by Charles in a comment on http://torontoist.com/2011/03/… which he has since deleted. He also expressed glee at seeing cyclists crash on TTC tracks and regret that he will have to indirectly pay for it via OHIP.

  • HamutalDotan

    Actually, he didn't – we did. While we step in to moderate comments or ban commenters very rarely, statements which relish in the injury of others fall afoul of what we're willing to tolerate.

  • http://twitter.com/tineaux tineaux

    I dropped by the show today. Artistically and politically very compelling work, Thank you, Brett Gundlock.

  • CocoHontas

    Wait a minute: there was a G20 confab in Toronto?

    How quickly one forgets.

  • CocoHontas

    Uh, obviously.

  • nevilleross

    Wrong, you need to read more than the neocon toilet paper you pick up every day, and also really learn enough about the real issues to stop voting against your true interests. But, like most (truly & secretly) neocon sheeple in 'liberal' clothing, you do the same shit over and over again, leading to the same shit happening over and over again and needing different generations to take to the streets to exercise their democratic rights again and again. All thanks to stupid, placid, self-interested, selfish, deluded, spoiled, (racist), (sexist), greedy, uncaring, cold-hearted, loathsome, brainwashed right-wing neocon sheeple (please don't consider yourself a human being-you'd fail the Bene Gesserit test of humanity if you did) like yourself, forcing humanity to make and learn from the same mistakes over and over again. And sadly, we will until people like you aren't allowed to make decisions for the rest of us at the ballot box or in government. Or make bullshit comments anywhere without being blasted (verbally) to bits.

  • nevilleross

    Oh, I'm sure that you have, Mr. Wrong? This coming from the guy (gal?) who couldn't even understand that the use of the word 'homo' by straight people as usually said is hurtful? Who misunderstood the intent of the students trying to get their peers to understand what homophobia is by correcting people using a button with a great slogan? If you can't understand that, what right have you to be even telling others what the Charter is?

  • nevilleross

    Boy, aren't you lucky you're here sprouting your bullshit and not at a site like this, where the mods will ban your comment no matter how anonymous you might be? Thank your lucky stars that all you get is a ton of correction of your stupid posts, 'cause you'd be fucked and burnt and wouldn't be able to comment. Enjoy your delusion.

  • sadp

    None of your rambling diatribe explains your bizarre tendency toward novel-length posts. It's sort of sad that you assume literally half a dozen straw men of what you imagine I believe. In reality of course, I'm just pointing out how nonsensical your posts are.

  • sadp

    None of your rambling diatribe explains your bizarre tendency toward novel-length posts. It's sort of sad that you assume literally half a dozen straw men of what you imagine I believe. In reality of course, I'm just pointing out how nonsensical your posts are.