Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
20°/16°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Partly Cloudy
21°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
22°/12°

12 Comments

news

Mess Is in the Eye of the Beholder


Earlier this week, the Annex Gleaner reported that the Bloor Annex Business Improvement Area intended to end the prolific postering of the stretch between Bathurst Street and Spadina Avenue with specially made light pole covers that are supposed to repel both tape and staples.
Just like digital locks on CDs could never stop determined pirates, it’s almost certain that some street hacker will figure out a way to affix a poster to these supposedly poster-proof sheathes. It’s almost as if the BIA is challenging them to find a way.
Still, coming on the heels of the ongoing debate surrounding Rob Ford’s plans to expunge all traces of spray paint and sharpie marker from Toronto, the announcement by the Bloor Annex BIA raises concerns over the sterilization of the city’s surfaces. Not only is a certain amount of messiness and visual clutter to be expected in any city of a certain size, but it should be welcomed as a sign of vibrancy—to a point, of course.


Dylan Reid, in a piece from the Summer 2010 issue of Spacing titled “Bless this Mess,” wrote about Toronto’s messy urbanism, noting that it is the city’s hodge-podge of architectural styles and general visual disorderliness that makes it so appealing. Posters and flyers contribute to this messy urbanism by cluttering our visual landscape. As Reid says, “The instinct for order and beauty has its place; the problem comes when it is dominant. It needs to be constantly challenged and questioned by the push for vibrant messiness.”
Consider this ideal against a city like Vancouver, where posters are corralled into specially designed poles and removed every Tuesday afternoon. Vancouver’s manicured streetscapes lose some of that explosive spontaneity that can be found in Toronto.
Designated postering spots are coming to Toronto too, albeit slowly. The City drafted a bylaw restricting posters and flyers in 2006, but enforcement has been lax and will continue to be so until enough official posters boards and columns, provided by Astral Media, are installed around the city. A June 2010 report by the City [PDF], requested by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong (Ward 34, Don Valley East) noted that 261 posters boards and thirty-four columns have been rolled out, but they are insufficient for the bylaw to be fairly enacted. Eventually, Astral Media will roll-out two thousand posters boards and five hundred columns across the city.


Postering and flyering have long been used not just by businesses, but also by citizens to advertise services, support political causes, or simply make announcements to their community. Today, when much of the community message board’s function has moved online to sites like Craigslist and Kijiji, it’s refreshing to walk down the street and see someone advertising their ugly, thirty-year-old couch, or their services as a piano teacher. If these anti-poster sheathes are put up all over the Annex—and if they spread elsewhere in the city— how will certain notorious gay porn websites, without the lure of those hot pink posters, entice men aged nineteen to twenty-six to audition? Won’t someone think of the porn?
No, not all posters are works of art. In fact, many are poorly designed, grammatically incorrect, written in Comic Sans bold, and rife with incorrectly used quotation marks and italics—but they are part of the neighbourhood. Posters are not just a form of community expression, but a sign of a lively, exciting place to live, of a city that has stuff going on and things to do and people with opinions to share. This city’s posters are like weeds: you can keep removing them one at a time, but they will sprout back if you don’t get at the root. And if the root is a community’s desire to express itself, do we really want to destroy that?
Posters and flyers can be found at varying degrees all across the city, but perhaps the best case is on St. George Street on the University of Toronto campus, where the posters cause light poles to bulge out in the middle, giving them the appearance of snakes who have only half-digested their meals. When was the last time these poles were stripped of their wheat-pasted second skins? One has to wonder at the layers of cultural history plastered to them. Peeling them back, one by one, would be an archeological dig uncovering concerts, roommates needed, and political rallies of days-gone-by. Imagine those same poles sans posters, empty and exposed and naked in their slimness.
There are worse things than a little mess.

Filed under: , , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    The sheaths won't stop flyering and postering. They will either be ineffective, or displace equal amounts of paper and wheatpaste to other adjacent surfaces.

    I'm on record here supporting poster pillars and the such, but as additional surfaces, sanctioned by the city, not as the only place postering can physically be done.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    I live on Bloor between Spadina and Bathurst and it wasn't until I read that Gleaner article that I'd really considered if there are 'too many' posters. I do like the tone of this article – not too many and not too few posters. I love this street and get worried when people want to start messing with it.

    I can't help but notice that posters on poles aren't the main cause of visual clutter. The majority of posters are on those pay-and-display parking meters (legal) and on various newspaper and magazine boxes (not legal). The posters on the various poles are usually well designed and often advertise DJs at the clubs downtown. The posters that are poorly designed, use 'comic-sans,' etc. are found on the newspaper boxes, sometimes even on buildings. So, putting up these 'pole sheathes' won't do much to get rid of the ugly posters.

    I've had little but praise for the Annex BIA – they are the ones who've installed the new sidewalk lighting and put flowers in the 'tree coffins' during the summer and tend to them. Much of the 'problem' on the street is because of the city – they don't clean the sidewalks or gutters nearly enough and let the 'utility cuts' ruin parts of the sidewalk (in front of the Pump is the latest). If they really wanted to reduce the street's clutter, the BIA could try and get some of the newspaper boxes removed (though I'm not sure if they'd be able to). In front of my apartment is a Now and an Eye box, but the Eye box is just full of garbage and there's another Eye box about 20 feet down. And then there are those rental and real estate magazines/guides.

  • smasharts

    I agree that whatever you may think of Vancouver's look – it is definitely a boring looking, and feeling, city.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=512253172 Mike Duffield

    Just to note, with the boxes, it's actually the paper's responsibility to maintain them. I was working for Exclaim! and whenever I did work on the annex I was expected to scrape the boxes of posters and clean them out of the garbage. Let's just saying working during the last garbage strike was awesome…

    Now and Eye have so many more boxes and I'm guessing there is less impetus to maintain them.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    Thanks. I've thought about calling or emailing Eye about this. But to be fair, it's not only them. Funny that these boxes in Street View look pretty much the same as they do today! http://goo.gl/uWd4y

  • Functionalist

    The tone of this article seems to be that postering is good within limits. But it doesn't discuss what the limits are and how we should deal with it, which is disappointing. That Vancouver seems boring is not a logical argument against their method of dealing with posters; Vancouver may be boring for reasons wholly unrelated to postering.

    We should take a cultured approach and have a lot of street furniture dedicated to posters, and not those tiny Astral contract-sourced pylons, with clear restrictions on where posters can't go and enforcement. This approach wouldn't lead to sterility, and people would be more inclined to actually notice what the poster is trying to communicate if posters could only be found in strategic places like at intersections. The current state of our streetscapes is so chaotic with all the posters, that the messages barely get across to anyone.

    These designated postering spaces should be cleaned regularly. Without limits, it gets excessive to the point that it looks nasty. When it's windy, they fly off, messing up the streets, or fall off in chunks on rainy days. The bulges around poles suggests failure to keep the city clean and indifference towards the public realm, probably because most people don't like the mess but feel powerless.

    So if you like street posters and like the vibrant look, but also like clean, well-maintained and beautiful public spaces, then limits are necessary as well as an effective strategy. Designated spaces and furniture will mean that the posters will not be lost in a chaotic mess, and won't bring down the look of the city in the eyes of residents in general and visitors.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=512253172 Mike Duffield

    Sorry, I shouldn't have singled Eye and Now out on that…as any box seems to be fair game.

  • tyrannosaurus_rek

    “But it doesn't discuss what the limits are and how we should deal with it, which is disappointing.”

    Perhaps because it would be a waste of time. The city has shown little interest in enforcing whatever regulations already exist, and with Ford as mayor we can safely assume no money will be set aside to change that.

    And I have to say the only time I'm aware of posters making the city look bad is when they're scraped or blasted off and the debris is left behind.

  • Functionalist

    It would be a waste of to think about the best way of dealing with the issue? I believe the city should be clean and in keeping government accountable for how my city is maintained. The least that can be done is to figure out what approach should be taken, because Rob Ford may not come up with a nuanced approach himself. Rob Ford has on numerous occasions shown that he's more of a populist than a rigid conservative. He wants to deal with graffiti, and if people complain to him, this issue can become part of the agenda. It's not going to break the bank; it's not that difficult to hold someone accountable for a misplaced poster when their contact information is on the poster.

    You may have become indifferent to the issue because of the neglect. As I said, I'm aware when I see the mess on every pole, on street furniture, and on street signs. I'm especially aware on a windy day, when they blow off and fly around the streets, or when chunks fall off in the rain. However, I don't even remember what the posters say because there's so many of them everywhere. Without limits, it's the community interests that get drowned out.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    There's a parallel between designated poster boards with enforcement and the designated protest sites we saw during the G20. They seem to turn our rights model on its head: free speech except where reasonably limited becomes free speech only where explicitly allowed.

    I like the pillars on the UofT campus. A couple of times I've passed people in the act of cleaning them—a vertical cut is made all the way through the posters, and the whole mass is peeled off like tree bark. It looks very organic. I think it happens at least once a year. In the same vein, you can sometimes see trucks with pressure washers along Bloor late at night… maybe the BIA got tired of paying for these.

    I'm also baffled about how Reg Hartt can afford to finance such a large share of postering in the Annex.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    I wonder if those pressure washers were funded by the BIA. I've often seen a guy using one to clean the Toronto Star box at Howland and I'd be willing to bet that's paid for by the Star. I would assume, too, that cleaning off the pay-and-display meters is paid by the city.
    So far as I know, it's Reg Hartt himself who does most of his postering.

    Anyway, this 'limit' to postering is really interesting to me. There are many things in the city that we like, but come to annoy us when it's 'too much.' I'm beginning to wonder if the marking of this line/limit is, philosophically, 'the political.'

  • http://twitter.com/MarkJull Mark Jull

    I wonder if those pressure washers were funded by the BIA. I've often seen a guy using one to clean the Toronto Star box at Howland and I'd be willing to bet that's paid for by the Star. I would assume, too, that cleaning off the pay-and-display meters is paid by the city.
    So far as I know, it's Reg Hartt himself who does most of his postering.

    Anyway, this 'limit' to postering is really interesting to me. There are many things in the city that we like, but come to annoy us when it's 'too much.' I'm beginning to wonder if the marking of this line/limit is, philosophically, 'the political.'