Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
31°/19°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
26°/16°

12 Comments

news

The Cost of Free Parking


You may not have known that this snowy February day in Toronto is in fact a very special one: it’s Free Parking Day Eve, everybody! Yes: starting tomorrow at 7:00 a.m., a website that writes about cars is springing for your parking in “Green P” lots and garages all around downtown, all of which are managed by the City-owned Toronto Parking Authority. The press release advertising the festivities is full of references to statistics demonstrating how expensive parking in Toronto is.
But before we all load our families into our cars to go a-parkin’, let’s have a Free Parking Day homily.


It’s true that parking in Toronto is extremely expensive, but you know which city has it even worse? Calgary. Their median monthly rate for unreserved parking was $435.38 in 2010, according to a study conducted by Colliers. In Toronto, the median rate was $336.25. (For monthly reserved parking, meanwhile, Toronto’s median rates were the most expensive in Canada.)
And so the next time feeding your credit card to the Pay-and-Display meter starts to feel like being mugged by some jerk robot, just remember this handy aphorism: “It would probably be worse if you were in Calgary.”
Globally, in 2010, Toronto didn’t even rank in the top twenty-five most expensive cities to park in, by unreserved monthly rates.
Still, the Colliers study did find that Toronto’s rates grew at a far faster clip between 2009 and 2010 than Calgary’s, meaning we may not be cheaper than them for long. But that’s as it should be.
Cities, including this one, determine their parking rates by weighing different user concerns, of which price is only one. San Francisco—considered a global exemplar of enlightened parking policy because of their fantastically well-packaged, computer-managed pricing pilot, SFpark—released, in 2009, a market study of parking users in their downtown area. Among respondents, price was a major concern, but more important was availability. In other words, these respondents were saying that it didn’t matter to them how much parking cost, to a certain extent, as long as there were always empty spaces for them to use.
The reason it’s significant that cost, in that survey, was secondary to availability, is that the two things are interrelated. As cost goes up, so does availability, because high prices for parking make it less enticing. At a certain price point, people who can take transit downtown rather than driving their cars will take transit downtown rather than driving their cars, leaving downtown parking spots for those who, for whatever reason, have decided that they really need them.
The magic price point varies from city to city. It all depends on how many spaces there are, and how many people want to use them.
Another thing parking fees are good for is shoring up the City’s finances. Our municipal government is notoriously dependent upon unpredictable, one-time revenue sources to balance its budget each year. This was true under David Miller, and it remains true under Rob Ford. This week, council signed off on using about $370 million in windfall, surplus, and reserve funds to balance the 2011 operating budget, leaving 2012′s estimated $774 million budget gap to be filled from other, yet-to-be-determined sources. The Toronto Parking Authority remits a minimum of 75% of its net revenue to the City, annually and reliably. In 2010, that amounted to almost $56.5 million. The TPA also pays municipal property taxes on the off-street lots it runs.
There are some indications that not everybody is content with this arrangement. The Star obtained a bunch of documents relating to the Ford administration’s efforts to find “gravy” at City Hall, and those documents reportedly indicate that the mayor and his team may, at one point, have been considering selling off the TPA to a private investor as a way of quickly raising a lump sum of money. The Brothers Ford should take note of the fact that Chicago recently sold its parking meters to a private company, for $1.5 billion, and it hasn’t worked out so well. Three years later, the money from the sale is almost spent.
Toronto’s parking fees, administered by a public parking authority, are as elegant a tool for keeping the city running as any we have. They’re a user fee and a traffic management system, all in one. And so on the eve of this day of free parking, or any future one, Torontonians would do well to wonder if there is in, fact, any such thing.

Filed under: , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • parking123

    Hold on…is the consensus that parking in Toronto is too expensive? I'm going to argue the exact opposite, that it's not nearly expensive enough, based on the ancillary costs of having that many cars squeezed into an already crowded city, from traffic congestion to environmental costs to the real-estate value of all those downtown parking lots. There's no better way to discourage the rampant over-driving in Toronto than to raise the costs of doing it. If the city re-invests this money in the TTC, then it's a win-win for everybody. Free parking day: to me, it's a bad idea.

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/therealcodybrody TTC means Take The Car

    I think this article was way too quick to say “it's worse in Calgary.” Sure, parking is worse in Calgary, but Toronto's one of the most expensive cities tin which to live. It's number 8, according to Swiss bank UBS. Calgary doesn't figure in to this list. In fact, the only reason parking is so expensive in Calgary is because not many people go or live downtown. It's more of a commuter location, if anything. On top of that, most of the parking space for office workers has no up front cost.

    So what's my point? Stop making this political. The subway line's going to be down, and frankly I'd rather drive my family downtown and park (for free) instead of cramming myself into a crowded streetcar with a bunch of other people. People are always going to drive, and people are always going to need to park, and rather than complain about something being given out (for free, remember), I, as a dweller in the out-lying area beyond Toronto, would accept it happily.

  • http://twitter.com/mark_dowling Mark Dowling

    The problem with TPA and their offstreet lots is it puts the city in the position of regulator and competitor with the private lots. I'd advocate leasing the offstreet lots while leaving TPA solely in charge of on-street lots due to the nature of the space (so a private firm couldn't sue, for instance, if the city wanted to halt on-street parking on a given street at rush hour or other times when at present it is unrestricted).

  • pickle_juice_drinker

    Calgary's not a cheap place to live either. It misses those lists because it's population is relatively tiny compared to cities with similar corporate presence (in terms of corporate activity, Calgary is already far more important than either Vancouver or Montreal, and on par with the City of Toronto itself, though dwarfed by the GTA's absolute size) . Its per capita income is a third higher than Toronto's so the higher cost of living is offset somewhat.

    Their parking rates are pretty much the result of free-market economics on parking, whereas there were no zoning incentives to build a lot of parking with new developments, and the last decade's building boom has eliminated much of the surface parking.

    It IS political, Calgary decided 30 years ago that getting cars downtown was not a priority. That's why parking is so high. It's really simple; Calgary has figured out that cars are not the best way to get downtown. The LRT is. This is an artefact of their free market economic outlook, but it shows just how much the car is pandered to in Toronto – despite the “war on the car rhetoric”.

  • Nick

    My biggest complaint with the TPA is that they don't provide any customer service in winter for what you're paying for. The same holds true for on-street block parking fees that the City levies to park on its streets. Because there is no rational system to remove snow from the on-street parking spaces (as there is in Montreal, where an alarm is sounded and everyone must move his or her car for the entire street to be cleared of snow) it's a crap-shoot if you'll actually be able to get you car out of its spot without the assistance of a kind passerby (especially a couple weeks after a big snowfall, followed by a thaw-freeze to make things nice and icy.) I've complained to Ford about this, but His Excellency has not responded to my letter. Sigh.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    People are always going to drive, and people are always going to need to park.

    How many? Should that need (“want”?) be satisfied? At what price?

    You seem to feel there's no need to discuss these questions or agree on answers. That's implicitly an argument for the status quo.

  • http://twitter.com/citypainter Gary Smith

    Like every product or service, the cost of parking is based on supply and demand. If more people want to park than there are spaces available, the prices go up. Toronto and Calgary are dense cities, and the same density that makes them attractive places to live and visit are what make them harder to get around and park in. After all, there's lots of free parking in the middle of nowhere, but there's no reason to park there.

    As others mention above, cheaper parking prices would simply encourage more people to park for longer periods, and the availability of spots would diminish. Economist Donald Shoup (who is involved in the SFpark project mentioned in this article) studied the economics and logic of parking extensively and determined that the best price for parking was the price that was high enough to ensure only 85% of spots were occupied at any given time (http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/). Based on what I see downtown, I think we need to raise parking prices, at least at peak hours.

    One point that is often lost in the discussions about congestion in Toronto is that, in a way, it's a *good* problem to have: far better to be a growing city attracting new residents and visitors than a dying one with a hollow, vacant core. We just need to deal with the resulting congestion more sensibly, and one of the most obvious ways would be to improve our transit system and discouraging driving when it's not necessary. Even though this would benefit everyone, it's sadly been politicized and misconstrued as “the war on the car” and now we all suffer, drivers, transit riders, cyclists and pedestrians alike.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    I agree almost completely, and thanks for the pointer to Donald Shoup. It's neat that he's both an engineer and economist.

    …but don't you mean, “the cost of parking should be based on supply and demand”? The core problem here seems to be that this is not currently happening.

  • TokyoTuds

    Here is a great illustration on video with models about street parking:
    http://www.streetfilms.org/ill…/

  • http://twitter.com/citypainter Gary Smith

    Ha, well, I think the cost of parking *is* already based loosely on supply and demand, in that parking in downtown Toronto is far more expensive than in the outskirts or in the suburbs, where it is usually free. But I agree this idea *should* be taken further, because some dense areas downtown still seem to have almost constant parking shortages.

  • http://toorudemag.blogspot.com/ Erin Pea

    Does Green P give out gift certificates? Or do they sell ten-clip cards? Maybe they should. I seriously spend way too much money on parking. If they offered special discounts, it would be grand.

    Ugh Toronto, your inefficiencies will be the death of me.

    Erin
    http://toorudemag.blogspot.com

  • http://toorudemag.blogspot.com/ Erin Pea

    Does Green P give out gift certificates? Or do they sell ten-clip cards? Maybe they should. I seriously spend way too much money on parking. If they offered special discounts, it would be grand.

    Ugh Toronto, your inefficiencies will be the death of me.

    Erin
    http://toorudemag.blogspot.com