Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
31°/19°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
26°/16°

24 Comments

news

CKLN Will Remain on the Air, For Now

20110211ckln.jpg
CKLN’s website, as of this evening.


Ryerson-based (but not Ryerson-run) campus-community radio station CKLN, 88.1 FM, has been granted a stay on the CRTC’s recent decision to revoke its broadcasting license, meaning the station will remain on the air until a federal judge can determine whether or not CKLN has grounds to appeal the CRTC’s ruling. CKLN staff expect that the stay will enable them to continue operating until at least April.


Under the federal Broadcasting Act, a CRTC decision can only be appealed with the permission of the Federal Court of Appeal. CKLN has not yet been given that permission, but the stay will keep them up and running until the court decides whether to grant it or not.
“We are thrilled and relieved by the decision which means that the diverse voices that make up our community radio station will continue to be heard for now,” said CKLN board vice-chair Andrew Lehrer, in a statement.
The CRTC’s decision to revoke CKLN’s license came after years of alleged non-compliance with CRTC regulations by the station. CKLN failed to file its annual financial returns on time, and then filed them incorrectly. The station also failed to provide logs and tapes of its programming when requested. These are both fundamental conditions of keeping a broadcasting license in Canada.
“Pretty well, in this day and age, there’s no excuse not to be able to deliver,” said Ken Stowar, station manager at CIUT, the University of Toronto’s campus-community radio station. CIUT has had compliance issues in the past, but now uses a computerized logging system with four layers of redundancy.
Lauren Speers, a longtime volunteer at CKLN, known to listeners as D.J. Chocolate, and also a law student at Osgoode Hall, is chairing the station’s legal defense committee. She points out that the lapses identified by the CRTC were committed by prior generations of administrators at the station.
“Our loggers had not been proper for years,” she said. “But the problem is that nobody knew, because [the CRTC] didn’t ask us for anything.”
“Unfortunately there’s no such thing as guilty with an explanation for regulatory offenses.” CKLN has recently installed new logging equipment.
The station receives the majority of its funding from a levy collected from students by Ryerson University, and then disbursed to CKLN by the Ryerson Students’ Union. (This year’s levy will be $10.09 per student.)
RSU president Toby Whitfield, who holds a seat on the CKLN board, said any discussion of changes to the station’s funding model would have to include university administrators. “I think we’re definitely waiting to see how things play out,” he said.
“One thing that we have definitely said in the past is that there’s a need to engage more students at the radio station.” Low student involvement has been an issue at the station, and was a factor in the CRTC’s ruling. Whitfield thinks the current board has shown a willingness to be more inclusive.
During the time it was failing to comply with the CRTC’s requirements, the station was wrapped up in a bitter internal feud—the specifics of which are too convoluted to recount here in detail. The broad strokes of the infighting survive in the archives of the Ryerson’s independent student newspaper, the Eyeopener.
In February 2008, according to a September 2008 article in the Eyeopener, the station’s membership voted to impeach most of its board, fire CKLN’s interim station manager, Mike Phillips, and also dismiss its program director, Tony Barnes. Neither Phillips nor Barnes nor the impeached board members recognized the vote as legitimate. Phillips and Barnes kept their jobs, and hired a lawyer.
In May 2008, Phillips abruptly fired more than twenty-five volunteers. At the end of July, some of the station’s membership elected a new board, but the old board hadn’t yet relinquished its power. As a result, CKLN had two competing boards of directors. At some point during all of this, the Ryerson Students’ Union began withholding the student levy until it could be sure it was dealing with a legitimate board.
From March until October 2009, the station’s studios in Ryerson’s Student Campus Centre were locked by the Palin Foundation, which manages that building. Staff and volunteers didn’t have access to the station during this time, and an audio loop of a jazz show was played in lieu of live programming.
The station has been involved in several court cases over the past few years. One, brought by members of one of its deposed boards, is still in process at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Current CKLN board members have said that the legal fees resulting from this court battle have made it difficult for them to hire full-time professional management staff. At the moment, the station is run by its board, none of whom are paid for their work.
In the CRTC hearing on December 8 that led to the revocation, members of the CKLN board blamed the station’s regulatory lapses on their predecessors, but owned up to the station’s checkered past.
“We are not using the fact that we were not the board that sat at the time those things happened,” CKLN board chair Ron Nelson is quoted as saying in the transcript from that meeting. “We are here to take responsibility, and we will live with whatever decision the Commission makes.”

Filed under: , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • Orby

    I believe that this move is just and important for CKLN as a chance not only to reinforce its relevance to the community, but the relevance of radio in general. Also a vote against the cynicism, sarcasm and self-interest of the stations's opponents, who will be lining up here shortly with their poison pamphlets. Thanks to the blogs for supporting the real.

  • paintingwalls

    If you read the full CRTC decision you'll see that CKLN is beyond redemption. They broke so many regulations it's hard to count. How can CKLN be relevant to the community when they are not meeting their mandate? The CRTC laid it out clearly; the current and former administrators of CKLN cannot demonstrate that they can or wish to follow the regulations. I believe it became painfully obvious to the CRTC that revocation was their only option.

    What is required at CKLN is a 100% turn over, all the hosts and management need to be removed and new system put in place. Maybe an order should read “in the hopes of saving CKLN all hosts and managers will be fired immediately and a new system will be established where new people from the community will be allowed to govern the station.” I have a strange feeling that this idea would not be popular with those who have control at CKLN.

    I used to listen to CKLN many years ago but the programming got bad and haven't really listened since then. Some quality control is needed to ensure that high quality programming is being run.

  • AniMookie

    Perhaps the station should be turned over to Greg Duffell and he could run it out of his house?

  • AniMookie

    The background information provided in this article is very useful and it doesn't seem that the CRTC paid attention to the backstory here or distinguished between the Phillips/Barnes management and current management. Hopefully the previous management who came very close to destroying the station in 2008/2009 won't be able to finish off the job now.

  • http://alterwords.wordpress.com/ Elizabeth

    I dearly hope that the Federal Court gives leave to appeal. This station is much too important to its community of listeners to be shut down. CKLN deserves an opportunity to ensure that it is in compliance with regulations – especially since it now seems on track. More to the point, its constituency deserves a properly functioning CKLN. There are too few places these days in which alternative and diverse voices are heard. Real democracy depends upon those voices.

  • nevilleross

    The programming is only bad to people like yourself who are more than likely neoconservatives that want to hear the same corporate dross over the airwaves and over all radio stations 24-7/365. Guess what, buddy/sister? Not gonna happen. If you can't stand CKLN, then don't listen to it, or go to Ryerson where your money will support it. It's that simple.

  • lipniki

    “…”We are not using the fact that we were not the board that sat at the time those things happened,” CKLN board chair Ron Nelson is quoted…”

    Maybe he said this at the December CRTC hearing, but at every other opportunity before and since, on the air, or off, Nelson insists that others are to blame for CKLN's woes, and holds himself and his collaborators blameless. He did so on his February 10, 2011 show, for instance.

    Nelson disparages in particular the CKLN management that dismissed him in June 2008 over a dispute in which Nelson refused to hand over advertising money to CKLN that he had collected during the course of his “Reggaemania” show. The fate of thousands of dollars in CKLN revenue is still unknown today. In Court papers filed in Small Claims Court, and provided in evidence by one of the interveners in the CRTC hearings, it is elaborated how Ron Nelson personally profited from his program. On his February 10, 2011 program he said that the closure of CKLN would affect people's “livelihoods”.

    The way Ron Nelson talks, you'd think he had nothing to do with that period of time back in 2008 and 2009 during which he was off the air. In fact, Ron Nelson was engaged in a fierce battle for control of CKLN and sat on a “illegitmate Board”, as he called it in line 3406 of the CRTC transcript:

    “…3405 MR. NELSON:…There was a very strong campaign, designed to get out the people that were in control before, and it wasn't just people who were part of my illegitimate Board at the time…”

    But maybe the whole idea of finger pointing to a previous management between 2007-2009 as the source of CKLN's woes can best be debunked by quoting the final few moments of the CRTC hearing on December 9, 2010:

    “…5199 THE CHAIRPERSON: So out of the seven people that are on the board currently, two of you were on the board prior to what you call the mess that you are cleaning up now?

    5200 MR. NELSON: Correct.

    5201 THE CHAIRPERSON: Okay. Those are my questions….”

  • torontothegreat

    lol, is that your answer for everything?

    c to the o to p to the o to the u to the t

  • AniMookie

    “…5199 THE CHAIRPERSON: So out of the seven people that are on the board currently, two of you were on the board prior to what you call the mess that you are cleaning up now?”

    One of those two was on the board for three months as a dissenting voice. The other, Toby Whitfield, was frozen out of the Board and was not allowed to attend meetings by the majority.

  • lipniki

    “Frozen out?”, you say. It appears as if Mr. Whitfield feels quite comfortable freezing himself out while lounging in the warmth and comfort of his RSU office. Besides, he doesn't have to attend meetings. He's all knowing and all seeing, no matter where he is. Let me allow Mr. Whitfield to speak for himself, via the CRTC transcripts of the December 8, 2010 hearing.

    “…2851 MR. WHITFIELD: … I hold the RSU (Ryerson Students' Union) seat on the (CKLN) Board, but I also work full-time as the president of the students' union. So I probably spend the least time dedicated to CKLN on the Board, and don't usually dedicate that many hours a week to the Board.

    2852 But, I guess, in my role as president of the students' union, that's the way I fulfil it…”

    You see, he doesn't HAVE to attend. It's enough that he's the RSU President.

    The Chair of the CRTC hearing became very curious about Mr. Whitfield's activities with regard CKLN.:

    “…3009 THE CHAIRPERSON: In the last 12 months how many meetings were there and how many have you attended?

    3010 MR. WHITFIELD: I couldn't give you numbers on either of those off the top of my head. But most recently, I think meetings are maybe once a week. I probably have maybe attended one or two since September.

    3011 THE CHAIRPERSON: And since last September?

    3012 MR. WHITFIELD: I couldn't give you a number off the top of my head.

    3013 THE CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Nelson, do you keep track of who attends your board meetings?

    3014 MR. NELSON: Yes and no….”

    “3019 THE CHAIRPERSON: So Mr. Whitfield, you haven't been attending very often…”

    Impressive.

    Then all roads led to Toby Whitfield's conflicts of interest. He's the President of the RSU….he's on the Board of CKLN…he's the Chair of the Palin Foundation that controls the space to the offices of CKLN…
    Now back to the hearing:

    “…3026 THE CHAIRPERSON: So you currently act as a board member to CKLN FM Radio Inc. and, as chairman of the PALIN Foundation that provides the space and the access for the station?…”

    “…3029 THE CHAIRPERSON: So my question is still the same. If an issue comes up… (snip) you are on the board and you want to continue to obviously have access in order to broadcast while at the same time you are president of the PALIN foundation…How do you marry those two obligations?

    3030 MR. WHITFIELD: Well, I think that the challenge is essentially to analyze what the current situation is…(snip)

    3032 THE CHAIRPERSON: Would you recuse yourself or step aside if discussions were being held at the CKLN board meeting with regard to access or safety and security issues and would you do the same thin on the PALIN Foundation side?

    3033 Like, where would you throw your allegiance if you had to make a decision that was obviously in conflict on both sides?

    3034 MR. WHITFIELD: I think what I would first try to do is to attempt to have some mediation between the parties,…”

    Toby doesn't know when to recuse himself, I guess because he attends so few meetings in the first place.

    So, is it any wonder that a responsible CKLN Board would demand that Mr. Whitfield recuse himself in areas in which he was in conflict, which would appear to be almost all the time in his case? And if Mr. Whitfield was being “frozen out” inappropriately, it would be the RSU responsibility to go to the courts to demand proper access to their Board seat on CKLN.

  • NewtonianGhost

    Your obsessive fixation on CKLN is quite something. Are you trying to compensate for some sort of childhood rejection? My guess is that you were a precocious child who no one ever said no to and that turned you into an insufferable adult who throws temper tantrums whenever someone contradicts him, says he's wrong, or just says no to something he wants.

    Maybe instead of spending all your resources trying to destroy CKLN you should go into therapy?

    Or maybe now that your career is over you're just bored and have nothing better to do than try to victimize others?

  • nevilleross

    I call it as I see it, same as paintingwalls is doing-or thinks that they're doing.

  • Godot_is_here

    With all due respect to Ken Stowar, he's full of shit. No community radio station could survive if they were under the same microscope CKLN's been put under. CIUT has problems with f-bombs being dropped in the daytime, lack of student involvement (Ken just axed Take 5 which was CIUT's main vehicle for student engagement and replaced it with archival broadcasts), CanCon, spoken word (playing Democracy Now! a few times a day instead of original content) and governance issues (CIUT just axed its longtime station manager after an internal audit exposed “irregularites” involving CIUT paying his company for work).

  • lipniki

    So, 10 people enjoyed this vile, disrespectful blog comment about a person that begins cynically with the words “With all due respect”? That ought to indicate the level of integrity of the persons or person participating here.
    The tactic employed in this “Godot_is_here” post is emblematic of the vicious campaigns of character assassination employed by those closely associated with CKLN in their attempts to maintain power (and salaries) at the station.
    I will take “Godot” to task about almost everything said here. Just for the record, I am not involved in CIUT and have never met the gentleman whose integrity is being impugned.
    1. “f-bombs being dropped in the daytime” on CIUT..There's no evidence of this cited. There are no CRTC complaints to this effect on the record. That said, it's been going on for years in a blatant fashion at CKLN .In 2006, the “f-bomb” was dropped 27 times in 2 minutes on a Saturday afternoon according to a CRTC complaint at the time. CKLN's shows are known for profanity.
    2. criticism of the cancellation of “Take 5″ on CIUT: CIUT should be lauded for taking the initiative to produce this program, which started 5 years ago. or so. It was ambitious, and light years beyond anything that CKLN has ever tried, especially with regard to using student talent. I understand that there was a grant from the University of Toronto to finance the program which ran out this past year and led to it coming to an end, so I don't think anyone at CIUT “axed” it.
    3. “playing Democracy Now”! a few times a day”. It is hypocritical to criticize CIUT for playing this program when Democracy Now! was played simultaneously on CKLN. I gather that CIUT actually had the rights to play the show in Toronto, while CKLN did not. CKLN's news director enforced a policy of playing “DN!” and “Free Speech Radio News” to cut down on local people having their say.. Much U.S. spoken word content has been heard on CKLN mainly due to discouragement or the lack of time and commitment by its spoken word programmers to create content. Many CKLN spoken word shows are filled with hip-hop music.
    4. “irregularities” at CIUT involving its “longtime station manger”: What's amazing about CIUT as compared to CKLN is that the general public even found out about this problem at all. CIUT's Board has acted properly in announcing and dealing with these accusations and I look forward to seeing the outcome. At least they've been a bit transparent in the face of scandal. In contrast, CKLN's Board has covered up allegations of wrongdoing whenever they surfaced. CKLN's Board and management have ruthlessly attempted to crush anyone that challenged their authority or demanded accountability (final result: revocation of license). CKLN 's Board allows conflict of interest to go on, to this day, by not only its programmers, but those that sit on its Board. CIUT's Board did their job in protecting the corporation in an ethical manner. CKLN “protects the corporation” by denying everything, engaging in character assassination and massive cover-ups. CKLN's members endorse this behaviour.

  • Godot_is_here

    “those closely associated with CKLN”

    I've been involved with a number of campus/community stations and know people at CKLN and CIUT but I'm not speaking for any of them.

    “character assassination”
    Saying Ken is “full of shit” is not character assassination. If you want to see character assassination look at some of the things that have been posted in a few comments sections and on Twitter about people at CKLN.

    “f-bombs”
    I've heard them on CIUT and other campus stations (and some mainstream stations) during the day myself but I'm not going to file complaints with the CRTC about them.

    Take5
    The point is that Take 5 was CIUT's major portal for student involvement. There are very few students on the station outside of it.

    DN
    DN is played 10 hours a week on CIUT, it's not on CKLN's schedule. A few shows might play excerpts of it but not 10 hours worth!

    irregularities re CIUT Station Manager
    See the Varsity's article at http://thevarsity.ca/articles/…
    I doubt you'd be as forgiving had what's suggested in that article (which seems to have been going on for years) happened at CKLN. Instead, you dismiss and excuse it away and go after CKLN again with unsubstantiated claims.

  • lipniki

    Maybe Mr. Kupferman at the Torontoist might do a variation on a theme and look into what the firing of the station manager at CIUT was all about. Or look into how all the community stations including CHRY are operating out of compliance with the CRTC, as Godot provides testimony of. Follow Godot's tremendous scoop! Wait no more for Godot, all you journalists and bloggers out there, go for it! Let's reform community radio in Toronto by showing why it's not working! Why risk losing more stations due to the rampant non-compliance to which Godot refers? Let's expose the problems and clean it up for the good of media access on radio in Toronto!

  • nevilleross

    There's nothing wrong with playing Democracy Now! on either station; in spite of it's American-centric news stories, it's actually quite a good progressive news program, and just like this progressive media outlet, it's need by the community at large.

    As for swearing-Who gives a #&%$?

    Lipinki, please find something to do with your time instead of blasting an organization and people that have done nothing to you.

  • nevilleross

    Why should progressive radio stations comply with rigged bullshit rules that the CRTC doesn't even make the commercial stations comply with? For instance, 1050 CHUM was supposed to be playing new music from Canadian and local artists-did they do that? No, they played Beatles/StonesKinks/Who/Elvis/whatever all day! So, tough shit for the CRTC and their lax enforcement of the rules.

  • LoFiHi

    Everyone knows that complaints happen, sometimes they are silly, Dire Straits anyone? But what the CRTC is more concerned with is willful and long term disregard of regulations that CKLN showed. They also want know how a station responds to them and CKLN's evasions and blaming prior staff for all their screwups was not going to cut it. And it still doesn't. Oh and responding to a listener complaint by daring the complainant to come down and face you “if you have the guts” (as CKLN did) is quite possibly the stupidest thing any media outlet has ever done.

  • LoFiHi

    .”Why should progressive radio stations comply with rigged bullshit rules” Excuse me? Why should so called “Progressives” not have to follow the rules? This is exactly the kind of arrogance I was speaking of.

    “1050 CHUM was supposed to be playing new music from Canadian and local artists”.
    Say what? CHUM may suck, but there is no way their CRTC promise of performance will say that. They have to comply with the same CanCon rules everyone does but if you can prove they aren't then go ahead and start filing complaints for real, “if you have the guts” of course.

  • LoFiHi

    The fact that the only reply you can come up with to such detailed post is a petty personal insult speaks volumes.
    Also, not to state the obvious, but going on a message board on which you already have NUMEROUS postings to accuse someone else of not having a life because they posted something you don't like shows an equally revealing lack of self awareness.

  • LoFiHi

    Everyone knows that complaints happen, sometimes they are silly, Dire Straits anyone? But what the CRTC is more concerned with is willful and long term disregard of regulations that CKLN showed. They also want know how a station responds to them and CKLN's evasions and blaming prior staff for all their screwups was not going to cut it. And it still doesn't. Oh and responding to a listener complaint by daring the complainant to come down in person “if you have the guts” (as CKLN did) is quite possibly the stupidest thing any media outlet has ever done.

  • LoFiHi

    .”Why should progressive radio stations comply with rigged bullshit rules” Excuse me? Why should so called “Progressives” not have to follow the rules? This is exactly the kind of arrogance I was speaking of.

    “1050 CHUM was supposed to be playing new music from Canadian and local artists”.
    Say what? CHUM may suck, but there is no way their CRTC “Promise of performance” requirements will say that they must play “New Canadian and Local Artists”. CHUM has been an oldies station since the 1980's, do you really think nobody at the CRTC noticed? They have to comply with the same CanCon rules everyone does of course but if you can prove they aren't then go ahead and start filing complaints for real instead of making vague postings. That is “if you have the guts” of course.

  • LoFiHi

    The fact that the only reply you can come up with to such detailed post is a petty personal insult speaks volumes.
    Also, not to state the obvious, but going on a message board on which you already have NUMEROUS postings to accuse someone else of not having a life because they posted something you don't like shows an equally revealing lack of self awareness.