Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
31°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
26°/15°

14 Comments

news

The Further Story of the Trinity Bellwoods Yarn Tree

20100930YT04.jpg
A close-up of the yarn tree, recently dismantled, presumably by the City. Photo by Michael Chrisman/Torontoist.


About two weeks ago, we had a post about a Norway maple, in the south end of Trinity Bellwoods Park, that had been laced with multicoloured yarn by an artist, or artists. The rogue artwork, while intricate and even beautiful, had been installed by driving nails into the bark of the tree, which prompted a concerned member of the Friends of Trinity Bellwoods Park, a community organization, to tie an eloquent letter to the tree’s trunk, informing the tree vandal (or vandals) that holes in bark can cause trees to become ill.
Soon after Torontoist’s article was published, the Star ran their own version of the story, with an eye-catching headline: Ailing tree victim of art attack? The newspaper spoke with Toronto’s director of urban forestry, who said that attaching things to City trees is against the law, and carries a maximum fine of five-thousand dollars. The Star also learned that the City would be removing the nails and yarn.
This negative attention was distressing to Felix Kalmenson and Sasha Foster. They were the ones responsible for yarning the tree.


Kalmenson and Foster are boyfriend and girlfriend, both in their early twenties. He’s an architecture and geography student at U of T, and she’s an illustration student at OCAD(U). They don’t consider themselves to be street artists; the yarn tree was only their second outdoor piece. Their apartment is a sprawling downtown loft with its own freight elevator, shared among them and some friends. In the corner of the living room is a pair of old doors, with some nails driven into them. Strands of thread, wound around the nails, form the outlines of a pair of surprisingly detailed human faces.
“Our initial aim was definitely not to hurt the tree,” said Kalmenson. “You know, we saw this tree. And we kind of chose that tree of all trees specifically because it looked like it was already dying.”
“In early August, it barely had any leaves,” said Foster.
The pair did the job in one night, from midnight to around 6 a.m., with Kalmenson working his way down from the top of the tree, and Foster working her way up from the bottom.
This was in early August, almost two months before Torontoist’s article. The pair seemed baffled by the fact that their work had suddenly become a matter of some controversy. Their plan had been to simply leave the piece in place, and observe its decay.
“We wanted to see how the yarn would start degrading, how leaves would get caught in it when fall came,” said Kalmenson. “Because we’re both really interested in seeing how nature reclaims space.”

20101006yarntreeupdate1.jpg
Kalmenson and Foster’s new yarn-based installation, recently completed and hanging somewhere in Trinity Bellwoods Park. Photo courtesy of Felix Kalmenson.


By the time Kalmenson and Foster had learned of the note from the Friends of Trinity Bellwoods Park, so much time had passed that they didn’t think it would be worthwhile to respond.
Michaelle McLean, the volunteer with Friends of Trinity Bellwoods Park who wrote the note, told us in a previous interview that the artists’ decision not to take the yarn down in a timely manner was one of the things that she most objected to about the piece. “That to me is not what sharing public space is about,” she told us. “It’s about having some consideration for your neighbours…And I’m not sure that some people who practice guerrilla art have consideration for their neighbours.”
Kalmenson and Foster hadn’t anticipated this type of reaction.
“That’s what you get when you put art in public space, is that you create this public dialogue about art,” said Kalmenson. “If we did these nail things at home, like we’ve been doing forever, no one would ever talk about it.”
“It is unfortunate that the City might have to pay somebody to take care of it, but at least the people who are going to take care of it will know how to properly take care of it,” said Foster.
The yarn and nails were removed, presumably by the City, at some point last week, leaving scars in the bark.
Kalmenson and Foster had reasons for doing what they did.
“You know, we were actually doing this for the community. We were trying to make something that everybody could appreciate,” said Foster.
The fact that the community reaction to the yarn tree was partly negative highlights something about shared urban spaces like Trinity Bellwoods Park—namely that our collective enjoyment of them is sometimes at cross-purposes.
Kalmenson and Foster, for their part, are now a little more conscious of competing claims on Toronto’s urban plant life. Their latest work is a yarn pyramid that hangs on a rope from the branch of a tree in Trinity Bellwoods Park, harmlessly.

Comments

  • http://undefined davedave

    “Our initial aim was definitely not to hurt the tree,” said Kalmenson. “You know, we saw this tree. And we kind of chose that tree of all trees specifically because it looked like it was already dying.”
    “In early August, it barely had any leaves,” said Foster.
    ——
    Ah, so the non-arborists figure they know whether a tree is alive or dead.
    Then they proceed to nail hundreds of nails into it.
    And then they don’t even apologize for possibly killing the tree.
    Way to go, jackas*es.

  • CanadianSkeezix

    No kidding. The two of them are somewhat delusional. I have to agree with the woman quoted from Friends of Trinity Bellwoods Park. These two don’t have a lot of consideration for others (including, apparently, trees).

  • http://undefined mattalexto

    Next time try beautifying something that isn’t already beautiful, like a utility pole or a chain link fence. There’s a difference between a tree that looks like it’s already dying, and a dead tree, or a piece of lumber.
    Can I practice my tattooing skills on your old grandma? She’ll be dead soon anyway.

  • http://undefined TrishB

    How stupid do you have to be to NOT know that driving all those nails into a tree wouldn’t damage the poor thing or that others would find it harmful? Also, why are they not paying the fine? Foster and Kamelson are just garnering further publicity for their shitty art installations that don’t do much but annoy those that have to actually live with their property damage. Grow up kiddies and stick to paper and film!!

  • http://undefined TrishB

    Ha!! Perfect comment!

  • http://undefined ellec

    Yep. They sound about as ignorant as required to do such a thing.

  • http://undefined ellec

    “If we did these nail things at home, like we’ve been doing forever, no one would ever talk about it.”
    That would be the point.

  • http://undefined Jos

    Typical hipster me-first generational stupidity.
    I don’t understand why nails had to be used. It’s yarn FFS!, they couldn’t tie the yarn to the tree directly?

  • http://undefined Laura Leung

    Yeah, eh? Those nails have inflicted wounds that provide entry for all sorts of diseases. For the record, trees fall ill too: this summer’s extreme heat has stressed out many trees in the GTA, which is why it may have lost its leaves in August. It takes years for a tree to reach that size, and makes me sad that this kind of ignorance to nature’s wonder is taken so lightly.. just like the removal of the Peace Garden in NPS.

  • http://undefined edenc

    I encountered Foster and Kalmenson’s tree on one of my frequent visits to Trinity Bellwoods (I live in the area) and I was thrilled and impressed to see that someone had put in so much time and effort to create something beautiful for the neighborhood to enjoy. In fact, while I was admiring the tree, a perfect stranger came up to me and commented that he liked it too and had been visiting it almost daily since the strings were installed. We had a lovely chat and agreed that this simple piece of art had brightened our day. Seeing something pretty and memorable enough to spark up a conversation between strangers is rare and does good things to contradict Toronto’s reputation as an unfriendly place.
    Call me cruel, but the tree was the least of my concerns. Foster and Kalmenson may not be arborists, but I am sure none of the people who’ve taken the time out to bash them are either. In fact, I am quite certain none of us are when shopping for furniture or enjoying a Christmas tree. Foster and Kalmenson took the time (a lot of time, as it appears) to do something that they thought would be enjoyed by their community. If they were members of the “me-first” generation, they’d have their art up in galleries where they can make money. If they were show-offs they wouldn’t have chosen a medium that’s anonymous. What the above comments reveal to me is that anyone can find a soapbox to stand on when it provides the opportunity to anonymously diss a couple that lives in a sprawling loft.

  • http://undefined cheribobbins

    hahahhaha good one…
    It appears by the looks of their latest piece that they may have gotten the point about damaging trees. It would be a nice gesture if they offered to purchase a new tree to be planted in the park instead of being forced to pay $5000….

  • http://undefined TrishB

    Ha, leave it a hanger-on bff of Felix and Sasha’s to save the day! Of course the tree was the least of your concerns, Eden. The difference between this tree and the christmas tree or wooden furniture that those trees are grown on farms with the specific intention of being cut down and used for other utilitarian purposes. Now in a park, which is considered public space, but operated privately, is another story and is not primarily intended for so-called “anonymous” art installations nor is it a free-for-all let’s see how many nails we can stab into a tree so it will look “pretty.” And by all means only a handful of people find the installation worth admiring while the rest of the community is annoyed that yet again another cheap artist has to use public property to express their ignorance. Your comments reveal to me that only a friend of Felix’s would have the nerve to say that our comments are anonymous attacks on some shitty art hipsters. When really there is nothing anonymous about these comments at all, except that we provide about as much information on our names as you do. Again, another little girl that needs to get out of her little delusional head and realize that the world does not revolve around you and your friends and that no, we don’t hate the art piece because the couple resides in a broken down “sprawling loft.” We hate it because it is damaging and it isn’t all that interesting or memorable. In my opinion it is more of a joke.

  • http://undefined edenc

    dayyyuuuum, who are you and how do you know who i’m friends with?? who’s the “hanger-on” in this situation, Trish?

  • http://undefined edenc

    YO TRISH I’LL FIGHT YOU!!!!!