Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
31°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
26°/15°

21 Comments

news

OneToronto Makes a Last-Minute Effort to Change the Tenor of Mayoral Rhetoric

OneToronto’s PowerPoint presentation, as presented Friday morning during their press conference.


Toronto has been an angry place during this municipal election. OneToronto is angry about that.


A coalition of community and political organizations, as well as concerned individuals, OneToronto was formed about three weeks ago with a goal in mind: engage voters in a positive, constructive conversation about Toronto’s future, as an alternative to the gloomy rhetoric that has dominated headlines throughout this year’s municipal election.
With less than three weeks to go before election day, it seems fair to point out that OneToronto’s campaign is probably coming too late in the cycle to have a profound impact on the outcome of the mayoral race, or any of the lower-profile municipal races currently underway.
But their press conference this morning, was, if nothing else, a valiant effort to inject some positivity into a political atmosphere where the only apparent way to connect with a majority of voters is to promise them tax cuts and austerity.
The turnout at the presser, at the Church of the Holy Trinity by Nathan Phillips Square, was low. All the best City Hall reporters were elsewhere, covering Rob Ford’s complete fiscal plan, which he was unveiling, ironically, at almost the exact same time. Ford’s plan calls for tax and spending cuts in order to deliver a claimed $1.67 billion surplus after four years, as part of his “respect for taxpayers” platform.
The OneToronto message was somewhat different. The organization’s position is that Toronto’s financial situation is not untenable, and that the City doesn’t need to cut services to survive.
Former (and possibly future) Parkdale-High Park MP Peggy Nash delivered a PowerPoint presentation that had been prepared by economist Jim Stanford, who was absent due to some unspecified medical emergency.
The presentation—which you can watch in its entirety above—pointed out, correctly, that the property tax bills of Toronto landowners are the lowest in the GTA, and that roughly two-thirds of the City’s operating budget goes to things like transit, emergency services, and provincially mandated social services that can’t be blithely cut. It also attempted to make political hay out of Toronto’s 2009 operating surplus of about $355 million. But the Board of Trade has pointed out that the City is reliant upon unsustainable, one-time cash infusions to balance its annual budgets, and so a 2009 surplus is not necessarily a guarantee that Toronto’s spending is perfectly under control. We might just have been lucky.
Gail Nyberg, executive director of Daily Bread Food Bank, took the microphone to speak in protest of the lack of attention paid to the underprivileged during this municipal election cycle.
GTA food banks handled 1,187,000 visits this year, a 15% increase from 2009.
“Be angry if you need to be angry,” said Nyberg, as though addressing the four front-running mayoral candidates in absentia. “But also decide the kind of city that you want to live in not today, but four years from today.”
Get more municipal election coverage from Torontoist here.

Comments

  • http://undefined Caligula Jones

    Wow. What a well balanced group: slightly left, very left, incredibly left and the unbelievably so far left they are practically right.
    Couldn’t get their crapalicious presentation to work on Firefox: any see where them mention that our reserves are almost depleted as well?

  • http://undefined Caligula Jones

    Er, that should probably read: anyone see where they…
    Don’t need to put out a spelling flame.

  • http://undefined davedave

    Wow property tax BULLSH*T
    I don’t know anybody whose property tax has gone down.
    Mine has gone up a lot more than 1.8% per year.
    There must be some sh*thole cheap places paying next to nothing in property taxes to drive the average that low.

  • http://undefined rich1299

    It worked fine for me and I’nm using Firefox, its a Youtube video after all.
    The whole point of their presentation,whcih I totally agree with is that the Toronto being talked about in the mayoral campaign isn’t a reflection of reality. Toronto has been doing very well, especially considering the world wide economic recession but to hear the candidates talk you’d think this was the worst city on the planet and is getting even worse every day. I like the Toronto of the last decade, its been a very good place to live and play for me and those I know at least. I know I’d like to see some recognition that Toronto is doing very well from the mayoral candidates.

  • http://undefined Astin

    Remember, comparative examples are the best ones! Because everyone else in the GTA pays more in property tax, so should we!
    I’m sure the same argument works on them when it’s used to support City Hall pay increases, or cuts to social spending.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Is that really the best you’re able to do against analyst findings by globally-reputable accounting and consultancy firms? “Left left left?” Honestly Caligula (and your like-spoken “taxpayers” around Toronto): just how many major cities have you spent much time living and paying local taxes? How much in comparative living experiences amongst those cities do you really have? What’s wrong with you moving out of Toronto and into the 905 where housing is bigger, cheaper, and you get more bang for your buck (and lots more parking spaces on your driveway? Or is it sich a great deal after all?
    All this really means is that a solid chunk of statistical analysis from industry-leading global consultancies (PriceWaterhouse, Aon, etc.) is sorta tough to wash down with a dry glass of “bloody leftists” whinery.
    Try not to choke.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    I agree.
    Since the first time I set foot in the city in ’96, it’s gone from being a great place to a place where some amazing things are happening on a scale that can’t be summed up in some simple generality.
    Maybe Flounder signifies the sense of revanchist resistance to that time before these amazing things began to happen (coincidentally, during the time before his daddy Doug, along with his boss Darth Harris, crunched all us six boroughs together into one place).
    Incidentally, to all Flounder supporters, most of Toronto actually happens outside of City Hall. I know. What a stunner. And that’s where the amazing stuff is happening. The municipal government, meanwhile, is remarkably stable, which is precisely what we need. Don’t believe it? Sit in on city hall meetings in comparably sized cities. The difference is stark.
    This isn’t a question of core versus suburbs so much as a matter of unified city versus people who want it to feel like it was when the boroughs were smaller and more provincial from one another. The good news is Canada is rife with cities the size of those old boroughs, and they all have cosy houses when that fuzzy feeling you hear Flounder talking about. You could always move there.
    But if you really would rather not leave this city, then you have to go with a flow that started long before this mayoral campaign, and well outside of anything happening inside city hall. Get angry all you want, but use that to move somewhere that makes you less so. A short term crank fest now by installing Flounder isn’t going to change that flow. Your taxes won’t really improve, though they might shift around from different sources (and at the probable cost of watching the city — the municipal services side — go to slime in a bucket).
    Stop think of yourselves as “taxpayers” and start thinking of yourself as citizens (who, by the way, pay taxes, too, and they also participate in their city). Or just go where taxpayers are the only people who matter, and citizenry is some kind of quaint memory.
    tl;dr: the “taxpayer” rhetoric has lost its punch. It’s an empty solution. I guarantee it.

  • http://undefined rek

    Was there supposed to be sound in the video? It seemed odd that there wasn’t, but if it was just taken from a presentation I guess the presenter supplied the “sound”.
    To the point at hand, Rob Ford sank the level of mayoral campaign debate into the deepest ditch he could find, and none of the other candidates really did anything to raise it.

  • http://undefined spacejack

    Whoa! “Think like me or GTFO?” Coming from someone who wasn’t even born here?? Sorry but that kind of attitude isn’t going to win many people over.
    Also, good luck with convincing people who pay taxes not to think of themselves as taxpayers.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Uh, no. What I’m saying is don’t “think like me.”
    And don’t think like Flounder and blithely try out his weight loss programme called “putting a stop to the gravy train” and “cutting out the waste in City Hall” (hint, think guys: scalpel, not machete; or just think, ok?). Don’t act like a lemming, or Ford lemming, or Flounder lemming, or Flemming. Have your choice. The lemming rhetoric is built on a shoddy foundation.
    What I am saying is first to think and second to think as a citizen — not as a, scare quote, “taxpayer.” “Taxpayer” reads as a badly veiled code for the Ford campaign to undo a lot of the good that has become the city we have now (after we were gorged with lemons in ’98 and ever since have tried to make some good of it, lemonade being just one idea). In this sense, “taxpayer” does not associate itself as a citizen. Being a citizen doesn’t even register to the “taxpayer.”
    The Ford(ist) cipher is “taxes” — the decoding reads as “citizen plurality and variety is no longer desired here,” “roads are designed for cars and trucks, full-stop,” “anyone who opposes us are dangling left elitists laughing at us from their ivory towers,” and “downtown no longer gets the upper hand on uptown.” It is, as the last comment I made, a ruse.
    What I hear — and hopefully I’m not the only one — is that people in Toronto making a social identity out of calling themselves big-T “Taxpayers” are expressing a preference to undo a lot of what really can’t be undone. It’s a pipe dream. Most of that is a function of time moving forward: they can’t wind back the clock to the halcyon pre-amalgamation days, to the glorious days of the Harris Common Sense Revolution, or to when our Good city wrapped up our public playground swing sets with chains on Sundays to prevent anyone from sinning by having fun on “the Lord’s Day.”
    “Toronto big-T Taxpayers” are just a local strain of the SARS-like rhetoric infecting wide swathes south of our nation’s border in a pandemic called the “Tea Party.” The symptoms are driven on anger, not on wisdom; fuelled by emotion, not by logic. Anger and emotion eventually wear out; wisdom and logic don’t. Even pandemics go away, though sometimes with severe, short-term harm. Unfortunately, we appear to be headed that way, and there will be casualties.
    As to responding to the Caligulas and JimBeams of Torontoist and other self-asserted Taxpayers in this very post-amalgamated city making lemon meringue pies and lemon gelato and a bunch of other lemony things — we’re cunning that way — this remark is a blunt way of saying that there are definitely Torontonians who: don’t buy Floundery rhetoric; pay their taxes; and also understand that these go into the indispensable services to a quality of living we have which other cities do not.
    To understand this and to agree to a consensus on improving the city further is to understand what it means to be a citizen first who also pays taxes second. You can be a taxpayer without being, in Flounder’s vision, a mob of Taxpayers who are mad as hell and blah blah blah you sound like a broken mp3.
    Ah yes, as to your birth remark: we obviously don’t pick where we’re born, but Toronto totally gets this. It’s vetted by our official motto, “Diversity Our Strength” (something Flounder wants to erase). Our city (and its surroundings) thrives from the very variety of people who voluntarily come here from all over to make a great place even better, day by day. We Torontonians-by-choice could go to many other places, but we choose here because there’s something special about it, something worth caring about, and something worth improving.
    So, yeah. tl;dr again, but there you go. If people don’t like it, then they can just disagree. We’re not lemmings. We do have to live together as a plurality, and for some to pretend we’re Flounder’s Toronto ’53, ’83, or whatever is just a pipe dream, and it’s all smoke.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Sadly, you’re right.

  • http://stevekupferman.typepad.com Steve Kupferman

    There isn’t supposed to be any sound, no. There was a live narration.

  • little_potato

    No one even suggested that we should be paying taxes. We are just saying that Rob Ford is wrong by saying we must cut a lot.

  • little_potato

    Ugh… no one even suggested that we should be paying *more* taxes.

  • http://undefined thomas.owain

    I’d like the ‘tone of mayoral rhetoric’ to change so that trying to fix problems, wanting safe bike lanes, and respecting scholarly expertise in urban planning are not seen as left-wing values. It’s really irritating, like having to explain why Darwin is more useful to biologists than the New Testament is, when instead we need to focus on how to burn less oil.
    Left-wingers and right-wingers should be fighting over whether rich kids are allowed to go to different schools and get all the best teachers and science-lab equipment. That’s worth disagreeing about. All this stuff about ‘let’s stop paying to fix problems’ is such nonsense. Even the conservative Fraser Institute agrees that Canadian taxes offer superb value for the vast majority of citizens.

  • http://undefined thomas.owain

    (Or the Old Testament, I guess.)

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Great comment.
    For sure, what comes from this reflexive populism is not a reasoned doctrine of fiscal conservatism (i.e., the Fraser Institute), but of “common sense” fallacy dictating our current political climate in the mayoral race.
    The first year I was in university was when I was challenged on why “common sense” is basically anything but correct or sensible, although definitely common. It may feel right down in the gut, but it’s usually not. “Common sense” is what leads to things like stake burnings, AIDS hysteria, a flat planet, physiognomy (that is, looking at someone’s physical features to deduce their “in-born criminality”), and slash-and-burning taxes while maintaining the same quality of living and environment.
    When I hear people lambaste urban planning as some kind of problem maker, then to hear Ford in a recent debate say how the city planner has to change his or her apolitical relationship with the city and councillors, underscores this logical shortcoming. The city planner, who must first be tediously schooled on the disciplined rules of the discipline and profession, must vow to an ethical code of responsibility (as a physician is bound to the Hippocratic oath). The city planner then is brought in independently of elected governments or contemporary mix of local developers.
    Since planning only came to be in the last century, these ethics are still relatively new, which informs why planners for much of the earlier 20th century got it so wrong (Robert Moses, Fred Gardiner, etc.) and hurt a lot of urban dynamics in the process.
    Going to school and learning advanced ideas does mean something. To be okay with throwing out planners and economists in favouring of populist, “common sense” ideas is to be okay with throwing out a physician to get your neighbour to take out your infected appendix in her or his garage.

  • http://undefined CaligulaJones

    Wow, “love it or leave it”. THAT’s the best YOU can do?
    Sorry, not leaving. Kicking some leftwing twits out, starting with Queen Bee Bussin, and watching hippies’ heads explode like a Cronenberg movie in a few weeks.
    BTW, I live a ten minute walk from Woodbine subway station, take the subway to work 5 days a week, and don’t own a car.
    But nice projecting….

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Awesome. I would love to be given the truth-out on having said that. Help me find that.
    As to “throw the bums out,” it’s historically never a strategic manoeuvre by an electorate, merely a tactical one — irrespective the location, era, or voting body. It never works with predictable results, when something even works at all (but Videodrome was an awesome, biting satire on Moses Znaimer’s City-tv origins).
    As to your locale, that’s also awesome. You live near Woodbine, so you’re probably not far from The Beaches. Was there a point to that from which we could glean? Also, with a name like Caligula, I suppose this also means you get excited by tyrannical behaviour and increasing the dictatorial powers of the executive. I suppose you also felt that way about executive power over these last few years?
    As to your remark about hippies, I’m mildly amused, but mostly bored.
    Toronto has about 83 hippies left, most of whom are ageing, sit in Bellevue Square in K-Mart, and toke away on most afternoons. That’s hardly a voting bloc or representative of a city which opposes Flounder’s disregard for plurality and this “take this city away from citizens and ground them for the next four years while only Toronto taxpayers can speak” he so sweetly sugar coats with cheesy stock music and petulant, bullying temper tantrums whilst in council session. That’s tyranny.

  • http://undefined CaligulaJones

    What’s wrong with you moving out of Toronto and into the 905
    Sorry, but its hard to NOT see this as “love it or leave it.
    You live near Woodbine, so you’re probably not far from The Beaches. Was there a point to that from which we could glean?
    See above.
    You seem to think that any Ford supporter(ish, in my case, still undecided) would be a ‘burbite. Sorry, but I love my 1,200 square foot home with a postage-stamp backyard right on the subway. I have to work in North York, and its about as soul-destroying as you can imagine. Ugh.
    As for hippies, c’mon, they don’t stay hippies forever. They turn into the types who support the left on Toronto council. Kinda like caterpillars turning into moths.
    As for power, etc., sorry, but its been your types over the last few years who want a strong mayor, and now that you might get someone you disagree with, you don’t really like the idea.
    As a (true) conservative, I think government should be small enough to meet every so often in a phone booth. I’d hardly want to give it MORE power. That’s your shtick, but as above, you only seem to want power for government when its not your particular political ox that is being gored. In other words, you get the government you deserve.
    BTW, I’m only Caligula by marriage. My father was Germanicus, my mother was careless. But, as my step-father/great uncle once said, “I’m nursing a viper at the bosom of Rome”. In this case, its a viper called “Ford”.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    I am sorry that it’s hard for you to see this as everything other than the reductionist conclusion you have arrived to.
    It’s really not an either/or affair, even as this rhetoric tries to reduce complexities into “‘left’ versus ‘common sense’.” Life would be so easy to understand were everything experienced in reductionist either/ors: “left versus right,” “gravy train versus common sense,” “Taxpayer versus everyone else,” “normalcy versus deviance,” “conservative versus communist,” and on and on. How boring. How simplistic. And how off.
    As for Ford being a viper — herpetologists know that vipers kill prey using poison. If Flounder is Toronto’s viper, then I suppose we should all expect the city to be dead or dying within four years after he is elected.