Today Fri Sat
It is forecast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on October 23, 2014
Clear
15°/6°
It is forecast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on October 24, 2014
Partly Cloudy
13°/8°
It is forecast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on October 25, 2014
Partly Cloudy
16°/8°

Your Toronto 2014 Issue Navigator

How the candidates compare on some of the city's biggest issues.

14 Comments

news

Oakmount Road’s Mysterious Fork

20101028oakmountroad1.jpg
Photo by Stephen Michalowicz/Torontoist.


Welcome to the corner of Oakmount Road, Oakmount Road, and well…Oakmount Road. Unlike boring ol’ run-of-the-mill streets, with their logical linear paths, Oakmount forks, going in three directions, creating what might be one of the oddest intersections in the city.


20101028oakmountroad2.jpg
For most of its length, Oakmount runs parallel to Keele Street, just north of Bloor Street West. It only splits near its northern end. Afterwards, the western part of the street continues until Pacific Avenue, while the eastern part merges with Medland Crescent.
Why the fork exists isn’t entirely clear. According to City records, Oakmount, which used to be known as Uttley Street, was created in 1884 by the Village of West Toronto Junction. It was later changed to Oakmount in 1911 by the City of Toronto (the City merged with the Junction in 1909). City maps from the period reveal that Oakmount’s eastern spoke was built sometime after the rest of the street, between 1910 and 1915, while City records indicate that Medland was laid down in 1911.
If the eastern spoke of Oakmount was constructed before Medland, it might explain why the street forks. Perhaps planners felt that it was unnecessary to create a whole new street for such a small expansion. But if Medland was constructed first, or at the same time, then logically, it should extend all the way up to the intersection. (Even Google Maps mistakenly agrees.)

20101028oakmountroad3.jpg
The road outlined in yellow is Uttley Street, before it became Oakmount Road. Plan of the City of Toronto, 1908.


To find answers, we contacted Kerry Ferguson, titles and status supervisor at the City’s Surveys and Mapping department, and Neil Ross, a historian with the West Toronto Junction Historical Society. But unfortunately, they could only offer us theories.
“Street configurations often reflect natural topography,” says Ferguson. “I suspect Oakmount and Medland are the way they are partially because of the topography. Also, the developer has to maximize the number of lots on the raw parcel of land that he owns. And so he has to design his subdivision so that he gets the maximum number of saleable lots all serviced by the minimum number of roads. Lots mean money, roads do not. Hence the twists and turns.”
Ross, on the other hand, suspects that the “system of creeks and rivers” that run through the area might have played a role in shaping the street’s odd path.
“The streets are all laid out there on the basis of the original creek beds, and a lot of them are funneled into pipes that run underneath the street system there,” Ross told us. “So, I would expect that that would be the original impetus for the street forking like that.”
Of course, Oakmount isn’t entirely unique. Toronto’s twisty, windy suburbs contain dozens of streets that loop around and intersect with themselves, like Hearst Circle, Valecrest Drive, and Decarie Circle. There are also plenty of streets that undergo random name changes for no apparent reason. The worst is probably Blackthorn Avenue, which turns into Haverson Boulevard, restarts somewhere else, abruptly ends, then restarts again. Or maybe Oak Street, which turns into Gary Drive, then PELMO Crescent, and then Woodward Avenue.
Oakmount’s confusing intersection could probably be fixed by extending Medland and eliminating the eastern part of Oakmount Road—though residents probably wouldn’t appreciate having their addresses changed. And as we’ve learned from other surveying snafus, it’s probably easier to bulldoze and start again than to effect a street name change.

Comments