Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
31°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
26°/15°

38 Comments

news

Newsstand: October 27, 2010

matt_newsstand_bikelane.jpg
Illustration by Matt Daley/Torontoist.

Today is Day 2, Year 0 of the new municipal order. In the news, the Fords triumphant show a magnanimous side, talking about lowering taxes, donating earnings to charity, and not ripping up your streetcar tracks just yet.

The Gravy Train Nation rejoices as mayor-elect Rob Ford sticks to his guns and says that cutting taxes will be first priority when he ascends to the mayoral throne. He hopes to start with the widely disliked vehicle registration tax at the first council meeting, and follow up by eliminating the municipal land transfer tax.
Doug Ford, who just won baby brother Rob Ford’s former Ward 2 council seat in Etobicoke, says he’ll donate his almost one-hundred-thousand-dollar salary to community organizations. He says he’s not doing it to embarrass his fellow councillors, which is just a bonus.
Doug Ford is also telling the media that “we want to look at more effective ways of running transit, but by no means are we going to get a crane and start yanking up streetcars and throwing them in the lake,” a revelation which bodes well not only for transit but for environmental policy in the city. Ford the elder says that the anti-streetcar idea was a rumour started by competing candidates, who presumably also inserted the line in Rob Ford’s transportation plan which says: “Streetcars on downtown arterial streets will be replaced with clean buses that provide the same capacity on the same routes.”
The gravy train may be pulling out of the station, but it’s not too late to hop on board! Council members who lost their seats in this week’s election won’t be going home empty-handed, as a 1999 bylaw gives outgoing councillors a month’s severance pay for each year of service, up to a full year’s salary. That means long-serving public servants like Joe Pantalone will be lunching on your dime long after Rob Ford has taken the axe to the city hall buffet.
G20 bad boy Alex Hundert is back in jail again after supposedly threatening a Crown attorney. The alleged ringleader of the summit miscreants had his bail revoked after he was supposedly seen copying down the licence plate number of the car belonging to one of the prosecuting attorneys. Ironically, Hundert was at the courthouse appealing his stringent bail conditions when the ineffectual threat was said to have occurred. Neither Rob nor Doug Ford were involved in this story.
Workers at the Delta Chelsea Hotel will set up picket lines today after voting overwhelmingly in favour of a two-week strike. The BlissDom Canada conference scheduled for this week is still on, although it may be slightly less blissful without clean towels.

Filed under: ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined Matthew

    What I want to know is whether or not RF is still coaching high school football. Cause I really don’t think that is what his supporters expected him to spend his time doing after being elected.

  • http://undefined linnyqat

    I read an article yesterday where he was being quoted while standing on the football field where he coaches (I think?)
    I doubt he’ll have time to continue with it after November 2. But this is one of the very few things I like about the guy.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    Ford had said he would stop coaching if he won the mayor’s seat. But he’s not actually mayor until December 1, 2010.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Football season will largely be over by then. Perfect for him. Not so perfect for next year’s team.

  • http://undefined linnyqat

    Right. I was thinking of the US midterm election day.
    In the meantime, let’s all cheer for the Don Bosco Eagles! (Had to google that one. Geez, what an awkward moniker.) Go DBEs!

  • http://undefined brodie

    http://www.cbc.ca/asithappens/episode/2010/10/26/tuesday-october-26-2010/
    Part one of yesterday’s “as it happens” should clear that question up. What an embarassing interview.

  • http://undefined linnyqat

    Yes, another commenter linked to it in a different post. The country laughs while the city weeps.
    http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/asithappens_20101026_40204.mp3

  • http://undefined linnyqat

    gah. sorry, I didn’t see you’d already provided a link. The more, the embarrassedier.

  • http://undefined Moonmoth

    Dear Torontonians, the idiom:
    You made your bed now sleep in it.
    couldn’t apply better for the next four years.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Yeah, and the idiom “given lemons, make lemonade” applies even more. End your lollygagging over the election results and take some ownership over this, your city. Make it better in spite of Flounder or his army of “taxpayers.”
    Citizens are better than that. Are you?

  • http://undefined Ben

    Seconded.
    As stated above, Ford has already reneged on one of his more egregiously wrong-headed planks, and we didn’t even have to work for that one. It’s a freebie to get the ball rolling.

  • rek

    The Conservative Cycle of Erosion
    1. Cut taxes.
    2. Cut services.
    3. Increase spending in surprising new ways.
    4. Turn surplus into shortfall.
    5. Lose election to left-leaning candidate who promises to fix your mistakes (raising taxes to do so) but doesn’t quite manage to get us back in order.
    6. Win re-election on promise to end Lefty’s tax-and-spend reign of terror/gravy train/entitlements/whatever.
    7. Go to Step 1.

  • http://undefined Nathan

    Depressing, but true.

  • rek

    There are about 3 Fordites on Torontoist, among a horde of Evil Socialists who didn’t vote for Ford, overwhelmingly voted for Smitherman in a move to block Ford, and have been consistent about how bad it could get under Ford since the moment he announced he was considering a run for mayor. Which bed did we (the aforementioned Evil Socialists) make, exactly?
    Perhaps you meant to post at Wishwewereinthe905ist.com

  • http://undefined Moonmoth

    Pardon moi but I refuse to “take ownership”/’make lemonade’ whatevs out that fact that a bigoted, xenophobic, homophobic, facile, bloated buffoon manhog now leads our city.
    Though I am glad many progressives were voted to council (Doucette, Perks, Wong-Tam, et al are going to be key in the next 4 years).

  • mark.

    http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontovotes2010/2010/10/26/15834981.html
    This article seeks to list all the ‘promises’ Ford made while campaigning. It’ll be interesting to see on which of these he follows through, and the position he takes on issues he has yet to say anything about. And, what spending he considers ‘waste.’
    From my own rough count, it looks as though we have 23 right-wing and 21 non-right-wing councillors + a right wing mayor. Previously we had 23 right-wing and 21 non-right-wing councillors + a non-right-wing mayor.
    If you find this strange, it’s likely because pigeon-holing local councillors as ‘right-wing,’ ‘left-wing’ or ‘progressive’ can be rather difficult. Left and right-wing began in France during the Revolution; for the majority of the 20th century, left meant communist (common ownership of the means of production); now it seems to mean anyone who thinks their is value in government! Since ‘left’ has so many meanings it has none, the term ‘progressive’ has come into play which seems to mean a willingness to try new things, that there is value in governance, ‘spending’ is termed ‘investment,’ and a belief that the capitalist mode of production can be directed toward the common good. Meanwhile, ‘right-wing’ has lost its association with ‘conservativism’ since many right-wing politicians run on a platform of ‘change.’ In the municipal campaign, it was Pantalone alone who ran on a ‘conservative’ platform by promising to ‘conserve’ the way things are.

  • http://undefined avp77

    It’s not surprising that eliminating any streetcar routes isn’t one of Ford’s priorities, despite the fear-mongering from opponents that streetcars would be gone from Toronto streets.
    Yes, it was part of his platform, but I can’t remember a politician, provincial or municipal, who implemented a transit plan that followed their campaign literature. Transit City, as a recent example, was something molded my compromises and consensus between various politicians/interests/levels of government. Those dreamland political campaign transit routes, from any candidate, usually aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    If you refuse to assume ownership over the city, then you’re part of our problem, not our remedy.
    Walk the walk, not the cheap talk, and maybe you’ll be taken more seriously at your word.

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    To do so means to hire transportation planners, and that is not cheap to do on a campaign budget.

  • http://undefined Ben

    Pardon moi but I refuse to “take ownership”/’make lemonade’ whatevs out that fact that a bigoted, xenophobic, homophobic, facile, bloated buffoon manhog now leads our city.

    “Take ownership,” means deal with the consequences and try to make the best of it. It seems like the right thing to do, given the circumstances. The fact that you don’t like him as a person doesn’t mean you shouldn’t oppose his policies.

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    This morning on the news Ford said that it was never part of his platform and it was just scare mongering from his opponents.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    Right, and this morning, in Newsstand, we disproved that claim.

  • http://undefined avp77

    I think some of the confusion is that Rob Ford’s platform indicated he would want to remove some streetcar routes, and then today his campaign manager Doug Ford has said that they definitely won’t be removing all the streetcar lines. Different news sources are working with longer/shorter quotes (I can’t say I have a full handle on the story myself). The National Post story pointed out Spadina and St. Clair as routes that definitely wouldn’t be touched, while the Toronto Star seemed to work with a more limited quote, and extrapolated that it was referring to all lines being status quo forever.
    Realistically, any major removal of streetcar lines will probably be a political mess they don’t want to start with. It was kind of a dumb campaign platform and I can’t imagine it won over any people that weren’t going to vote Ford anyway.

  • http://undefined avp77

    I meant dumb campaign *plank*, not platform, haha…though I’m sure many wouldn’t have a problem with the first statement.

  • http://undefined Dipsomaniac

    When you’re given crap, make crapenade.

  • http://undefined rek

    I’m not sure you understand the idioms you’re using or referencing.

  • http://undefined rek

    The National Post has whipped up this graphic breaking down how they see the composition of council.

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    Sorry David, I should have been more clear, this is what I was trying to say. It just seems to be a splitting hairs on wording IMHO. We will remove ‘some’ streetcars vs we will remove ‘all’ streetcars. We will remove streetcars from major arterial roads. Do streetcars even exist on NON-MAJOR ARTERIALS ROADS?
    He hasn’t even taken office yet and this is the kind of crap he’s double talking already?

  • http://flickr.com/aged_accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Is that like a tapénade?

  • Moonmoth

    Word.

  • Mr. Palmer

    I haven’t read a single word that you have written that has added to any conversation you’ve entered into. You tell us to sleep in the beds WE made, but then mention you live in Toronto, something about an “us”. Well I hardly feel any kinship with a total moron. You mention soemthing about being glad some progressives were elected, yet you speak like a regressive fool. Say something worthwhile, just once pal, just once, I dare you.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    I’ve tried as best I can to transcribe that wonderful interview here.

  • Mr. Palmer

    When you said sorry, you should have just left it at that.
    and take the H out of IMHO, i don’t see honesty in your opinion, let alone value.

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    FYI: H = Humble.
    Stop trolling me. It’s getting old.

  • Mr. Palmer

    No, H means honest, but if you must, you also don’t seem to be a humble person (see accozzaglia’s comments about you).

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    Actually it means both, but “humble” is the most common usage of it.
    If you have anything you’d like to discuss concerning my point, cool. Otherwise, STFU. Troll.

  • http://undefined rek

    H means humble; IMNSHO doesn’t make sense otherwise.

  • http://undefined dowlingm

    I must say I expected DF to be #twojobsFord and grab both salaries, so that’s a pleasant surprise, but I don’t like his and other politicians’ practice of donating the cash. If you want to reduce the burden on taxpayers, refuse the salary – don’t give to your favourite cause just to look like a good guy and get a mega tax receipt.