Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
31°/19°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
26°/16°

9 Comments

news

With No “Comprehensive” Plan from the Mayoral Candidates, the Toronto Board of Trade Unveils Their Own

20100913boardoftrade.jpg
A graph of the gap between the City’s operating budget and its revenue, courtesy of the Toronto Board of Trade.


The Toronto Board of Trade, which represents the interests of Toronto’s business sector, released a set of recommendations for mayoral candidates today, emphasizing several of what they deem to be the City’s most urgent needs over the course of the next administration.


“A well thought-out vision with a clear, comprehensive plan is needed to guide our city forward,” said Carol Wilding, the Board of Trade’s president, at a press conference this morning. “With just six weeks left until the election, no candidate has yet put forth a comprehensive plan on how they will address the challenges facing Toronto and advance Toronto’s capacity for economic growth and job creation.”
The Board’s recommendations include cost-cutting, in order to end the City’s growing dependence on one-time cash infusions; a more regional approach to transit development, in order to drive growth throughout the GTA; and reform at City Hall, in order to increase civic participation and encourage councillors to focus on citywide issues, rather than ward-specific ones.
Taken together, the recommendations (which were culled from a long series of previous discussion papers released as part of the Board of Trade’s VoteToronto 2010 campaign, and can be read in their entirety right here) comprise a set of policies that is at least comparable, in terms of depth, to any platform advanced by any mayoral candidate so far.
The Board is deliberately avoiding endorsing any particular candidate. Wilding would not say whose mayoral platform her organization considers to be the best. Neither would she deride or discount Rob Ford, despite repeated (and extremely creative) questioning along those lines from certain intrepid members of the press. (“We have worked and will work with whoever moves in,” she said.)
On transit, the Board is firmly behind The Big Move, Metrolinx’s estimated fifty-billion dollar regional transit plan, which includes controversial projects like the Union-Pearson rail link, PRESTO fare cards, and the always-beleaguered Transit City. This puts the Board in varying degrees of contention with every single mayoral front-runner, with the possible exception of Joe Pantalone, who (after some hedging in the early stages of the campaign) has voiced unconditional support for Transit City. The Big Move is still eighty percent unfunded, and the Board is asking candidates to propose models for raising the remaining forty-billion dollars necessary to bring the plan about.
The Board also recommends a number of measures to reduce the City’s annual budget shortfall, which they say will amount to nearly two-billion dollars per year by 2019, if allowed to grow unchecked. These include a call for the City to reduce spending on hiring and pensions, as well as a plea for multi-year budgeting. Also recommended is a public review of City programs and services, to determine what could be cut or contracted out.
These budget recommendations are more in line with those of George Smitherman and Rocco Rossi than those of Rob Ford, whose stated plans for cost-saving so far revolve around cutting perks at City Hall.
David Soknacki, former councillor, and City budget chief during Miller’s first term, was in attendance at the press conference.
“Every one of us would cut plant watering if that would solve the issue. We would cut the MasterCard,” he told the assembled press, alluding to Rob Ford’s campaign promises to cut the City Hall plant-watering budget and reduce councillor office budgets. “That’s easy…it’s visceral—people understand it. But the tough issues are dealing with police, with transit, with debt. That’s how you essentially free up the money.”
“I think people have to look at themselves in the mirror, as well…and say ‘what do I want from this city?’”
Get more municipal election coverage from Torontoist here.

Comments

  • http://bit.ly/accozzaglia accozzaglia

    If they know the best way to financially manage the city, then they should have either run a candidate of their own to drive their position or recruit one of the big five as their business-friendly marionette. For the latter, I would have thought Thompson would be the best woman for the job, since she has run and owned a gas station.
    To the Board of Trade: as for “a more regional approach to transit development,” that’s what Metrolinx is for. Physical results take time, but throw your weight behind there to nudge things along (now that they’ve already cleared their house of public representation once) and you should start to see progress around 2025.
    Next?

  • http://stevekupferman.typepad.com Steve Kupferman

    They ARE behind Metrolinx.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    ^ Ouch. If it makes you feel better, I did read the article.
    @accozz: credible independence and political influence can’t be had simultaneously. The Board pretty clearly prefers the former. Also, lacking a domestic equivalent to Citizens United, it is difficult to operate a political marionette in Canada—contrary to common partisan hysteria.

  • http://bit.ly/accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Maybe it’s that I’m more accustomed to the manner by which select candidates in other major North American cities — from Montréal to Chicago to Houston — receive thinly-veiled support by a chamber of commerce, board of trade, or other heavy political force.
    No, I have not yet taken five to read the article, but at first face, it does seem a bit self-serving and eleventh hour for the Toronto Board of Trade to draw attention to themselves and their plan rather than lay out at the start of the year those policies and goals they wanted to reach with the next municipal government. Then at least the candidates would have the time to argue the finer points of their plan in debate and discourse.
    In other words, this would have given a little more “meat” and less “gristle” for the candidates to chew all summer. [Insert Flounder job as appropriate.]

  • http://bit.ly/accozzaglia accozzaglia

    n.b., and by “article”, I am actually referring to the report. Sorry for any confusion.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    You don’t need to follow the links…Steve wrote:

    On transit, the Board is firmly behind The Big Move, Metrolinx’s estimated fifty-billion dollar regional transit plan…

    I’m not affiliated in any way, but there’s nothing “eleventh-hour” about the Board’s involvement, though it may have passed beneath your radar.
    For example, see here that they released a report on 19 May titled “Funding The Big Move”. I read it with interest the day it came out, and I’ve been waiting—in vain—for the ideas to crop up in candidates’ platforms.
    Given Rossi’s recent joke of an announcement, evidently he (and some others) either haven’t read it or don’t care. Instead of advocating this or that policy alternative, from most there is a very worrying silence. But I don’t think you can lay that at the feet of the report authors.

  • http://bit.ly/accozzaglia accozzaglia

    It’s true: it passed beneath my radar. So I had a question: beyond a press statement feed and mirroring it on their own blog, how else did the TBoT draw attention to this report?
    The Star buried an editorial below the fold. The Sun introduced the report as a recommendation for the necessity to toll roads, to which Flounder, their go-to candidate, responded with a bunch of the creatively delicate word “no”. The next day, The Sun then followed up with their own editorial, speaking in an uncharacteristically pragmatic way about the need to have the discussion you want to have here. Even Torontoist made scant mention of the report, echoing The Sun regarding tolls and burying it at the bottom of the May 20th Newsstand. Oh, and of course Canadian Business just echoed the press release. Collectively, it was a ho-hum effort.
    Given the clout the Toronto Board of Trade have over business and, ostensibly, political affairs, this May 19th announcement appears to be run of the mill and not in any way more exceptional than any other report they announce with a perfunctory statement. Announcing it is one step; getting the message out there is the second step they didn’t seem to take until now. Put another way: if their members run businesses as effectively as they are at drawing attention to their work, then a lot of businesses are in trouble.
    In the din of media, I conjecture this is why none of the candidates, save Flounder, bothered picking up on the report’s talking points. To cover themselves, the TBoT can officially go on record with the plausible deniability of saying, “See, but we did bring this up before. We just don’t understand why so few paid much attention.”
    This is why it looks last-minute on their behalf to announce their wish list of recommendations for the next mayor in a way that local press actually bit on this time. Why couldn’t they attract that attention sooner?

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    Now that you know it’s there, examine the sheer volume of content on the VoteToronto2010 website, and the other reports preceding and following the one I linked. What other non-journalist body has produced as much output during this campaign?
    You’re suggesting they could have both led the news media horse to water and made it drink.

  • http://bit.ly/accozzaglia accozzaglia

    The media is a dumb horse. Or, as John Stewart on The Daily Show noted recently, media is the dog in the CGI film Up (i.e., “squirrel!”).
    Otherwise, granta. I’ll be looking at their stuff in the coming weeks. But information and content delivery, something businesses must know effectively, are vital to get principal messages out to audiences in a way they can digest easily and/or be prompted to action of their own volition by looking deeper into available material.
    You can get a drink of water from a fire hose, but it’s overload and overkill.