Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
31°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
26°/15°

13 Comments

news

4chan’s Hopes For a m00t Condo Dashed

201007194chan.jpg
At left, the leaderboard last Wednesday; at right, the leaderboard today.


Can 4chan get a Toronto condo named after their founder, m00t? As of today, no.


The top-ranked entry in the contest to pick a name for the new tower at Yonge and The Esplanade, with almost five thousand first-place votes, was “reported and deactivated” this afternoon. So were other high-placing, jokier entries, like “Anythin U condo I condo better” and the Reddit-backed “Mr. Splashy Tower.” (Garry Valk Plaza, for the ex–Maple Leaf, is still in the competition, as is “Stephen Colbert Tower.”)
Not that this should come as much of a surprise.
Sam P. Crignano, a partner with the condo’s developers, cityzen, made it clear that they weren’t too excited about an entrant backed by 4chan, the notorious online message board most recently responsible for this and this. Crignano told us last week that “if someone’s intentions are misguided or their intentions are—I don’t want to use the word malicious—then at that point, what option is available to us? We have to step in and try and prevent that from happening.”
Still, before the name “m00t” was disabled this afternoon, the 4chan user who submitted it maintained to Torontoist that everything was on the level.
“At no point did I ever encourage cheating, nor did I ever encourage voting for malicious purposes,” explained the user, who asked for anonymity. “I rallied the first 1500 votes on my own, promoting it as ‘Let’s do something awesome ______. Here’s our chance to name a new condominium building after m00t, please vote once a day!’ No one was ever misinformed or lied to by me.”
“I do not believe there is any reason for that behaviour to be expected to begin with,” he continued. “We have a clear lead over the competition…if there are illegitimate votes being made, remove them, but do not remove the entry. If perhaps someone decides to cheat the vote in favour of my submission or anyone else’s, do not punish the one who submits it.”
The initial name was submitted, explains the 4chan-er, in part because the other entrants were so “bland and boring.” That, and “it’s funny. It’s not funny in the sense that to walk down the street and see this would be a complete joke, but it’s funny in the sense that the people who are interested in actually voicing an opinion on what the name should be are choosing this name for the very same reasons that I am. Believe it or not, there’s a deeper sense of community involved in this voting process.”
Hat tip to @alex_sebenski for spotting “m00t”‘s removal.

Filed under: , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined TOgal

    Seems a little unfair to have it removed. I placed a legitimate vote for Moot. And I have nothing to do with 4chan… I don’t really know much about it… but I do know that I would much prefer Moot to Euphoria Towers. I mean, really!?! What the hell is so euphoric about a condo? Ugh.

  • http://undefined Craig C

    I’m going to assume now that it will end up being named Garry Valk Plaza regardless of the voting. If this is a case of the developers not realizing that joke names would be entered and that they would be successful, then I guess they’ve just discovered the Internet.

  • http://undefined hellomike

    Faceless urban development company solicits names and votes from the people, discards all interesting ones. Surprise.
    “Anything U Condo I Condo Better” was genius.
    So was Moot, really. I voted for both. What’s so bad about Mr Splashy Tower?
    Way to ruin a great publicity boom, Sam P. Crignano.

  • http://undefined dowlingm

    I don’t think this condo developer wanted public input, merely publicity.

  • little_potato

    Yes, this is just a PR stunt; they have already decided the name beforehand. I would have voted for “m00t” if I bothered to.

  • http://undefined montrealexport

    I just hope people keep voting for Garry Valk Plaza. At least it has something to do with Toronto, and seems good intentioned.

  • http://undefined caron

    It’s too bad that they’ve removed it, especially as the judges apparently have the final say in which one wins.
    If anyone is interested in voting for my choice, Noble Heights:
    http://www.nameourcondo.com/entry/910

  • rek

    Lesson: Don’t solicit input from the internet if you’re not at all familiar with what happens on the internet.

  • http://undefined mgl2

    The purge of fun name continues. After deleting 3 of the higher-placed entries, “Stephen Colbert Tower” must have made been #9 for a short while. But it is no more due to “Your entry has been reported multiple times by the public and has been deactivated.” Does “the public” = “the developer”?
    The developer purged the top 10 of names they hated but this just bumped similar names such as Casa di Colbert up into the top 20. The developer probably doesn’t care about fun names as long as they’re not in the top 10.

  • http://undefined rek

    How about… Wendel Clark Park Tower?

  • http://undefined EricSmith

    Tkarcondo?

  • http://bit.ly/accozzaglia accozzaglia

    Maybe we should all pitch in for a vote of “Heart O’ the City Condos.” It’s all a simulacrum anyway.

  • http://undefined montrealexport

    Wendel’s already gotten so much from this town. It’s time Valk got some credit from Torontonians – he did a lot for this city.
    http://www.nameourcondo.com/entry/319