Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
31°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
26°/15°

8 Comments

news

Let’s Gape At One Bloor, Shall We?

One of Toronto’s most important intersections is finally on its way to being built back up after being torn down, and one of Toronto’s most doomed condo plans is finally being buried. At the end of last year, we picked the then-empty lot at Yonge and Bloor as one of our Villains of 2009; in the wake of colossal financial mismanagement at the hands of Bazis International, new owners Great Gulf Homes took over the site, only to promise a “typical highrise building,” which Torontoist’s Quin Parker wrote was a “waste.” What was unveiled for One Bloor at the end of March, however, was refreshingly atypical.
No, there was no public square. The Toronto Public Space Committee (with whom we traded tweets) wanted one at Yonge and Bloor, a laudable but implausible plan that went ignored. (Jonathan Goldsbie’s thoughts on the new building and its public-ness or lack thereof, published on Spacing‘s Wire, are worth reading.)
What there was instead was a sixty-something–storey condo, with retail at its feet. The new building, as imagined by Hariri Pontarini Architects, is still awfully tall, and everything other than its retail—including its residents-only seventh-floor terrace—is more than likely out of your price range. What the building does have going for it, and what makes it easier to forget its faults, is that it happens to be very attractive. Sort of wavy, sort of boxy, but not too much of either, the building—at least its renderings (starting here in the gallery above) and its scale model (over on Urban Toronto)—seems to connect with the sky, the skyline, and the street equally well. It’s better than nice enough, which is better than we were expecting. The Star‘s Christopher Hume praised the “changing rhythm of the balconies”; without them, One Bloor would “otherwise be a straight-forward box.”
In four years, it’s looking like Yonge and Bloor won’t be the city’s most valuable parcel of flattened land, or its newest park—or a waste.

Filed under: , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined davedave

    Overall, the new design for the land is a piece of sh1t.
    The tower is kind of interesting but the first 7 floors are GARBAGE.
    Lame materials, lame design, zero imagination.
    It’s just more predictably sh1tty Toronto architecture.
    In the meantime the developer should put sod down and let people use the space for chrissakes.

  • http://undefined rek

    1. At least it doesn’t look like a windshield ice scraper, as the old design did.
    2. This is the first time I’ve seen the renderings include street level retail (it isn’t on the hoarding as I recall), and I guess it’s the best we could expect for something that was never going to have public space worth noting.
    3. Residents won’t use the terrace, condo/apartment dwellers never do, certainly not to the extent the public would.

  • http://undefined jw03

    The sidewalk along Yonge looks to be awfully shadowy!

  • http://undefined Roger2000

    Looks like Brancusi’s “Bird in Space”, on the side of the building in the last photo.
    I guess this is better than the usual cheap-looking stepped boxes, named after vacation destination lifestyles, such as “Malibu Beach”, et al.

  • http://www.realjohnson.com TheRealJohnson

    Thank god someone is finally building some condos in Toronto!

  • http://undefined John Duncan

    Quite nice for what it is.
    My only real complaint is that the location of the tower component (NWish bit of the property) maximizes shadowing of the street, which isn’t cool.
    I’d have loved a park or plaza, but that wasn’t going to happen with the land’s price tag and the current Canadian opinion of spending money on the public realm. Pedestrianization of Yonge Street can serve some of the same purpose, as long as its done right.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    In the first photo, there is a nondescript three-story building in the left background. The foreground is empty land, the value of which you can estimate by guessing a per-square-metre cost for upscale condo units (based on, say, One St. Thomas) and multiplying by 60.
    Does anyone want to hazard a guess at when the three-story building gets demolished?

  • http://undefined AR

    It could be a fantastic addition to the city, but it’s still sadly overshadowed by the Absolute towers in Mississauga. That’s hard to swallow, that despite the price and prominence of Yonge and Bloor, the developer still couldn’t eclipse match the innovation of a certain condo tower built in the periphery.