Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 09, 2012
Clear
4°/-1°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 10, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
5°/-9°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 11, 2012
Partly Cloudy
1°/-5°

50 Comments

news

David Miller Announces $100 Million in Additional Surplus

20100310miller.jpg
Photo by Christopher Drost/Torontoist.


David Miller announced today that the City of Toronto has discovered, in its most up-to-date analysis of its finances, that its 2009 budget surplus is $100 million higher than previously calculated. This will enable the City to make adjustments to its operating budget and plans for the next two years, allowing it to lower property taxes, mitigate some previously announced user fees and service cuts, and set up a reserve fund that will be put towards the 2011 operating budget.
“I know that Torontonians share [the] vision of a prosperous, livable city where everyone has real opportunity, and they have supported the City—and me— in implementing that vision through two municipal elections and seven City budgets,” said Miller before announcing the surplus. “Those budgets are far more than just balance sheets. They are the blueprint we use to implement the many programs and services that keep this city livable, prosperous, and provide opportunity for every single resident of our city.”
Miller will be recommending, for 2010, that the residential property taxes go up 2.9% instead of the previously announced 4%, and that commercial property taxes go up less than 1%. Additionally, some of the user fees and service cuts that were recently announced will be rolled back (though Miller did not specify which at this morning’s press conference); however, the majority of the new surplus, about 75% of it, will go into a “Property Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund,” to be used to help balance the 2011 budget.
As for this newly discovered surplus, according to Miller it has come from cost containment, wage constraint on management and front line staff, higher than expected interest and investment earnings, higher than anticipated parking revenues, an increasing in supplementary taxes from new development and construction, and a reduction in property tax appeals.
With seven and a half months left in Miller’s term, the advisory sent out late yesterday afternoon informing the media of today’s announcement set off a fury of speculation, with everyone trying to figure out what Miller’s important news might be. Would he be seeking a third term as mayor after all? Resigning to take a prestigious appointment elsewhere? Was there a major new piece of funding coming Toronto’s way? The actual news was in some sense anti-climactic, lacking the dramatic punch of some of these other alternatives, but it was also a solid bit of good financial news in what has otherwise been a dire year. Miller was beaming after the announcement—something we haven’t seen him do in quite some time.

Filed under: , , , ,

Pin It Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined Robsonian

    gasp.
    also: cheeky.

  • http://undefined znoosle

    Phew, for a second I thought he was going to announce the use of Microsoft Project instead of BASECAMP as platform of choice for all Project Management tasks in the city planning department. 2.5 million Torontonians dodged a huge bullet today!

  • Darren

    Its fuzzy math. Bolognie

  • http://undefined the_yellow_dart

    I guess Miller is trying to clean it up at the end to not be remembered as the worst Toronto mayor of all time.

  • http://undefined McKingford

    It isn’t enough that you regularly bombard this comment section with your inanities and profound ignorance on all matters of policy. No, you also have to also subject us to your complete inability to read and write in the English language.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Wow, because I cant spell bolognie, which is spelt differntly in different cultures. Or are you going to now attack me because my English language skills are not up to your levels? Do you normally attack people who have different english skills then you? How discriminatory of you? Do you also have a swaztika tattooed on your body somewhere?
    Ignorance? How, because I dont believe David Miller? We just saw large cost savings from less snoowfall, yet no mention of how that plays into this supposed budget surplus. Oh goodie, he is taxing me less then the forcasted tax increase.
    Do you even pay taxes McKingford? Were you not peeved during the summer when the unions walked all over the residents of this city and this Miller literally gave them carte blanche for crimes committed during their strike, and then gave them everything they wanted in the CBA.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Shhhh yellow dart. You might make the natives aware that you haven’t drank the Miller Cool-aid like the rest of them.

  • http://piorkowski.ca/ qviri

    swastika*

  • http://undefined Darren

    Thank you

  • tapesonthefloor

    Can Torontoist implement a policy of blocking anyone who invokes Godwin’s Law in a discussion about spelling errors? Please and thank you.

  • http://undefined Robsonian

    you know,
    there was a time when the tenor of debate around here was considerably more moderate, restrained and intelligent.

  • http://undefined Giancarlo

    I agree! At this rate the comment boards will eventually rival those of the Toronto Sun.

  • http://undefined dowlingm

    1. Funny how he waited until after Police Board passed their budget to find extra money. Smart.
    2. Plan based on getting more money from Queens Park. Good luck with that.

  • http://undefined friend68

    I thought it was because of the missing apostrophe in “It’s” signaling the contraction of “It is” rather than the possessive.
    But agreed — too many recent comments have tended away from the civility of spirited debate and have also displayed a wane in the sense of humour of participants.
    But hey, just wait until the election really gets going.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Godwin’s Law my left foot
    The comment directly questioned my right to comment here because my english skills are not up to par with his. The last I checked the internet isnt an english speaking only locale, and Toronto (and Torontoist by extension) is the most multi cultural city in the world. Anyone taking pot shots at someone’s english language skills opens himself up to be called either a complete ass and/or a racist

  • mark.

    I third (or fifth or whatever number we’re at) that these comment threads are boring now. There used to be interesting points presented, clear responses and general civility. Now it’s just grade-three level name-calling. Worse than useless.

  • http://undefined Luke

    Darren, please tell us how this relates to a proposed subway in Vaughan, then go on a tangent about that. That’s what we all really want to hear from you.

  • http://undefined Matthew

    Agreed.

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    I just don’t understand how cutting the proposed property taxes (even though we have the lowest in the GTA) is good for anyone, amidst the closing of public facilities etc.
    I know this was a major sticking point for people up in Leaside when Miller was elected :P

  • http://undefined Darren

    I like Royson James’ take on this;
    http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/777794–surprise-city-bolsters-budget-with-new-found-surplus?bn=1
    “What they got was a ballsy political ploy aimed at preserving the mayor’s legacy”

  • http://undefined Darren

    Or better yet please tell us how this fisacal surplus will impact your desire to see bike lanes on every single Toronto road.

  • http://undefined friend68

    He must have know that making a surprise announcement would have triggered suggestions of him running again, especially after his piece in Now magazine, so this is a bit of a letdown.
    If budgets are so unpredictable (oops, we found $100 million!), couldn’t the surprise have just as easily been the other way, into the red? It seems strange to make such a happy deal out of what seems a mistake. Maybe it should all go into building back up the emergency reserve, for the next surprise.

  • http://undefined Caligula Jones

    Well, I guess I was right when I said the announcement will probably be that some city worker dug up some gold coins…
    Considering we have a $6 billion, a $100 million windfall is really nothing. All the doom and gloom could have been eliminated if the monkeys at the typewriters had just asked: have you checked in the couch cushions?
    Seriously, this is Media Manipulation 101: say nothing, but say it LOUDLY.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    What a stupid thing to say.
    No, just kidding. But to everyone concerned about the direction the comments are going: we moderate as lightly as possible (I think we’ve unpublished five comments in the past month or so?), and that won’t change (both for the sake of us not interfering, and for time constraints on editors to do other stuff). That means that, if you want better comments, it’s as much in your hands as ours. Ignore people who you think are stupid. Argue with people you think are smart. Back-up people you think are smart who you happen to agree with. Drown out what you don’t like in our comments with what you do like.
    And I’d suggest that first, things really aren’t that bad now, and second, the rest of the internet is pretty horrible, comparatively.

  • http://undefined Peter K

    Well that was anticlimactic.
    How much of this found money has comes from money saved due to the lack of snow? And they say global warming is a bad thing!

  • http://undefined Giancarlo

    I wasn’t being totally serious, but there does seem to be more aggressive tones in the comments than I can remember in the past. On a positive note, it makes for an interesting read on different viewpoints (…unlike the Toronto Sun)

  • http://undefined the_yellow_dart

    Heheh, I know….
    I feel like I might have to defend myself whenever I post things like that.
    It’s not that I disagree with his overall views (quite the opposite), it’s just that the man has executed his vision poorly, and has presented Toronto in a bad light to higher levels of government. When politicians swear at your mayor as he asks them for help – it’s time for a new mayor.

  • http://undefined rek

    There’s also a Grease Monkey Torontoist user script for filtering comments from repeat offenders.

  • Darren

    Its fiscal and calendar year 09, so any savings from the snow were limited to Dec 31.

  • http://undefined Vincent Clement

    Agreed. Why not raise the taxes to 4% and use the extra money on the backlog of infrastructure projects and increasing the size of the reserve.

  • http://undefined rek

    Or time for a new politician. Toronto gets the shit end of the stick at provincial and federal levels, and no mayor will ever be able to change that.
    Maybe Miller should get into provincial politics someday just to upload services from the city and get us the transit funding we need.

  • http://undefined Vincent Clement

    There is no found money.
    This is a budget, which is nothing more than a financial estimate, a guideline. It does not record actual income or revenue. It is an estimate of how much revenue the City expects to bring in and how much it expects to spend.
    Change an assumption here and there and voila, you have an extra $100 million. You lower tax rate and everyone is happy.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Rek, the politician was Baird and the issue had nothing to do with his lack of interest in funding TO. The city simmply didnt apply the right way for the funds. It was the city’s mistake.

  • http://undefined Darren

    How about just scaling back some of these insane infrastructure projects, cutting costs and then being able to afford more of them

  • http://undefined Vincent Clement

    Scaling them back means your just setting aside certain features or improvements for the future, which means that your backlog will continue to grow.
    Besides, I didn’t say use the whole increase on infrastructure projects. I also said that the reserves should be increased.
    You do realize that infrastructure also includes public transit. Perhaps we could finance your precious DRL ;)

  • http://undefined Darren

    No scaling back can mean permanently canceling certain features; ex canceling pretend renos of perfectly fine subway stations, and scaling back the stations being built along the Spadina Ext.
    We only need 5 million to study the DRL, which isnt just my precious project, but a project that was voted on before the BD line was built. The city spends 5 million a lot more trivial issues. Its not for me to give the ideas on how they can scale back. Its the politicians responsability to justify why something needs to cost what they say it needs to cost. They represent taxpayers and they have to look at both cist reductions as well as tax increasing. That 1.1 difference between 2.9 and 4.4 is a big deal to those paying it.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Sorry major typose there, but the scheduled increase was to be 4 not 4.4

  • http://undefined Darren

    The ‘found money’ pertains to the 2009 calendar year.

  • http://undefined thelemur

    There is a way of retaining civility and a sense of humour while still pointing out that another commenter’s inability to, say, distinguish between ‘then’ and ‘than’ seriously hampers readability … isn’t there?

  • http://undefined Darren

    The NP’s take on this;
    “Punk’d by David Miller”
    http://network.nationalpost.com/NP/blogs/toronto/archive/2010/03/10/punk-d-by-david-miller.aspx
    And in terms of cutting costs instead of raising taxes, the city was yet again the winner of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s “Teddy Waste Award”. Last year Joe Pantalone won for literally flushing a million dollars down the toilet;
    http://network.nationalpost.com/NP/blogs/toronto/archive/2010/03/10/homeless-audit-earns-wasteful-spending-award.aspx

  • http://undefined torontocomments

    Is this $100m surplus or found money (or whatever you want to call it) good news? Yes. But it’s also bad news. How? Because coming less than a month after City’s budget it highlights the Mayor’s utter lack of credibility with respect to fiscal matters. Miller and his supporters can try as hard as they like to spin this as a straightforward good news story. But while the surplus itself is positive, the timing of this announcement (mere weeks after the budget) speaks to the Mayor’s incompetence or manipulativeness or both. This is not the way that you maintain credibility with the senior levels or the electorate. I basically consider myself to be “progressive” and I do not look forward to Smitherman (or Rossi) becoming Mayor. But it’s stunts like this that have made Miller (or anyone he is seen as endorsing) un-electable.

  • http://undefined Jim Beam

    I think you are on to something Darren. I’ll bet anything that McKingford doesn’t pay property taxes, business taxes, car registry taxes or land transfer taxes. Experience tells me that thoses who defend tax increases are typically those who take more from the system than they put in. McKingford and his ilk are a net drain on society and they expect hard-working, tax-paying folks like you and I to foot the bill. Is it any wonder that the taxpayer feels ripped off? Is it any wonder that many of us taxes spend so much time with lawyers and accountants looking for ways to deny dead-beats like McKingford the opportunity to spend our money?

  • http://undefined Lauriemc

    Ya, how come he didn’t mention the lack of snow? Could climate change balance books?! Wouldn’t that be deliciously ironic for this mayor?
    Realtalk tho, none of these candidates are good news for us.

  • http://undefined Jim Beam

    I was really hoping Miller was going to run again for Mayor. Not because I admire the man or would vote for him but because I wanted the satisfaction of seeing him lose! The guy is without a doubt the most dangerous politician this City has ever seen. The City of Toronto has had to endure this pompous windbag for far too long. Good riddance Mayor Miller, don’t let the door hit you on the way out! Vote Anyone but Incumbant in the next municipal election.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    Despite everyone’s best efforts to control their bowels, even one individual intent on fouling the pool can ruin the fun for everybody.

  • http://undefined rek

    It doesn’t matter who the politician was; Toronto shouldn’t have to come begging for funding for infrastructure and transit. If the provincial and/or federal government has no interest in overall improvements (and job creation) in the most important city in Ontario’s and Canada’s economies, they need to be replaced.

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    …and while we`re on this subject. If the prov and fed gov`ts don`t want to give us cash, cool. We`ll keep all of our own cash/taxes too. We fund the entire province. Yet it`s the rest of the province that gets the fruits of our labour…

  • http://undefined Darren

    No one wanted TO to beg, they wanted them to use the funding for projects which met the criteria for the funding. TO did it wrong, and when the MP was flustered with the issue he dropped the F bomb. It was never about begging but about asking. And even begging has its limitations. Can a guy walk into a soup kitchen and ask for a coffee when they only serve soup?

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    Maybe the province shouldn’t bite the hand that feeds.
    When I buy the groceries I don’t ask permission to eat something…

  • Darren

    True, but this was between the feds and the city