Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 08, 2012
Partly Cloudy
3°/-1°
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 09, 2012
Clear
3°/-11°
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 10, 2012
Chance of Snow
0°/-13°

17 Comments

news

For Adam Giambrone Scandal, The Toronto Sun Looks No Further Than Zack Taylor

20100212giambrone_taylor_lead.gif
Pictured: journalism.


Over the past week, as the Adam Giambrone scandal came to a head and then popped, gossip blogger Zack Taylor has published two breathless—and obviously dubious—stories about the former mayoral candidate in an attempt to cash in. We’d call that attempt “futile,” but it hasn’t been: the Toronto Sun, an actual newspaper with people who have job titles like “reporter” and “editor,” has picked up both of Taylor’s stories, and republished the details in them, with apparently no research of their own of Taylor’s claims whatsoever.
We mostly try hard to ignore him, but we’ve written about Zack Taylor before. We laughed at his ironic self-declared devotion to high journalistic standards when, several minutes after avowing such high standards, he broke news of Jeff Goldblum’s death. (Goldblum, somehow, remains alive to this day.) Before that, we mocked Taylor’s colossal, and wholly unjustifiable, hubris. (There was also the time where he maybe actually got a tween celebrity scoop, but as the old adage goes, everyone makes mistakes sometimes people who always make mistakes don’t.) We’d have ignored Taylor this time, were it not for the daily newspaper which has seen fit to give him the attention he so relentlessly craves, and the credibility he so obviously doesn’t deserve.
Watch the Sun work:


20100212giambronetaylor1.gif
1:13 a.m., Wednesday.
Taylor publishes a photo of the torso of a man who is almost certainly not Adam Giambrone: the photo has almost everything that could identify its subject cropped out, and everything in it that could identify its subject—the approximate build, the chin, the bizarrely huge head, the sliver of a smile, what looks like acne—points to someone other than the Ward 18 councillor and TTC chair. (One might also take note that the photo appears to be taken at a straight angle, but the reflection of the lens of the camera taking the shot isn’t visible, which would mean that the shot was cropped digitally by someone after it was taken.) For good measure, Taylor slaps a small photo of Giambrone in the lower-left corner, which effectively obscures one-quarter of the photo. Taylor titles the post “ADAM GIAMBRONE SENT KRISTEN LUCAS NAKED PHOTOS?!” because responsible journalism is publishing an unverified and altogether unlikely rumour with a question mark after it. Taylor writes that he “received the above cell-phone photo of what appears to be Adam (we cannot confirm 100% it is him).” Right now, you are probably thinking of a sarcastic thing that could easily take the place of this sentence.
20100212giambronesuna.gif
10:11 p.m., Wednesday.
The Sun publishes “Giambrone has ’Net all a-Twitter,” about the web’s reaction to the Giambrone scandal. Three paragraphs are ceded to Taylor. The paper—which prints Taylor’s photo of not-Giambrone, big, in the print edition Thursday—describes the shot as featuring “a bare-chested young man who resembles the Davenport councillor.” The article lets Taylor assert that “it appears to be Giambrone in a cellphone photo taken in a mirror that was allegedly sent to Kristen Lucas during their ‘texting affair.’” The Sun apparently does not attempt to confirm Zack Taylor’s assertions themselves, instead outsourcing that job to…Zack Taylor. “Taylor,” the paper notes, “stressed he has yet to confirm that it is the councillor.”
20100212giambronetaylor2.gif
1:11 p.m., Thursday.
Taylor publishes “ANOTHER WOMAN COMES FORWARD IN THE ADAM GIAMBRONE SCANDAL.” The woman, says Taylor, alleges “never ha[ving] sex or anything” with Giambrone, “but we used to text each other all the time.” In a later update to the post, Taylor notes that the woman cannot produce any text messages. He runs a larger photo of her, and her name, nonetheless: Ashley Tanner. Cumulatively, there is no evidence whatsoever of a relationship, of a text message relationship, of text messages, or that the woman is who Taylor claims she is. (This is the only Ashley Tanner we can find in Toronto, and we can’t place either of the two photos—apparently taken at the same event—at any Toronto venue.) The woman claims, says Taylor, “I will not be commenting more about this as I’m not a ‘fameseeker’ like the other girl.” Taylor does not notice the irony.
20100212sun.gif
10:19 p.m., Thursday.
The Sun publishes “Giambrone linked to another young lady: Gossip website.” Its lede is “More sexy skeletons are coming out of Councillor Adam Giambrone’s closet,” which, were the bit about sexy skeletons true, would certainly make for a much more interesting sex scandal. Instead, the Sun alleges a “texting relationship” in an article which is little more than a re-write of Taylor’s with slightly more colourful adjectives (“the randy Red Rocket commissioner”; “buxom Ashley”). The Sun, once again, apparently makes no attempt to verify the story in any way, deferring wholly to what they call Taylor’s “reporting.” And then the paper prints what must be the most ludicrous lie of all: Taylor’s site, they say, is “one of the top 10 in North America.” There is literally no quantitative or qualitative measure that would justify such a claim. But this is the Toronto Sun, and that, it seems, is par for the course.

Filed under: , , , , ,

Report an error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://www.sayitwithpie.com Karen Whaley

    It’s cool how you can just go around telling people you’re one of the Top 10 celebrity gossip sites in North America!?

  • http://undefined Pan Von Sol

    I propose Torontoist post a bunch of satire articles about Zack Taylor having a relationship with Adam Giambrone, you know, for shits and giggles.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    I just want to let you know that this reply is one of the Top 10 comment replies in North America.

  • http://brokenengine.blogspot.com brokenengine

    Karen, to crib a line from The Untouchables: “Who would claim to be that, who was not?”
    I can’t think of a more useless point on a resume than “Gossip Blogger”, let alone top 10 in North America. Congrats, you are one of the top 10 useless wastes of oxygen on the continent!

  • http://brokenengine.blogspot.com brokenengine

    And I’m totally not surprised about The Sun. They’ve also stolen the UK Suns schtick, and are becoming trashier by the day.

  • http://undefined panko

    They will be picking up stories from “The Onion” imminently….

  • http://brokenengine.blogspot.com brokenengine

    Not that I spent a lot of time on this, but the alleged picture of Adam resemble Mr Taylor a lot more than Mr Giambrone. And considering Mr Taylors MO, that would make a lot more sense.

  • http://undefined addict

    I sometimes wonder if *anyone* in the city takes The Toronto Sun seriously. It’s never been a respectable paper in my opinion.

  • http://undefined Tony Wonder

    Being a ‘celebrity blogger’ in Toronto is like being a restaurant critic in Newmarket.

  • http://brokenengine.blogspot.com brokenengine

    Lol @ Tony!! I’m from that town, so I get it.

  • http://undefined Michael

    At first glance, I thought the photo looked vaguely authentic simply because there’s only so many people whose heads are the same width as their neck.
    I’m surprised the Sun is still in business. As far as I can tell they just copy the same formula from a completely different Sun paper, and while I can see that working in the UK with their rumour-mill print industry, I can’t figure out how it can work in Canada. Especially Toronto.
    The only reason the British one has a big audience is because tight government regulation for factual, neutral TV news sends everything scandalous into the unregulated print field.

  • http://undefined rek

    His logo is just bad. Stamped faux weathering, circa 1994, and the merged Z and T make it read LT to me.

  • http://www.sayitwithpie.com Karen Whaley

    OH SNAP!

  • Amanda Buckiewicz

    Perez Hilton. TMZ. Jezebel. Lainey Gossip. Gawker. DListed. ONTD. The Superficial. Go Fug Yourself. Pink is the new Blog.
    Oh look, ten celebrity gossip sites that are much, much better than Zack Taylor, both in terms of audience and content. Who the hell decided he was ranked in the top ten?!

  • http://undefined OTerry

    I think the Tiger Woods scandal in some way legitimized news organizations picking up gossip blogs and non-verifiable stories because it *appeared* that NJOs (non-journalistic organizations) such as TMZ were the only sources that were able to find real information. Absurd as it seems, a few people actually tell NJOs the truth, and they are good at rapidly collecting information from a wide net of sources. They do this without integrity, disclosure, and standards. The first to go press, sorry – first to blog – gains control of the narrative.
    Unfortunately, with respect to the Tiger Woods case, there has been no definitive explanation, so it’s impossible to disprove TMZ or others, and it seems that they had the core facts correct. The media storm surrounding Woods simply forced main stream news to run with whatever they could, or else they would be completely left out of the discussion.
    The Toronto Sun decision to pick up Zack Taylor incoherent ramblings is unsurprising. Especially given the context that previous scandals have created.

  • http://undefined SmellTest

    Ridiculous. Not The Sun but you for dedicated countless more space to the articles than the Sun did. It’s actually this post that’s just waste of space. Meanwhile the scuttlebutt is the Sun’s readership, both online and print, and revenue from both sources keeps going up and up and up. I’m sure they’re happy you’re reading and talking about them…Grow up.

  • http://undefined 6Speed

    Spot on, I really enjoyed reading that!!
    -Vadim