Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
29°/18°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
28°/18°
It is forcast to be Overcast at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Overcast
27°/15°

35 Comments

news

City’s Moves May Threaten Dufferin Grove Park

20100221dufferingrove2.jpg
Dufferin Grove Park is home to a bonfire pit, wood-burning ovens where residents can bake pizza and bread, an adobe courtyard, a weekly farmers’ market, dozens of year-round art festivals, two skating rinks, a cheap and healthy cafe, and regular pay-what-you-can community meals.
It’s a chaotic, eclectic, and fairly idyllic public space, but what makes Dufferin Grove Park truly unique is not what they do but how they do it. Members of the community are more-than-usually involved in working to maintain the park, while city staff are more-than-usually integrated into the community. According to community leader Jutta Mason, this simpatico relationship is about to change, and with it all of the features of the park that neighbourhood residents have come to cherish.


The park’s many programs are staffed by part-time workers for the city’s Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division. Earlier this year, the Parks and Rec supervisor for Dufferin Grove’s Ward 18, Tino DeCastro, was moved to a position at Metro Hall that Jutta Mason describes as “a non-job supervising cleaners.” Mason, who has been a leading figure in community involvement in Dufferin Grove Park since 1993, believes that DeCastro’s move is intended as a punishment for fraternizing with Friends of Dufferin Grove Park—an informal community group whose ad hoc, non-hierarchical structure clashes with the top-down workings of the City. “I think from the perspective of downtown we’re like a weed,” she says. “We’re like a noxious weed growing way out of control, and somebody’s got to cut us back. But I don’t agree.”
Mason claims that lower-level employees, too, are regularly accused of having conflicts of interest based on their community involvement.
“The people who work here actually want to be here, and when they have ideas they actually carry them out. They’re not always waiting for someone to order them to do this or that, and that’s pretty unusual,” Mason says. “That’s the work culture that’s grown up around here. It’s been very, very much backed by the community and very, very much ignored by the powers that be.”
20100221dufferingrove1.jpg
Brenda Patterson, the general manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, describes the relationship between the Dufferin Grove Park community and the City as “an incredible and unique long-standing partnership”—one that she says will in no way be affected by Tino DeCastro’s move. “People are concerned that programming at Dufferin Grove Park is going to change, and I’m not sure why. The change in supervisors is in no way intended to change those programs.” Patterson maintains that the moving of supervisors from one portfolio to another is commonplace. Re-assignments are intended to help employees acquire a variety of skills. “When you work for the City of Toronto, you should expect to work anywhere in the City of Toronto,” she says.
Evidently, the Dufferin Grove Community doesn’t agree. The Facebook group created in response to DeCastro’s move is 1,500 members strong, and hundreds of citizens have sent emails to both the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division and to City of Toronto Ombudsman Fiona Crean. Patterson says that every email has been given a response: nothing is changing at Dufferin Grove Park. From the City’s perspective, community members have misunderstood a simple job re-assignment to mean the death knell to their vibrant community programming. According to Jutta Mason, “This is not about us. This is about what seems to me to be a completely unworkable idea of moving everybody to somewhere else. What does building relationships mean if not that you can rely on it?”
Photos from 2009′s Night of Dread by Nick Kozak/Torontoist.

Comments

  • http://undefined Bryan

    “Friends of Dufferin Grove Park—an informal community group whose ad hoc, non-hierarchical structure clashes with the top-down workings of the City.”
    A big issue is that the “Friends” are running businesses at DGP in City facilities without a memorandum of understanding. City staff answer to members of this group that on their own web site claim “The friends of Dufferin Grove Park are not an organization. There is no executive, no annual meetings, no formal status. There is no written agreement anywhere between the friends and the city.”
    This non-organization has revenue of over $100k per year derived from their operations on City property. They have keys to the facilities. They “top-up” unionized city staff with stipends. They have torn down intr walls in the rink house without permission. They tried to install an illegal toilet without permission (digging a massive hole that is a serious safety hazard).
    No bad for a group that does not exist.
    There is way more going on here than meets they eye. Perhaps it is time for someone to do a little journalism on this story.

  • http://undefined falldowngoboom

    This background piece on the Parks and Rec power grab is enlightening:
    THE RECREATION SERVICE PLAN: THE MOST GRANDIOSE SCHEME OF ALL
    http://dufferinpark.ca/newsletter/wiki/wiki.php/#tino
    Why is Toronto is burdened by these unelected and incompetent bureaucrats?

  • http://undefined Corey

    In response to the first comment, perhaps you should drop by the park, go for a skate, have a hot dog and observe how people of all ages and nationalities are having a good time there.
    There is nothing insidious happening as you are implying.
    What you see is what you get: a community taking ownership and involvement of something they already own.
    What is insidious is the power grab from city hall.

  • http://undefined Bryan

    I have been there, Corey. My issue is one of governance. Can I go and start a business on City property? Should unions accept that their members are being topped up to do work that is not part of their collective agreement? Who benefits from the hundreds of thousands of dollars that are generated by the businesses run at DGP? Where is the oversight?
    You say that there is nothing insidious. Then let’s have a look at where the money goes. Where it comes from. Who is in charge? Is it all cash? If there is nothing untoward going on, then there is no reason not to have a look at the operation. An operation that is, by any measure, illegally carrying on business in city facilities and using the proceeds for their own purposes.

  • http://undefined Corey

    First of all, it is not a for-profit business that is happening on city property.
    Whatever money that is being raised there goes back to the community.
    If you want to know where it goes, just ask the people there.
    Also, if you want to see for yourself, go to parks in other parts of the city and then go back to Dufferin Grove and compare.
    If you have a problem with governance, why aren’t you complaining about the f*ck ups going on at City Hall??

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Apparently, it is not a business at all. There is not agreement between the “friends” and the city. In the last “Friends” newsletter, it states that there is $50k “left over” from the “cookie money” that is used for “contracts”. What does that mean, exactly? do they pay rent for the space? Who gets these “contracts”.
    And I complain plenty about the goings on at City Hall. Letting this illegal operation continue is on of my complaints.
    And a final thought. You mention above that I should ask people at the park where the money goes. That is not h things are supposed to work, my friend. Don’t you believe that governments should be run transparently with proper oversight of common resources? Can I go to DGP and set up a rival Friday night supper? Why not?

  • http://undefined John

    Um, all this governance stuff is fascinating, but what does this have to do with the average person’s enjoyment of the park? Bottom line: Dufferin Grove is a special place, and the people who helped make it special are being sidelined by a bureaucracy that believes city staffers are interchangeable like spark plugs.
    Unless Mr. Governance really wants to take over the Friday night suppers, he should save this Dilbertesque crap for his civil service exams. And until the Parks bureaucracy can replicate the clear success of Dufferin Grove at its other centrally-managed parks, it should stop trying to fix what ain’t broke.

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Bottom line: Dufferin Grove is a special place. Agreed.
    “The people who helped make it special are being sidelined by a bureaucracy.” Really? What has changed? How can they be sidelined when the “Friends” has no structure, agreement with the City, or anything else. Don’t they just show up and do stuff? How will that change?
    Do you think it is a viable model for citizen groups to have unmonitored control over city resources (including keys), to act as managers for unionized staff, to take in revenue and make a profit without oversight and without any accountability? Don’t you believe in democratic control over public space?
    I would say that it IS broken. Public resources are peing managed by private interests and used to generate profits that are spent without any form of oversight. By their own admission, the “friends” don’t really exist. How can this be a good way to run things? Perhaps I can go to another park and set up a pizza store and see what the city thinks of that. I will have the same transparency with governance and finances that exists at DGP. I would expect your full support in my new venture, of course. I’ll let you know when we open so you can drop by and contribute to the “cookie money”.

  • http://undefined John

    The managers of Dufferin Grove are park staff, not the Friends of Dufferin Grove. The workers are also park staff, not FDG volunteers. The FDG do not have control, monitored or otherwise, over the park resources. They do cajole, agitate, mobilize and push hard to make things happen, just like any other citizens’ group. Any unofficial authority or key privileges they may have is a function of the credibility and trust they have built through successful programming. And if this experiment hadn’t succeeded so well, no one would care what the FDG had to say (and no one would give Jutta Mason a key to the water hose). But nothing happens in the park without City authority, and your “illegal operation” comments are just plain wrong.
    You say you agree Dufferin Grove is a special place. I don’t believe you. The success of Dufferin Grove cannot be separated from the City/FDG partnership that helped create it, and which is indeed being sidelined with the reassignment of Tino DeCastro. If you would replace that partnership with further bureaucratization (which is the only issue here, not FDG governance structure), that outcome is not only less democratic, it would destroy everything that helped make the park a success.
    And for all that, FDG happens to be one of the most transparent groups out there, something that cannot be said about the Parks, Forestry and Recreation department.

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Into which bank account does the money collected from ongoing operations at DGP flow? Who has signing authority over those accounts? How is that money disbursed?
    What are the parameters of the Memorandum of Understanding that allows these enterprises to exist using City resources? Do City Staff do any work in the furtherance of these enterprises? If yes, is such work within the parameters of the Collective Agreement and their job descriptions? Does the Union approve of its members receiving additional compensation from whoever has signing authority of the accounts that collect the money?
    Transparent, indeed. Don’t tell me. Show me.

  • http://undefined John

    I wrote to Jutta Mason to get her response to Mr. Governance’s first post above. It seems like they have a bit of a history. He has apparently been twice invited to inspect CELOS’s books, but has so far declined. Anyway, she writes (with permission to post here):

    The fact is, the cash that park users hand over is not handled informally by friends of the park — it’s handled by CELOS, the little research organization that started at the park but whose activities extend citywide. The acronym stands for The Centre for Local Research into Public Space, and we’re a non-profit with charitable status. (This means that our financial statements are public, and also sent in to the tax people every year.)
    However, running Dufferin Grove Park is not part of our long-term mandate. Dufferin Grove has been a kind of workshop where various people can try things (lots of things don’t work — learn by experience!). We document them and then put them out there for others who want to try things in parks, rinks etc. We try pretty hard to interest city staff, too. But that’s not so easy.
    So in the case of park or rink snack bars (“cookie money”) — two seasons ago the part-time recreation staff, with Tino’s and the councillor’s support, set up some simpler snacks and skate rental at Wallace Rink. They wanted to see if the Dufferin Grove experience could be applied more simply at another rink. The result was as anticipated — much higher attendance and more fun for skaters. Since the beginning of this rink season we’ve been asking the city to try taking it over. No luck yet — we haven’t even been able to get the meeting we asked for.
    We want to see if the city could gain revenue at some of the outdoor rinks and playgrounds, and at the same time use their own staff in a more imaginative way — i.e. no Second Cup! But the folks downtown seem to be too worried about the grand plans to be distracted by such local details. Which loops us back around to the question of how “local” can meet “central.” Stay tuned — I think this discussion is going somewhere. You might want to visit the CELOS website too — messy but lots of public space content.

    And yes, Mr. Governance, if you were to set up a Dufferin Grove-style pizza oven at say, Christie Pits, with the proceeds going to charity, you would have my support. When does it open?

  • http://undefined Bryan

    First of all, “John”, you know my name because I use it when I comment on websites. Perhaps you could use it instead of the pejorative you insist on using. It is odd that you don’t like proper governance over public resources. It makes me wonder why. Any particular reason that you are resisting proper oversight, “John”.
    Ms. Mason’s reply does not, in the least, address the issues that I detailed. I am well aware of CELOS. Having CELOS handle the money was instituted a few years ago after some people asked the same questions I am asking now. That being said, even if I take what Ms. Mason says at face value, then why is a private operation running in a public space being used to fund a private charity?
    As for the pizza oven and other operations being duplicated a Christie Pits… Why would the proceeds go to charity? You are insinuating that the proceeds from DGP go to charity. They do not. They go to groceries, band aids and little contracts for people around the park. Apparently. Hard to tell. Nobody has seen any audited numbers. Nobody has seen a daily cash-flow statement. Nobody knows. Not even you. If you do, please share your knowledge.

  • http://undefined Jutta Mason

    For the record, re the accusations made by “Facebook User”:
    (1) I do not manage the part-time city staff who work at the Ward 18 parks. We talk a lot (which is not against any by-law, as far as I know). They like some of my ideas, and try them, and they think others of my ideas are silly. They tell me that, and they don’t carry out the ideas they don’t like. Free country.
    (2) City staff do not get “topped up.”
    (3) What they do in Ward 18 parks is not outside of their collective agreement.
    (4) CELOS started in 2000, long before you began telling people what you think of us.
    (5) CELOS does not collect cookie money to give to charity. We collect it to pay contracts for people who want to try out special projects at the Ward 18 parks. Full disclosure: we also use a bit of it to try things at other parks, if asked by other park friends. And we sometimes use it to do research (although that mostly comes from grants). Examples of research: we used it to pay a McGill biology grad to find out the relation between the angle of the sun and energy use at city outdoor rinks. We used it to produce a great booklet on how to make Toronto’s outdoor rinks, citywide, work better. Etc.
    And since you first began making your complaints and accusations against what we do, Bryan LeBlanc, you never once took me up on the offer to have a conversation, and to show you how the money is spent here. You seem to like to stay hidden.

  • http://undefined nd lax

    You guys need to cool your jets! the guy in the first picture had a dirty beard….. props, and the guy beside him had greasy flow. The broad needs to give her head a shake because shes not wearing distasteful clothes. Now, the second picture.What is on the girls face, and why is the guy wearing a mask? The guy in the middle is a skinny twig, and the guy has a nice hat. Overall solid pictures, classic. That is all

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Ms. Mason, you are making my point for me. First off, we have only spoken about this once, so I don’t understand why you seem to insinuate otherwise. Secondly, it is ridiculous that I should have to come and chat with you about the commercial operations in a public park that are carried on without a permit or a memorandum of understanding with the City.
    You say that city staff do not get topped up. Are you saying that no members of the bargaining unit receive funds from the operations in the park? That no members perform work for CELOS/Friends? When did the City direct their staff to stop handling money in the Park? They must have been handling money before that directive was necessary. Could you clarify that for me?
    When did CELOS start administering the cash from the ongoing operations in the park? I notice that there are no financials posted on the CELOS website for any time before September 2007, just after I first asked you about this. Is the a coincidence? Perhaps the financial documentation from ongoing operations in the park could be made available from 2000 onwards, given that your implication is that CELOS has been running them since then. The last financial statements are from 2007/2008. Anything to report since then?
    For the record, my issue is not with anything that happens in the park. My issue is that the Friends (or CELOS or whoever) is running a commercial enterprise without a permit on public property using public infrastructure for private benefit.
    I think it is quaint and folksy that you call your revenue “cookie money”. This “cookie money” amounted to over $200,000 in 2007/2008. That is a lot of cookies.
    As for me staying hidden. Because I do not make a pilgrimage to discuss things with you does not mean I am hidden. What is hidden is any permits or memorandum of understanding that would allow the commercial operations in the park, and any transparency in the financial dealings of the Friends/CELOS.
    And, in the interest of transparency, what is your salary/remuneration from CELOS, Ms. Mason?

  • http://undefined Corey

    You lose all credibility when you bitch and moan demanding all kinds of answers and end up being too lazy to drop by the park and talk to people.
    If you are that concerned about governance, get off your ass and go to the rink house and talk to someone.
    The people there are nice. If they don’t know the answer, they’ll point you out in the right direction.
    Going back to your first comment, that so-called illegal toilet was the idea of a mother who did not want her kids and other kids to venture too far away from the playground.
    It was never a safety hazard and has been covered up with the project being stalled because of anally retentive types like you.
    Going back to your third point. Go ahead and set up a rival Friday night supper at the park if you’d like.
    Make sure the revenue goes back to the community.
    I recommend that you offer soup, salad, a meat dish, a vegetarian dish, and a dessert.
    If you want to make a good first impression, I suggest chocolate cake with ice cream as a first dessert.
    Go ahead. I dare you to get off your ass and get involved.

  • http://undefined rek

    “First of all, “John”, you know my name because I use it when I comment on websites. Perhaps you could use it instead of the pejorative you insist on using.”
    I’m not sure what it looks like to you, but I see your name as Facebook User so I assume John and others do as well. If he/others knows your name by reputation/outside Torontoist that’s another matter.

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Corey, if you read carefully (or stop being too lazy to do so) you will note that I did not say that I have not been to the park to discuss things. I said that I objected to the necessity of a pilgrimage to visit Ms. Mason to find out what is going on with public resources in my city. I have spent a lot of time at DGP and, as I mentioned, I have no issues other than the fact that the Friends (or CELOS or whoever) is running a commercial enterprise without a permit on public property using public infrastructure for private benefit.
    I appreciate that parents may have wanted a toilet closer to the playground. Unilaterally digging a hole to install install one is not the correct way to go about it. Spoiled children think that they can do anything they want at any time despite the rules. Adults, not so much. Wouldn’t you agree?
    You miss my point entirely about the Friday suppers. That was an example that I used to illustrate the issue. Public resources are being used to generate revenue for a private organization. Can I take over a room at Trinity-Bellwoods and open a cafe? No. No, I can’t. I hope my point is more clear to you now.
    As for getting involved. Well. You have no idea how involved I am. Is this conversation not “being involved”? But I suppose you get to define the parameters for what constitutes “being involved”, too. I see a pattern here.
    As for my ass… at least I can sit on it. You see, my head is not stuffed into it.

  • http://undefined nd lax

    you guys are hurt

  • http://undefined Park Neighbour

    Corey, your response is precisely the reason some park neighbours are furious with the so-called “Friends of Dufferin Grove.”
    “Facebook User” has asked legitimate questions that deserve answers but the “Friends’” default position on anyone with dissenting opinion is that they must be anti-park or anti-community…or lazy, uninvolved, and anally retentive.
    Thank you “Facebook User” for having the guts to stand your ground. Let me be the first of Dufferin Grove’s uninvolved, lazy, and anally retentive neighbours to congratulate you for calling it like it is. Something IS broken at Dufferin Grove and the City needs to fix it.

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Rek, I log in using Facebook Connect. There must be a glitch in the implementation. As Ms. Mason mentioned, my name is Bryan Leblanc.

  • http://undefined Henrik

    Hello, my name is Henrik Bechmann, and I am the webmaster of celos.ca, dufferinpark.ca, and cityrinks.ca. I also provide technical support for the friends of dufferin grove email list.
    We have encountered these kinds of discussions in the past, and in response have developed criteria for civil debate, something like this:
    ===================
    We welcome a diversity of opinion. We require a certain standard of writing to better contribute to community discussions.
    Anyone is welcome to submit opinions about the park or related subjects, with the following standards:
    No anonymous submissions. This is a neighbourhood forum, so please make yourself known.
    This column is about neighbourhood and related projects. Please confine your comments to that. Constructive reports, suggestions and criticisms are accepted. General complaining and unsupported assertions are not. Please stay on point.
    Obviously, no abusive (generalized negative attributions), offensive, or demeaning language.
    Facts must be verifiable, and referenced.
    Reasoning must be sensible: conclusions must follow sensibly and directly from premises. The corollary is also true: conclusions must be directly and sensibly supported by premises.
    ============================
    I invite readers to determine which of the above submissions rises to this standard. I also invite participants in this forum to try to maintain this kind of civil and constructive discussion.
    Thanks,
    - Henrik

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Thanks for posting your rules, Henrik. Let me follow up on one.
    “Facts must be verifiable, and referenced.”
    Perhaps you are in a position to share the facts of the financial situation and the legal status of the Friends/CELOS operation at DGP. The only thing I have to reference is out of date and quite incomplete.
    And, in the interest of transparency, do you receeve any stipend or remuneration from the “cookie money” revenue generated by the Friends/CELOS commercial operations at DGP?

  • http://undefined Bloorcourt Resident

    Henrik, this is not your website and it’s not your place to try to set up rules for comments here. And as for anonymity, that is actually a cornerstone of democracy. Sometimes people need to say what needs to be said without fear of reprisal.
    It’s great that people can speak out on a forum like torontoist, rather than one like dufferinpark.ca which by your own admission screens out material it deems inconvenient.

  • http://undefined Bryan
  • http://undefined Bryan

    …crickets…

  • http://undefined Bryan

    Henrik, I just remembered! Aren’t you Ms. Mason’s brother?

  • http://undefined Jutta Mason

    This thread is getting a bit grim but I think it could go back to being interesting. Our amateurism is showing — as Bryan points out, our numbers are not up to date on the website. They are or course up to date with the tax man and I’ll try to find the time by tomorrow to post them on celos.ca and to answer as many of Bryan’s other questions as I can. They’re good questions.
    Of course, it’s not only amateurism that’s a problem here — it’s also overwork. A fun kind of overwork for staff and the “extras,” often, since the Ward 18 rinks are so well-used that it’s like being in the village square (or a soap opera) a lot of the time. So much lively conversation, so many stories brought in by people from all over, so many youth with “issues” but also with youthful enthusiasm, so many frustrated people who turn into friends, etc. It sure keeps everybody busy.
    Anyway, finances tomorrow.

  • http://undefined Iam

    hear hear,
    not to mention parking trucks on tree roots to sell veggies and running bake ovens on smog days.

  • http://undefined Jutta Mason

    As promised, I am working on answering Bryan LeBlanc’s questions. This is the current location of the answers:
    http://celos.ca/wiki/wiki.php?n=CELOS.Financial. I’ll be continuing to add material as I get time today — it’s kind of enjoyable, as I thought it would be.
    I have removed the out-of-date financial statements. The correct ones will be posted when our book-keeper gets the time to export them out of Quickbooks, always a challenge. But no time for that today — today she is the farmers’ market baker. There is one graph left, up to the beginning of 2009, giving a fairly good overview of funding.
    There are two answers that I don’t intend to put on the financial page, as they are not customarily put there by organizations. However I’m glad to answer them directly here.
    1. is Henrik Bechmann my brother: yes. I’m just lucky, to have a brother that is such an inspired programmer and so interested in good governance that he gives us his services for a fraction of the going rate. That allows us to keep three very big websites going: http://celos.ca, http://cityrinks.ca, and http://dufferinpark.ca.
    2. The sunshine list requested by Bryan, about my income from CELOS:
    2004: $6,725.44
    2005: $7009.15
    2006: $3520.97
    2007: $6352.64
    2008: $2726.19
    Of course, most of those wages comes from the grants we get, not from the “cookie money.”

  • http://undefined Iam

    Glad to see CELOS doing research on what works, although i am more interested in the impact of high traffic volumes on trees and soil than studies of light and icerinks.

  • http://undefined Jutta Mason

    I’ve finished posting the answers to Bryan’s questions on this CELOS web page: http://celos.ca/wiki/wiki.php?n=CELOS.Financial. I’ll be glad to add in what I’ve missed. The CELOS financial reports will be up as soon as we can find the time. This was a good reminder for us to do some housecleaning. It also gives us a link for people who want to adapt our experiences to their context.
    One question for the readers of this thread, including Bryan LeBlanc: what are some examples of municipal “letters of agreement” that are working well in Toronto’s parks or public spaces? There must be some, even though the snack bar kitchen at Nathan Phillips Square stood empty for years before it was turned into a postcard shop. The same for the snack bar at Mel Lastman Square, still shuttered, and the same for the snack bar beside Giovanni Caboto Rink on St.Clair — it’s been empty for over 20 years. The city sells a yearly permit for the community kitchen at Christie Pits, which includes all rights to sell food. But that only results in a locked and shuttered kitchen and some forever “out-of-order” vending machines. But Bryan, you mention these formal governance arrangements so often, you must have some specific places in mind…can you let me know?

  • http://undefined schmal

    Bryan seems pretty concerned about the money trail, so here’s a variation on the theme… The one thing that many folks aren’t discussing is the issue of property values. I own a house close to the park, and if I were to choose to sell it, I’d make damn sure that the ad says, ‘Close to Dufferin Grove Park’. I figure that that sentence alone is worth about $5,000 minimum, and probably a lot more if the purchaser is (more than likely) a young family. If the park gets marginalized and the magic disappears (pizza night, friday night suppers, theatre festivals, coffee cart at the playground…) then it’s going to cost me and all the other property owners in the area (including Bryan?) a LOT of money. A little crass, perhaps, but that’s the money trail that I’m interested in.

  • http://undefined kikod

    I’d love to visit Dufferin park someday — I often tell people about the site and the wonderful work that’s going on there. Georgie Donais, who I know because of her work as a natural builder, and who used to be a park neighbor, mentioned the news to me and I came here and read with interest the debate about money and the role of the friends. If you’ll consider the comments of a complete outside, it seems to me worth expanding the discussion.
    From a big-picture perspective, I hear you talking about the natural workings of two kinds of economies: individual economies as managed by individual people to meet their own (related) needs; and aggregated economies, as managed by (ostensibly) “rational” economic theory, but often mismanaged because theoretical economic “interests” are so easily distorted by human irrationality (or just greed).
    However, it also sounds to me like park operations are heading towards an ideal that offers the best of both — individual relationships within an aggregated economy/government where both individuals and governments can hold each other accountable. I think Jane Jacobs would love it. I’m particularly reminded of her chapter on “gradual money and cataclysmic money,” in the Death and Life of Great American Cities (which applies, of course, to great Canadian Cities as well).
    Gradual money feeds individual economies, and is also largely free of the judiciary controls that we try to apply to aggregated economies — that’s why gradual money is so effective in building community. Cataclysmic money, on the other hand, feeds aggregated power and tends to destroy neighborhoods and communities.
    It looks to me, from what I read here, that CELOS seeks to provide a mechanism by which to aggregate, in a good way, the economic power of individuals. I also admire how individual city staffers seem to see the benefits of working with (unincorporated) individuals to improve the life of the city for all. In all such negotiations, the spirit of the law is more important than the letter. The law was made for us (individuals), we were not made for the law…
    Hurrah and three cheers to you all from rainy, rural Oregon, where two pickup trucks stopped in the middle of the road is a meeting!

  • http://undefined torontocomments

    I’m not sure I agree with the idea of a community or group getting to decide who the Parks and Rec administrator should be. One administrator cannot make that much of a difference if appropriate policies are in place…and if appropriate policies are not in place, the fight should be to get the policies changed, not to lobby for a specific administrator. The fact that Dufferin Grove has the connections to be able to attract media attention to what would be a non-issue (from the media’s perspective) if it had happened elsewhere, doesn’t mean it deserves privileges beyond what other communities can expect.
    That said, I can understand why many who make use of the Dufferin Grove facilities are concerned that the City is about make it harder for them to continue implement the many wonderful, innovative ideas they have been able to over the past few years. The City could no doubt allay some of these concerns by demonstrating its commitment allowing the innovative community-building ideas to continue at Dufferin Grove (with the proper checks and balances of course) even with a change in the Park’s administrator. In fact, the City should go further and commit to working with other communities to help spread some of that innovative approaches at Dufferin Grove to other areas. Yes there are likely issues around such things as who gets to do what and collective agreements and liability and what not — and I don’t know enough to comment whether these issues have been properly sorted out at DuffGrove. But surely these are issues that can be sorted out so that communities across the City can make better use of local Parks and Recs facilities. The bottom line is that when local communities are discouraged from making good use of local facilities, that means we are getting a less than adequate return on the investments we have made (through our taxes) in public resources.