Today Tuesday Wednesday
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 20, 2013
Thunderstorm
88°/68°
It is forcast to be Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 21, 2013
Thunderstorm
82°/64°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM CDT on May 22, 2013
Chance of a Thunderstorm
79°/57°

22 Comments

news

Dimitri the Lover Goes to the Movies

200901dimitrithelovermovie.jpg
Illustration by Brian McLachlan/Torontoist.


There are any number of ways to imagine a movie based on the life and (many, many) loves of Toronto’s crackpot Casanova Dimitri the Lover. You could make it a contemporary Frankenstein fable where a bolt of lightning animates a crusty splooge stain into some slimy T-1000 sexual predator. You could cast Gerard Butler in the lead and have our loathsome lothario get a harsh lesson in romance by some obstinate Sandra Bullock type. Hell, you could throw Jay Baruchel or Michael Cera in there and have the D-Man teach them how to wheedle their way into the prom queen’s panties.
Or you could get Brad Goodman, the producer behind Sacha Baron Cohen’s mock-docs Borat and Brüno, on board to help give Dimitri—né James Sears—the docutainment treatment he deserves.


That’s right, gang: Dimitri the Lover is getting the Hollywood treatment! And considering all the digital breadcrumbs of misogyny, harassment, and greaseball inanity that he’s left since we all caught a whiff of his Aqua Velva–scented stench, there’s no dearth of material for a feature-length film on Dimitri’s pervy sexcapades.
While Goodman (who also worked on Bill Maher’s snarky 2008 doc Religulous) teased the movie a while ago on a YouTube channel he set up to promote the project, he was kind enough to correspond with Torontoist via e-mail to talk about the film in detail.
Though details at this point are scant—no word on a release date or distributor—it seems as if Goodman and filmmaker Rob Bryton are poised to capture the sleazy charisma of the Hogtown pickup artist we all love to hate. It should be enough to slate the thirst of salivating Dimitri fans, at least until the movie itself (or his still yet-to-be-released book, appallingly titled Mein Kock) sees release.
Torontoist: How did you hear about Dimitri? What made him such a compelling subject for this documentary?
Brad Goodman: Director Rob Bryton started filming the Dimitri The Lover documentary in June–July 2008 while I was in post on Religulous and Brüno. Rob is also a musician and his team was working with me on some music cues for Religulous. He mentioned the Dimitri film to me, and it piqued my curiosity. I did a little research about Dimitri, including his controversial past and his current role in the Toronto seduction community. I also discovered that Dimitri had tried to pick up my friend’s wife (she said he was very charming) and he had left a business card version of his seduction poster on some of my friends’ cars in Toronto. Then, after viewing some of the raw footage it was clear he would make a good subject, so I asked Rob if I could be involved in producing it with him.
I do find it interesting when people have a “following.” And whether the person is a politician, priest, rock star, or even a demented cult leader, I am fascinated with people who have that kind of charisma.
How did you approach him about the project? Was he at all suspicious? He seems very guarded about how he wants to be presented in the media.
Actually, that part of project was underway before I officially jumped on board. Rob and Dimitri spoke about doing an impartial movie about Dimitri’s story and Dimitri agreed. Dimitri is guarded with reporters because he doesn’t trust the media, especially in Toronto, and wanted someone other than the press to help tell his story in an unbiased and unfiltered way.
Considering your work on films like Borat and Brüno, how did you approach this real-deal social provocateur? Is the same sense of humour required to “get” Dimitri?
I have to say that at first I thought “Dimitri The Lover” was a hoax, a persona invented by a very clever guy with a warped sense of humour. It was quite obvious that Dimitri was very clever, but I ruled out that it was a hoax months ago, blaming my doubts on my proximity to [Borat and Brüno director] Larry Charles for most of the past few years. But beyond that, there really isn’t a huge connection between those films and the Dimitri project. The only exceptions are his voice mails to Olga. I’m on the fence about whether those are real or not.
Some of the things Dimitri says and does are humorous, but we didn’t set out to make a comedy. Dimitri is naturally funny, and Rob captured that aspect of him. None of it is forced or staged for humour for other reasons. Dimitri feels that he can help men meet women, and given his past it makes for interesting conversation about how he (or anyone else) is qualified to give relationship advice.

So how does the film present Dimitri? Certainly, it’s easy to laugh off what he’s doing, but there’s a good deal of social irresponsibility in his “work” (like his suggestion that HIV doesn’t affect heterosexual men) that seems less easy to take lightly. How do you handle that?
The film presents Dimitri in a balanced light. Dimitri is actually extremely intelligent, charming, and funny, and on the surface it is difficult to believe this guy has such a nefarious past. We have interviewed both his detractors and many people that think highly of him. Dimitri’s opinions are his, and he will continue to influence men that he coaches. As filmmakers we are just telling this story.
His position on HIV could be wrong and have serious consequences for some people, but the same could be said about the global warming debate, or even evolution vs. creation. For years science told us smoking cigarettes was a “healthy” thing to do. Each of those sides have some “credible” people defending their positions, even though only one of the sides seems logical to many of us. And I can assure you that many, many men agree with Dimitri about HIV. They rightly or wrongly think that as long as you are the pitcher and not the catcher you are safe.
One thing I can say about Dimitri is that he is honest and up-front about his positions. He doesn’t pretend to be one person (like Tiger Woods) only to discover he’s been feeding us bullshit all these years. Tiger’s affairs and alleged lack of use of condoms during his escapades should concern your readers as much as what Dimitri does. At least Dimitri doesn’t hide it, and from what I have researched he doesn’t cheat on a girlfriend if he is in a relationship, let alone a wife.
Dimitri seems representative of the current climate of pick-up artistry, as marked by the popularity of books like The Game and the general interest in the “seduction community.” How does he fit into this trend?
Dimitri The Lover claims he represents the ANTI-pua movement. He loathes much of what books like The Game represent. It’s not a game to him. He believes very strongly that naive shy men are being financially taken advantage of by all of these seduction books and courses. Instead, Dimitri claims he is teaching men to change their way of THINKING regarding seduction, i.e. to act at all times like what his definition of a MAN is. He clearly states meeting women is not a game, but a hunt.
What was it like working with Dimitri? What do you make of his “followers”?
We all found Dimitri to be honest, straightforward, decent, and fair. He let us make the film we wanted to make. I personally am not a follower of others so it intrigues me, especially coming off a film that questions both followers and leaders like in Bill Maher’s Religulous. I kind of feel sad for his followers. I find it sad these men cannot easily find a loving, sexual, or whatever kind of relationship they are looking for. His followers all seem like very nice people, and I do believe men (and dare I say women) can walk away from him having learned some positive things.
That’s not to say I agree with all of his philosophies. For example, he believes people should only be married if they procreate, and as someone who is both married and childless I personally have a problem with this rule. He also thinks that white men who are exclusively attracted to Asian women are probably closeted pedophiles (because Asian women tend to have boy-like body frames), and I think many of my friends in Los Angeles would take exception to that conclusion. But we live in free countries so he is entitled to his opinion.
But let me be clear…I found no evidence that any of Dimitri’s offensive opinions are based on hate or misogyny. Rather, his belief system has been constructed from combining life experience and scientific research.

Filed under: , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://piorkowski.ca/ qviri

    “But let me be clear…I found no evidence that any of Dimitri’s offensive opinions are based on hate or misogyny. Rather, his belief system has been constructed from combining life experience and scientific research.”
    Uh… Right… Because hate and misogyny can absolutely never result from “life experience” and the kind of “scientific research” that tells one hetero men can’t get HIV.

  • http://undefined thewatchmaker

    It sounds like he’s really desperately trying to make Dimitri not sound like the misogynistic nutjob that he is, doesn’t it?
    I can’t even tell if Goodman is being ironic at points. The analogies that he uses to defend Dimitri’s opinions on HIV are laughably bad – one, because there’s no disagreement among doctors as to whether straight guys can be infected, and two, because those comparable disagreements aren’t really disagreements at all – at least, not among science and medical professionals.
    And the whole bit about Dimitri not being a pick-up artist because ‘he clearly states meeting women is not a game, but a hunt’? Are we supposed to see those two things as different, somehow? If anything, ‘hunt’ sounds even worse than ‘game’.

  • http://undefined johnc

    I am sure my interest in this subject started here.. I’ve come full circle after doing a bit of research and find myself thinking “really?!?!! THIS is the topic of a movie?”.. While I don’t believe everything I read, when it’s supported by clips, several media outlets, and quotes for what would appear to be reliable sources.. again.. “REALLY!?!?!” My best guess is this guy asked out a girl way out of his league while promoting his “techniques”, she recorded it, media picked up on it and he had the foresight to capitalize thinking “no press is bad press”.. James.. some press is bad press…
    We’re talking about James N Sears that lost his medical license after pleading guilty to 2 sex assault charges? Maybe Canadian courts needs to preface each ruling with “you are prohibited from benefiting in any way from this process should you be found or plead guilty”.
    My concern isn’t that an online resource or movie maker would take advantage (of what I’m not sure..), it’s that there would appear to be men signing up for this guys courses! No doubt he’s preaching to the converted, validating their notions of women being a lesser gender, that saleswomen (among others) are the most promiscuous.
    Can any promoters for James N Sears risk being responsible for the actions of the disturbed, ill-informed, and generally desperate male population that will gravitate to him? I’m all for a joke, and certainly James qualifies, but at whose expense? It would seem there are some very real consequences behind, and ahead of this man.
    I have every confidence that the women of Toronto know how to handle James and team, but the question remains.. why should they have to? And what benefit is there in feeding James’s wayward ego? I think we all see the risks, so maybe the question is why do anything promoting James?
    Someone will need to fund this movie, I’d think twice before opening my wallet, or promoting anyone that finds him “charismatic”.. We watch extreme sports for the same reasons.. one day, carnage.. charisma has nothing to do with it.

  • Andrew Pulsifer

    I find it hard to believe that this film will not be humourous entirely at Dimitri’s expense. I get the feeling that Goodnman is simply being diplomatic at this point to assuage Dimitri’s concerns.
    All those points of Dimitri’s “natural humour?” I don’t think he is referring to an intentional attempt to be funny on his part.
    Or, maybe I’m too cynical to think that anybody could ever possibly project an unbiased view of this man.

  • http://undefined ked

    James is a doctor who was struck off for sexually assaulting a patient and, as reported in this blog, has followers that treat women as cattle to be herded and sexually harass them on public transport. I hope the doc covers this as well as his embarrassing , sad and potentially dangerous (harassment and assault) “technique.”

  • http://undefined Chris Shepherd

    A simple google search will reveal that Brad Goodman was not “the producer behind Sacha Baron Cohen’s mock-docs Borat and Brüno”, but in fact was a Post Production Supervisor.
    Seems like you’re being lied to.

  • http://undefined Buyers Remorse

    I used to attend Dimitri’s “Toronto Real Men” meetings. I stopped going for ethical reasons. If you want to understand his demented world and this misogynistic movie, please read on. His seduction methods work because he teaches men how to, as he says, “mentally rape” women by steamrolling over objections and making the women feel “abnormal” for not submitting to sexual advances. Dimitri abuses his medical knowledge to create these disgusting methods. I attended his meetings for several months, used his methods with great success, but one day after leaving a woman’s home I met only an hour earlier and pressured into bed, I felt remorse because I realized that the way in which I seduced her was immoral. Meeting attendees knew in the spring of 2008 that Dimitri was writing a script for his movie because he announced it at one of the meetings and read some excerpts out to us. He said he was going to use Ryerson University students. He also mentioned using a woman to spread “voicemails” through the net for publicity. He did not go into a lot of detail as to how, but when those voicemails surfaced later I knew they were the ones he was referring to. A close friend of mine still attends meetings and was present a couple of months ago for a viewing of a rough edit of the trailer for this film. According to him, the trailer showed several scenes of Dimitri approaching women. He recognized one scene in Kensington Market. He says it portrayed Dimitri like a total rock star and made him appear funny and likeable. He said the women were very attractive and appeared responsive. He said the trailer was very entertaining. My friend obviously disagrees with my opinions on Dimitri. If anyone reading this article thinks for one minute that the movie will be FAIR AND BALANCED, they are living in a dream world. According to my friend the movie is being used to propel Dimitri to stardom for a reality TV show and a worldwide speaking tour. These producers are not mocking him. Rather, they’re cleaning up his image and making him more palatable for the general public. As for all of the negative comments all over the net about Dimitri, he LOVES IT. IF you want to stop him, SHUT UP AND IGNORE HIM. All these negative articles combined with the voicemails are what attracted these Hollywood people to Dimitri in the first place. And that’s why he’s probably going to be rich. Anyway, that’s my two cents worth.

  • http://undefined Japhet

    “His position on HIV could be wrong and have serious consequences for some people, but the same could be said about the global warming debate, or even evolution vs. creation. For years science told us smoking cigarettes was a “healthy” thing to do. Each of those sides have some “credible” people defending their positions, even though only one of the sides seems logical to many of us. And I can assure you that many, many men agree with Dimitri about HIV. They rightly or wrongly think that as long as you are the pitcher and not the catcher you are safe.”
    There’s no maybe/woulda/shoulda/coulda with HIV. If you’re not having safe sex, you’re being an idiot. Same goes for global warming and evolution.
    Science did not tell us that smoking was healthy. Lobbyists and paid experts did and we bought it until it became clear that this was incredibly wrong. The three issues above are no different.
    Whether many men, as Brad Goodman asserts, may believe that “giving it” reduces their chances of contracting HIV from a partner or not makes no difference in the real risks present in unprotected sex.
    Even if they give or get something like herpes, does that make it any better? Safe sex is incredibly important and to suggest otherwise downplays the risk of STDS in general, not to mention HIV.

  • http://undefined tiger123

    I am a survivor of a sexual assault by James Sears, perpetrated in October of 1991 when he came to my house for a house call service.
    I see nothing funny, or educational or entertaining about a predatory doctor who purposely joins a housecall so he can have direct contact with sick, vulnerable woman in their homes. I had a 104 degree fever and was so sick I could hardly get off the couch, and was terrifed of this doctor, who had 100 lbs and 1 foot one me, telling me sick, perverted jokes, telling me how non sexual his wife was, asking me if I wanted to see his penis. After he ‘examined’ me, he went to the bathroom where I heard him masturbate and climax. Then the assault.
    This person is a sick, disturbed predator. At the College of Physicians hearing to discuss various accusations against him behaving in an inappropriate manner towards female patients, there were over 40 women there with similar complaints, one with a letter from the housecall service dated one week before my assault, apologizing for the miscommunication during treatment…yada yada.
    After he lost his license and no longer had access to these ‘targets’ he began to finesse his predatory skills…and the end game is we see his Toronto Real Men Club.
    So now we’re revisiting the days of the Victorian Freakshow, ‘let’s all gather around this predatory freak of nature and laugh at his sickness’. Wow, how funny and entertaining it is. Well I’m not laughing.
    I reached out to Mr. Goodman and asked him why he would be doing such a thing as this. He said he wanted to present the entire story, which he feels he has. Well, he never spoke to me, or the other survivor, or the 50 or more women who complained about masturbating phone calls they received after meeting with the Doctor, or the psychiatric patient who was receiving drugs from the Doctor in exchange for sex. He knew nothing about when he was arrested and told he couldn’t practice medicine unless there was a female nurse present, and he continued to practice by himself and in less than 24 hours had been inappropriate with yet another woman. And since he did not research the above, he couldn’t have taken into account how our individual interaction with this monster changed all of us. Traumatized us. Hurt us.
    So sure Mr. Goodman, hope you make lots of bucks from this predatory monster’s sickness and the pain and trauma of his survivors. Your mother must be so proud.

  • http://undefined rich1299

    I never knew of this aspect of him until reading this particular article, I used to just laugh at how pathetic and slimy he seemed but knowing this side of him I don’t think I can find him funny in any way at all anymore. I really hope the movie covers this aspect of him since it tells us much about his real thoughts about women and how his “technique” was formed through past sexual assaults though I can’t imagine I’ll ever willingly watch a movie about him.

  • http://undefined Brad Goodman

    James Sear’ background is available as a matter of public record and was researched and presented in the documentary. An excerpt:
    The unwillingness of a key witness to appear caused the prosecution to withdraw the charge of improper use of one’s authority, to prescribe medications. The Committee thus had to consider a guilty plea to three charges of sexual impropriety with patients and to one charge of disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct with a fourth patient. Each of the charges stemmed from action of Dr. Sears during house calls to patients who contacted an organization which provided such physician services. During a professional visit to the first female complainant. Dr. Sears made comments to the effect that he would like to get to know her better, that sex was fun and that he would call her later about getting together for a drink. He also pulled her to him and kissed her on the neck The second complainant was visited in her home and, following a clinical evaluation, was asked about her sex life, present commitments and past involvements with married men. Dr. Sears then discussed his unsatisfactory sexual relationship with his wife and asked the patient to date him or to become involved in a sexual relationship with him. She declined both requests. Upon leaving, he hugged and kissed her and suggested that she should reconsider her decision.
    Following the laying of criminal charges of sexual assault by two of his patients, Dr. Sears was released with one of the conditions being that he not examine a female patient without the presence of a third party. He subsequently attended at a patients home unaccompanied by a third party and conducted a routine assessment and treatment. He thereupon began to make sexual overtures to the patient.
    Complaining about his wife’s lack of interest in sex, he boasted that he could do it 10 times a day. The patient declined his request that they have sex. He then went to the washroom where he admits that he may have masturbated.

    We found no information or evidence in the report that there were fifty complaints against him though. In addition, the identity of his accusers is not in the reports.

  • http://undefined Brad Goodman

    For the record, I never made the claim that I was a producer on those films. My role on those films was just as you have stated.

  • http://undefined Buyers Remorse

    I have a serious ethical problem with you tiger123. I want to stop Dimitri primarily by educating the general public about what he does. Unfortunately, doing so may publicise his activities and whether positive or negative, benefit him financially. I am having a moral dilemma for those reasons which I must contend with in my own heart. However, I checked what Mr. Goodman said about Dimitri’s past by going to the web site for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Mr. Goodman is right. You lied tiger123 (if you really are one of his victims, which I am now doubting). There were not 40-50 victims as you claimed (3 in total) and if you are the specific victim you claim to be as described in the report, you were never assaulted (just sexually propositioned). I am just as big a detractor of Dr. James Sears as you are but why do you make up such HUGE LIES about his past? Don’t you see how that destroys any credibility me or anyone else against him have? We have enough evidence that he is evil without having to resort to out and out lies. The truth will eventually sink him. If word gets out that people like you are making up wild crazy accusations that are totally fabricated then the general public will think that every one of us who had dealings with Dimitri/James are all reactionary crackpots, and we get nowhere. I initially felt such pity for you and your story pulled my heartstrings. You should be ashamed of yourself tiger123.

  • http://undefined tiger123

    Wow Mr. Goodman. A survivor shares their story and all you can do is respond with the court transcripts, insinuating that I’m a liar. I can’t say I’m surprised.
    How about this – I’ll give you some highlights. I sat on my sofa and he sat on one of the stairs to my sunk-in my basement apartment’s living room on Rainsford Road in the Beaches in Toronto in October of 1991. Immediately when he walked in, I sensed something off. He asked me if I had ‘ever heard of him before’. I said no, that I was new to Toronto having just returned from a backpacking trip in Europe. He immediately launched in to a full sexual come on, even though I was so sick I could barely move.
    Right around this time, Pee Wee Herman had just been arrested for masturbating in a movie theater, to which James Sears remarked that he was his hero. Then he made a hand gesture and said ‘what’s this’? Pee Wee’s Playhouse and laughed. My mind hit a mental record button. Could this be happening to me? What should I do? If I make a run for the phone, will he overpower me? How do I handle this. Then he started speaking about his wife and how non sexual she was. He had a newborn son, and she wasn’t interested in getting him off anymore so he was finding it anywhere he could. I told him I had just gotten back from Europe and I asked him if he’d ever been abroad and he said ‘NO I’ve never been A BROAD’. (I should also add, that when I took the stand as witness to testify to that, and when relayed that comment he laughed out loud from his witness chair, which infuriated the judge). Meanwhile, I’m sick with a fever, by myself, weak and know that if I make a play for the door or the phone, I may not make it. He went to the bathroom where I heard him masturbate and climax. I was terrified and frozen. He walked over to me, telling me that by seeing him he’d make it worth my while and then pulled me towards him, trying to hug me and kiss me.
    It’s absolutely no surprise Mr. Goodman that you gave me the court transcript, and insinuated I was a liar. After all, it would take a fellow misogynist to misinterpret James Sears the predator, and underestimate the damage he has done to so many women. So good for you. Once again, your mother must be so proud.
    And buyer’s Remorse: There were two proceedings against James Sears – one in the criminal courts and another by the College of Physicians and Surgeons. In the criminal proceedings he plead guilty to two counts of sexual assault.
    In the other proceeding held by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario to investigate complaints brought against him by female patients, there were over 40 women present at his hearing, who had experienced inappropriate behavior by James Sears but did not report it. These were various complaints, all were complaints of a sexual nature. These 40 plus women were all ill, at their homes when James Sears visited them and behaved in such an inappropriate manner that they contacted the judicial body that governs doctors behavior to lodge a formal complaint. There was one woman there who had James Sears respond and treat her, and shortly after, she began receiving obscene phone calls where the person would masturbate over the phone. She had assumed the phone calls were coming from one of her daughter’s classmates so she phoned the police. James Sears then called and asked out her 16 year old daughter who had been on the receiving end of some of these calls. When he was arrested shortly after, she had finally figured it out and attended the hearing, offering to testify.
    So now I wonder how many woman may have gone through what I went through but were too traumatized or ashamed or not strong enough to follow through on pressing charges or lodge a formal complaint with the College. And do you know why we have this problem Mr. Goodman? It’s because of people like you. People who minimize the effect of sexual predators, who glorify their sickness and turn it into some Victorian Freakshow Comedy hour, without realizing the pain and trauma you’re causing to so many people who have been on the receiving end. You’re giving the community the message that it’s ok to do what he does…hey, you’ll even make a movie about it. Wow, wont that be funny??
    Mr. Goodman it’s obvious you have a complete lack of understanding about sexual predators and how dangerous they are and the damage they cause. The damage to their survivors, to the female species and the community at large. It’s this glorifying of the predators, the almost dismissive, comedy you’re presenting that is an affront to society.

  • http://undefined tiger123

    Clarify: I did not proofread before I hit send.
    Of the 40 plus women who were at attendance at the College hearing, there were some women who lodged formal complaints, but not all of the 40 plus women. Not until it hit the news and he was arrested did the majority of the women come forward with similar stories. The majority of the women at the College hearing did NOT lodge formal complaints with the College.
    There were more than 3 formal complaints lodged with the College of Physicians and Surgeons. I do not know how many, all I do know is that when I called the College to complain, I left a message for the investigator with James Sears name. My call was returned within minutes because he was already under investigation.
    James Sears plead guilty to two counts of sexual assault, so he was now convicted in criminal court. Based on those convictions, the College decided to pursue those two specific complaints, since the criminal court had found him guilty. It was based on those two convictions that James Sears lost his licence to practice medicine.

  • http://undefined agentprovocatrice

    Thank you for sharing Tiger123. I can only imagine how traumatizing it must be to learn that James Sears might profit from his misogyny and that his hateful views will be given a wider audience. With that in mind, I am going to boycott this movie, and any other films from any releasing or distribution company that releases it, and I am urging all of my friends and family to do the same. Vermin like Brad Goodman, Sears’ apologist, will only thrive on publicity, so I’m torn, but if I can dissuade people from seeing this garbage by letting them know that their money is going to fill the coffers of a convicted sex offender, then perhaps releasing companies will shy away.

  • http://undefined ked

    The behaviour described by Tiger123 and Brad Goodman is unacceptable and unforgivable regardless of whether it happened to one woman or 40. I worry that this film, by taking a tongue in cheek look or presnting at Sears’ odd view of woman in a jokey light will make him seem harmless when clearly he is not. Experiences of harassment by him and his followers have already been discussed in previous torontoist posts and the thought that he might in some way profit from this is just gross. Sears’ is pathetic and misguided and it could be your wife, girlfriend, sister, mother or friend that he approaches or assaults next.

  • http://undefined tyciol

    Brad Goodman sounds familiar, wasn’t he on the Simpsons? The ‘do what you feel like boy’ arc with Bart?

  • http://undefined tyciol

    Ked, that’s not what he says in his blog, he says it was for making advances on them. Or am I remembering wrong, where does he admit to assaulting someone?

  • http://undefined tyciol

    Rich, is it accurate to say we ‘know’ this aspect of the person when it is only alleged at this point? The man at least deserves a chance to speak on his own behalf in response to these allegations.

  • http://undefined tyciol

    Tiger, there seems to be a miscommunication here basically upon which charges he plead guilty to. The others are saying it was ‘impropriety’ and you are saying it was ‘assault’. Could a transcript or some kind of legal document from the government clear up the dispute? I don’t know either way. I am reluctant to consider nonconsensual kissing as ‘assault’ considering the much more serious forms of sexual assault out there (such as rape) but I could understand it technically being classed as this. I am not sure what ‘impropriety’ is in law and how it is distinguished from assault.

  • http://undefined bria

    What I can’t figure out is why Ontario auto insurers hired Sears to go to the homes of vulnerable accident victims and, under the guise of providing timely treatment to mva victims, conduct in-home surveillance. Sears ran a Toronto-based firm called “The Second Opinion Inc.” (seems the website has been taken down recently). On the site, in his self-description, he listed a series of medical fraud articles he wrote which were published in a premier Canadian insurance journal – each was signed “Dr. James Sears. One such article entitled “Rehabilitation Comes Calling” gave specific examples of how he saved insurers cash with his “mobile treatment”/surveillance. One example was about a claimant who wanted an orthopaedic mattress due to back injury. Sears article talks about how he was able to get a sneaky peak at this claimant’s mattress – decided it was good enough – and presto – on the basis of Sears’ “medical” opinion – the insurer denied the request. Seems to me to be kind of creepy – passing this dangerous wing-nut off as a lisenced doctor and sending him to the homes (even bedrooms) of accident victims – so he could creep around looking for ways to deny policy benefits. Why would insurers, who say we can trust them, hire “Dr. Sears to go to claimants’ homes knowing he had lost his medical lisence for abusing his patients in their homes? Surely they checked to confirm he was a lisenced doctor and in good standing with his lisencing body before hiring him on a fee-for-service basis? Didn’t they know? Or did they know but not care? Call me crazy but isn’t it a bit unethical (if not illegal) for an insurer to be passing Sears off as a lisenced doctor and hiring him to provide in-home “mobile treatment” to mva victims? Will this aspect of the Sears’ saga be incorporated into the upcoming movie?

The forecast for Toronto by Wunderground for WordPress